`
`
`
`Lewis E. Hudnell, III (CASBN 218736)
`lewis@hudnelllaw.com
`Nicolas S. Gikkas (CASBN 189452)
`nick@hudnelllaw.com
`HUDNELL LAW GROUP P.C.
`800 W. El Camino Real Suite 180
`Mountain View, California 94040
`Telephone: 650.564.3698
`Facsimile: 347.772.3034
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`VoIP-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`Case No. 3:21-cv-9773-JD
`
`JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`X CORP.
`Plaintiff,
`v.
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`Plaintiff X Corp. (“X”) and Defendant VoIP-Pal, Inc. (“VoIP-Pal”) file this stipulation of
`
`dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
`
`The parties stipulate that all pending requested relief should be denied as moot. The parties
`
`stipulate to the dismissal of all of X’s claims in this lawsuit with prejudice. The parties stipulate to
`
`the dismissal of all of VoIP-Pal’s claims in this lawsuit with prejudice. The parties further stipulate
`
`that each party is to bear its own fees, expenses, and costs.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
`3:21-cv-9773-JD
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 71 Filed 06/07/23 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`/s/ Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`Lewis E. Hudnell, III (CASBN 218736)
`lewis@hudnelllaw.com
`Nicolas S. Gikkas (CASBN 189452)
`nick@hudnelllaw.com
`HUDNELL LAW GROUP P.C.
`800 W. El Camino Real Suite 180
`Mountain View, California 94040
`Telephone: 650.564.3698
`Facsimile: 347.772.3034
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`VoIP-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`Dated: June 6, 2023
`
`
`/s/ Taylor Gooch (with permission)
`Sonal N. Mehta (Bar No. 222086)
`Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
`2600 El Camino Real, Suite 400
`Palo Alto, California, 94306
`Telephone: (650) 858-6000
`Facsimile: (650) 858-6100
`
`Taylor Gooch (Bar No. 294282)
`Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
`One Front Street, Suite 3500
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: (628) 235-1000
`Facsimile: (628) 235-1001
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`X Corp.
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTESTATION
`Under Civ. L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been
`obtained from the signatory indicated by a ‘conformed’ signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.
`
`
`
`/s/ Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
`3:21-cv-9773-JD
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 71 Filed 06/07/23 Page 3 of 3
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims
`
`for relief asserted against VoIP-Pal are dismissed, with prejudice;
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all claims for relief asserted against X Corp. are dismissed,
`
`with prejudice;
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending requested relief is denied as moot; and
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees, costs of court and expenses shall be
`
`borne by each party incurring the same.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated:
`
`James Donato
`United States District Judge
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
`3:21-cv-9773-JD
`
`June 7, 2023
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site