`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`CASE No C
`3:21-cv-09773-JD
`
`ADR CERTIFICATION BY
`PARTIES AND COUNSEL
`
`
`Plaintiff(s)
`
`Defendant(s)
`
`
`TWITTER, INC.
`
`
`
`v.
`
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.
`
`
`Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8(b) and ADR L.R. 3-5 (b), each of the undersigned certifies that he or
`she has:
`
`
`1) Read the handbook entitled “Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures Handbook”
`(available at cand.uscourts.gov/adr).
`2) Discussed with each other the available dispute resolution options provided by the Court
`and private entities; and
`3) Considered whether this case might benefit from any of the available dispute resolution
`options.
` March 1, 2022
`Date:
`
` March 1, 2022
`Date:
`
`
`/s/ Gene Lee
`
`
`/s/ Michael Wu
`
`
`Party
`
`Attorney
`
`Counsel further certifies that he or she has discussed the selection of an ADR process with
`counsel for the other parties to the case. Based on that discussion, the parties:
`(cid:136) intend to stipulate to an ADR process
`(cid:136) prefer to discuss ADR selection with the Assigned Judge at the case management
`conference
`
`■
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` March 1, 2022
`Date:
`
`
`/s/ Gene Lee
`
`Attorney
`
`Important! E-file this form in ECF using event name: “ADR Certification (ADR LR 3-5 b) of Discussion of ADR
`Options.”
`
`Form ADR-Cert rev. 1-15-2019
`
`