throbber
1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 26 Filed 02/22/22 Page 1 of 5
`
`
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`Sarah Fowler (Bar No. 264838)
`3150 Porter Drive
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
`Telephone: 650-838-4300
`SFowler@perkinscoie.com
`
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`Gene W. Lee (pro hac vice)
`Thomas V. Matthew (pro hac vice)
`1155 Avenue of the Americas, 22nd floor
`New York, NY 10112-0015
`Telephone: 212.262.6900
`GLee@perkinscoie.com
`TMatthew@perkinscoie.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Twitter, Inc.
`
`
`Lewis E. Hudnell, III (Bar No. 218736)
`lewis@hudnelllaw.com
`Nicolas S. Gikkas (Bar No. 189425)
`nick@hudnelllaw.com
`HUDNELL LAW GROUP P.C.
`800 W. El Camino Real Suite 180
`Mountain View, California 94040
`Telephone: 650.564.3698
`Facsimile: 347.772.3034
`
`Attorneys for Defendant VoIP-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`
`Case No. 21-cv-09773-JD
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND
`[PROPOSED] ORDER TO REQUEST
`EXTENSION OF BRIEFING DEADLINES
`AND HEARING DATE FOR VOIP-PAL’S
`MOTION TO DISMISS
`
`TWITTER, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
`RELATING TO MOTION TO DISMISS
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 21-cv-09773-JD
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 26 Filed 02/22/22 Page 2 of 5
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2(a), Plaintiff Twitter, Inc. (“Twitter”) and
`Defendant VoIP-Pal.com, Inc., (“VoIP-Pal”) (collectively “Parties”) submit this stipulation to
`request an extension of the briefing deadlines and hearing date for VoIP-Pal’s Motion To Dismiss.
`ECF 25.
`VoIP-Pal filed its Motion To Dismiss on February 11, 2022, pursuant to a stipulation by the
`Parties to extend the time for VoIP-Pal to respond to the complaint by 30 days. ECF 10.
`The current briefing deadlines are as follows:
`
`Scheduled Event
`
`Twitter’s Opposition
`
`VoIP-Pal’s Reply
`
`Current Deadline
`
`February 25, 2022
`
`March 4, 2022
`
`Twitter requests that the Court extend the deadline for Twitter’s Opposition by 14 days.
`VoIP-Pal agrees to this request provided that the Court also extends the deadline for VoIP-Pal’s
`Reply by 7 days. These extensions would give the Parties sufficient time to fully consider and
`develop the issues and arguments for those briefs. As such, the proposed extended deadlines would
`be as follows:
`
`Scheduled Event
`
`Twitter’s Opposition
`
`VoIP-Pal’s Reply
`
`Extended Deadline
`
`March 11, 2022
`
`March 25, 2022
`
`VoIP-Pal noticed the hearing for its Motion To Dismiss for March 24, 2022. As explained
`in the concurrently-filed Declaration of Gene W. Lee, counsel for Twitter has a long-standing
`scheduling conflict that involves travel for the week that includes that date. Accordingly, the Parties
`request that the hearing for VoIP-Pal’s Motion To Dismiss be set for April 21, 2022, or at a later
`date at the Court’s convenience.
`The Parties enter into this stipulation in the interest of justice and not delay. The requested
`extension would not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court order. The Court
`has not yet held a case management conference or issued a case management order for this case.
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
`RELATING TO MOTION TO DISMISS
`
`
`1
`
`Case No. 21-cv-09773-JD
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 26 Filed 02/22/22 Page 3 of 5
`
`Dated: February 22, 2022
`
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Lewis Hudnell
`Lewis E. Hudnell, III (Bar No. 218736)
`lewis@hudnelllaw.com
`Nicolas S. Gikkas (Bar No. 189425)
`nick@hudnelllaw.com
`HUDNELL LAW GROUP P.C.
`800 W. El Camino Real Suite 180
`Mountain View, California 94040
`Telephone: 650.564.3698
`Facsimile: 347.772.3034
`
`Attorneys for Defendant VoIP-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`
`
`/s/ Gene Lee
`Sarah Fowler (Bar No. 264838)
`3150 Porter Drive
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
`Telephone: 650-838-4300
`SFowler@perkinscoie.com
`Gene W. Lee (pro hac vice)
`Thomas V. Matthew (pro hac vice)
`1155 Avenue of the Americas, 22nd floor
`New York, NY 10112-0015
`Telephone: 212-262-6900
`Email: GLee@perkinscoie.com
`Email: TMatthew@perkinscoie.com
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Twitter, Inc.
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
`RELATING TO MOTION TO DISMISS
`
`
`2
`
`Case No. 21-cv-09773-JD
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 26 Filed 02/22/22 Page 4 of 5
`
`ATTESTATION
`Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that all signatories to this document
`concur in its filing.
`
`Dated: February 22, 2022
`
`/s/ Gene Lee
`Gene W. Lee
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
`RELATING TO MOTION TO DISMISS
`
`
`3
`
`Case No. 21-cv-09773-JD
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 26 Filed 02/22/22 Page 5 of 5
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ordered.
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: ___________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`____________________________
`Honorable James Donato
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
`RELATING TO MOTION TO DISMISS
`
`
`4
`
`Case No. 21-cv-09773-JD
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket