throbber
Case 3:14-cv-02235-DMS-BLM Document 116 Filed 05/11/17 PageID.2361 Page 1 of 9
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`v.
`
`WI-LAN, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
`
`
`
` Case No.: 14cv2235-DMS (BLM),
`consolidated with 14cv1507-DMS
`(BLM)
`
`AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT
`ORDER REGULATING
`DISCOVERY AND OTHER
`PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS IN A
`PATENT CASE
`
`1. WiLAN shall serve an amended Disclosure of Asserted Claims and
`
`Infringement Contentions on or before May 15, 2017.
`
`2.
`
`On or before June 15, 2017, each party opposing a claim of infringement shall
`
`serve Invalidity Contentions pursuant to Patent L.R. 3.3 and produce documents as required
`
`by Patent L.R. 3.4.
`
`3.
`
`On or before June 29, 2017, the parties shall exchange Preliminary Claim
`
`Constructions pursuant to Patent L.R. 4.1(a) and identify extrinsic evidence as required by
`
`Patent L.R. 4.1(b).
`
`4.
`
`On or before July 13, 2017, the parties shall exchange Responsive Claim
`
`Constructions pursuant to Patent L.R. 4.1(c) and identify extrinsic evidence as required by
`
`1
`14cv2235-DMS (BLM), consolidated with 14cv1507-DMS (BLM)
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:14-cv-02235-DMS-BLM Document 116 Filed 05/11/17 PageID.2362 Page 2 of 9
`
`
`
`Patent L.R. 4.1(d).
`
`5.
`
`On or before July 27, 2017, parties shall complete and file a Joint Claim
`
`Construction Chart, Joint Claim Construction Worksheet, and Joint Hearing Statement
`
`pursuant to Patent L.R. 4.2.
`
`6.
`
`All discovery intended for use in the Claim Construction Hearing must be
`
`completed by August 24, 2017. See Patent L.R. 4.3.
`
`7.
`
`On or before August 31, 2017, the parties must file simultaneously their
`
`Opening Claim Construction Briefs. See Patent L.R. 4.4(a).
`
`8.
`
`On or before September 25, 2017, the parties must file simultaneously their
`
`Responsive Claim Construction Briefs. See Patent L.R. 4.4(b).
`
`9.
`
`The Claim Construction and tutorial hearing will be held October 30, 2017,
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`at 9:00 a.m. See Patent L.R. 4.5.
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`10. Not later than thirty (30) days after the filing of the Claim Construction Order,
`
`any party relying upon advice of counsel as part of a patent-related claim or defense for
`
`any reason must make the disclosures required by Patent L.R. 3.7
`
`11. A party asserting infringement must serve final amended infringement
`
`contentions, within the meaning of Patent L.R. 3.6(a)(1), not later than thirty (30) days
`
`after service of the Court’s Claim Construction Ruling.
`
`12. A party opposing a claim of infringement must serve final amended invalidity
`
`contentions, within the meaning of Patent L.R. 3.6(b)(2), not later than fifty (50) days after
`
`service of the Court’s Claim Construction ruling.
`
`13. The initial date for the substantial completion of document discovery
`
`including electronically stored information (“ESI”) is September 27, 2017. See Patent
`
`24
`
`L.R. 2.1(a)(1).
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`14. All fact discovery shall be completed by all parties on or before January 12,
`
`2018. All expert discovery shall be completed by all parties on or before April 9, 2018.
`
`"Completed" means that all discovery under Rules 30-36 of the Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure, and discovery subpoenas under Rule 45, must be initiated a sufficient period of
`
`2
`14cv2235-DMS (BLM), consolidated with 14cv1507-DMS (BLM)
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:14-cv-02235-DMS-BLM Document 116 Filed 05/11/17 PageID.2363 Page 3 of 9
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`time in advance of the cut-off date, so that it may be completed by the cut-off date, taking
`
`into account the times for service, notice, and response as set forth in the Federal Rules of
`
`Civil Procedure.
`
`Counsel shall promptly and in good faith meet and confer with regard to all
`
`discovery disputes in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(1) and Civil
`
`Local Rule 26.1(a). All discovery motions must be filed within 30 days of the service of
`
`an objection, answer or response which becomes the subject of dispute or the passage of a
`
`discovery due date without response or production, and only after counsel have met and
`
`conferred and have reached impasse with regard to the particular issue. The Court’s
`
`procedures for resolving discovery disputes are set forth in Magistrate Judge Barbara L.
`
`Major’s Civil Chambers Rules, which are posted on the Court’s website. A failure to
`
`comply in this regard will result in a waiver of a party's discovery issue. Absent an
`
`order of the court, no stipulation continuing or altering this requirement will be
`
`14
`
`recognized by the court.
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`15. All expert disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) shall be served on
`
`all parties on or before November 10, 2017. Any contradictory or rebuttal disclosures
`
`within the meaning of Rule 26(a)(2)(D)(ii) shall be disclosed on or before November 20,
`
`2017. Unless otherwise stipulated by the parties, the required expert disclosures shall
`
`include an expert report as required by Rule 26(a)(2)(B). If a written report is not required,
`
`the disclosure must provide the information required under Rule 26(a)(2)(c).
`
`16. Each expert witness designated by a party shall prepare a written report to be
`
`provided to all other parties no later than February 8, 2018, containing the information
`
`required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(A) and (B). Except as provided in paragraph 17
`
`below, any party that fails to make these disclosures shall not, absent substantial
`
`justification, be permitted to use evidence or testimony not disclosed at any hearing
`
`or at the time of trial. In addition, the Court may impose sanctions as permitted by
`
`27
`
`Fed. R. Civ. P. 37.
`
`28
`
`17. Any party, through any expert designated, shall in accordance with Fed. R.
`
`3
`14cv2235-DMS (BLM), consolidated with 14cv1507-DMS (BLM)
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:14-cv-02235-DMS-BLM Document 116 Filed 05/11/17 PageID.2364 Page 4 of 9
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(D) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e)(2), supplement any of its expert reports
`
`regarding evidence intended solely to contradict or rebut evidence on the same subject
`
`matter identified in an expert report submitted by another party. Any such supplemental
`
`reports are due on or before March 8, 2018.
`
`18. All other dispositive motions, including those addressing Daubert issues, shall
`
`be FILED on or before April 23, 2018. Please be advised that counsel for the moving party
`
`must obtain a motion hearing date from the law clerk of the judge who will hear the motion.
`
`Failure of counsel to timely request a motion date may result in the motion not being heard.
`
`Motions in Limine are to be filed as directed in the Local Rules, or as otherwise set by
`
`10
`
`Judge Dana M. Sabraw.
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`19. Briefs or memoranda in support of or in opposition to any pending motion
`
`shall not exceed twenty-five (25) pages in length without permission of the judge or
`
`magistrate judge who will hear the motion. No reply memorandum shall exceed ten (10)
`
`pages without leave of the judge or magistrate judge who will hear the motion.
`
`20. A Mandatory Settlement Conference shall be conducted on May 23, 2018 at
`
`9:30 a.m. in the chambers of Magistrate Judge Barbara L. Major located at 333 West
`
`Broadway, Suite 1110, San Diego, CA 92101. All discussions at the Mandatory
`
`Settlement Conference will be informal, off the record, privileged, and confidential.
`
`Counsel for any non-English speaking party is responsible for arranging for the appearance
`
`20
`
`of an interpreter at the conference.
`
`a.
`
`Personal Appearance of Parties Required: All parties, adjusters for
`
`insured defendants, and other representatives of a party having full and complete authority
`
`to enter into a binding settlement, as well as the principal attorneys responsible for the
`
`litigation, must be present in person and legally and factually prepared to discuss
`
`settlement of the case. Counsel appearing without their clients (whether or not counsel has
`
`been given settlement authority) will be cause for immediate imposition of sanctions and
`
`may also result in the immediate termination of the conference.
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`4
`14cv2235-DMS (BLM), consolidated with 14cv1507-DMS (BLM)
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:14-cv-02235-DMS-BLM Document 116 Filed 05/11/17 PageID.2365 Page 5 of 9
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Unless there is good cause, persons required to attend the conference pursuant to
`
`this Order shall not be excused from personal attendance. Requests for excuse from
`
`attendance for good cause shall be made in writing at least three (3) court days prior to the
`
`conference. Failure to appear in person at the Mandatory Settlement Conference will be
`
`grounds for sanctions.
`
`b.
`
`Full Settlement Authority Required: In addition to counsel who will
`
`try the case, a party or party representative with full settlement authority1 must be present
`
`for the conference. In the case of a corporate entity, an authorized representative of the
`
`corporation who is not retained outside counsel must be present and must have
`
`discretionary authority to commit the company to pay an amount up to the amount of
`
`Plaintiff's prayer (excluding punitive damages prayers). The purpose of this requirement
`
`is to have representatives present who can settle the case during the course of the
`
`conference without consulting a superior. Counsel for a government entity may be excused
`
`from this requirement so long as the government attorney who attends the Mandatory
`
`Settlement Conference (1) has primary responsibility for handling the case, and (2) may
`
`negotiate settlement offers which the attorney is willing to recommend to the government
`
`official having ultimate settlement authority.
`
`c.
`
`Confidential Settlement Statements Required: No later than May
`
`11, 2018, the parties shall submit directly to Magistrate Judge Major's chambers (via hand
`
`delivery or email address) confidential settlement statements no more than ten (10) pages
`
`in length. These confidential statements shall not be filed or served on opposing
`
`
`
`1 “Full settlement authority” means that the individuals at the settlement conference must be authorized to
`explore settlement options fully and to agree at that time to any settlement terms acceptable to the parties.
`Heileman Brewing Co. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 1989). The person needs to have
`"unfettered discretion and authority" to change the settlement position of a party. Pitman v. Brinker Int'l,
`Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485-86 (D. Ariz. 2003). The purpose of requiring a person with unlimited settlement
`authority to attend the conference contemplates that the person's view of the case may be altered during
`the face to face conference. Id. at 486. A limited or a sum certain of authority is not adequate. See Nick
`v. Morgan's Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 595-97 (8th Cir. 2001).
`
`5
`14cv2235-DMS (BLM), consolidated with 14cv1507-DMS (BLM)
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:14-cv-02235-DMS-BLM Document 116 Filed 05/11/17 PageID.2366 Page 6 of 9
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`counsel. Each party's confidential statement must set forth the party’s statement of the
`
`case, identify controlling legal issues, concisely set out issues of liability and damages, and
`
`shall set forth the party’s settlement position, including any previous settlement
`
`negotiations, mediation sessions, or mediation efforts, the last offer or demand made by
`
`that party, and a separate statement of the offer or demand the party is prepared to make at
`
`the settlement conference. If a specific demand or offer for settlement cannot be made at
`
`the time the brief is submitted, then the reasons therefore must be stated along with a
`
`statement as to when the party will be in a position to state a demand or make an offer.
`
`General statements that a party will "negotiate in good faith" is not a specific
`
`10
`
`demand or offer contemplated by this Order. It is assumed that all parties will negotiate in
`
`11
`
`good faith.
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`d.
`
`Requests to Continue a Mandatory Settlement Conference: Any
`
`request to continue the Mandatory Settlement Conference or request for relief from any of
`
`the provisions or requirements of this Order must be sought by a written ex parte
`
`application. The application must (1) be supported by a declaration of counsel setting
`
`forth the reasons and justifications for the relief requested, (2) confirm compliance with
`
`Civil Local Rule 83.3(h), and (3) report the position of opposing counsel or any
`
`unrepresented parties subject to the Order. Absent good cause, requests for continuances
`
`will not be considered unless submitted in writing no fewer than (7) days prior to the
`
`scheduled conference.
`
`If the case is settled in its entirety before the scheduled date of the conference,
`
`counsel and any unrepresented parties must still appear in person, unless a written
`
`joint notice confirming the complete settlement of the case is filed no fewer than
`
`twenty-four (24) hours before the scheduled conference.
`
`21. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 16.3, all party representatives and claims
`
`adjusters for insured defendants with full and unlimited authority to negotiate and enter
`
`into a binding settlement, as well as the principal attorney(s) responsible for the litigation,
`
`must be present and legally and factually prepared to discuss and resolve the case at the
`
`6
`14cv2235-DMS (BLM), consolidated with 14cv1507-DMS (BLM)
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:14-cv-02235-DMS-BLM Document 116 Filed 05/11/17 PageID.2367 Page 7 of 9
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`mandatory settlement conference. Retained outside corporate counsel shall not appear on
`
`behalf of a corporation as the party who has the authority to negotiate and enter into a
`
`settlement. Failure to attend the conference or obtain proper excuse will be considered
`
`grounds for sanctions.
`
`22.
`
`In order to identify the claims to be tried and eliminate delay and surprise at
`
`trial, the Court enters the following pretrial order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16.
`
`23. Parties are excused from the requirement of Local Rule 16.1(f)(2)(a); no
`
`Memoranda of Law or Contentions of Fact are to be filed.
`
`24. All parties or their counsel shall fully comply with the Pretrial Disclosure
`
`requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) on or before May 25, 2018. Failure to comply
`
`with these disclosures requirements could result in evidence preclusion or other sanctions
`
`12
`
`under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37.
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`25. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 16.1(f)(4), on or before June 1, 2018, the parties
`
`shall meet and confer to comply with the provisions of that section and prepare a proposed
`
`pretrial order in accordance with Local Rule 16.1(f)(6)(c), and containing the following:
`
`a.
`
`A joint neutral statement to be read to the jury, not in excess of one
`
`page, of the nature of the case and the claims and defenses.
`
`b.
`
`A list of the causes of action to be tried, referenced to the Complaint
`
`[and Counterclaim if applicable]. For each cause of action, the order shall succinctly list
`
`the elements of the claim, damages and any defenses. A cause of action in the Complaint
`
`[and/or Counterclaim] which is not listed shall be dismissed with prejudice.
`
`c.
`
`A list, in alphabetical order, of:
`
`i.
`
`Each witness counsel actually expect to call at trial with a brief
`
`statement, not exceeding four sentences, of the substance of the
`
`witnesses’ testimony.
`
`ii.
`
`Each expert witness counsel actually expect to call at trial with a
`
`brief statement, not exceeding four sentences, of the substance of
`
`the expert witnesses’ testimony.
`
`7
`14cv2235-DMS (BLM), consolidated with 14cv1507-DMS (BLM)
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:14-cv-02235-DMS-BLM Document 116 Filed 05/11/17 PageID.2368 Page 8 of 9
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`iii.
`
`Additional witnesses, including experts, counsel do not expect to
`
`call at this time but reserve the right to call at trial along with a
`
`brief statement, not exceeding four sentences, of the substance of
`
`the witnesses’ testimony.
`
`d.
`
`A list of:
`
`i.
`
`All exhibits that counsel actually expect to offer at trial with a
`
`one-sentence description of the exhibit. All exhibits are to be
`
`identified numerically, plaintiff starting with “1” and defendant
`
`beginning with an agreed upon numerical designation.
`
`ii.
`
`All other exhibits that counsel do not expect to offer at this time
`
`but reserve the right to offer if necessary at trial with a one-
`
`sentence description of the exhibit.
`
`e.
`
`A statement of all facts to which the parties stipulate. This statement
`
`shall be on a separate page and will be read to and provided to the jury.
`
`f.
`
`A list of all deposition transcripts by page and line, or videotape
`
`depositions by section, that will be offered at trial.
`
`g.
`
`Counsel will note any objections they have to any other parties’ Fed. R.
`
`18
`
`Civ. P. 26 (a)(3) Pretrial Disclosures.
`
`19
`
`
`
`The Court encourages the parties to consult with the assigned magistrate judge to
`
`20
`
`21
`
`work out any problems in preparation of the proposed pretrial order. Judge Dana M.
`
`Sabraw will entertain any questions concerning the conduct of the trial at the pretrial
`
`22
`
`conference.
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`26. Counsel for plaintiff will be responsible for preparing the pretrial order and
`
`arranging the meetings of counsel pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16.1(f)(6)(a). On or before
`
`June 8, 2018, plaintiff’s counsel must provide opposing counsel with the proposed pretrial
`
`order for review and approval. Opposing counsel must communicate promptly with
`
`plaintiff’s attorney concerning any objections to form or content of the pretrial order, and
`
`both parties should attempt promptly to resolve their differences, if any, concerning the
`
`8
`14cv2235-DMS (BLM), consolidated with 14cv1507-DMS (BLM)
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:14-cv-02235-DMS-BLM Document 116 Filed 05/11/17 PageID.2369 Page 9 of 9
`
`
`
`order.
`
`27. The proposed final pretrial conference order, including objections counsel
`
`have to any other party’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) Pretrial Disclosures shall be prepared,
`
`served and lodged with Judge Dana M. Sabraw chambers on or before June 15, 2018,
`
`and shall be in the form prescribed in and in compliance with Local Rule 16.1(f)(6)(c).
`
`Counsel shall also bring a court copy of the pretrial order to the pretrial conference.
`
`28. The final pretrial conference shall be held before the Honorable Dana M.
`
`Sabraw, United States District Court Judge, on June 22, 2018 at 10:30 a.m., during which
`
`time the Court will address the submission of motions in limine, trial briefs, proposed voir
`
`dire and jury instructions and the trial schedule.
`
`29. The trial is scheduled to commence on July 23, 2018 at 9:00 a.m.
`
`30. The dates and times set forth herein will not be modified except for good cause
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`shown.
`
`14
`
`31. Plaintiff’s counsel shall serve a copy of this order on all parties that enter this
`
`15
`
`case hereafter.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: 5/10/2017
`
`
`
`
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`9
`14cv2235-DMS (BLM), consolidated with 14cv1507-DMS (BLM)
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket