throbber
Case 5:23-cv-03624-BLF Document 43 Filed 11/27/23 Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`AGIS HOLDINGS, INC., et al.,
`
`Case No. 23-cv-03624-BLF
`
`
`ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO SEAL
`
`[Re: ECF No. 41]
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`On November 13, 2023, Plaintiff Google LLC (“Google”) filed a redacted Amended
`
`Complaint for Declaratory Judgment. ECF No. 42 (“Amended Complaint”). That same day,
`
`Google filed an Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Material Should Be
`
`Sealed Re: Google's Amended Complaint. ECF No. 41 (“Administrative Motion”). The
`
`Administrative Motion concerns “information” in the Amended Complaint “that Defendants
`
`potentially view as confidential and may therefore wish to seal.” Id. at 1.
`
`“For any document a party (‘Filing Party’) seeks to seal because that document has been
`
`designated as confidential by another party or non-party (the ‘Designating Party’), the Filing Party
`
`must, instead of filing an Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, file an Administrative Motion
`
`to Consider Whether Another Party’s Material Should Be Sealed.” Civil L. R. 79-5(f). “Within 7
`
`days of the motion’s filing, the Designating Party must file a statement and/or declaration as
`
`described in subsection (c)(1).” Civil L. R. 79-5(f)(3). “A failure to file a statement or declaration
`
`may result in the unsealing of the provisionally sealed document without further notice to the
`
`Designating Party.” Id.
`
`Google (the Filing Party) filed the Administrative Motion on November 13, 2023. ECF
`
`No. 41. Defendants (the Designating Party) did not file a statement or declaration with reasons for
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`

`

`Case 5:23-cv-03624-BLF Document 43 Filed 11/27/23 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`keeping the Amended Complaint under seal. The Court therefore DENIES Google’s
`
`Administrative Motion (ECF No. 41) WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendants may submit a
`
`declaration by December 4, 2023. If no declaration is submitted, the Court may unseal the
`
`unredacted Amended Complaint.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: November 27, 2023
`
`
`
`______________________________________
`BETH LABSON FREEMAN
`United States District Judge
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket