`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`Plaintiff(s),
`
`v.
`
`Defendant(s).
`
`,
`
`,
`
`Case No.
`
`APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF
`ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE
`(CIVIL LOCAL RULE 11-3)
`
`I,
`
`, an active member in good standing of the bar of
`
`, hereby respectfully apply for admission to practice pro hac
`
`vice in the Northern District of California representing:
`
`above-entitled action. My local co-counsel in this case is
`
` in the
`
`, an
`
`attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office
`
`within the State of California. Local co-counsel’s bar number is: _________________.
`Perkins Coie, LLP, Avenue of the
`Perkins Coie, LLP
`
`MY ADDRESS OF RECORD
`
`LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S ADDRESS OF RECORD
`
`MY TELEPHONE # OF RECORD
`
`LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S TELEPHONE # OF RECORD
`
`MY EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD
`
`LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD
`
`I am an active member in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest court of
`another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above; my bar number is: 2564284.
`
`.
`
`A true and correct copy of a certificate of good standing or equivalent official document
`
`from said bar is attached to this application.
`
`1
`I have been granted pro hac vice admission by the Court _______ times in the 12 months
`
`preceding this application.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`3:21-cv-09773
`
`Gene Lee
`
`Southern District of New York
`
`Plaintiff Twitter, Inc.
`
`Sarah Fowler
`
`Americas, 22nd Fl., New York, NY 10036
`
`3150 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, CA 94304
`
`(212) 261-6825
`
`(650) 838-4300
`
`GLee@perkinscoie.com
`
`SFowler@perkinscoie.com
`
`TWITTER, INC.
`
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.
`
`264838
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 35 Filed 04/25/22 Page 2 of 3
`
`I agree to familiarize myself with, and abide by, the Local Rules of this Court, especially
`
`the Standards of Professional Conduct for attorneys and the Alternative Dispute Resolution Local
`
`Rules. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`April 25, 2022
`Dated:
`
`APPLICANT
`
`ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
`
`FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application of
`
` is
`
`granted, subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney
`
`must indicate appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon, and communication with, local co-
`
`counsel designated in the application will constitute notice to the party.
`
`Dated:
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE
`
`Updated 11/2021
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`Gene Lee
`
`Gene Lee
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 35 Filed 04/25/22 Page 3 of 3
`
`United States District Court
`Southern District of New York
`
`Certificate of Good Standing
`
`I, Ruby J. Krajick, Clerk of Court, Certify that
`GENE W. LEE
`, Bar #
`
`GL9386
`
`was duly admitted to practice in the Court on
`March 22, 1994
`
`and is in good standing as a member of the Bar of this Court
`
`Dated at
`
`500 Pearl St.
`New York, New York
`
`Ruby J. Krajick
`Clerk of Court
`
`On
`
`By
`
`April 18, 2022
`
`s/ A. Eames
`Deputy Clerk
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
