throbber
Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 165 Filed 08/10/22 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`YAR R. CHAIKOVSKY (SB# 175421)
`yarchaikovsky@paulhastings.com
`PHILIP OU (SB# 259896)
`philipou@paulhastings.com
`JOSEPH J. RUMPLER, II (SB# 296941)
`josephrumpler@paulhastings.com
`DAVID OKANO (SB# 278485)
`davidokano@paulhastings.com
`BORIS LUBARSKY (SB# 324896)
`borislubarsky@paulhastings.com
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`1117 S. California Avenue
`Palo Alto, California 94304-1106
`Telephone: 1(650) 320-1800
`Facsimile: 1(650) 320-1900
`
`MATTHIAS KAMBER (SB#232147)
`matthiaskamber@paulhastings.com
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`101 California Street, 48th Floor
`San Francisco, California 94111
`Telephone: 1(415) 856-7000
`Facsimile: 1(415) 856-7100
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`DEMARAY LLC,
`Defendant.
`
`CASE NO. 5:20-cv-09341-EJD
`APPLIED MATERIALS INC.’S
`RENEWED ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLIED’S RENEWED ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 165 Filed 08/10/22 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`On March 23, 2022, Applied Materials Inc. (“Applied”) through counsel, and pursuant to
`
`Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5, moved for leave to file under seal portions of Applied’s Opposition to
`Demaray LLC’s (“Demaray”) Motion To Amend its Answer (the “Opposition”) and documents in
`support thereof as they contain highly confidential business information relating to Applied,
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.,
`and Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC (collectively “Samsung”), and Intel Corporation
`(“Intel”) product details and configurations. Dkt. 141. On August 5, 2022, this Court denied
`Applied’s motion to seal directing Applied to renew its motion so as to comply with Civil Local
`Rule 79-5(c)(3). Dkt. 164.
`Pursuant to Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5, Applied hereby renews its motion for leave to file
`under seal Applied’s Opposition to Demaray’s Motion To Amend its Answer. This request is
`narrowly tailored to protect highly confidential business information.
`Specifically, Applied seeks leave to file the following under seal:
` Exhibits D–G, L to the Declaration of Boris Lubarsky in Support of Applied’s
`Opposition to Demaray’s Motion to Amend its Complaint. (“Lubarsky Decl.”)
`include technical specifications, a PVD chamber manual, and Applied’s corporate
`representative’s testimony, and contain highly confidential Applied business
`information including details of proprietary reactor technology.
` Exhibits A–C, J, K to the Lubarsky Decl. are infringement contentions brought by
`Demaray in the customer suits in the Western District of Texas and contain highly
`confidential Intel, Samsung, and Applied business information including details of
`proprietary reactor technology. Demaray has also designated these infringement
`contentions as Highly Confidential under the respective protective orders in the
`customer suits in the Western District of Texas.
` Portions of Applied’s Opposition that cite or discuss the above information.
`Applied states:
`1. A protective order issued in this action on June 14, 2022. Dkt. 157.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`APPLIED’S RENEWED ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 165 Filed 08/10/22 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`2. The above exhibits contain highly confidential business information including
`details of proprietary reactor technology. Applied has invested significant financial
`and technical resources in developing its proprietary reactor technology and public
`dissemination of the information could cause Applied and its customers, competitive
`and financial harm by revealing proprietary and confidential information specific to
`Applied’s trade secrets and intellectual property.
`3. Demaray has also designated its infringement contentions as Confidential – Outside
`Counsels Eyes Only under the respective protective orders in the customer suits in
`the Western District of Texas.
`4. Applied is filing herewith the Declaration of Boris Lubarsky in Support of Applied’s
`Renewed Administrative Motion to File Under Seal and a Proposed Order.
`WHEREFORE, Applied respectfully requests that this Court grant it leave to file the above
`exhibits under seal as set forth herein.
`
`
`
`
`DATED: August 10, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`YAR R. CHAIKOVSKY
`PHILIP OU
`MATTHIAS KAMBER
`JOSEPH J. RUMPLER, II
`DAVID OKANO
`BORIS LUBARSKY
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`
`By: /s/ Yar R. Chaikovsky
`YAR R. CHAIKOVSKY
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`APPLIED MATERIALS
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`APPLIED’S RENEWED ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket