Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 31 Filed 03/14/22 Page 1 of 4
`
`Lewis E. Hudnell, III (Bar No. 218736)
`lewis@hudnelllaw.com
`Nicolas S. Gikkas (Bar No. 189425)
`nick@hudnelllaw.com
`HUDNELL LAW GROUP P.C.
`800 W. El Camino Real Suite 180
`Mountain View, California 94040
`Telephone: 650-564-3698
`Facsimile: 347-772-3034
`Attorneys for Defendant VoIP-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`Sarah Fowler (Bar No. 264838)
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`3150 Porter Drive
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
`Telephone: 650-838-4300
`SFowler@perkinscoie.com
`Gene W. Lee (admitted pro hac vice)
`Thomas Matthew (admitted pro hac vice)
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`1155 Avenue of the Americas, 22nd floor
`New York, NY 10112-0015
`Telephone: 212-262-6900
`GLee@perkinscoie.com
`TMatthew@perkinscoie.com
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Twitter, Inc.
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`Case No. 21-cv-09773-JD
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
`ORDER TO REQUEST EXTENSION OF
`BRIEFING DEADLINES FOR VOIP-
`PAL’S MOTION TO DISMISS
`
`TWITTER, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.
`Defendant.
`
`STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
`REQUEST EXTENSION OF BRIEFING
`SCHEDULE, CASE NO. 21-CV-09773-JD
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 31 Filed 03/14/22 Page 2 of 4
`
`Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2(a), Plaintiff Twitter, Inc. (“Twitter”) and
`Defendant VoIP-Pal.com, Inc., (“VoIP-Pal”) (collectively “Parties”) submit this stipulation to
`request an extension of the briefing deadlines and hearing date for VoIP-Pal’s Motion To Dismiss.
`ECF 25.
`VoIP-Pal filed its Motion To Dismiss on February 11, 2022, pursuant to a stipulation by the
`Parties to extend the time for VoIP-Pal to respond to the complaint by 30 days. ECF 10. The Court
`previously extended the briefing deadlines for Twitter’s Opposition and VoIP-Pal’s Reply to
`March 11, 2022 and March 25, 2022, respectively. ECF 27.
`The current briefing deadlines are as follows:
`
`Scheduled Event
`
`Twitter’s Opposition
`
`VoIP-Pal’s Reply
`
`Current Deadline
`
`March 11, 2022
`
`March 25, 2022
`
`Twitter requests that the Court extend the deadline for Twitter’s Opposition by one business
`day. The Court’s ECF system experienced a technical failure on March 11, 2022. See Declaration
`of Gene Lee, filed herewith, ¶ 3. Counsel for Twitter tried multiple times on March 11, 2022, to
`file Twitter’s Opposition To VoIP-Pal’s Motion To Dismiss, but Twitter was unable to do so solely
`because of the technical failure of the Court’s ECF system. See id. ¶¶ 3-4.
`In view of the technical failure of the Court’s ECF system, Twitter served VoIP-Pal’s
`counsel by email a courtesy copy of Twitter’s Opposition To VoIP-Pal’s Motion To Dismiss on
`counsel for VoIP-Pal on March 11, 2022. Id. ¶ 5. That copy of Twitter’s Opposition was 24 pages
`in length, within the 25-page limit of Civ. L. R. 7 4(b), but it overlooked this Court’s standing order,
`which includes a 15-page limit for memoranda. Id.
`On Monday, March 14, 2022, counsel for VoIP-Pal informed counsel for Twitter of the non-
`compliance with this Court’s 15-page limit. Id. ¶ 7. Accordingly, Twitter revised its Opposition to
`comply with this Court’s 15-page limit and is filing a revised Opposition on March 14, 2022,
`
`1
`
`STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
`REQUEST EXTENSION OF BRIEFING
`SCHEDULE, CASE NO. 21-CV-09773-JD
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 31 Filed 03/14/22 Page 3 of 4
`
`pursuant to Civ. L. R. 5 1(d)(5) and to account for the 15-page limit under this Court’s standing
`order. Id.
`Twitter requests an extension of one business day to allow it to file a corrected Opposition
`brief on March 14, 2022, that complies with this Court’s 15-page limit. VoIP-Pal agrees to this
`request provided that the Court also extends the deadline for VoIP-Pal’s Reply a corresponding
`amount (one business day), so that it may have sufficient time to fully consider and develop the
`issues and arguments for its brief. As such, the proposed extended deadlines would be as follows:
`
`Scheduled Event
`
`Twitter’s Opposition
`
`VoIP-Pal’s Reply
`
`Extended Deadline
`
`March 14, 2022
`
`March 28, 2022
`
`The Parties enter into this stipulation in the interest of justice and not delay. The requested
`extension would not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court order. The Court
`has not yet held a case management conference or issued a case management order for this case.
`
`Dated: March 14, 2022
`
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`
`/s/ Lewis Hudnell (with permission)
`Lewis E. Hudnell, III (Bar No. 218736)
`lewis@hudnelllaw.com
`Nicolas S. Gikkas (Bar No. 189425)
`nick@hudnelllaw.com
`HUDNELL LAW GROUP P.C.
`800 W. El Camino Real Suite 180
`Mountain View, California 94040
`Telephone: 650.564.3698
`Facsimile: 347.772.3034
`Attorneys for Defendant VoIP-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`/s/ Gene Lee
`Sarah Fowler (Bar No. 264838)
`3150 Porter Drive
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
`Telephone: 650-838-4300
`SFowler@perkinscoie.com
`Gene W. Lee (pro hac vice)
`Thomas V. Matthew (pro hac vice)
`1155 Avenue of the Americas, 22nd floor
`New York, NY 10112-0015
`Telephone: 212-262-6900
`Email: GLee@perkinscoie.com
`Email: TMatthew@perkinscoie.com
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Twitter, Inc.
`
`2
`
`STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
`REQUEST EXTENSION OF BRIEFING
`SCHEDULE, CASE NO. 21-CV-09773-JD
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 31 Filed 03/14/22 Page 4 of 4
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ordered.
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated:
`
`Honorable James Donato
`United States District Judge
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`3
`
`STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
`REQUEST EXTENSION OF BRIEFING
`SCHEDULE, CASE NO. 21-CV-09773-JD
`
`