throbber
Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 116 Filed 01/14/22 Page 1 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`DEMARAY LLC,
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 5:20-cv-09341-EJD-NMC
`[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
`CASE SCHEDULE
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 116 Filed 01/14/22 Page 2 of 6
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`Pursuant to Magistrate Judge Cousins’ directive during the January 12, 2022 hearing, the
`parties submit the following table of their respective proposals regarding case deadlines and the
`Court orders the following deadlines as indicated. Applied is amenable to proceeding with the
`claim construction hearing before Magistrate Judge Cousins. Demaray believes that Judge Davila
`should address any claim construction issues and respectfully declines to have the claim
`construction before Magistrate Judge Cousins.
`
`
`Event
`
`Applied’s
`Proposal
`
`Proposed Deadline
`Demaray’s
`Proposal
`
`January 26, 2022
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`Court Ordered
`Deadline
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`N/A2
`
`
`
`January 31, 2022
`
`January 28, 2022
`
`
`
`February 14, 2022
`
`
`
`N/A; see PLR 4-1;
`Dkt. No. 66
`
`or
`
`TBD4
`
`February 14, 2022
`(if applicable)
`
`
`
`Deadline to File Proposed
`ESI Order and Proposed
`Protective Order
`(AGREED)
`
`Demaray’s Proposal for
`Applied to Provide
`Targeted Product
`Disclosures as detailed in
`Section 8 the 12/22/21
`Joint CMC Statement1
`Applied’s Proposed
`Deadline for Demaray to
`File Motion for Leave to
`Amend Answer to Assert
`Affirmative Infringement
`Claims3
`Patent L.R. 3-1/3-2:
`Disclosure of Asserted
`Claims and Infringement
`Contentions and associated
`document production
`
`
`1 Demaray states that its proposed deadlines for Patent L.R. 3-1/3-2/3-3/3-4/3-8/3-9 and
`Applied’s proposed deadline for Demaray to move for leave are contingent on Applied providing
`complete Targeted Product Disclosures by Jan. 31, 2022. Applied states it has already provided
`complete disclosures for Demaray to determine if it will assert infringement.
`2 Applied does not agree that this deadline is applicable as detailed during the 1/12/22 hearing and
`in Sections 3 and 8 of the 12/22/21 Joint CMC Statement.
`3 Applied does not agree that leave should be granted if requested and will oppose the motion.
`4 Applied does not agree that these deadlines are applicable to the case and believes that they will
`only be applicable if (1) Demaray files a motion for leave to amend its answer to assert
`affirmative claims of infringement and (2) the Court grants leave. Applied proposes that if the
`Court grants leave, the parties at that time should meet and confer regarding any applicable Patent
`
`- 1 -
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 116 Filed 01/14/22 Page 3 of 6
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Event
`
`Patent L.R. 3-3/3-4:
`Invalidity Contentions and
`associated document
`production
`
`Patent L.R. 3-8: Damages
`Contentions
`
`Patent L.R. 3-9:
`Responsive Damages
`Contentions
`
`Patent L.R. 4-1: Parties
`Served Proposed Terms for
`Construction on the
`Following Dates
`
`October 14, 2021
`
`
`
`Patent L.R. 4-2: Parties
`Served Preliminary Claim
`Constructions and
`Extrinsic Evidence on the
`Following Dates
`
`November 4, 2021
`
`
`
`Patent L.R. 4-3: Joint
`Claim Construction and
`Prehearing Statement
`(JCCPS)
`
`
`
`Patent L.R. 4-4:
`Completion of Claim
`Construction Discovery
`
`January 21, 2022
`
`
`
`January 28, 2022
`
`
`
`Applied’s
`Proposal
`
`Proposed Deadline
`Demaray’s
`Proposal
`
`March 31, 2022 (if
`applicable)
`
`
`Court Ordered
`Deadline
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`May 20, 2022 (if
`applicable)
`
`June 20, 2022 (if
`applicable)
`
`
`December 27, 2021
`
`(reset to April 4,
`2022 if affirmative
`infringement
`claims are allowed)
`
`January 7, 2022
`
`(reset to April 25,
`2022 if affirmative
`infringement
`claims are allowed)
`
`February 1, 2022
`
`(reset to May 30,
`2022 if affirmative
`infringement
`claims are allowed)
`
`March 3, 2022
`
`(reset to June 29,
`2022 if affirmative
`infringement
`claims are allowed)
`
`
`
`L.R. deadlines. Demaray proposes that the parties’ file a discovery letter with Magistrate Judge
`Cousins on February 14, 2022, on this issue contingent on Applied providing complete Targeted
`Product Disclosures by Jan. 31, 2022 and Demaray making a determination that affirmative
`infringement claims are appropriate and requests that the motion be heard at the Court’s earliest
`convenience. Applied does not oppose Magistrate Judge Cousins addressing whether Demaray
`should be allowed to amend its answer and make compulsory counterclaims of infringement, but
`does not agree that claim construction or other case deadlines should be further delayed pending
`resolution of that issue or that those deadlines should be reset if infringement claims are allowed.
`
`- 2 -
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 116 Filed 01/14/22 Page 4 of 6
`
`
`
`Court Ordered
`Deadline
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Applied’s
`Proposal
`
`February 3, 2022
`
`
`
`Proposed Deadline
`Demaray’s
`Proposal
`
`March 18, 2022
`
`(reset to July 15
`2022 if affirmative
`infringement
`claims are allowed)
`
`February 17, 2022 April 1, 2022
`
`(reset to July 28,
`2022 if affirmative
`infringement
`claims are allowed)
`
`February 24, 2022 April 8, 2022
`
`(reset to Aug. 4,
`2022 if affirmative
`infringement
`claims are allowed)
`
`April 15, 2022
`
`(reset to Aug. 11,
`2022 if affirmative
`infringement
`claims are allowed)
`
`April 29, 2022 or at
`the Court’s earliest
`convenience
`
`(reset to August 25,
`2022 or at the
`Court’s earliest
`convenience if
`affirmative
`infringement
`claims are allowed)
`
`
`March 3, 2022
`
`March 17, 2022 or
`at the Court’s
`earliest
`convenience
`
`Event
`
`Patent L.R. 4-5(a):
`Applied’s Opening Claim
`Construction Brief5
`
`Patent L.R. 4-5(b):
`Demaray’s Responsive
`Claim Construction Brief
`
`Patent L.R. 4-5(c):
`Applied’s Reply Claim
`Construction Brief
`
`Demaray’s Sur-Reply
`Claim Construction Brief
`
`Patent L.R. 4-6:
`Claim Construction
`Hearing and Tutorial
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`5 Patent L.R. 4-5 states that “… the party claiming patent infringement, or the party asserting
`invalidity if there is no infringement issue present in the case, shall serve and file an opening brief
`and any evidence supporting its claim construction.” As neither circumstance applies to the
`current posture of the case, the parties met and conferred and propose, subject to Court approval,
`equal briefing with Applied filing an opening brief, Demaray filing a response, Applied filing a
`reply and Demaray filing a sur-reply. If the Court does not approve of this proposal, the parties
`have a dispute regarding the ordering of the briefing.
`
`- 3 -
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 116 Filed 01/14/22 Page 5 of 6
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Event
`
`Applied’s
`Proposal
`
`Proposed Deadline
`Demaray’s
`Proposal
`
`30 days after Markman order or at the
`Court’s earliest convenience
`
`30 days after Markman order
`
`30 days after Markman order
`
`No later than 7 days before the Trial
`Setting Conference pursuant to Court’s
`Standing Order For Civil Cases
`
`Post-Markman Status
`Conference (AGREED)
`Patent L.R. 3-7: Advice of
`Counsel (AGREED)
`
`Last Day to Move to
`Amend Pleadings or Add
`Parties (AGREED)
`
`Joint Trial Setting
`Conference Statement
`(AGREED)
`
`Trial Setting Conference
`Close of Fact Discovery
`May 13, 2022
`Expert Disclosures (Initial) May 20, 2022
`
`April 13, 2022
`
`June 3, 2022
`
`December 14, 2022
`
`January 13, 2023
`
`February 17, 2023
`
`March 17, 2023
`
`
`June 17, 2022
`
`June 24, 2022
`
`April 21, 2023
`
`May 19, 2023
`
`July 8, 2022
`
`June 16, 2023
`
`July 15, 2022
`
`June 30, 2023
`
`TBD at Trial Setting Conference
`
`
`TBD at Trial Setting Conference
`
`
`TBD at Trial Setting Conference
`
`
`Expert Disclosures
`(Rebuttal)
`
`Close of Expert Discovery
`
`Last Day to File Daubert
`and Summary Judgment
`Motions
`
`Daubert and Summary
`Judgment Opposition
`Briefs
`
`Daubert and Summary
`Judgment Reply Briefs
`
`
`
`Serve Pretrial Disclosures
`(Witness List, Deposition
`Designations, and Exhibit
`List) (AGREED)
`
`Serve Objections to
`Pretrial Disclosures
`(AGREED)
`
`Last Day to Serve Motions
`In Limine (AGREED)
`
`
`Court Ordered
`Deadline
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-09341-EJD Document 116 Filed 01/14/22 Page 6 of 6
`
`
`
`Event
`
`Last Day to Serve
`Responses to Motions In
`Limine (AGREED)
`
`Last Day to submit
`“Pretrial Filings” (Joint
`Pretrial Statement, Trial
`Briefs, Compiled Briefing
`on Motions In Limine,
`Proposed Jury Instructions,
`Proposed Verdict Form,
`Proposed Voir Dire
`Questions, Witness List,
`and Exhibit List)
`(AGREED)
`
`Final Pretrial Conference
`(AGREED)
`
`Trial (AGREED)
`
`Applied’s
`Proposal
`
`Proposed Deadline
`Demaray’s
`Proposal
`
`TBD at Trial Setting Conference
`
`
`TBD at Trial Setting Conference
`
`
`TBD at Trial Setting Conference
`
`
`TBD at Trial Setting Conference
`
`
`Court Ordered
`Deadline
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`Dated:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
`United States Magistrate Judge
`
`- 5 -
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket