throbber
Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 138-14 Filed 03/18/22 Page 1 of 9
`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 138-14 Filed 03/18/22 Page 1 of 9
`
`EXHIBIT 11
`EXHIBIT 11
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 138-14 Filed 03/18/22 Page 2 of 9
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`DEMARAY LLC,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff
`
`v.
`
`INTEL CORPORATION,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`DEMARAY LLC,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`v.
`
`Case No. 6:20-cv-00634-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD (A
`KOREAN COMPANY), SAMSUNG
`ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,
`and SAMSUNG AUSTIN
`SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Case No. 6:20-cv-00636-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF DEMARAY LLC’S DISCLOSURE OF EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`10906703
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 138-14 Filed 03/18/22 Page 3 of 9
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s scheduling order, Plaintiff Demaray LLC (“Demaray”) hereby
`
`provides its disclosure of extrinsic evidence that Demaray may rely on for its claim construction
`
`positions for U.S. Patent Nos. 7,544,276 and 7,381,657 (the “Demaray Patents”). These
`
`disclosures are solely for purposes of the parties’ meet-and-confer process. Demaray reserves its
`
`right to add, remove, or modify any of its proposed constructions and claim construction positions
`
`based on any disclosures made by the above-captioned Defendants (collectively, “Defendants”) or
`
`as a result of the parties’ further discussions.
`
`Demaray reserves its right to rely on any and all intrinsic evidence in support of its claim
`
`construction positions. Demaray also reserves its right to add or remove citations to any extrinsic
`
`evidence based on any disclosures made by Defendants or as a result of the parties’ further
`
`discussions. Demaray further reserves its right to rely on any extrinsic evidence cited by
`
`Defendants or as needed to rebut Defendants’ proposed constructions or evidence.
`
`I.
`
`DISCLOSURE OF EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE
`
`Demaray may rely on the expert testimony of Dr. Alexander D. Glew. Dr. Glew is
`
`expected to testify regarding why Demaray’s proposed constructions are consistent with how one
`
`of ordinary skill in the art would understand the disputed terms in the context of the patents in
`
`which they appear and why Defendants’ constructions are not consistent with how one of
`
`ordinary skill in the art would understand the term in the context of the Demaray Patents. In
`
`particular, Dr. Glew may offer testimony regarding the underlying technology of the Demaray
`
`Patents, including, but not limited to, the process of depositing thin films using physical vapor
`
`deposition, potential problems associated with depositing thin films, how the Demaray Patents
`
`address such problems, how a person of ordinary skill in the art would understand the claim
`
`terms in that context, and how a person of ordinary skill in the art would not understand
`
`Defendants’ proposed constructions to be correct in that context. Demaray may also rely on John
`
`E. Mahan, Physical Vapor Deposition of Thin Films (2000), for background information. In
`
`addition, Demaray may also rely on the following additional extrinsic evidence:
`
`
`
`
`
`10906703
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 138-14 Filed 03/18/22 Page 4 of 9
`
`
`
`Proposed Terms
`
`Proposed Constructions
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`“substrate”
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`or
`
`“material that provides the
`surface on which something is
`deposited or inscribed, for
`example a silicon wafer used to
`manufacture integrated
`circuits”
`
`“pulsed DC power supply”
`
`“pulsed DC power”
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`or
`
`“supply for providing direct
`current power that oscillates
`between positive and negative
`voltages”
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`or
`
`
`10906703
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`Expert testimony of Dr.
`Glew regarding how a
`person of ordinary skill in
`the art would understand
`the term “substrate,”
`including technical
`background concerning
`the claim term and what
`one of ordinary skill in
`the art would understand
`the claim term to mean in
`view of the patent
`disclosure, the
`prosecution history,
`and/or the extrinsic
`evidence.
`
`substrate (The New
`Oxford American
`Dictionary, 2001): “a
`substance or layer that
`underlies something, or
`on which some process
`occurs, in particular: … a
`material that provides the
`surface on which
`something is deposited or
`inscribed, for example the
`silicon wafer used to
`manufacture integrated
`circuits”
`See Extrinsic Evidence
`for “pulsed DC power,”
`cited infra.
`
`
`Expert testimony of Dr.
`Glew regarding how a
`person of ordinary skill in
`the art would understand
`the term “pulsed DC
`power [supply],”
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 138-14 Filed 03/18/22 Page 5 of 9
`
`
`
`“direct current power that
`oscillates between positive and
`negative voltages”
`
`“narrow band-rejection filter”
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`or
`
`“filter that passes all of the
`frequencies of the power
`supply except within a narrow
`band”
`
`10906703
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`including technical
`background concerning
`the claim term and what
`one of ordinary skill in
`the art would understand
`the claim term to mean in
`view of the patent
`disclosure, the
`prosecution history,
`and/or the extrinsic
`evidence.
`pulse (Modern Dictionary
`of Electronics (7th ed.):
`“1. A variation of a
`quantity whose value is
`normally constant; this
`variation is characterized
`by a rise and a decay and
`has finite amplitude and
`duration. 2. An abrupt
`change in voltage, either
`positive or negative, that
`conveys information to a
`circuit. See also impulse.
`3. A brief excursion of a
`quantity from normal. 4.
`Signal characterized by
`the rise and decay in time
`of a quantity whose value
`is normally constant. 7. A
`sudden and abrupt jump
`in an electrical quantity
`from its usual level to a
`higher or lower value,
`quickly followed by an
`equally abrupt return. ”
`
`Expert testimony of Dr.
`Glew regarding how a
`person of ordinary skill in
`the art would understand
`the term “narrow band-
`rejection filter,” including
`technical background
`concerning the claim term
`and what one of ordinary
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 138-14 Filed 03/18/22 Page 6 of 9
`
`
`
`skill in the art would
`understand the claim term
`to mean in view of the
`patent disclosure, the
`prosecution history,
`and/or the extrinsic
`evidence.
`
`narrowband (The New
`Oxford American
`Dictionary, 2001): “of or
`involving signals over a
`narrow range of
`frequencies”
`Expert testimony of Dr.
`Glew regarding how a
`person of ordinary skill in
`the art would understand
`the term “corresponds
`to,” including technical
`background concerning
`the claim term and what
`one of ordinary skill in
`the art would understand
`the claim term to mean in
`view of the patent
`disclosure, the
`prosecution history,
`and/or the extrinsic
`evidence.
`correspond (The
`American Heritage
`Dictionary of the English
`Language, 4th ed.): “1.
`To be in agreement,
`harmony, or conformity.
`2. To be similar or
`equivalent in character,
`quantity, origin, structure,
`or function”
`
`correspond (The New
`Oxford American
`Dictionary, 2001): “have
`a close similarity; match
`or agree almost exactly”
`
`“corresponds to”
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`10906703
`
`
`- 5 -
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 138-14 Filed 03/18/22 Page 7 of 9
`
`
`
`correspond (Webster’s
`Third New International
`Dictionary): “1a: to be in
`conformity or agreement :
`… match or compare
`closely”
`Expert testimony of Dr.
`Glew regarding how a
`person of ordinary skill in
`the art would understand
`the term “rejects at,”
`including technical
`background concerning
`the claim term and what
`one of ordinary skill in
`the art would understand
`the claim term to mean in
`view of the patent
`disclosure, the
`prosecution history,
`and/or the extrinsic
`evidence.
`
`reject (Webster’s Third
`New International
`Dictionary): “one that is
`or has been rejected: as a
`: one rejected as not
`wanted, unsatisfactory, or
`not fulfilling standard
`requirements”
`
`reject (The New Oxford
`American Dictionary,
`2001): “a person or thing
`dismissed as failing to
`meet standards or satisfy
`tastes”
`
`Expert testimony of Dr.
`Glew regarding how a
`person of ordinary skill in
`the art would understand
`the term “operating at,”
`including technical
`background concerning
`the claim term and what
`
`“rejects at”
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`“operating at”
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`10906703
`
`
`- 6 -
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 138-14 Filed 03/18/22 Page 8 of 9
`
`
`
`one of ordinary skill in
`the art would understand
`the claim term to mean in
`view of the patent
`disclosure, the
`prosecution history,
`and/or the extrinsic
`evidence.
`operate (The American
`Heritage Dictionary of
`the English Language, 4th
`ed.): “1. To perform a
`function; work … 3a. To
`exert an influence: forces
`operating on the
`economy. B. To produce a
`desired or proper effect: a
`drug that operates
`quickly.”
`operate (The New Oxford
`American Dictionary,
`2001): “(of a machine,
`process, or system)
`function in a specific
`manner”
`Expert testimony of Dr.
`Glew regarding how a
`person of ordinary skill in
`the art would understand
`the term “reconditioning
`the target,” including
`technical background
`concerning the claim term
`and what one of ordinary
`skill in the art would
`understand the claim term
`to mean in view of the
`patent disclosure, the
`prosecution history,
`and/or the extrinsic
`evidence.
`
`reconditioning (McGraw-
`Hills Electronics
`Dictionary, 4th ed. & 6th
`
`“reconditioning the target”
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`or
`
`“cleaning and conditioning the
`target”
`
`10906703
`
`
`- 7 -
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 138-14 Filed 03/18/22 Page 9 of 9
`
`“metallic mode”
`
`“mode of operation in which
`the surface of the target is
`substantially metallic”
`
`“poison mode”
`
`“mode of operation in which
`the rate of the thin film
`formation on the surface of the
`target equals or exceeds the rate
`of sputter removal of the
`surface of the target”
`
`ed.): “Restoration of an
`object to a good
`condition”
`
`Expert testimony of Dr.
`Glew regarding how a
`person of ordinary skill in
`the art would understand
`the term “metallic mode,”
`including technical
`background concerning
`the claim term and what
`one of ordinary skill in
`the art would understand
`the claim term to mean in
`view of the patent
`disclosure, the
`prosecution history,
`and/or the extrinsic
`evidence.
`
`metallic (The New
`Oxford American
`Dictionary, 2001): “of,
`relating to, or resembling
`metal or metals”
`Expert testimony of Dr.
`Glew regarding how a
`person of ordinary skill in
`the art would understand
`the term “poison mode,”
`including technical
`background concerning
`the claim term and what
`one of ordinary skill in
`the art would understand
`the claim term to mean in
`view of the patent
`disclosure, the
`prosecution history,
`and/or the extrinsic
`evidence.
`
`
`
`
`
`10906703
`
`
`- 8 -
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket