`
`
`
`
`
`YAR R. CHAIKOVSKY (SB# 175421)
`yarchaikovsky@paulhastings.com
`PHILIP OU (SB# 259896)
`philipou@paulhastings.com
`JOSEPH J. RUMPLER, II (SB# 296941)
`josephrumpler@paulhastings.com
`DAVID OKANO (SB#278485)
`davidokano@paulhastings.com
`ANDY LEGOLVAN (SB# 292520)
`andylegolvan@paulhastings.com
`BORIS LUBARSKY (SB# 324896)
`borislubarsky@paulhastings.com
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`1117 S. California Avenue
`Palo Alto, California 94304-1106
`Telephone: 1(650) 320-1800
`Facsimile: 1(650) 320-1900
`
`MATTHIAS KAMBER (SB#232147)
`matthiaskamber@paulhastings.com
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`101 California Street, 48th Floor
`San Francisco, California 94111
`Telephone: 1(415) 856-7000
`Facsimile: 1(415)856-7100
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`DEMARAY LLC,
`Defendant.
`
`CASE NO. 5:20-cv-09341-EJD
`DECLARATION OF PHILIP OU IN
`SUPPORT OF APPLIED MATERIALS,
`INC.’S OPPOSITION TO DEMARAY
`LLC’S MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME
`TO RESPOND
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF PHILIP OU
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 143-1 Filed 03/28/22 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`I, Philip Ou, hereby declare as follows:
`1.
`I am a partner with the law firm Paul Hastings LLP, counsel for the Plaintiff Applied
`Materials, Inc. (“Applied”) in the above captioned matter. I am counsel for Applied’s customers,
`Intel and Samsung, in Demaray’s lawsuits against them in the Western District of Texas. I have
`personal knowledge of the facts contained in the declaration and, if called upon to do so, I could
`and would testify competently to the matters set forth herein. I submit this declaration in support
`of Applied’s Opposition To Demaray LLC’s Motion To Enlarge Time To Respond.
`2.
`In Demaray’s lawsuits against Intel and Samsung, Demaray has alleged that the
`claim required “narrow band rejection filter” can “be located in match circuits, combiners boxes,
`the power source hosing, cables or cable connects, among other locations that are coupled between
`the pulsed DC power supply and the target area” and identified components in certain PVD
`chambers not even in this location (e.g., an RF match connected to the substrate). An example of
`these contentions can be found at Dkt. No. 37-12, Sealed Exhibit C at pgs. 29-30 (Demaray’s
`February 5, 2021 supplemental infringement contentions to Intel for the ’276 patent.) Demaray has
`maintained substantially similar allegations in multiple supplementations to its infringement
`contentions in Texas, including as recently as this month.
`3.
`On January 7, 2022, Applied produced a bill of materials for its PVD chamber types
`having a DC power supply connected to the target and RF bias supply connected to the substrate,
`which Demaray agreed to as the configurations it sought in discovery for Applied’s declaratory
`judgment claims of non-infringement. Applied did not limit this production to PVD chambers sold
`to Intel and Samsung or only ones accused in the Texas customer suits. On March 7, 2022, counsel
`for Demaray sent correspondence to me asking to confirm that the document produced was a
`complete list of those PVD chambers. I responded with confirmation.
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`
`DATED: March 28, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Philip Ou
`Philip Ou
`
`p
`
`- 1 -
`
`DECLARATION OF PHILIP OU
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`