`
`Exhibit B
`(Filed Publicly
`Pursuant to Order)
`
`
`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 871 Filed 04/21/23 Page 2 of 3
`
`Message
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`
`Subject:
`
`Jeffrey Gersh [jgersh@stubbsalderton.com]
`3/29/2021 4:56:06 PM
`Anthony Neumann [/o=Exchangelabs/ou=Exchange Administrative Group
`(FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=2f46881d75534da88cda6ea3c888c9db-aneumann]; Murray Markiles, ECA
`[mmarkiles@ecamail.com]; Michael Sherman [masherman@stubbsalderton.com]
`RE: Pweb - Privileged
`
`I will ck. I am sorry if I missed them
`
`Jeffrey F. Gersh
`Partner, Stubbs Alderton & Madd!es, UP
`
`i~I~
`~!~, □
`
`Fl, Sherman
`
`CA 91403
`
`The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an
`attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent
`responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination,
`distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the
`original message.
`
`From: Anthony Neumann <aneumann@brilliantdigital.com>
`Sent: Monday, March 29, 202112:21 PM
`To: Jeffrey Gersh <jgersh@stubbsalderton.com>; Murray Markiles, ECA <mmarkiles@ecamail.com>; Michael Sherman
`<masherman@stubbsalderton.com>
`Subject: RE: Pweb - Privileged
`
`[EXTERNAL EMAIL] This email ls from an external sender, and not from Stubbs Alderton & Markiles.
`Do not cilck on !inks or attachments unless you are sure of the sender.
`
`They were uploaded as requested a while ago ....
`
`From: Jeffrey Gersh <jg_fr.~.@stubbsa!derton.c~m>
`Sent: Monday, March 29, 202110:39 AM
`To: Murray Markiles, ECA <mmarkiles@ecamaiLcom>; Michael Sherman <masherman@)stubbsalderton.com>
`Cc: Anthony Neumann <aneumann@bri!liantdig1taLrnm>
`Subject: RE: Pweb - Privileged
`
`My recollection is that John did not know much about the secured loans. Anthony was going
`to send me the loans and filings to look at. ! don1t recall seeing them. I don't know much
`about the appeal issues you asked about
`
`JG
`
`Jeffrey L Ger:sh
`
`Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`BDE-00064425
`
`
`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 871 Filed 04/21/23 Page 3 of 3
`
`1S2fi() \/entura
`
`2()th
`
`The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an
`attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent
`responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination,
`distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the
`original message.
`
`From: Murray Markiles, ECA <mmarki!es@ecarnaiLcom>
`Sent: Monday, March 29, 202110:36 AM
`To: Michael Sherman <masherman@stubbsalderton.com>; Jeffrey Gersh <igersh@stubbsalderton.com>
`Cc: 'Anthony Neumann (anewnann@bdlliantdigitai.com)' <aneurnann@bri!!iantdi!!ital.com>
`Subject: Pweb - Privileged
`
`[EXTERNAL EMAIL] Thls email ls from an external sender, and not from Stubbs Alderton & Markiles.
`Do not click on !inks or attachments unless you are sure of the sender.
`
`I assume we have heard nothing from the Fed Circuit appeal panel? What does that thell us if anything?
`
`What is the timing of the appeal of the fee award?
`
`Did John Mcllvery verify that the secured loans and associated UCC filing statements were in good order?
`
`Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`BDE-00064426
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
