`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 62-1 Filed 03/20/23 Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`Case No. 3:22-CV-3199-JD
`
`DECLARATION OF LEWIS E.
`HUDNELL, III IN SUPPORT OF VOIP-
`PAL.COM, INC.’S OPPOSITION TO 101
`MOTION
`
`
`Case No. 3:22-CV-03202-JD
`
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`
` v.
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
` Defendant.
`
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`
` v.
`META PLATFORMS INC., et al.,
`
` Defendants.
`
`TWITTER, INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`
` v.
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,
`
` Defendant.
`
`Case No. 3:21-CV-09773-JD
`
`
`
`I, Lewis E. Hudnell, III, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of California and the State of New
`
`York and admitted to practice in this District.
`
`2.
`
`I am an attorney at the Hudnell Law Group, P.C., 800 W. El Camino Real, Mountain
`
`View, California 94040 representing VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. (“VoIP-Pal”) in the above-captioned cases.
`1
`DECLARATION OF LEWIS E. HUDNELL, III IN SUPPORT OF VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.’S OPPOSITION TO 101
`MOTION Case Nos.: 3:22-CV-3199-JD; 3:22-CV-3202-JD; 3:21-CV-9773-JD
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 62-1 Filed 03/20/23 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`3.
`
`I have personal knowledge of the facts contained herein and, if called as a witness, I
`
`could and would testify competently thereto. I make this Declaration in Support of VoIP-Pal.com,
`
`Inc.’s Opposition To 101 Motion.
`
`4.
`
` Attached as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of (1) Order Denying Motion to Relate
`
`issued in Case No. 20-cv-02460-LHK (NDCAL); (2) Order Denying Motion to Relate issued in Case
`
`No. 20-cv-02995-LHK (NDCAL); and (3) Order Determining that Cases Are Not Related issued in Case
`
`No. 20-cv-03092-LHK, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
`
`5.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of comparison chart between claim 1 of
`
`the ’234 patent and certain independent claims of the patents-in-suit.
`
`6.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of the parties’ Joint Claim Construction
`
`Statement dated May 6, 2022.
`
`7.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of the Claim Construction Order in Case
`
`VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. Amamzon.com, Inc. et al., No. 6:21-cv-668-ADA (WDTX) dated June 3, 2022.
`
`8.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of the Applicant Arguments/Remarks
`
`Made in an Amendment in App. No. 13/056,277 dated May 24, 2013.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California and United States of
`
`America that the foregoing statements are true and correct.
`
`Dated this 20th day of March 2023.
`
`
`
`/s/Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`2
`DECLARATION OF LEWIS E. HUDNELL, III IN SUPPORT OF VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.’S OPPOSITION TO 101
`MOTION Case Nos.: 3:22-CV-3199-JD; 3:22-CV-3202-JD; 3:21-CV-9773-JD
`
`