throbber
Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 869-7 Filed 04/19/23 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`Thomas M. Robins III (State Bar No. 054423)
` trobins@frandzel.com
`Michael Gerard Fletcher (State Bar No. 070849)
` mfletcher@frandzel.com
`Bruce D. Poltrock (State Bar No. 162448)
` bpoltrock@frandzel.com
`FRANDZEL ROBINS BLOOM & CSATO, L.C.
`1000 Wilshire Boulevard, Nineteenth Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90017-2427
`Telephone: (323) 852-1000
`Facsimile: (323) 651-2577
`
`Attorneys for Third Parties BRILLIANT
`DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and
`MONTO HOLDINGS PTY LTD
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`
` Case No. 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`
`Case No. 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`
`Case No. 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`DECLARATION OF THOMAS M.
`ROBINS, III IN SUPPORT OF BDE AND
`MONTO OPPOSITION TO AMAZON’S
`MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION
`OF DOCUMENTS OF THIRD PARTIES
`BDE/MONTO WITHHELD AS
`PRIVILEGED (Dkt. 860, 862, 864)
`
`
`
`IN RE: PERSONAL WEB TECHNOLOGIES,
`LLC ET AL., PATENT LITIGATION
`
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC., and AMAZON WEB
`SERVICES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`v.
`
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and
`LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`
`Defendants,
`
`
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
`and LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`TWITCH INTERACTIVE, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`i
`
`Case No. 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`
`4900992v1 | 101334-0002
`ROBINS DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF BDE AND MONTO OPPOSITION TO AMAZON’S MOTION TO
`COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS OF THIRD PARTIES BDE/MONTO WITHHELD AS PRIVILEGED
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`FRANDZEL ROBINS BLOOM & CSATO, L.C. 
`
`1000 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, NINETEENTH FLOOR 
`
`LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017‐2427 
`
`(323) 852‐1000 
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 869-7 Filed 04/19/23 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`I, Thomas M. Robins, III, declare:
`1.
`I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all of the courts of the State
`of California and this Court. I am a shareholder of Frandzel Robins Bloom & Csato, L.C.,
`attorneys of record for Third Parties Brilliant Digital Entertainment, Inc. (“BDE”) and Monto
`Holdings Pty, Ltd. (“Monto”). If called as a witness, I could and would testify to the following
`based on my own personal knowledge.
`2.
`I personally became actively involved in this case in March 2022. Thus, I have no
`personal knowledge about the events and communications that occurred between our clients, my
`colleagues Michael Gerard Fletcher, Craig Welin and/or Bruce Poltrock, and the Stubbs Alderton
`firm (“SAM”) and Jeffrey Gersh back in April 2021.
`3.
`Since Amazon began its efforts to compel production of the materials that are
`included in our client’s privilege log (see Amazon’s original Exhibit A filed with the Joint
`Statement, Dkt. 860-2, color coded Orange (Gersh emails) and Yellow (non-Gersh Emails), I have
`been speaking with Jeffrey Gersh of SAM regarding the events that occurred in late March
`through late April 2021 that are reflected in the Bermeister, Neumann, Dyne, Markiles, Fletcher
`and Welin declarations filed concurrently herewith and the matters that are the subject of
`Amazon’s current motion.
`4.
`Following the issuance of the Court’s Order, Dkt. 862, I emailed and spoke with
`Mr. Gersh about providing a declaration addressing the issues raised by the motion. Mr. Gersh
`stated that he was reluctant to provide a declaration. On Saturday, April 8, 2023, I was telephoned
`by Michael A. Sherman of SAM who told me that, on the advice of counsel, Mr. Gersh would not
`be providing a declaration.
`5.
`On the afternoon of Monday, April 18, 2023, I was told by Kevin Bermeister and
`later, Murray Markiles, that Mr. Gersh was now willing to consider a declaration but that he was
`in New Orleans in depositions all that day and would be on April 19th, as well.
`6.
`I attempted to reach Mr. Gersh the evening of April 18th and commencing at 5:30
`a.m., my time, the morning of April 19th, both unsuccessful. At 8:15 a.m., I received a call from
`Mr. Sherman who told me that Mr. Gersh would not be able to provide a declaration today
`1
`Case No. 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`4900992v1 | 101334-0002
`ROBINS DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF BDE AND MONTO OPPOSITION TO AMAZON’S MOTION TO
`COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS OF THIRD PARTIES BDE/MONTO WITHHELD AS PRIVILEGED
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`FRANDZEL ROBINS BLOOM & CSATO, L.C. 
`
`1000 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, NINETEENTH FLOOR 
`
`LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017‐2427 
`
`(323) 852‐1000 
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 869-7 Filed 04/19/23 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`because of his schedule. I requested that he consider providing a declaration tomorrow, April
`20th, which I would file with the Court, albeit beyond the opposition deadline set by the Court.
`7.
`As of the time of signing this declaration I do not know whether such a declaration
`from Mr. Gersh will be forthcoming, but if I receive one, it will be filed with the Court.
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the law of the United States that the forgoing is
`true and correct.
`Executed this 19th day of April, 2023 at Los Angeles, California.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`THOMAS M. ROBINS III
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`2
`4900992v1 | 101334-0002
`ROBINS DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF BDE AND MONTO OPPOSITION TO AMAZON’S MOTION TO
`COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS OF THIRD PARTIES BDE/MONTO WITHHELD AS PRIVILEGED
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`FRANDZEL ROBINS BLOOM & CSATO, L.C. 
`
`1000 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, NINETEENTH FLOOR 
`
`LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017‐2427 
`
`(323) 852‐1000 
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket