throbber
Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 25-7 Filed 02/11/22 Page 1 of 5
`Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 25-7 Filed 02/11/22 Page1of5
`
`EXHIBIT 6
`EXHIBIT 6
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 25-7 Filed 02/11/22 Page 2 of 5
`Case 2:18-cv-01076-MMD-VCF Document 19 Filed 11/13/18 Page 1 of 4
`
`Kevin N. Malek (pro hac vice)
`MALEK MOSS PLLC
`340 Madison Avenue, 19th Floor
`New York, NY 10173
`Tel: 212-812-1491
`E-mail: kevin.malek@malekmoss.com
`
`Kurt R. Bonds
`Adam R. Knecht
`ALVERSON, TAYLOR, MORTENSEN
`& SANDERS
`6605 Grand Montecito Pkwy., Suite 200
`Las Vegas, NV 89149
`Tel: 702-384-7000
`E-mail: efile@alversontaylor.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF NEVADA
`
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,
`
`Case No. 2:18-cv-01076-MMD-VCF
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware
`corporation; AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES,
`INC., a Nevada corporation; and AMAZON
`LAB126,
`
`Defendants.
`
`STIPULATION AND ORDER
`TRANSFERRING THE CASE TO
`THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
`CALIFORNIA
`
`Plaintiff VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. (“VoIP-Pal”) and Defendants Amazon.com, Inc., and Amazon
`
`Technologies, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) agree and stipulate as follows:
`
`WHEREAS VoIP-Pal filed a separate lawsuit against Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon
`
`Wireless (“Verizon”) in this District asserting patents that are related to those asserted in this litigation,
`
`Voip-Pal.com, Inc. v. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, No. 2:16-cv-00271-RCJ-VCF (D.
`
`Nev.), that was transferred by stipulation to the United States District Court for the Northern District
`
`of California on October 1, 2018;
`
`STIPULATION AND ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE
`
`1
`
`Case No. 2:18-cv-01076-MMD-VCF
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 25-7 Filed 02/11/22 Page 3 of 5
`Case 2:18-cv-01076-MMD-VCF Document 19 Filed 11/13/18 Page 2 of 4
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`WHEREAS VoIP-Pal filed a separate lawsuit against Twitter, Inc. in this District asserting
`
`patents that are related to those asserted in this litigation, Voip-Pal.com, Inc. v. Twitter, Inc., No. 2:16-
`
`cv-02338-RFB-CWH (D. Nev.), that was transferred to the Northern District of California on July 23,
`
`4
`
`2018;
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`WHEREAS VoIP-Pal has also filed separate lawsuits against Apple and AT&T Corp. in this
`
`District asserting patents that are the same as or related to those asserted in this litigation, VoIP-
`
`Pal.com, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., Case No. 2:18-cv-00953-RFB-GWF (D. Nev.), VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v.
`
`Apple, Inc., Case No. 2:16-cv-00260-RFB-VCF (D. Nev.), VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. AT&T, Inc., No.
`
`2:18-cv-01129-RCJ-VCF (D. Nev.), that were transferred by stipulation to the Northern District of
`
`California on October 5, 2018, October 5, 2018, and October 4, 2018, respectively;
`
`WHEREAS VoIP-Pal consents to the transfer of this case to the Northern District of California;
`
`WHEREAS VoIP-Pal has conferred with Defendants, and Defendants have agreed that this
`
`13
`
`case should be transferred to the Northern District of California;
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that this case is transferred to the United States District Court
`
`for the Northern District of California. The Clerk of Court shall close this case in this District.
`
`This Stipulation is filed in good faith and is not intended to cause unnecessary delay. The
`
`convenience of the parties and witnesses favors transfer to the Northern District of California. And
`
`because the Twitter, Verizon, Apple, and AT&T cases identified above have been transferred to
`
`California, it would be efficient for the parties and the Court to also transfer this case. There is thus
`
`20
`
`good cause to transfer the case to the Northern District of California.
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`STIPULATION AND ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE
`
`2
`
`Case No. 2:18-cv-01076-MMD-VCF
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 25-7 Filed 02/11/22 Page 4 of 5
`Case 2:18-cv-01076-MMD-VCF Document 19 Filed 11/13/18 Page 3 of 4
`
`Dated: November 6, 2018
`
`MALEK MOSS PLLC
`
`By: /s/ Kevin N. Malek
`Kevin N. Malek (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`340 Madison Avenue, FL 19
`New York, New York 10173
`(212) 812-1491
`kevin.malek@malekmoss.com
`
`ALVERSON, TAYLOR,
`MORTENSEN & SANDERS
`Kurt R. Bonds
`Nevada Bar No. 6228
`Adam R. Knecht
`Nevada Bar No. 13166
`7401 W. Charleston Boulevard
`Las Vegas, NV 89117
`(702) 384-7000
`efile@alversontaylor.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED:
`
`____________________________________
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`November 13, 2018
`DATED: _________
`
`STIPULATION AND ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE
`
`3
`
`Case No. 2:18-cv-01076-MMD-VCF
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 25-7 Filed 02/11/22 Page 5 of 5
`
`Case 2:18-cv-01076-MMD-VCF Document 18 Filed 11/06/18 Page 4 of 4Case 2:18-cv-01076-MMD-VCF Document 19 Filed 11/13/18 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
` I
`
` hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Stipulation and Order Tranferring Case is being served
`on counsel for Defendants on November 6, 2018 by email as follows:
`
`McCullough, Christina J. (Perkins Coie) CMcCullough@perkinscoie.com
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Kevin N. Malek
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATION AND ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE
`
`4
`
`Case No. 2:18-cv-01076-MMD-VCF
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket