throbber
Case 5:21-cv-09773-EJD Document 20-1 Filed 01/07/22 Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-2769-LHK
`
`DECLARATION OF LEWIS E.
`HUDNELL, III IN SUPPORT OF
`OPPOSITION TO SUA SPONTE
`JUDICIAL REFERRAL TO CONSIDER
`WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE
`RELATED
`(Civil L.R. 3-12 and 7-11)
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-9773-EJD
`
`TWITTER, INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`v.
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`TWITTER, INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`v.
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,
`Defendant.
`

`
`I, Lewis E. Hudnell, III, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am the founding principal of Hudnell Law Group P.C., counsel for VoIP-Pal, and I
`
`am admitted to the Bar of this Court. I have personal knowledge of the facts in this declaration, and
`
`if called as a witness, I could and would testify competently regarding those facts.
`
`2.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 1 to my declaration is a true and correct copy of Order Denying
`
`Motion to Relate in Case No. 5:20-cv-2460-LHK dated August 25, 2021.
`
`3.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 2 to my declaration is a true and correct copy of Order Denying
`
`Motion to Relate in Case No. 5:20-cv-2995-LHK dated August 25, 2021.
`
`1
`DECLARATION OF LEWIS E. HUDNELL, III IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO SUA SPONTE JUDICIAL
`REFERRAL TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED
`Case No. 5:21-cv-2769-LHK; Case No. 5:21-cv-9773-EJD
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-09773-EJD Document 20-1 Filed 01/07/22 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`4.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 3 to my declaration is a true and correct copy of Order
`
`Determining That Cases Are Not Related Case No. 5:20-cv-3092-LHK dated August 26, 2021.
`
`5.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 4 to my declaration is a true and correct copy of Order Granting
`
`Motion to Relate in Case No. 3:21-cv-5078-JD dated September 14, 2021.
`
`6.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 5 to my declaration is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No.
`
`8,630,234.
`
`7.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 6 to my declaration is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No.
`
`10,880,721.
`
`8.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 7 to my declaration is a true and correct copy of a comparison
`
`chart of claims of the ’234 and ’721 patents versus claims of other VoIP-Pal patents from a different
`
`patent family.
`
`9.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 8 to my declaration is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No.
`
`9,935,872.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California and United States
`
`of America that the foregoing statements are true and correct.
`
`Dated this 7th day of January, 2022.
`
`s/Lewis E. Hudnell, III___
`Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`
`2
`DECLARATION OF LEWIS E. HUDNELL, III IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO SUA SPONTE JUDICIAL
`REFERRAL TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED
`Case No. 5:21-cv-2769-LHK; Case No. 5:21-cv-9773-EJD
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket