throbber
Case 5:23-cv-03624-BLF Document 41 Filed 11/13/23 Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`
`DARIN SNYDER (CA S.B. #136003)
`dsnyder@omm.com
`LUANN L. SIMMONS (CA S.B. #203526)
`lsimmons@omm.com
`MARK LIANG (CA S.B. # 278487)
`mliang@omm.com
`BILL TRAC (CA S.B. #281437)
`btrac@omm.com
`AMY LIANG (CA S.B. #291910)
`aliang@omm.com
`SORIN ZAHARIA (CA S.B. #312655)
`szaharia@omm.com
`DANIEL SILVERMAN (CA S.B. #319874)
`dsilverman@omm.com
`O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
`Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
`San Francisco, California 94111-3823
`Telephone:
`+1 415 984 8700
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`GOOGLE LLC
`
`
`STACY YAE (CA S.B. #315663)
`syae@omm.com
`O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
`400 South Hope Street, 18th Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90071
`Telephone: +1 213 430 6000
`
`CASON COLE (TX S.B. #24109741)
`ccole@omm.com
`GRANT GIBSON (TX S.B. #24117859)
`ggibson@omm.com
`O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
`2501 N. Harwood St., 17th Floor
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`Telephone: +1 972 360 1916
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`AGIS HOLDINGS, INC., ADVANCED
`GROUND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.,
`AND AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
`LLC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Case No. 5:23-cv-03624-BLF
`
`PLAINTIFF GOOGLE LLC’S
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
`CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER
`PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE
`SEALED RE: GOOGLE’S AMENDED
`COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ADM. MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER
`TO SEAL ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL
`NO. 5:23-CV-03624-BLF
`
`

`

`Case 5:23-cv-03624-BLF Document 41 Filed 11/13/23 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5(f), and the Court’s Standing Order Re Civil
`Cases, Plaintiff Google LLC (“Google”) submits this Administrative Motion to Consider Whether
`Another Party’s Material Should Be Sealed in connection with Google’s Amended Complaint For
`Declaratory Judgment.
`Google files this motion because portions of Google’s Amended Complaint refer to
`information that Defendants potentially view as confidential and may therefore wish to seal. The
`following table identifies those portions of the Amended Complaint.
`
`ECF or Ex.
`No.
`
`Reasons for Sealing
`
`Document
`
`Portions to Seal
`
`Amended
`Complaint For
`Declaratory
`Judgment
`
`
`41-1
`
`
`
`Highlighted portions of
`Paragraphs 66, 115, 116,
`and 156.
`
`Refers to information that Defendants
`potentially view as confidential and
`may therefore wish to seal.
`
`
`
`Dated: November 13, 2023
`
`
`O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Luann L. Simmons
` Luann L. Simmons
`
`DARIN SNYDER
`LUANN L. SIMMONS
`MARK LIANG
`BILL TRAC
`AMY LIANG
`SORIN ZAHARIA
`DANIEL SILVERMAN
`STACY YAE
`CASON COLE
`GRANT GIBSON
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Google LLC
`
`
`1
`
`ADM. MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER
`TO SEAL ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL
`NO. 5:23-CV-03624-BLF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket