Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 48-5 Filed 11/21/22 Page 1 of 3
`Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 48-5 Filed 11/21/22 Page 1of3
`
`EXHIBIT 5
`EXHIBIT 5
`
`

`

`12/17/21, 2:43 PM
`
`Voip-Pal PTAB Rejects APPL Rehearing Request
`Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 48-5 Filed 11/21/22 Page 2 of 3
`
` 
`December 14, 2021
`VoIP-Pal Provides the Current Schedule for Litigation of Their Patent
`Infringement Lawsuits in the Western District of Texas
`
`December 7, 2021
`VoIP-Pal Provides a Legal Update on Current Litigation in the Western
`District of Texas
`
`December 2, 2021
`VoIP-Pal Files Two New Patent Infringement Lawsuits Against New
`Defendants Samsung and Huawei Asserting its Mobile Gateway Patents in
`U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Waco Division
`
`About Us
`
`Our Technology
`
`Our Team
`
`Investor Relations
`
`Legal Action
`
`News & Interviews
`
`•••••
`
`Voip-Pal Files Patent Infringement Lawsuits Against Facebook/WhatsApp, Google, Amazon
`and Apple in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas Waco Division
`The Company is weighing its next moves following the recent Appeals Court decision
`
`April 8, 2020 -- Voip-Pal.com Inc. (“Voip-Pal”, “Company”) (OTCQB: VPLM) has filed four patent infringement lawsuits in the U.S. District Court for the
`Western District of Texas, Waco Division against the following defendants:
`
`Facebook Inc. and WhatsApp Inc.; Civil Action No. 20-cv-267
`Google LLC; Civil Action No. 20-cv-269
`Amazon.com Inc. et al.; Civil Action No. 20-cv-272
`Apple Inc.; Civil Action No. 20-cv-275
`
`The four complaints allege infringement by the defendants of Voip-Pal’s United States Patent No. 10,218,606, entitled “Producing Routing Messages For
`Voice Over IP Communications.”  These actions concern the defendants’ use of Voip-Pal’s proprietary technology to provide user-customizable access to
`route calls in a distributed private network using public phone numbers to identify users.
`
`The Company also announced they are currently assessing their options and planning their next moves following the March 16, 2020 decision by the
`United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, affirming the Northern District of California’s dismissal of VoIP-Pal’s Case Nos. 18-CV-06177-LHK,
`
`https://www.voip-pal.com/voip-pal-new-patent-lawsuits-april-
`
`1/2
`
`

`

`12/17/21, 2:43 PM
`
`Voip-Pal PTAB Rejects APPL Rehearing Request
`Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 48-5 Filed 11/21/22 Page 3 of 3
`18-cv-06217-LHK, C, 18-cv-04523-LHK, and 18-cv-06054-LHK under 35 U.S.C. § 101.  The Federal Circuit invoked Rule 36 and provided no comment or
`explanation for why it declined to address various District Court errors as alleged by Voip-Pal.
`
`The Federal Circuit has been criticized for its frequent practice of invoking Rule 36 to summarily dismiss cases without issuing any opinion.  Recently,
`Emil Malak, CEO of Voip-Pal, in his January 4, 2020 op-ed entitled “A Plea for Clarity and a New Approach on Section 101 in 2020” for IP
`Watchdog discussed the problems with the Federal Circuit’s § 101 jurisprudence.
`
`Emil Malak, CEO of Voip-Pal, stated, “While the appellate court’s decision to affirm the district court without giving any reasons was disappointing, we
`are undeterred in our fight to assert our intellectual property rights. Our legal team is assessing our next moves regarding this Alice decision and we
`expect to announce our intentions soon. I can tell you; we are not finished.”
`
`“Our patent portfolio began with five core patents and to date has expanded to 23 patents in the United States alone, not counting our many foreign
`patents. We remain firm in our resolve to achieve monetization for our shareholders and will continue to see this fight through until a successful
`resolution is reached. Patience is a virtue.” 
`
`Next Article
`
`All statements contained in this website, other than those identifying historical facts, constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities
`Exchange Act of 1934 and the Safe Harbor provisions as contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements relating to the
`Company's future expectations, including but not limited to revenues and earnings, technology efficacy, strategies and plans, are subject to safe harbors protection. Actual Company
`results and performance may be materially different from any future results, performance, strategies, plans, or achievements that may be expressed or implied by any such
`forward-looking statements. The Company disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements.
`
`© 2021 VOIP-PAL.COM. All Rights Reserved.
`
`https://www.voip-pal.com/voip-pal-new-patent-lawsuits-april-
`
`2/2
`
`