throbber
Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 138-19 Filed 03/18/22 Page 1 of 16
`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 138-19 Filed 03/18/22 Page 1 of 16
`
`EXHIBIT 16
`EXHIBIT 16
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 138-19 Filed 03/18/22 Page 2 of 16
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`Morgan Chu (70446)
`MChu@irell.com
`Benjamin W. Hattenbach (186455)
`BHattenbach@irell.com
`C. Maclain Wells (221609)
`MWells@irell.com
`1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
`Los Angeles, California 90067-4276
`Telephone: (310) 277-1010
`Facsimile:
`(310) 203-7199
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`DEMARAY LLC
`
`
`
`APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`Case No. 5:20-cv-09341-EJD
`
`DEMARAY LLC’S PATENT LOCAL
`RULES 4-2 DISCLOSURES—
`PRELIMINARY CLAIM
`CONSTRUCTIONS
`
`
`
`
`
`DEMARAY LLC,
`
`
`vs.
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11052582
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DEMARAY’S P.L.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURES
`PRELIMINARY CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`(Case No. 5:20-cv-09341-EJD)
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 138-19 Filed 03/18/22 Page 3 of 16
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s Patent Local Rule 4-2, Defendant Demaray LLC (“Demaray”)
`hereby provides its preliminary constructions for the identified claim terms of U.S. Patent Nos.
`7,544,276 (“the ’276 patent”) and 7,381,657 (“the ’657 patent”) (collectively, the “Demaray
`Patents”) and disclosure of intrinsic and extrinsic evidence that Demaray may rely on for its claim
`construction positions. These disclosures are solely for purposes of the parties’ meet-and-confer
`process. Demaray reserves its right to add, remove, or modify any of its proposed constructions
`and claim construction positions based on any disclosures made by the above-captioned Plaintiff
`or as a result of the parties’ further discussions.
`
`Demaray reserves its right to rely on any and all intrinsic evidence in support of its claim
`construction positions. Demaray also reserves its right to add or remove citations to any extrinsic
`evidence based on any disclosures made by Plaintiff Applied Materials, Inc. or as a result of the
`parties’ further discussions. Demaray further reserves its right to rely on any extrinsic evidence
`cited by Plaintiff or as needed to rebut Plaintiff’s proposed constructions or evidence.
`I.
`DISCLOSURE OF INTRINSIC AND EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE
`
`Demaray may rely on the expert testimony of Dr. Alexander D. Glew. Dr. Glew is
`expected to testify regarding why Demaray’s proposed constructions are consistent with how one
`of ordinary skill in the art would understand the disputed terms in the context of the patents in
`which they appear and why Plaintiff’s constructions are not consistent with how one of ordinary
`skill in the art would understand the term in the context of the Demaray Patents. In particular, Dr.
`Glew may offer testimony regarding the underlying technology of the Demaray Patents, including,
`but not limited to, the process of depositing thin films using physical vapor deposition, potential
`problems associated with depositing thin films, how the Demaray Patents address such problems,
`how a person of ordinary skill in the art would understand the claim terms in that context, and how
`a person of ordinary skill in the art would not understand Defendants’ proposed constructions to
`be correct in that context. Demaray may also rely on John E. Mahan, Physical Vapor Deposition
`of Thin Films (2000), for background information. In addition, Demaray may also rely on the
`following additional intrinsic and extrinsic evidence:
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`11052582
`
`
`
`
`DEMARAY’S P.L.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURES
`PRELIMINARY CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`(Case No. 5:20-cv-09341-EJD)
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 138-19 Filed 03/18/22 Page 4 of 16
`
`Proposed Terms
`
`“pulsed DC power supply” /
`“pulsed DC power”
`
`Proposed
`Constructions
`pulsed DC
`power supply:
`
`supply for
`providing pulsed
`power
`
`pulsed DC
`power:
`
`direct current
`power that
`oscillates
`between positive
`and negative
`voltages
`
`
`
`Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evidence
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`
`’276 Patent at Abstract, 2:45–53, 5:9–18,
`5:19–20, 5:30–39, 5:40–47, 5:59–5:67, 12:26–
`31, 10:41–45, 12:39–43, 13:19–23, 13:43–
`13:57, 21:45–51, 22:31–33
`
`’657 Patent at Abstract, 2:45–54, 5:15–24,
`5:25–26, 5:36–45, 5:46–53, 5:66–6:3, 10:54–
`59, 12:46–50, 12:58–62, 13:39–42, 13:64–
`14:12, 22:7–11, 22:59–67
`
`U.S. Patent App. No. 10/101,863 prosecution
`history February 6, 2007 Applicant
`Amendment/Request for Reconsideration,
`Claims, Applicant Arguments/Remarks Made
`in an Amendment
`
`U.S. Patent App. No. 10/101,863 prosecution
`history June 12, 2006 Applicant
`Amendment/Request for Reconsideration,
`Claims, Claims, Applicant
`Arguments/Remarks Made in an Amendment
`
`U.S. Patent App. No. 10/101,863 prosecution
`history December 18, 2007 Applicant
`Amendment/Request for Reconsideration,
`Claims, Applicant Arguments/Remarks Made
`in an Amendment
`
`IPR2021-00103, Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Response
`
`IPR2021-00103, Patent Owner’s Response
`
`IPR2021-00103, Ex. 2002 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00103, Ex. 2009 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00104, Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Response
`
`IPR2021-00104, Patent Owner’s Response
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`11052582
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`DEMARAY’S P.L.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURES
`PRELIMINARY CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`(Case No. 5:20-cv-09341-EJD)
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 138-19 Filed 03/18/22 Page 5 of 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`11052582
`
`
`IPR2021-00104, Ex. 2002 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00104, Ex. 2009 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00105, Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Response
`
`IPR2021-00105, Ex. 2002 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00106, Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Response
`
`IPR2021-00106, Ex. 2002 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`Expert testimony of Dr. Glew regarding how a
`person of ordinary skill in the art would
`understand the term “pulsed DC power
`[supply],” including technical background
`concerning the claim term and what one of
`ordinary skill in the art would understand the
`claim term to mean in view of the patent
`disclosure, the prosecution history, and/or the
`extrinsic evidence.
`
`Declaration of Alexander D. Glew from W.D.
`Tex cases (Case Nos. 6:20-cv-634 and 6:20-
`cv-636)
`
`Deposition Testimony of Alexander D. Glew
`from W.D. Tex cases (Case Nos. 6:20-cv-634
`and 6:20-cv-636)
`
`Claim Construction Orders, August 17, 2021,
`from W.D. Tex cases (Case Nos. 6:20-cv-634
`and 6:20-cv-636)
`
`pulse (Modern Dictionary of Electronics (7th
`ed.): “1. A variation of a quantity whose value
`is normally constant; this variation is
`characterized by a rise and a decay and has
`finite amplitude and duration. 2. An abrupt
`change in voltage, either positive or negative,
`that conveys information to a circuit. See also
`impulse. 3. A brief excursion of a quantity
`DEMARAY’S P.L.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURES
`PRELIMINARY CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`(Case No. 5:20-cv-09341-EJD)
`
`- 3 -
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 138-19 Filed 03/18/22 Page 6 of 16
`
`“narrow band rejection
`filter”
`
`Plain and
`ordinary
`meaning
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`from normal. 4. Signal characterized by the
`rise and decay in time of a quantity whose
`value is normally constant. 7. A sudden and
`abrupt jump in an electrical quantity from its
`usual level to a higher or lower value, quickly
`followed by an equally abrupt return.”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`
`’276 Patent at Abstract, 2:48–51, 5:19–20,
`5:49–58, 22:31–33
`
`’657 Patent at Abstract, 2:49–52, 5:25–26,
`5:56–65, 22:59–67
`
`U.S. Patent App. No. 10/101,863 prosecution
`history June 12, 2006 Applicant
`Amendment/Request for Reconsideration,
`Claims, Applicant Arguments/Remarks Made
`in an Amendment, Declaration of Dr. R.E.
`Demaray
`
`U.S. Patent App. No. 10/101,863 prosecution
`history December 5, 2005 Applicant
`Amendment/Request for Reconsideration,
`Claims, Applicant Arguments/Remarks Made
`in an Amendment
`
`’657 prosecution history, December 18, 2007
`Applicant Amendment/Request for
`Reconsideration, Claims, Applicant
`Arguments/Remarks Made in an Amendment
`
`’276 prosecution history, December 22, 2008
`Notice of Allowability
`
`IPR2021-00103, Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Response
`
`IPR2021-00103, Patent Owner’s Response
`
`IPR2021-00103, Ex. 2002 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00103, Ex. 2009 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00104, Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Response
`
`11052582
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`DEMARAY’S P.L.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURES
`PRELIMINARY CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`(Case No. 5:20-cv-09341-EJD)
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 138-19 Filed 03/18/22 Page 7 of 16
`
`IPR2021-00104, Patent Owner’s Response
`
`IPR2021-00104, Ex. 2002 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00104, Ex. 2009 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00105, Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Response
`
`IPR2021-00105, Ex. 2002 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00106, Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Response
`
`IPR2021-00106, Ex. 2002 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`Expert testimony of Dr. Glew regarding how a
`person of ordinary skill in the art would
`understand the term “narrow band rejection
`filter,” including technical background
`concerning the claim term and what one of
`ordinary skill in the art would understand the
`claim term to mean in view of the patent
`disclosure, the prosecution history, and/or the
`extrinsic evidence.
`
`Declaration of Alexander D. Glew from W.D.
`Tex cases (Case Nos. 6:20-cv-634 and 6:20-
`cv-636)
`
`Deposition Testimony of Alexander D. Glew
`from W.D. Tex cases (Case Nos. 6:20-cv-634
`and 6:20-cv-636)
`
`Claim Construction Orders, August 17, 2021,
`from W.D. Tex cases (Case Nos. 6:20-cv-634
`and 6:20-cv-636)
`
`narrowband (The New Oxford American
`Dictionary, 2001): “of or involving signals
`over a narrow range of frequencies”
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`11052582
`
`
`- 5 -
`
`DEMARAY’S P.L.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURES
`PRELIMINARY CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`(Case No. 5:20-cv-09341-EJD)
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 138-19 Filed 03/18/22 Page 8 of 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`“A method of depositing an
`insulating film on a
`substrate, comprising:”
`
`Preamble is not
`limiting, except
`for “insulating
`film on a
`substrate”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`
`’657 at 2:39–41, 3:34–36, 7:47–52, 7:62–65,
`10:34–39, 10:41-44, 18:10–12, 18:55–57,
`22:59-67, 23:26–27, Claim 1, Claim 2
`
`’657 prosecution history, December 18, 2007
`Applicant Amendment/Request for
`Reconsideration, Claims, Applicant
`Arguments/Remarks Made in an Amendment
`
`IPR2021-00103, Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Response
`
`IPR2021-00103, Patent Owner’s Response
`
`IPR2021-00103, Ex. 2002 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00103, Ex. 2009 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00104, Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Response
`
`IPR2021-00104, Patent Owner’s Response
`
`IPR2021-00104, Ex. 2002 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00104, Ex. 2009 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00105, Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Response
`
`IPR2021-00105, Ex. 2002 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00106, Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Response
`
`IPR2021-00106, Ex. 2002 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`Expert testimony of Dr. Glew regarding how a
`person of ordinary skill in the art would
`understand the term “substrate,” including
`
`- 6 -
`
`DEMARAY’S P.L.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURES
`PRELIMINARY CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`(Case No. 5:20-cv-09341-EJD)
`
`11052582
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 138-19 Filed 03/18/22 Page 9 of 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`“insulating film”
`
`Plain and
`ordinary
`meaning
`
`
`
`technical background concerning the claim
`term and what one of ordinary skill in the art
`would understand the claim term to mean in
`view of the patent disclosure, the prosecution
`history, and/or the extrinsic evidence.
`
`Declaration of Alexander D. Glew from W.D.
`Tex cases (Case Nos. 6:20-cv-634 and 6:20-
`cv-636)
`
`Deposition Testimony of Alexander D. Glew
`from W.D. Tex cases (Case Nos. 6:20-cv-634
`and 6:20-cv-636)
`
`Claim Construction Orders, August 17, 2021,
`from W.D. Tex cases (Case Nos. 6:20-cv-634
`and 6:20-cv-636)
`
`substrate (The New Oxford American
`Dictionary, 2001): “a substance or layer that
`underlies something, or on which some
`process occurs, in particular: … a material
`that provides the surface on which something
`is deposited or inscribed, for example the
`silicon wafer used to manufacture integrated
`circuits”
`
`
`
`’657 Patent at Title, Abstract, 7:47–52, 7:62–
`65, 10:41-44, 18:10–12, 18:55–57, 22:59–67,
`23:26–27, Claim 2, Claim 4
`
`’657 prosecution history, July 25, 2005
`Applicant Amendment/Request for
`Reconsideration, Claims, Applicant
`Arguments/Remarks Made in an Amendment
`
`’657 prosecution history, December 21, 2005
`Applicant Amendment/Request for
`Reconsideration, Claims, Applicant
`Arguments/Remarks Made in an Amendment
`
`’657 prosecution history, December 18, 2007
`Applicant Amendment/Request for
`Reconsideration, Claims, Applicant
`Arguments/Remarks Made in an Amendment
`
`11052582
`
`
`- 7 -
`
`DEMARAY’S P.L.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURES
`PRELIMINARY CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`(Case No. 5:20-cv-09341-EJD)
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 138-19 Filed 03/18/22 Page 10 of 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`11052582
`
`
`IPR2021-00103, Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Response
`
`IPR2021-00103, Patent Owner’s Response
`
`IPR2021-00103, Ex. 2002 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00103, Ex. 2009 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00104, Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Response
`
`IPR2021-00104, Patent Owner’s Response
`
`IPR2021-00104, Ex. 2002 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00104, Ex. 2009 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00105, Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Response
`
`IPR2021-00105, Ex. 2002 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00106, Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Response
`
`IPR2021-00106, Ex. 2002 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`Declaration of Alexander D. Glew from W.D.
`Tex cases (Case Nos. 6:20-cv-634 and 6:20-
`cv-636)
`
`Deposition Testimony of Alexander D. Glew
`from W.D. Tex cases (Case Nos. 6:20-cv-634
`and 6:20-cv-636)
`
`Claim Construction Orders, August 17, 2021,
`from W.D. Tex cases (Case Nos. 6:20-cv-634
`and 6:20-cv-636)
`
`
`
`- 8 -
`
`DEMARAY’S P.L.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURES
`PRELIMINARY CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`(Case No. 5:20-cv-09341-EJD)
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 138-19 Filed 03/18/22 Page 11 of 16
`
`Plain and
`ordinary
`meaning
`
`“wherein an oxide material
`is deposited on the
`substrate, and the insulating
`film is formed by reactive
`sputtering in a mode
`between a metallic mode
`and a poison mode”
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`’657 Patent at Title, Abstract, 2:61–62, 7:47–
`50, 7:62–8:1, 9:8–10, 10:41-44, 18:10–12,
`18:55–57, 22:59–67, 23:26-27, Claim 2,
`Claim 4
`
`’657 prosecution history, July 25, 2005
`Applicant Amendment/Request for
`Reconsideration, Claims, Applicant
`Arguments/Remarks Made in an Amendment
`
`’657 prosecution history, December 21, 2005
`Applicant Amendment/Request for
`Reconsideration, Claims, Applicant
`Arguments/Remarks Made in an Amendment
`
`’657 prosecution history, December 18, 2007
`Applicant Amendment/Request for
`Reconsideration, Claims, Applicant
`Arguments/Remarks Made in an Amendment
`
`IPR2021-00103, Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Response
`
`IPR2021-00103, Patent Owner’s Response
`
`IPR2021-00103, Ex. 2002 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00103, Ex. 2009 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00104, Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Response
`
`IPR2021-00104, Patent Owner’s Response
`
`IPR2021-00104, Ex. 2002 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00104, Ex. 2009 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00105, Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Response
`
`IPR2021-00105, Ex. 2002 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`11052582
`
`
`- 9 -
`
`DEMARAY’S P.L.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURES
`PRELIMINARY CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`(Case No. 5:20-cv-09341-EJD)
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 138-19 Filed 03/18/22 Page 12 of 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`“A method of depositing a
`film on an insulating
`substrate, comprising:”
`
`
`
`
`
`11052582
`
`
`IPR2021-00106, Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Response
`
`IPR2021-00106, Ex. 2002 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`Expert testimony of Dr. Glew regarding how a
`person of ordinary skill in the art would
`understand the term “substrate,” including
`technical background concerning the claim
`term and what one of ordinary skill in the art
`would understand the claim term to mean in
`view of the patent disclosure, the prosecution
`history, and/or the extrinsic evidence.
`
`Declaration of Alexander D. Glew from W.D.
`Tex cases (Case Nos. 6:20-cv-634 and 6:20-
`cv-636)
`
`Deposition Testimony of Alexander D. Glew
`from W.D. Tex cases (Case Nos. 6:20-cv-634
`and 6:20-cv-636)
`
`Claim Construction Orders, August 17, 2021,
`from W.D. Tex cases (Case Nos. 6:20-cv-634
`and 6:20-cv-636)
`
`substrate (The New Oxford American
`Dictionary, 2001): “a substance or layer that
`underlies something, or on which some
`process occurs, in particular: … a material
`that provides the surface on which something
`is deposited or inscribed, for example the
`silicon wafer used to manufacture integrated
`circuits”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`
`’657 Patent at abstract, 2:39–41, 2:49–54,
`2:61–62, 3:34–36, 7:62–8:1, 10:34–39, 18:10–
`12, 22:59–67, 23:26–27, Claim 1, Claim 2
`
`’657 prosecution history, December 18, 2007
`Applicant Amendment/Request for
`Reconsideration, Claims, Applicant
`Arguments/Remarks Made in an Amendment
`
`Preamble is non-
`limiting, except
`for insulating
`substrate
`
`- 10 -
`
`DEMARAY’S P.L.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURES
`PRELIMINARY CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`(Case No. 5:20-cv-09341-EJD)
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 138-19 Filed 03/18/22 Page 13 of 16
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`Expert testimony of Dr. Glew regarding how a
`person of ordinary skill in the art would
`understand the term “substrate,” including
`technical background concerning the claim
`term and what one of ordinary skill in the art
`would understand the claim term to mean in
`view of the patent disclosure, the prosecution
`history, and/or the extrinsic evidence.
`
`Declaration of Alexander D. Glew from W.D.
`Tex cases (Case Nos. 6:20-cv-634 and 6:20-
`cv-636)
`
`Deposition Testimony of Alexander D. Glew
`from W.D. Tex cases (Case Nos. 6:20-cv-634
`and 6:20-cv-636)
`
`Claim Construction Orders, August 17, 2021,
`from W.D. Tex cases (Case Nos. 6:20-cv-634
`and 6:20-cv-636)
`
`substrate (The New Oxford American
`Dictionary, 2001): “a substance or layer that
`underlies something, or on which some
`process occurs, in particular: … a material
`that provides the surface on which something
`is deposited or inscribed, for example the
`silicon wafer used to manufacture integrated
`circuits”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`
`’657 Patent at abstract, 2:39–41, 2:61–62,
`3:34–36, 7:62–8:1, 10:34–39, 18:1–12, 22:59–
`67, Claim 1, Claim 2
`
`’657 prosecution history, December 18, 2007
`Applicant Amendment/Request for
`Reconsideration, Claims, Applicant
`Arguments/Remarks Made in an Amendment
`
`IPR2021-00103, Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Response
`
`IPR2021-00103, Patent Owner’s Response
`
`“insulating substrate”
`
`Plain and
`ordinary
`meaning
`
`The term
`substrate
`includes, but is
`not limited to a
`wafer coated
`with an insulator
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`11052582
`
`
`- 11 -
`
`DEMARAY’S P.L.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURES
`PRELIMINARY CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`(Case No. 5:20-cv-09341-EJD)
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 138-19 Filed 03/18/22 Page 14 of 16
`
`IPR2021-00103, Ex. 2002 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00103, Ex. 2009 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00104, Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Response
`
`IPR2021-00104, Patent Owner’s Response
`
`IPR2021-00104, Ex. 2002 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00104, Ex. 2009 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00105, Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Response
`
`IPR2021-00105, Ex. 2002 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`IPR2021-00106, Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Response
`
`IPR2021-00106, Ex. 2002 (Declaration of
`Alexander D. Glew)
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`Expert testimony of Dr. Glew regarding how a
`person of ordinary skill in the art would
`understand the term “substrate,” including
`technical background concerning the claim
`term and what one of ordinary skill in the art
`would understand the claim term to mean in
`view of the patent disclosure, the prosecution
`history, and/or the extrinsic evidence.
`
`Declaration of Alexander D. Glew from W.D.
`Tex cases (Case Nos. 6:20-cv-634 and 6:20-
`cv-636)
`
`Deposition Testimony of Alexander D. Glew
`from W.D. Tex cases (Case Nos. 6:20-cv-634
`and 6:20-cv-636)
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`11052582
`
`
`- 12 -
`
`DEMARAY’S P.L.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURES
`PRELIMINARY CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`(Case No. 5:20-cv-09341-EJD)
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 138-19 Filed 03/18/22 Page 15 of 16
`
`Claim Construction Orders, August 17, 2021,
`from W.D. Tex cases (Case Nos. 6:20-cv-634
`and 6:20-cv-636)
`
`substrate (The New Oxford American
`Dictionary, 2001): “a substance or layer that
`underlies something, or on which some
`process occurs, in particular: … a material
`that provides the surface on which something
`is deposited or inscribed, for example the
`silicon wafer used to manufacture integrated
`circuits”
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`C. Maclain Wells
`
`By: /s/ C. Maclain Wells
`C. Maclain Wells
`Attorneys for DEMARAY LLC
`
`
`
`Dated: January 7, 2022
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`11052582
`
`
`- 13 -
`
`DEMARAY’S P.L.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURES
`PRELIMINARY CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`(Case No. 5:20-cv-09341-EJD)
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 138-19 Filed 03/18/22 Page 16 of 16
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18
`and not a party to the within action. My business address is 1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900,
`Los Angeles, California 90067-4276.
`On January 7, 2022, I served the following documents described below:
`1. Demaray LLC’s Patent Local Rule 4-2 Disclosures—Preliminary Claim Constructions;
`on all counsel of record
`X
`(BY ELECTRONIC MAIL) I caused the foregoing documents to be served
`electronically by electronically mailing a true and correct copy through Irell &
`Manella LLP’s electronic mail system to the e-mail address(es) of all counsel of
`
`record and the transmission was reported as complete and no error was reported.
`Executed on January 7, 2022, at Los Angeles, California.
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
`foregoing is true and correct.
`
`
`Jeffrey Linxwiler
`(Type or print name)
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Jeffrey Linxwiler
`(Signature)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`11052582
`
`
`
`
`DEMARAY’S P.L.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURES
`PRELIMINARY CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`(Case No. 5:20-cv-09341-EJD)
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket