`
`Exhibit 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 133-7 Filed 03/09/22 Page 2 of 5
`
`1
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`DEMARAY LLC,
`PLAINTIFF,
`
`
`)(
`CIVIL ACTION NO.
`)(
`6:20-CV-634-ADA
`)(
`WACO, TEXAS
`)(
`VS.
`)(
`AUGUST 17, 2021
`)(
`INTEL CORPORATION,
`10:01 A.M.
`)(
`DEFENDANT.
`___________________________________________________________
`DEMARAY LLC,
`)(
`
`PLAINTIFF,
`)(
`CIVIL ACTION NO.
`)(
`6:20-CV-636-ADA
`)(
`WACO, TEXAS
`)(
`)(
`AUGUST 17, 2021
`)(
`10:01 A.M.
`
`VS.
`INTEL CORPORATION,
`DEFENDANT.
`
`
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING
`BEFORE THE HONORABLE JUDGE ALAN D ALBRIGHT
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`FOR THE PLAINTIFF: Mr. Benjamin W. Hattenbach
`Mr. C. Maclain Wells
`Irell & Manella LLP
`1800 Avenue of the Stars
`Suite 900
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`Ms. Shelly Holmes, CSR, TCRR
`Certified Shorthand Reporter
`2593 Myrtle Road
`Diana, TX 75640
`(903) 720-6009
`shellyholmes@hotmail.com
`
`COURT REPORTER:
`
`(Proceedings recorded by mechanical stenography, transcript
`produced on a CAT system.)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`
`
`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 133-7 Filed 03/09/22 Page 3 of 5
`
`2
`
`FOR THE PLAINTIFF: Mr. Rick Milvenan
`McGinnis Lochridge, LLP
`1111 W. 6th Street
`Suite 400
`Austin, TX 78703
`
`
`
`FOR INTEL:
`
`Mr. Yar R. Chaikovsky
`Mr. Philip Ou
`Mr. Joseph J. Rumpler, II
`Paul Hastings, LLP
`1117 South California Avenue
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`Ms. Claire M. Specht
`WilmerHale
`60 State Street
`Boston, MA 02109
`Mr. J. Stephen Ravel
`Kelly Hart & Hallman, LLP
`303 Colorado Street
`Suite 2000
`Austin, TX 78701
`
`FOR THE SAMSUNG:
`
`Mr. Brian C. Nash
`Mr. Austin M. Schnell
`Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP
`401 Congress Avenue
`Suite 1700
`Austin, TX 78701-3797
`Mr. Cosmin Maier
`Mr. Sam Ha
`Desmarais, LLP
`230 Park Avenue
`26th Floor
`New York, NY 10169
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`
`
`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 133-7 Filed 03/09/22 Page 4 of 5
`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 133-7 Filed 03/09/22 Page 4of5
`
`44
`
`Said it's the definition in the file history.
`
`They
`
`understood that.
`
`Now, you ask yourself why do they change? And
`
`The final
`
`remove the passing. And one wonders why, despite all this
`
`file history, Demaray's declaration, why did the passing go
`
`away?
`
`Well, we suggest to you, Your Honor,
`
`that the
`
`passing went away in light of one item, and that item --
`
`get the slide -- that item is -- we produced to
`
`Dr. Demaray,
`
`that is Applied Materials produced,
`
`a document
`
`prior to January 22nd but after the 15th, which is the only
`
`document showing that there's a reactor having a filter.
`
`And it doesn't have a narrow band rejection filter.
`
`It's
`
`got a low band pass filter. But it's the only document
`
`that has a filter.
`
`And so from the 8th to the 15th to the 22nd, you
`ang
`have a revised construction from Dr. Demaray, which is
`
`inconsistent with the definition of Dr. Demaray,
`
`
`
`inconsistent with the file history where he's wiped out
`
`the
`
`
`
`they eventually do change on the 22nd.
`
`disclosure we have here,
`the revised construction, and they
`
`And so this inconsistency is the problem we have.
`
`passing notion.
`
`after doing that,
`
`And that's even despite later in the IPR,
`
`telling the Patent Office it still is
`
`
`
`that with passing all the frequencies.
`
` ae
`
`
`
`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 133-7 Filed 03/09/22 Page 5 of 5
`
`83
`
`CERTIFICATION
`
`I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and
`correct transcript from the stenographic notes of the
`proceedings in the above-entitled matter to the best of my
`ability.
`
` /S/ Shelly Holmes
`SHELLY HOLMES, CSR, TCRR
`CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTER
`State of Texas No.: 7804
`Expiration Date: 10/31/2021
`
`10/14/2021
`Date
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
