throbber
Case 3:14-cv-02235-DMS-BLM Document 380 Filed 05/31/18 PageID.20421 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`JOHN ALLCOCK (Bar No. 98895)
`john.allcock@dlapiper.com
`SEAN C. CUNNINGHAM (Bar No. 174931)
`sean.cunningham@dlapiper.com
`ERIN GIBSON (Bar No. 229305)
`erin.gibson@dlapiper.com
`ROBERT WILLIAMS (Bar No. 246990)
`robert.williams@dlapiper.com
`TIFFANY MILLER (Bar No. 246987)
`tiffany.miller@dlapiper.com
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`401 B Street, Suite 1700
`San Diego, California 92101-4297
`Tel: 619.699.2700
`Fax: 619.699.2701
`
`ROBERT BUERGI (Bar No. 242910)
`robert.buergi@dlapiper.com
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`2000 University Avenue
`East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2215
`Tel: 650.833.2000
`Fax: 650.833.2001
`
`Attorneys for
`APPLE INC.
`
`
`MARK C. SCARSI (Bar No.
`183926)
`mscarsi@milbank.com
`ASHLEE N. LIN (Bar No.
`275267)
`anlin@milbank.com
`MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY &
`MCCLOY LLP
`2029 Century Park East, 33rd Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`Tel: 424.386.4000
`Fax: 213.629.5063
`
`CHRISTOPHER J. GASPAR
`(admitted pro hac vice)
`cgaspar@milbank.com
`MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY
`& MCCLOY LLP
`28 Liberty Street
`New York, NY 10005
`Tel: 212.530.5000
`Fax: 212.822.5019
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`WI-LAN, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`CASE NO. 3:14-cv-1507-DMS-BLM
`(consolidated);
`
`CASE NO. 3:14-cv-02235-DMS-BLM
`(lead case)
`
`
`APPLE INC.’S OBJECTIONS TO
`EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY WI-LAN
`IN OPPOSING APPLE’S MOTION
`FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`
`Date: June 15, 2018
`Time: 1:30 p.m.
`Dept.: 13A
`Judge: Hon. Dana M. Sabraw
`Magistrate Judge: Hon. Barbara L. Major
`
`AND RELATED
`COUNTERCLAIMS
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`S A N D I E G O
`
`
`
`
`WEST\281790159.1
`
`
`
`
`OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY WI-LAN
`3:14-CV-001507-DMS-BLM
`
`

`

`Case 3:14-cv-02235-DMS-BLM Document 380 Filed 05/31/18 PageID.20422 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`Apple Inc. (“Apple”) respectfully submits the following objections to
`
`evidence submitted by Wi-LAN, Inc. (“Wi-LAN”) with its opposition to Apple’s
`
`summary judgment motion (Dkt. No. 358). Specifically, Apple objects to the
`
`untimely new expert opinions offered by Wi-LAN’s infringement expert, Dr. Vijay
`
`Madisetti, in a 14-page declaration filed in support of Wi-LAN’s opposition.
`
`Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B) requires expert reports to contain
`
`a “complete statement of all opinions the witness will express and the basis and
`
`reasons for them” and “the facts or data considered by the witness in forming
`
`them.” “If a party fails to provide information or identify a witness as required by
`
`10
`
`Rule 26(a) or (e), the party is not allowed to use that information or witness to
`
`11
`
`supply evidence on a motion, at a hearing, or at a trial, unless the failure was
`
`12
`
`substantially justified or is harmless.” Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 37(c). Courts should not
`
`13
`
`consider expert declarations submitted in response to a summary judgment motion
`
`14
`
`that attempt to supplement the expert’s submission. O2 Micro Int’l Ltd. v.
`
`15
`
`Monolithic Power Sys., Inc., 467 F.3d 1355, 1368-69 (Fed. Cir. 2006); Shaba v.
`
`16
`
`United States, No. 07cv738-WQH-CAB, 2009 WL 482350, at *4-5 (S.D. Cal. Feb.
`
`17
`
`23, 2009) (exclusion is the proper remedy for an expert declaration submitted with
`
`18
`
`summary judgment briefing).
`
`19
`
`Here, the majority of Dr. Madisetti’s declaration consists of new opinions
`
`20
`
`that were not disclosed in his expert reports or at his deposition. Attached as
`
`21
`
`Exhibit A is an annotated version of Dr. Madisetti’s declaration that identifies in
`
`22
`
`red brackets the portions of Dr. Madisetti’s declaration that are new (see Ex. A at
`
`23
`
`¶¶ 5, 8-18, 20-27, 29-31, 35-36) and therefore should not be considered by the
`
`24
`
`Court. See O2 Micro Int’l Ltd., 467 F.3d at 1368-69. Dr. Madisetti offered all of
`
`25
`
`these new opinions well after the Court’s deadline for expert discovery. In some
`
`26
`
`instances Wi-LAN’s opposition cites Dr. Madisetti’s expert report (see, e.g., Opp.
`
`27
`
`at 6), in some instances Wi-LAN cites Dr. Madisetti’s report and his new
`
`28
`
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`S A N D I E G O
`
`declaration (see, e.g., Opp. at 4), and in other instances Wi-LAN cites only Dr.
`
`
`WEST\281790159.1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-1-
`OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY WI-LAN
`3:14-CV-001507-DMS-BLM
`
`

`

`Case 3:14-cv-02235-DMS-BLM Document 380 Filed 05/31/18 PageID.20423 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`Madisetti’s new declaration (see, e.g., Opp. at 5). Apple does not object to the
`
`portions of Dr. Madisetti’s declaration that restate opinions in his expert report, but
`
`does object to opinions not disclosed in Dr. Madisetti’s reports as violating Federal
`
`Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B). Apple respectfully requests that the Court
`
`sustain Apple’s objections to these new opinions.
`
`Dated: May 31, 2018
`
`
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`
`By /s/ Sean C. Cunningham
`JOHN ALLCOCK
`SEAN C. CUNNINGHAM
`ERIN GIBSON
`ROBERT BUERGI
`ROBERT WILLIAMS
`TIFFANY MILLER
`JACOB ANDERSON
`AMY WALTERS
`
`
`
`Attorneys for
`APPLE INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`S A N D I E G O
`
`
`
`WEST\281790159.1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-2-
`OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY WI-LAN
`3:14-CV-001507-DMS-BLM
`
`

`

`Case 3:14-cv-02235-DMS-BLM Document 380 Filed 05/31/18 PageID.20424 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on May 31, 2018, I electronically transmitted the
`
`attached document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and
`
`transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the CM/ECF registrants.
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Sean C. Cunningham
`Sean C. Cunningham
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`S A N D I E G O
`
`
`
`WEST\281790159.1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-3-
`OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY WI-LAN
`3:14-CV-001507-DMS-BLM
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket