throbber
Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 869-1 Filed 04/19/23 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`Thomas M. Robins III (State Bar No. 054423)
` trobins@frandzel.com
`Michael Gerard Fletcher (State Bar No. 070849)
` mfletcher@frandzel.com
`Bruce D. Poltrock (State Bar No. 162448)
` bpoltrock@frandzel.com
`FRANDZEL ROBINS BLOOM & CSATO, L.C.
`1000 Wilshire Boulevard, Nineteenth Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90017-2427
`Telephone: (323) 852-1000
`Facsimile: (323) 651-2577
`
`Attorneys for Third Parties BRILLIANT
`DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and
`MONTO HOLDINGS PTY LTD
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`
` Case No. 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`
`Case No. 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`
`Case No. 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`DECLARATION OF ANTHONY
`NEUMANN IN SUPPORT OF BDE AND
`MONTO OPPOSITION TO AMAZON’S
`MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION
`OF DOCUMENTS OF THIRD PARTIES
`BDE/MONTO WITHHELD AS
`PRIVILEGED (Dkt. 860, 862, 864)
`
`
`
`IN RE: PERSONAL WEB TECHNOLOGIES,
`LLC ET AL., PATENT LITIGATION
`
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC., and AMAZON WEB
`SERVICES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`v.
`
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and
`LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`
`Defendants,
`
`
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
`and LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`TWITCH INTERACTIVE, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`1
`4901103v1 | 101334-0002
`DECLARATION OF ANTHONY NEUMANN IN SUPPORT OF BDE AND MONTO OPPOSITION TO
`AMAZON'S MOTION TO COMPEL
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`FRANDZEL ROBINS BLOOM & CSATO, L.C.
`
`1000 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, NINETEENTH FLOOR
`
`LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017-2427
`
`(323) 852-1000
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 869-1 Filed 04/19/23 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`I, Anthony Neumann, declare:
`I am Vice President of Business Development of Brilliant Digital Entertainment,
`1.
`Inc. (“BDE”). I have been employed by BDE since its inception in 1996. Kevin Bermeister is a
`founder and CEO of BDE. If called as a witness I could and would competently testify to the
`following based on my own personal knowledge.
`Since BDE’s inception, Murray Markiles and/or law firms of which he was a
`2.
`partner have provided legal advice and services to BDE and its subsidiaries. After formation of
`Stubbs Alderton Markiles (“SAM”) that firm has provided legal services to BDE and its
`subsidiaries up through the present time.
`In addition to other legal services provided to BDE as BDE’s primary corporate
`3.
`counsel, SAM attorneys, commencing in 2011, drafted documents in connection with the loans by
`BDE and Topodia, now assigned to Monto Holdings Pty, Ltd. (“Monto”), and by Europlay Capital
`Advisors, LLC (“ECA”) and Claria Innovations, LLC (“Claria”) to PersonalWeb Technologies,
`LLC (“PW”), consisting of Promissory Notes, Security Agreements, and other related documents,
`including periodic amendments to same up to and through the 2019 amendments. Mr. Markiles is
`affiliated with ECA and Claria.
`Attorney Jeffrey Gersh has provided legal services to BDE and one or more of its
`4.
`subsidiaries, beginning as early as 2004 -- well before the time he joined the Stubbs Alderton firm
`approximately seven-eight years ago. Once Mr. Gersh was with SAM, he has been working with
`other SAM lawyers representing PW in the Amazon litigation. Moreover, while at SAM, Mr.
`Gersh also performed legal services for BDE and its subsidiaries, including in 2018 with respect to
`a trade mark matter.
`In March 2021, after this Court’s attorneys’ fees award was rendered against PW,
`5.
`the issue arose as to what impact that award could have on the secured lenders’ position vis-à-vis
`PW and the collateral that PW had granted to the secured lenders, including in light of the pending
`appeal of the Court’s summary judgment order to the United States Supreme Court, the anticipated
`appeal of the attorneys’ fees award, and appeals of adverse judgments that were then pending in
`other non-Amazon matters. Mr. Bermeister and Mr. Markiles requested that I contact an attorney
`2
`Case No. 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`4901103v1 | 101334-0002
`DECLARATION OF ANTHONY NEUMANN IN SUPPORT OF BDE AND MONTO OPPOSITION TO
`AMAZON'S MOTION TO COMPEL
`
`
`
`FRANDZEL ROBINS BLOOM & CSATO, L.C.
`
`1000 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, NINETEENTH FLOOR
`
`LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017-2427
`
`(323) 852-1000
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 869-1 Filed 04/19/23 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`by the name of Ronald Bender of the Levene, Neale, Bender law firm in Los Angeles to act as
`counsel for BDE, Monto, ECA, and Claria to advise the secured lenders with respect to these
`issues.
`
`As I recall, Mr. Markiles asked Mr. Gersh to assist us in obtaining and reviewing
`6.
`the loan documents that had been prepared by SAM, and be part of discussions regarding same
`with Mr. Bender. Mr. Gersh was a party to and copied on emails with Mr. Bender during the last
`few days of March and the first two days of April 2021. See for example Exhibits C and D,
`previously submitted to the Court. I copied Mr. Gersh and included him on those communications
`by me because I fully believed and understood that he was participating as counsel assisting BDE,
`ECA and Monto in connection with the issues confronting the secured lenders concerning their
`collateral interests and rights. I included Mr. Markiles because ECA and Claria were co-lenders
`and he served as the general counsel and a managing director of ECA.
`On April 2, 2021, Mr. Bender informed me that his firm could not handle the
`7.
`proposed retention and referred me to Craig Welin of Frandzel Robins Bloom & Csato, LC.
`On April 2, 2021 at approximately 5:00 p.m. I sent the email to Mr. Welin that is
`8.
`Exhibit B, previously submitted to the Court. I copied Mr. Gersh and included him on this
`communication and subsequent communications by me because I fully believed and understood
`that he was participating as legal counsel assisting BDE, ECA and Monto in connection with the
`issues confronting the lenders concerning their collateral interests. As can be seen from the body
`of my April 2, 2021, email to Mr. Welin, I identified “[t]he company I work for. . . .” BDE, as “a
`lender to a company that is the subject of an attorney fee award” and I identified Stubbs Alderton
`Markiles as “the law firm we have worked with for decades. . . .”
`Thereafter, Mr. Gersh was included on emails and conference/Zoom calls with Mr.
`9.
`Welin, and his colleagues, Michael Fletcher and Bruce Poltrock, of the Frandzel firm regarding
`the evaluation of the secured lenders’ positions and rights under the loan documents and
`applicable law, including possible strategies for the secured lenders to protect their collateral
`interests, which ultimately led to the filing of the action for the appointment of a receiver over
`PW.
`Case No. 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`3
`4901103v1 | 101334-0002
`DECLARATION OF ANTHONY NEUMANN IN SUPPORT OF BDE AND MONTO OPPOSITION TO
`AMAZON'S MOTION TO COMPEL
`
`
`
`FRANDZEL ROBINS BLOOM & CSATO, L.C.
`
`1000 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, NINETEENTH FLOOR
`
`LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017-2427
`
`(323) 852-1000
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 869-1 Filed 04/19/23 Page 4 of 4
`
`From the beginning of Mr. Gersh’s involvement in late March 2021 in the approach
`10.
`to Mr. Bender and in the approach to and communications with the Frandzel firm, I understood
`that Mr. Gersh was acting on behalf of BDE, and by extension, the secured lenders as a member or
`representative of SAM which had been long-time counsel for BDE -- consistent with how I
`introduced the firm to Mr. Welin in my April 2, 2021 email, Exhibit B.
`11.
`Attached hereto is Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of the Fourth Amended and
`Restated Secured Revolving Promissory Note between PW and BDE. The same form of
`Promissory Note was executed by PW with Monto, ECA, and Claria.
`12.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of the Pledge and General
`Security Agreement between PW and BDE (the same form was also executed in connection with
`the loans by Monto, ECA and Claria).
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is
`true and correct.
`Executed April 19, 2023 at Los Angeles County, California.
`
`ANTHONY NEUMANN
`
`Case No. 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`4
`4901103v1 | 101334-0002
`DECLARATION OF ANTHONY NEUMANN IN SUPPORT OF BDE AND MONTO OPPOSITION TO
`AMAZON'S MOTION TO COMPEL
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`FRANDZEL ROBINS BLOOM & CSATO, L.C.
`
`1000 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, NINETEENTH FLOOR
`
`LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017-2427
`
`(323)852-1000
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket