throbber
Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 911-4 Filed 11/21/23 Page 1 of 12
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 911-4 Filed 11/21/23 Page 1 of 12
`
`EXHIBIT D
`EXHIBIT D
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 911-4 Filed 11/21/23 Page 2 of 12
`
`McCormick, Patrick Emerson
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com>
`Tuesday, November 21, 2023 12:27
`McCormick, Patrick Emerson
`Christopher Lavin
`RE: conference
`
`CAUTION! [EXTERNAL to Lewis Roca]
`
`Thanks Patrick, I have re-sent my last email. I do not think the lead time objection is going to be very
`persuasive with the Court, given that we filed our motion months ago and the Court here is already
`giving PersonalWeb a second chance on an objection that it failed to substantiate in its opposition
`brief. And by your own admission, until the correction late last night PersonalWeb’s calculation was
`hundreds of thousands of dollars off. I can confirm that Amazon’s position is that $500,000 is not a
`correct calculation, even if the Court were to accept PersonalWeb’s objection.
`
`Todd Gregorian
`Fenwick | Partner | +1 415-875-2402 | tgregorian@fenwick.com
`
`From: McCormick, Patrick Emerson <PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2023 11:15 AM
`To: Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com>
`Cc: Christopher Lavin <CLavin@fenwick.com>
`Subject: RE: conference
`
`
`** EXTERNAL EMAIL **
`Todd,
`
`Perhaps there is a glitch in our communications. I have not received any email from you or Chris offering
`a phone call to discuss, so I worry that I might be missing emails from you. Can you please send again?
`
`Amazon did not provide enough lead time for me to get a response from PersonalWeb before the brief
`was due, so I cannot accept or reject any offer from Amazon. My point is, and has been, that attempting
`to negotiate new frameworks given the timeframe of the deadline of this filing and late timing of
`Amazon’s offer was unlikely to be productive. Amazon had this information for three days, yet failed to
`follow up with an offer until I nudged you the day before.
`
`If I hear from PersonalWeb with a response before I file this brief, I will let you know. Otherwise, I do not
`expect a phone call would be productive as I am not authorized to agree to any proposal from Amazon
`short of the 25%, or approximately $500,000, PersonalWeb originally requested in its Response. If that is
`a proposal you are interested in discussing, please let me know.
`
`Best,
`Patrick
`
`
`
`Patrick Emerson McCormick, CIPP/US
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 911-4 Filed 11/21/23 Page 3 of 12
`
`He|Him|His
`Associate
`Admitted in Arizona, California, and Colorado
`
`
`
`PMcCormick@lewisroca.com
`D. 520.629.4455
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2023 11:59
`To: McCormick, Patrick Emerson <PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>
`Cc: Christopher Lavin <CLavin@fenwick.com>
`Subject: RE: conference
`
`CAUTION! [EXTERNAL to Lewis Roca]
`
`Patrick,
`
` I
`
` have provided a dollar range for a compromise, two alternative approaches to the issue that would
`bring us within that dollar range, and just now in a separate email thread offered you a phone call to
`discuss them. Either PersonalWeb is interested in pursuing a discussion along those lines, or it is not. If
`PersonalWeb is only interested in the bottom line and not the principles, that is fine. But please do not
`posture as if Amazon has not made a proposal.
`
`Todd Gregorian
`Fenwick | Partner | +1 415-875-2402 | tgregorian@fenwick.com
`
`From: McCormick, Patrick Emerson <PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2023 10:41 AM
`To: Christopher Lavin <CLavin@fenwick.com>; Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com>
`Subject: RE: conference
`
`
`** EXTERNAL EMAIL **
`Chris,
`
`Unsurprisingly, PersonalWeb disagrees with Amazon’s characterizations, but that will all be addressed in
`its supplemental response.
`
`I really wish Amazon had gotten back to me earlier than the night before this is due, especially since it
`had PersonalWeb’s list of challenged entries for three days. I only received any proposal from Amazon
`after following up with your office, at which point Amazon sought to define new frameworks for
`negotiation instead of engaging with the content provided by PersonalWeb.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 911-4 Filed 11/21/23 Page 4 of 12
`
`Again, if Amazon would like to propose a specific number to which the Parties might stipulate, or
`identify entries to which it objects for PersonalWeb to consider, please let me know. The Parties can still
`resolve this via stipulation after we file PersonalWeb’s Supplemental Response today.
`
`Best,
`Patrick
`
`
`
`Patrick Emerson McCormick, CIPP/US
`He|Him|His
`Associate
`Admitted in Arizona, California, and Colorado
`
`
`
`PMcCormick@lewisroca.com
`D. 520.629.4455
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Christopher Lavin <CLavin@fenwick.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2023 11:22
`To: McCormick, Patrick Emerson <PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>; Todd Gregorian
`<TGregorian@fenwick.com>
`Subject: RE: conference
`
`CAUTION! [EXTERNAL to Lewis Roca]
`
`Patrick,
`
`Your position that Amazon has waived its claim for fees that PersonalWeb has falsely deemed as
`incurred solely in pursuit of alter ego claims is unfounded. Amazon argued that fees for “post-judgment
`proceedings” are proper, and more specifically, “fees incurred in the related state court actions,” which
`covers the disputed time entries that PersonalWeb failed to identify in its opposition brief. Reply at 2-
`4. Moreover, the crux of Amazon’s position on further supplemental fees is that a case is viewed as an
`“inclusive whole” and that fees to enforce a judgment, which all these time entries were, are
`recoverable. Id.
`
`Amazon has proposed two principles for coming to agreement on an amount of fees along with an
`approximate amount of fees, depending on which one was used. But so far, PersonalWeb has not
`responded to either proposal and, unfortunately, shown no interest in engaging in a discussion except to
`raise clearly unsupported positions.
`
`Regards,
`Chris
`
`Chris Lavin
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 911-4 Filed 11/21/23 Page 5 of 12
`
`Fenwick | Associate | +1 415-875-2287 | CLavin@fenwick.com
`
`From: McCormick, Patrick Emerson <PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>
`Sent: Monday, November 20, 2023 8:43 PM
`To: Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com>
`Cc: Christopher Lavin <CLavin@fenwick.com>
`Subject: RE: conference
`
`
`** EXTERNAL EMAIL **
`Todd,
`
`I understand that this is Amazon’s position, but the time to raise these argument was in Amazon’s reply.
`Instead, Amazon made no challenges to the unavailability of fees incurred in pursuit of alter ego claims.
`Instead, it conceded the point and voluntarily waived a small portion of fees related to alter ego claims.
`The attached worksheet simply applies this point to all the fees Amazon incurred in pursuit of alter ego
`liability of the Secured Creditors and discovery related to the same.
`
`I will let you know if PersonalWeb is willing to entertain Amazon’s proposed amounts. In the meantime,
`as I double-check my work, I realized I had made two errors. First, I had copy-pasted the entries from
`the invoices directly without applying Amazon’s discount on its hours. Second, I had included entries
`from individuals who must have billed less than 30 hours during the relevant period, as there are no
`hourly rates provided for them in Dkt. 873 at 6. A new version properly reflecting Amazon’s requested
`rates and excluded individuals is attached. PersonalWeb is now seeking a $566,411.51 reduction in fees.
`
`If Amazon comes to a solid number to which it is willing to stipulate while I wait for a decision from
`PersonalWeb, please let me know, as I do not expect we will have a lot of opportunity for back-and-
`forth tomorrow before I have to finalize this supplemental response.
`
`Best,
`Patrick
`
`
`Patrick Emerson McCormick, CIPP/US
`He|Him|His
`Associate
`Admitted in Arizona, California, and Colorado
`
`PMcCormick@lewisroca.com
`D. 520.629.4455
`
`
`
`
`-----Original Message-----
`From: Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com>
`Sent: Monday, November 20, 2023 18:11
`To: McCormick, Patrick Emerson <PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>
`Cc: Christopher Lavin <CLavin@fenwick.com>
`Subject: Re: conference
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 911-4 Filed 11/21/23 Page 6 of 12
`
`CAUTION! [EXTERNAL to Lewis Roca]
`
`To be clear, the suggestion that these billing entries were in support of a separate alter ego case is Mr.
`Shipley’s fantasy. Amazon objects to any deduction on those grounds. Its proposal is following the
`Court’s instruction to settle on an amount to deduct if Personalweb succeeds on its objection.
`
`
`From: Todd Gregorian
`Sent: Monday, November 20, 2023 4:15 PM
`To: McCormick, Patrick Emerson PMcCormick@lewisroca.com
`Cc: Christopher Lavin CLavin@fenwick.com
`Subject: Re: conference
`
`My proposals would work out to something like 180k-300k.
`
`On Nov 20, 2023, at 4:03 PM, McCormick, Patrick Emerson <PMcCormick@lewisroca.com> wrote:
`
`
`** EXTERNAL EMAIL **
`
`Todd,
`
` I
`
` provided you with the entries PersonalWeb believes the Court should deny as they were incurred in
`pursuit of alter ego claims and evidence in support of those claims on Amazon’s requested timeline. If
`Amazon objects to certain entries as not part of Amazon’s alter ego pursuit, or if Amazon wants to
`propose an alternative number for PersonalWeb to consider, please let me know tonight. This does not
`require the Parties to agree to a different framework before discussing numbers.
`
`Best,
`Patrick
`
`Patrick Emerson McCormick, CIPP/US
`He|Him|His
`Associate
`Admitted in Arizona, California, and Colorado <image001.png>
`PMcCormick@lewisroca.com<mailto:PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>
`D. 520.629.4455
`<image002.png>
`
`
`From: Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com>
`Sent: Monday, November 20, 2023 16:29
`To: McCormick, Patrick Emerson <PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>
`Cc: Christopher Lavin <CLavin@fenwick.com>
`Subject: RE: conference
`
`CAUTION! [EXTERNAL to Lewis Roca]
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 911-4 Filed 11/21/23 Page 7 of 12
`
`________________________________
`Assuming arguendo that the Court were to accept PersonalWeb’s objection that some amount should
`be excluded due to its potential for re-use in the alter ego case (which Amazon continues to contest),
`the amount should be something like 50% of the document review entries only, or some percentage of
`entries dating from after the investors filed the DJ complaint. I am guessing that is a non-starter for
`Pweb, but if we can agree to something in principle, Chris will have an associate or paralegal tie out the
`specifics.
`
`
`Todd Gregorian
`Fenwick | Partner | +1 415-875-2402 | tgregorian@fenwick.com<mailto:>
`
`From: McCormick, Patrick Emerson
`<PMcCormick@lewisroca.com<mailto:PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>>
`Sent: Monday, November 20, 2023 3:22 PM
`To: Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com<mailto:TGregorian@fenwick.com>>
`Cc: Christopher Lavin <CLavin@fenwick.com<mailto:CLavin@fenwick.com>>
`Subject: RE: conference
`
`** EXTERNAL EMAIL **
`
`Todd, I will need some lead time to discuss Amazon’s position on this with my client before the filing
`deadline tomorrow. Is Amazon interested in stipulating to a number?
`
`Patrick Emerson McCormick, CIPP/US
`He|Him|His
`Associate
`Admitted in Arizona, California, and Colorado <image001.png>
`PMcCormick@lewisroca.com<mailto:PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>
`D. 520.629.4455
`<image002.png>
`
`
`From: McCormick, Patrick Emerson
`Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2023 21:31
`To: Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com<mailto:TGregorian@fenwick.com>>
`Cc: Christopher Lavin <CLavin@fenwick.com<mailto:CLavin@fenwick.com>>
`Subject: RE: conference
`
`
`Todd, thanks for flagging that for me. I removed three entries that were included in the entries Amazon
`waived (one for anti-SLAPP and two for alter ego). The updated list is attached.
`
`Please advise if Amazon has a proposal to resolve this before PersonalWeb files the request on Tuesday.
`
`Patrick Emerson McCormick, CIPP/US
`He|Him|His
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 911-4 Filed 11/21/23 Page 8 of 12
`
`Associate
`Admitted in Arizona, California, and Colorado <image001.png>
`PMcCormick@lewisroca.com<mailto:PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>
`D. 520.629.4455
`<image002.png>
`
`
`From: Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com<mailto:TGregorian@fenwick.com>>
`Sent: Friday, November 17, 2023 17:10
`To: McCormick, Patrick Emerson <PMcCormick@lewisroca.com<mailto:PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>>
`Cc: Christopher Lavin <CLavin@fenwick.com<mailto:CLavin@fenwick.com>>
`Subject: RE: conference
`
`CAUTION! [EXTERNAL to Lewis Roca]
`________________________________
`Thank you
`
`Todd Gregorian
`Fenwick | Partner | +1 415-875-2402 | tgregorian@fenwick.com<mailto:>
`
`From: McCormick, Patrick Emerson
`<PMcCormick@lewisroca.com<mailto:PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>>
`Sent: Friday, November 17, 2023 4:09 PM
`To: Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com<mailto:TGregorian@fenwick.com>>
`Cc: Christopher Lavin <CLavin@fenwick.com<mailto:CLavin@fenwick.com>>
`Subject: RE: conference
`
`** EXTERNAL EMAIL **
`
`Todd, my mistake. In my rush to get this to you today per your request, I forgot that those entries were
`already part of the record. I’ll cross-reference them and make sure none are included in PersonalWeb’s
`request to the Court. I won’t be able to do that until tomorrow night at the earliest, but the list I sent
`you already should give you a good starting point for a conversation with your client.
`
`Patrick Emerson McCormick, CIPP/US
`He|Him|His
`Associate
`Admitted in Arizona, California, and Colorado <image001.png>
`PMcCormick@lewisroca.com<mailto:PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>
`D. 520.629.4455
`<image002.png>
`
`
`From: Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com<mailto:TGregorian@fenwick.com>>
`Sent: Friday, November 17, 2023 16:51
`To: McCormick, Patrick Emerson <PMcCormick@lewisroca.com<mailto:PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>>
`Cc: Christopher Lavin <CLavin@fenwick.com<mailto:CLavin@fenwick.com>>
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 911-4 Filed 11/21/23 Page 9 of 12
`
`Subject: RE: conference
`
`CAUTION! [EXTERNAL to Lewis Roca]
`________________________________
`Patrick,
`
`The list of waived entries is already in the district court record. Are you saying you made no comparison
`between this chart and the excluded entries in order to inflate the total and/or pass that work off to
`Amazon? If that is the case, we will just object and inform the Court of that fact. We may also request
`that due to PersonalWeb’s continued game playing Amazon should also be allowed to supplement its
`request now to include fees incurred between March 31, 2023 and present.
`
`Todd Gregorian
`Fenwick | Partner | +1 415-875-2402 | tgregorian@fenwick.com<mailto:>
`
`From: McCormick, Patrick Emerson
`<PMcCormick@lewisroca.com<mailto:PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>>
`Sent: Friday, November 17, 2023 3:39 PM
`To: Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com<mailto:TGregorian@fenwick.com>>
`Cc: Christopher Lavin <CLavin@fenwick.com<mailto:CLavin@fenwick.com>>
`Subject: RE: conference
`
`** EXTERNAL EMAIL **
`
`Todd,
`
`Attached are the entries PersonalWeb believes are related to Amazon's pursuit of alter ego claims
`against the Secured Creditors. I did my best to avoid including anti-SLAPP entries and entries related to
`the state court declaratory relief action that Amazon has already waived. Please let me know if I
`included any entries that Amazon has already waived.
`
` I
`
` hope you have a good weekend. Let me know if Amazon has a proposal to resolve this before
`PersonalWeb files its supplemental request for reduction on Tuesday.
`
`Best,
`Patrick
`
`
`
`Patrick Emerson McCormick, CIPP/US
`
`He|Him|His
`
`Associate
`
`Admitted in Arizona, California, and Colorado
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 911-4 Filed 11/21/23 Page 10 of 12
`
`
`
`PMcCormick@lewisroca.com<mailto:PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>
`
`D. 520.629.4455
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-----Original Message-----
`From: McCormick, Patrick Emerson
`Sent: Friday, November 17, 2023 09:37
`To: 'Todd Gregorian' <TGregorian@fenwick.com<mailto:TGregorian@fenwick.com>>
`Cc: Christopher Lavin <CLavin@fenwick.com<mailto:CLavin@fenwick.com>>
`Subject: RE: conference
`
`
`
`Todd, I will get you PersonalWeb's contested entries as soon as I am able. I will try to make it today, but
`this was an unexpected short deadline on an already-full pre-holiday calendar.
`
`
`
`Patrick Emerson McCormick, CIPP/US
`
`He|Him|His
`
`Associate
`
`Admitted in Arizona, California, and Colorado
`
`
`
`PMcCormick@lewisroca.com<mailto:PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>
`
`D. 520.629.4455
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 911-4 Filed 11/21/23 Page 11 of 12
`
`
`
`
`-----Original Message-----
`
`From: Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com<mailto:TGregorian@fenwick.com>>
`
`Sent: Friday, November 17, 2023 09:25
`
`To: McCormick, Patrick Emerson <PMcCormick@lewisroca.com<mailto:PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>>
`
`Cc: Christopher Lavin <CLavin@fenwick.com<mailto:CLavin@fenwick.com>>
`
`Subject: conference
`
`
`
`CAUTION! [EXTERNAL to Lewis Roca]
`
`
`
`Patrick,
`
`Could you shoot us over the identification of entries for the “unsuccessful” discovery motion today? We
`need some lead time to get a timely response from Amazon.
`
`Thanks much
`
`-t
`
`________________________________
`
`This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they
`are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the
`employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you
`are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is
`strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
`replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be
`privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is
`covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
`
`________________________________
`
`This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they
`are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the
`employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you
`are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 911-4 Filed 11/21/23 Page 12 of 12
`
`strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
`replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be
`privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is
`covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
`
`________________________________
`
`This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they
`are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the
`employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you
`are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is
`strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
`replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be
`privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is
`covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
`
`________________________________
`
`This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they
`are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the
`employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you
`are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is
`strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
`replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be
`privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is
`covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
`
`
`
`This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
`message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the
`intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly
`prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information
`transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended
`recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
`
`
`
`This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
`message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the
`intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly
`prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information
`transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended
`recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
`
`
`
`This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
`message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the
`intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly
`prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information
`transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended
`recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
`
`11
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket