throbber
Case 3:13-cv-00352-DMS-WVG Document 31 Filed 05/11/22 PageID.236 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
`
`
`Lead Case No. 11-cv-1810 DMS (WVG)
`Related Case No. 13-cv-0352 DMS (WVG)
`
`JUDGMENT
`
`
`Hon. Dana M. Sabraw
`Judge:
`CTRM: 13A
`
`
`AMERANTH, INC.
`
`
` Plaintiff,
`
`
` v.
`
`
`
`TICKETBISCUIT, LLC
`
`
` Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`WHEREAS the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and/or the Federal Circuit Court
`
`of Appeals has held all claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,384,850 (“the’850 Patent”), all
`
`claims other than claim 14 of U.S. Patent No. 6,871,325 (“the ’325 Patent”), and all
`
`claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,982,733 (“the ’733 Patent") patent ineligible and/or
`
`invalid, and all appeals of those decisions have been exhausted;
`
`WHEREAS, on October 11, 2018, the Court issued a Judgment in related Case
`
`No. 12-cv-0733 in favor of Domino’s Pizza (Doc. No. 66) declaring claims 1, 4-9, 11,
`
`and 13-18 of U.S. Patent No. 8,146,077 (“the ’077 Patent”) ineligible under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§101 (hereinafter, “Section 101”);
`
`- 1 -
`[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
`Related Case No. 13-cv-0352 DMS (WVG)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:13-cv-00352-DMS-WVG Document 31 Filed 05/11/22 PageID.237 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`WHEREAS, on November 1, 2019, the Federal Circuit, Case No. 2019-
`
`1141/2019-114, issued a Decision affirming in part and vacating in part the District
`
`Court’s Order granting summary judgment, and remanded the matter to the District
`
`Court to vacate the October 11, 2018 Judgment with respect to claims 4 and 5 of the
`
`’077 Patent;
`
`WHEREAS, on November 18, 2021, the Court issued an Order in related Case
`
`No. 12-cv-0733 granting Ameranth’s Motion for Issuance of a Final and Appealable
`
`Judgment (Doc. No. 184), amending the Court’s October 11, 2018 Judgment in
`
`conformance with the Federal Circuit’s Decision, and eliminating claims 4 and 5 of the
`
`10
`
`’077 Patent from the scope of the Judgment;
`
`11
`
`WHEREAS, on December 2, 2021, the Court issued an Order Following Status
`
`12
`
`Conference (Doc. No. 1504) that required Ameranth “to show cause why it should be
`
`13
`
`allowed to reassert any claims that were not selected in response to the Court’s
`
`14
`
`February 14, 2017 Order” (Doc. No. 623);
`
`15
`
`WHEREAS, in response to the Order Following Status Conference, Ameranth
`
`16
`
`filed its “Response to Order To Show Cause Regarding Assertion of Unselected
`
`17
`
`Claims” (Doc. No. 1508), and defendants thereafter filed a consolidated response
`
`18
`
`(Doc. No. 1511);
`
`19
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, on December 27, 2021, the Court issued an Order (Doc. No. 1512)
`
`20
`
`entitled Order on Ameranth’s Request to Reopen Litigation On Additional Patent
`
`21
`
`Claims, And Setting Briefing Schedule On Patent Claims 4 and 5;
`
`22
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, on March 14, 2022, the Court issued an Order (Doc. No. 1551)
`
`23
`
`granting summary judgment of ineligibility under Section 101 of claims 4 and 5 of the
`
`24
`
`’077 Patent;
`
`25
`
`Now, therefore, pursuant to Rules 56 and 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil
`
`26
`
`Procedure, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
`
`27
`
`
`
`Claims 1, 4-9, 11, and 13-18 of the ’077 Patent having been found ineligible,
`
`28
`
`
`
`judgment is entered in favor of defendant Ticketbiscuit, LLC (“Defendant”), and
`- 2 -
`[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
`Related Case No. 13-cv-0352 DMS (WVG)
`
`

`

`Case 3:13-cv-00352-DMS-WVG Document 31 Filed 05/11/22 PageID.238 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`against plaintiff Ameranth, Inc. (“Ameranth”), on Ameranth’s claims for infringement
`
`of the patent-ineligible claims of the ’077 Patent asserted against Defendant (“the
`
`Ineligible Asserted Claims”).
`
`Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant, and against Ameranth, on
`
`Defendant’s counterclaims for patent ineligibility of the Ineligible Asserted Claims of
`
`the '077 Patent, and on all claims of the ‘850, ‘325, and ‘733 Patents, other than claim
`
`14 of the ‘325 Patent. Defendant's other counterclaims are dismissed without
`
`prejudice.
`
`No application for costs or motion seeking to declare this case exceptional
`
`10
`
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §285 shall be filed in this matter until 90 days after the Federal
`
`11
`
`Circuit enters an order dismissing or renders a decision in Ameranth’s appeal of this
`
`12
`
`Court’s Order in Ameranth, Inc. v. Domino’s Pizza, LLC, Case No. 3:12-cv-0733-
`
`13
`
`DMS-WVG granting Domino’s Pizza, LLC’s Motion to Declare the Case Exceptional
`
`14
`
`(Doc. No. 134), currently pending before the Federal Circuit as Case No. 22-1200.
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Dated: May 11, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
`Related Case No. 13-cv-0352 DMS (WVG)
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket