`
`
`JOHN ALLCOCK (Bar No. 98895)
`john.allcock@dlapiper.com
`SEAN C. CUNNINGHAM (Bar No. 174931)
`sean.cunningham@dlapiper.com
`ERIN GIBSON (Bar No. 229305)
`erin.gibson@dlapiper.com
`ROBERT WILLIAMS (Bar No. 246990)
`robert.williams@dlapiper.com
`TIFFANY MILLER (Bar No. 246987)
`tiffany.miller@dlapiper.com
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`401 B Street, Suite 1700
`San Diego, California 92101-4297
`Tel: 619.699.2700
`Fax: 619.699.2701
`
`ROBERT BUERGI (Bar No. 242910)
`robert.buergi@dlapiper.com
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`2000 University Avenue
`East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2215
`Tel: 650.833.2000
`Fax: 650.833.2001
`
`Attorneys for
`APPLE INC.
`
`
`MARK C. SCARSI (Bar No.
`183926)
`mscarsi@milbank.com
`ASHLEE N. LIN (Bar No.
`275267)
`anlin@milbank.com
`MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY &
`MCCLOY LLP
`2029 Century Park East, 33rd Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`Tel: 424.386.4000
`Fax: 213.629.5063
`
`CHRISTOPHER J. GASPAR
`(admitted pro hac vice)
`cgaspar@milbank.com
`MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY
`& MCCLOY LLP
`28 Liberty Street
`New York, NY 10005
`Tel: 212.530.5000
`Fax: 212.822.5019
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`WI-LAN, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`CASE NO. 3:14-cv-1507-DMS-BLM
`(consolidated);
`
`CASE NO. 3:14-cv-02235-DMS-BLM
`(lead case)
`
`
`APPLE INC.’S OBJECTIONS TO
`EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY WI-LAN
`IN OPPOSING APPLE’S MOTION
`FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`
`Date: June 15, 2018
`Time: 1:30 p.m.
`Dept.: 13A
`Judge: Hon. Dana M. Sabraw
`Magistrate Judge: Hon. Barbara L. Major
`
`AND RELATED
`COUNTERCLAIMS
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`S A N D I E G O
`
`
`
`
`WEST\281790159.1
`
`
`
`
`OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY WI-LAN
`3:14-CV-001507-DMS-BLM
`
`
`
`Case 3:14-cv-02235-DMS-BLM Document 380 Filed 05/31/18 PageID.20422 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`Apple Inc. (“Apple”) respectfully submits the following objections to
`
`evidence submitted by Wi-LAN, Inc. (“Wi-LAN”) with its opposition to Apple’s
`
`summary judgment motion (Dkt. No. 358). Specifically, Apple objects to the
`
`untimely new expert opinions offered by Wi-LAN’s infringement expert, Dr. Vijay
`
`Madisetti, in a 14-page declaration filed in support of Wi-LAN’s opposition.
`
`Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B) requires expert reports to contain
`
`a “complete statement of all opinions the witness will express and the basis and
`
`reasons for them” and “the facts or data considered by the witness in forming
`
`them.” “If a party fails to provide information or identify a witness as required by
`
`10
`
`Rule 26(a) or (e), the party is not allowed to use that information or witness to
`
`11
`
`supply evidence on a motion, at a hearing, or at a trial, unless the failure was
`
`12
`
`substantially justified or is harmless.” Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 37(c). Courts should not
`
`13
`
`consider expert declarations submitted in response to a summary judgment motion
`
`14
`
`that attempt to supplement the expert’s submission. O2 Micro Int’l Ltd. v.
`
`15
`
`Monolithic Power Sys., Inc., 467 F.3d 1355, 1368-69 (Fed. Cir. 2006); Shaba v.
`
`16
`
`United States, No. 07cv738-WQH-CAB, 2009 WL 482350, at *4-5 (S.D. Cal. Feb.
`
`17
`
`23, 2009) (exclusion is the proper remedy for an expert declaration submitted with
`
`18
`
`summary judgment briefing).
`
`19
`
`Here, the majority of Dr. Madisetti’s declaration consists of new opinions
`
`20
`
`that were not disclosed in his expert reports or at his deposition. Attached as
`
`21
`
`Exhibit A is an annotated version of Dr. Madisetti’s declaration that identifies in
`
`22
`
`red brackets the portions of Dr. Madisetti’s declaration that are new (see Ex. A at
`
`23
`
`¶¶ 5, 8-18, 20-27, 29-31, 35-36) and therefore should not be considered by the
`
`24
`
`Court. See O2 Micro Int’l Ltd., 467 F.3d at 1368-69. Dr. Madisetti offered all of
`
`25
`
`these new opinions well after the Court’s deadline for expert discovery. In some
`
`26
`
`instances Wi-LAN’s opposition cites Dr. Madisetti’s expert report (see, e.g., Opp.
`
`27
`
`at 6), in some instances Wi-LAN cites Dr. Madisetti’s report and his new
`
`28
`
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`S A N D I E G O
`
`declaration (see, e.g., Opp. at 4), and in other instances Wi-LAN cites only Dr.
`
`
`WEST\281790159.1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-1-
`OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY WI-LAN
`3:14-CV-001507-DMS-BLM
`
`
`
`Case 3:14-cv-02235-DMS-BLM Document 380 Filed 05/31/18 PageID.20423 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`Madisetti’s new declaration (see, e.g., Opp. at 5). Apple does not object to the
`
`portions of Dr. Madisetti’s declaration that restate opinions in his expert report, but
`
`does object to opinions not disclosed in Dr. Madisetti’s reports as violating Federal
`
`Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B). Apple respectfully requests that the Court
`
`sustain Apple’s objections to these new opinions.
`
`Dated: May 31, 2018
`
`
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`
`By /s/ Sean C. Cunningham
`JOHN ALLCOCK
`SEAN C. CUNNINGHAM
`ERIN GIBSON
`ROBERT BUERGI
`ROBERT WILLIAMS
`TIFFANY MILLER
`JACOB ANDERSON
`AMY WALTERS
`
`
`
`Attorneys for
`APPLE INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`S A N D I E G O
`
`
`
`WEST\281790159.1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-2-
`OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY WI-LAN
`3:14-CV-001507-DMS-BLM
`
`
`
`Case 3:14-cv-02235-DMS-BLM Document 380 Filed 05/31/18 PageID.20424 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on May 31, 2018, I electronically transmitted the
`
`attached document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and
`
`transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the CM/ECF registrants.
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Sean C. Cunningham
`Sean C. Cunningham
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`S A N D I E G O
`
`
`
`WEST\281790159.1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-3-
`OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY WI-LAN
`3:14-CV-001507-DMS-BLM
`
`