throbber
Case 5:20-cv-05676-EJD Document 31-2 Filed 10/23/20 Page 1 of 5
`Case 5:20-cv-05676—EJD Document 31-2 Filed 10/23/20 Page 1 of 5
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05676-EJD Document 31-2 Filed 10/23/20 Page 2 of 5
`
`From:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Wells, Maclain
`Ou, Philip; Faasisila, Nikole; Chu, Morgan; Hattenbach, Ben; Mueller, Mariandrea
`Demaray - AMAT; LeGolvan, Andy; Trevino, C. Daniel; Lubarsky, Boris; Faasisila, Nikole; #Demaray Service [Int]
`[EXT] RE: Applied Materials v. Demaray LLC - PI motion sur-reply / customer contentions
`Thursday, October 15, 2020 2:46:53 PM
`
`Phil,

`The seven fact declarations and the new evidence should have been included in Applied’s opening filing to allow
`Demaray to respond.  The declarations and evidence appear to relate to the issues of subject matter jurisdiction,
`Applied’s license/ownership defenses, Applied’s arguments regarding the customer suit exception, and issues of
`comparative convenience.  Applied raises new arguments on each of these issues as well as the issues of comity
`and the applicable legal standard for a preliminary injunction.

`Please let us know if Applied opposes our request for a sur-reply.

`Regarding Demaray’s infringement contentions in the Texas matters, please explain why Applied needs
`confidential materials from those cases.

`Thanks,
`Maclain

`From: Ou, Philip <philipou@paulhastings.com> 
`Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 5:11 PM
`To: Wells, Maclain <MWells@irell.com>; Faasisila, Nikole <nikolefaasisila@paulhastings.com>; Chu, Morgan
`<MChu@irell.com>; Hattenbach, Ben <BHattenbach@irell.com>; Mueller, Mariandrea <MMueller@irell.com>
`Cc: Demaray - AMAT <Demaray-AMAT@paulhastings.com>; LeGolvan, Andy <andylegolvan@paulhastings.com>;
`Trevino, C. Daniel <cdanieltrevino@paulhastings.com>; Lubarsky, Boris <borislubarsky@paulhastings.com>;
`Faasisila, Nikole <nikolefaasisila@paulhastings.com>; #Demaray Service [Int] <Demaray-Service@irell.com>
`Subject: RE: Applied Materials v. Demaray LLC - PI motion sur-reply / customer contentions
`
`Maclain,

`Thanks for your e-mail.  We disagree that Applied submitted new arguments in its reply brief.  The
`arguments and supporting evidence (e.g., the declarations) were submitted in direct response to
`arguments made by Demaray in its opposition brief.

`That said, as a matter of equity, we are willing to consider not opposing a limited sur-reply.  Can you please
`identify what you specifically contend are “new arguments and supporting evidence” that you believe
`warrant a sur-reply?  Is it limited to the declarations and exhibits, and the arguments they support?

`Separately, we understand that Demaray has served infringement contentions on Intel and Samsung in the
`customer cases in WDTX.  Applied believes that the scope of your infringement allegations in those cases is
`relevant to the pending injunction motion.  Will you provide those contentions to us if we treat them as
`confidential?  If not, can you explain why?    

`Happy to confer about both issues tomorrow or Friday at your convenience.

`Thanks,
`Phil
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05676-EJD Document 31-2 Filed 10/23/20 Page 3 of 5
`

`From: Wells, Maclain <MWells@irell.com> 
`Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 1:03 PM
`To: Ou, Philip <philipou@paulhastings.com>; Faasisila, Nikole <nikolefaasisila@paulhastings.com>; Chu, Morgan
`<MChu@irell.com>; Hattenbach, Ben <BHattenbach@irell.com>; Mueller, Mariandrea <MMueller@irell.com>
`Cc: Demaray - AMAT <Demaray-AMAT@paulhastings.com>; LeGolvan, Andy <andylegolvan@paulhastings.com>;
`Trevino, C. Daniel <cdanieltrevino@paulhastings.com>; Lubarsky, Boris <borislubarsky@paulhastings.com>;
`Faasisila, Nikole <nikolefaasisila@paulhastings.com>; #Demaray Service [Int] <Demaray-Service@irell.com>
`Subject: [EXT] RE: Applied Materials v. Demaray LLC - inadvertently omitted declarations to reply brief
`
`Phil,
`
`We do not believe that it is appropriate for Applied to submit new arguments and supporting evidence in a
`reply brief. Doing so is manifestly unfair as Demaray has no opportunity for a written response. Given the
`seven declarations and additional exhibits attached to Applied’s reply, we intend to request permission from
`the Court to file a 10-page sur-reply. Please let us know if Applied will oppose this request.
`
`In addition, we will file objections to submitted evidence as appropriate according to the local rules.
`
`Thank you,
`Maclain

`From: Ou, Philip <philipou@paulhastings.com> 
`Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 11:57 AM
`To: Faasisila, Nikole <nikolefaasisila@paulhastings.com>; Chu, Morgan <MChu@irell.com>; Hattenbach, Ben
`<BHattenbach@irell.com>; Wells, Maclain <MWells@irell.com>; Mueller, Mariandrea <MMueller@irell.com>
`Cc: Demaray - AMAT <Demaray-AMAT@paulhastings.com>; LeGolvan, Andy <andylegolvan@paulhastings.com>;
`Trevino, C. Daniel <cdanieltrevino@paulhastings.com>; Lubarsky, Boris <borislubarsky@paulhastings.com>;
`Faasisila, Nikole <nikolefaasisila@paulhastings.com>; #Demaray Service [Int] <Demaray-Service@irell.com>
`Subject: RE: Applied Materials v. Demaray LLC - inadvertently omitted declarations to reply brief
`
`Maclain,

`An inadvertent clerical omission from Friday’s filing of our reply brief has come to our attention.  In
`preparing and filing our administrative motion to seal certain declarations and exhibits, we inadvertently
`did not file the declarations that did not require redactions.  Those are the Thomson, Dietz and Cross
`declarations (from certain Samsung entities) that are cited in the reply, e.g., at page 9, which I’ve attached. 
`As you’ll see, they were executed either last Thursday or Friday.

`We intend to submit these omitted items to the Court today.  If you have any objections, please let us know
`before COB today.

`I’m also available to discuss if needed.

`Thanks,
`Phil


`From: Faasisila, Nikole <nikolefaasisila@paulhastings.com> 
`Sent: Friday, October 9, 2020 7:56 PM
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05676-EJD Document 31-2 Filed 10/23/20 Page 4 of 5
`
`To: mchu@irell.com; bhattenbach@irell.com; mwells@irell.com; mmueller@irell.com
`Cc: Demaray - AMAT <Demaray-AMAT@paulhastings.com>; LeGolvan, Andy <andylegolvan@paulhastings.com>;
`Trevino, C. Daniel <cdanieltrevino@paulhastings.com>; Lubarsky, Boris <borislubarsky@paulhastings.com>;
`Faasisila, Nikole <nikolefaasisila@paulhastings.com>
`Subject: Applied Materials v. Demaray LLC, Case No. 5:20-cv-5676-EJD
`
`
`Counsel,
`
`Attached please find the documents filed under seal tonight with Docket No. 26.
`
`Regards,
`Nikole
`
`____________________________________________________________________________
` Nikole Faasisila | Client Service Specialist
`Paul Hastings LLP | 1117 S. California Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94304 | Direct: +1.650.320.1806 | Main:
`+1.650.320.1800 | Fax: +1.650.320.1906 | nikolefaasisila@paulhastings.com | www.paulhastings.com
`
`
`
`Files attached to this message
`Filename
`Size
`
`Checksum (SHA1)
`
`755
`KB 11f68941668ea22f5e34cc701c064bfc2ec8d8d5bc62cd7aa67d490ef299fcfa
`
`699
`KB 002844bb76b93049527cff111a2390e6a7c70ff90b0112c47527d9cf71b57713
`
`363
`KB 39527f8fa9cce6b3f58c80aed11f8e40249157728ecada746c23d3510b75e48f
`
`239
`KB 4227857b27f81cc24023b2c9b8b49724cb5dfb8be682db2a0fb36c08f7debdfb
`
`2020-10-
`09_26_10
`Declaration
`of Herrgott
`SEALED.pdf
`
`2020-10-
`09_26_12
`Declaration
`of Kim
`SEALED.pdf
`
`2020-10-
`09_26_14
`Declaration
`of Miller
`SEALED.pdf
`
`2020-10-
`09_26_4
`Reply ISO
`Motion for
`Preliminary
`Injunction
`SEALED.pdf
`
`2020-10-
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05676-EJD Document 31-2 Filed 10/23/20 Page 5 of 5
`
`09_26_6 Ex
`N -
`Mukundan
`Agreement
`SEALED.pdf
`
`2020-10-
`09_26_8
`Declaration
`of Greuter
`SEALED.pdf
`
`997
`KB dbeaa87766d138a575a28ae4caeeb7cc183f19a693fca71b4fbb81592c63f635
`
`2.13
`MB 1d748a6dc99e0082c1542ece3537e6f09afe3c13ba43f1207d6b4feff2fc369b
`
`Click on the following link to download the attachments:
`https://phftpus.phextranet.com/message/K79ClFaRH7fT6SuTGnMRhP
`
`This message or download link can only be forwarded to internal users of PH Secure File Transfer Service.
`phftpus.phextranet.com.
`
`The attachments are available until: Friday, 16 October.
`
`Message ID: K79ClFaRH7fT6SuTGnMRhP
`
`******************************************************************************************
`This message is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you received
`this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachments.
`If you reply to this message, Paul Hastings may collect personal information including your name, business name
`and other contact details, and IP address. For more information about Paul Hastings’ information collection, privacy
`and security principles please refer to our Global Privacy Statement (available at
`
`******************************************************************************************
`This message is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you received
`this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachments.
`If you reply to this message, Paul Hastings may collect personal information including your name, business name
`and other contact details, and IP address. For more information about Paul Hastings’ information collection, privacy
`and security principles please click HERE. If you have any questions, please contact Privacy@paulhastings.com.
`
`PLEASE NOTE: This message, including any attachments, may include privileged, confidential and/or
`inside information. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended
`recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
`the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. Thank you.
`
`******************************************************************************************
`This message is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you received
`this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachments.
`If you reply to this message, Paul Hastings may collect personal information including your name, business name
`and other contact details, and IP address. For more information about Paul Hastings’ information collection, privacy
`and security principles please click HERE. If you have any questions, please contact Privacy@paulhastings.com.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket