`Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 25-2 Filed 02/11/22 Page 1 of 4
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 25-2 Filed 02/11/22 Page 2 of 4
`Case 2:16-cv-00271-RCJ-VCF Document 89 Filed 10/01/18 Page 1 of 3
`
`Kelly H. Dove, Esq. (Nevada Bar No. 10569)
`SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
`3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
`Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
`Telephone: 702.784.5200
`Facsimile: 702.784.5252
`kdove@swlaw.com
`
`Frank C. Cimino, Jr. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`Megan S. Woodworth (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`VENABLE LLP
`600 Massachusetts Ave., NW
`Washington, D.C. 20001
`Telephone: 202.344.4569
`Facsimile: 202.344.8300
`mswoodworth@venable.com
`fccimino@venable.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Cellco Partnership
`d/b/a Verizon Wireless
`
`Kevin N. Malek (pro hac vice)
`MALEK MOSS PLLC
`340 Madison Avenue, FL 19
`New York, New York 10173
`(212) 812-1491
`kevin.malek@malekmoss.com
`
`Kurt R. Bonds
`Nevada Bar No. 6228
`Adam R. Knecht
`Nevada Bar No. 13166
`ALVERSON, TAYLOR,
`MORTENSEN & SANDERS
`7401 W. Charleston Boulevard
`Las Vegas, NV 89117
`(702) 384-7000
`efile@alversontaylor.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff VoIP-Pal.com, Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF NEVADA
`
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,
`
`Case No. 2:16-cv-00271-RCJ-VCF
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`STIPULATION AND ORDER
`TRANSFERRING THE CASE TO THE
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
`CALIFORNIA
`
`CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a Verizon
`Wireless,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Plaintiff VoIP-Pal.com (“Plaintiff” or “VoIP-Pal”) and Defendant Cellco Partnership d/b/a
`
`Verizon Wireless (“Verizon”) agree and stipulate as follows:
`
`WHEREAS Verizon filed on August 17, 2018, a Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern
`
`District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) [Dkt. No. 72]. The Motion to Transfer is
`
`fully briefed as of September 11, 2018. VoIP-Pal no longer opposes Verizon’s Motion to Transfer;
`
`WHEREAS VoIP-Pal filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Inc. in this District asserting the same
`
`patents as are asserted in this litigation. Voip-Pal.com, Inc. v. Twitter, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-02338-
`
`RFB-CWH (D. Nev.). The Voip-Pal v. Twitter case was transferred to the Northern District of
`
`California on July 23, 2018;
`
`WHEREAS VoIP-Pal has also filed lawsuits against AT&T Corp., Apple Inc., and
`
`STIPULATION AND ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE
`
`CASE NO. 2:16-CV-00271-RCJ-VCF
`
`415-653-3750
`
`SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
`
`101 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 3800
`
`VENABLE LLP
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 25-2 Filed 02/11/22 Page 3 of 4
`Case 2:16-cv-00271-RCJ-VCF Document 89 Filed 10/01/18 Page 2 of 3
`
`Amazon.com, Inc. in this District. VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. AT&T, Inc., No. 2:18-cv-01129-RCJ (D.
`
`Nev.); VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., Case No. 2:16-cv-00260-RFB-VCF (D. Nev.); Voip-
`
`Pal.com, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al., No. 2:18-cv-01076-MMD-VCF (D. Nev.). The cases
`
`involve similar allegations as this case. VoIP-Pal consents to transfer of the AT&T Corp., Apple
`
`Inc., and Amazon.com, Inc. cases to the Northern District of California.
`
`IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that this case is transferred to the United States District
`
`Court for the Northern District of California. The Clerk of Court shall close this case in this
`
`District.
`
`This Stipulation is filed in good faith and is not intended to cause unnecessary delay. The
`
`convenience of the parties and witnesses favors transfer to the Northern District of California. And
`
`because the Twitter, Inc. case was transferred to California, and VoIP-Pal consents to transfer of
`
`the AT&T Corp., Apple Inc., and Amazon.com, Inc. cases, it would be efficient for the parties and
`
`the Court to also transfer this case. There is thus good cause to transfer the case to the Northern
`
`District of California.
`
`2
`STIPULATION AND ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE
`
`CASE NO. 2:16-CV-00271-RCJ-VCF
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`1 2 3
`
`415-653-3750
`
`SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
`
`101 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 3800
`
`VENABLE LLP
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-09773-JD Document 25-2 Filed 02/11/22 Page 4 of 4
`Case 2:16-cv-00271-RCJ-VCF Document 89 Filed 10/01/18 Page 3 of 3
`
`Dated: September 28, 2018
`
`Dated: September 28, 2018
`
`MALEK MOSS PLLC
`
`SNELL & WILMER
`
`/s/ Megan S. Woodworth
`Kelly H. Dove
`Nevada Bar No. 10569
`3883 Howard Hughes Pkwy # 1
`Las Vegas, NV 89169
`(702) 784-5200
`kdove@swlaw.com
`
`Frank C. Cimino, Jr. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`Megan S. Woodworth (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`VENABLE LLP
`600 Massachusetts Ave., NW
`Washington, D.C. 20001
`Telephone: 202.344.4569
`Facsimile: 202.344.8300
`mswoodworth@venable.com
`fccimino@venable.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Cellco Partnership
`d/b/a Verizon Wireless
`
`/s/ Kevin N. Malek
`Kevin N. Malek (Pro Hac Vice)
`340 Madison Avenue, FL 19
`New York, New York 10173
`(212) 812-1491
`kevin.malek@malekmoss.com
`
`ALVERSON, TAYLOR,
`MORTENSEN & SANDERS
`Kurt R. Bonds
`Nevada Bar No. 6228
`Adam R. Knecht
`Nevada Bar No. 13166
`7401 W. Charleston Boulevard
`Las Vegas, NV 89117
`(702) 384-7000
`efile@alversontaylor.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED:
`
`____________________________________
`UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
`
`DATED: _________
`
`3
`STIPULATION AND ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE
`
`CASE NO. 2:16-CV-00271-RCJ-VCF
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`1 2 3
`
`415-653-3750
`
`SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
`
`101 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 3800
`
`VENABLE LLP
`
`DATED: This 1st day of October, 2018.
`
`