`
`
`
`J. DAVID HADDEN (CSB No. 176148)
`dhadden@fenwick.com
`SAINA S. SHAMILOV (CSB No. 215636)
`sshamilov@fenwick.com
`MELANIE L. MAYER (admitted pro hac vice)
`mmayer@fenwick.com
`TODD R. GREGORIAN (CSB No. 236096)
`tgregorian@fenwick.com
`RAVI R. RANGANATH (CSB No. 272981)
`rranganath@fenwick.com
`CHRISTOPHER S. LAVIN (CSB No. 301702)
`clavin@fenwick.com
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`Silicon Valley Center
`801 California Street
`Mountain View, CA 94041
`Telephone:
`650.988.8500
`Facsimile:
`650.938.5200
`
`Counsel for Defendants AMAZON.COM, INC.,
`AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC., and
`TWITCH INTERACTIVE, INC.
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`IN RE: PERSONAL WEB TECHNOLOGIES,
`Case No.: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`LLC ET AL., PATENT LITIGATION
`
`Case No. 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC., and AMAZON WEB
`Case No. 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`SERVICES, INC.,
`
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
`Plaintiffs
`CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER
`PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE
`SEALED OF AMAZON.COM, INC.,
`AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC., AND
`TWITCH INTERACTIVE, INC. AS TO
`THE JOINT SUBMISSION
`REGARDING AMAZON’S MOTION TO
`COMPEL PRODUCTION OF
`DOCUMENTS THAT THE
`PERSONALWEB INVESTORS HAVE
`IMPROPERLY WITHHELD AS
`PRIVILEGED
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and
`LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`Defendants,
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and
`LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`Plaintiffs
`
`v.
`
`TWITCH INTERACTIVE, INC. a Delaware
`corporation
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`ADMIN. MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER
`PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NOS 5:18-cv-02834-BL;
`5:18-cv-00767-BLF; 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`
`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 859 Filed 03/24/23 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5, Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Web Services,
`Inc., and Twitch Interactive, Inc. (“Amazon”) hereby provisionally file under seal, pending the
`Court’s ruling on the motion to seal, the following documents produced by non-party Brilliant
`Digital Entertainment, Inc. (“BDE”), which BDE has designated as “Attorneys’ Eyes Only” or
`“Confidential,” pursuant to the Stipulated Amended Protective Order (Dkt. Nos. 427, 786):
`
`Document
`
`Exhibits
`
`Description
`
`Exhibits B-D and H-I to the Declaration of
`Todd R. Gregorian in Support of Amazon’s
`Portion of the Joint Submission Regarding
`Amazon’s Motion to Compel Production of
`Documents That the PersonalWeb Investors
`Have Improperly Withheld as Privileged
`
`Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(f), Amazon expects that BDE will submit a statement
`and/or declaration substantiating that the above documents should be sealed.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Dated: March 24, 2023
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`By: /s/ Todd R. Gregorian
`Todd R. Gregorian
`
`Counsel for AMAZON.COM, INC.
`AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC. and
`TWITCH INTERACTIVE, INC.
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`ADMIN. MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER
`PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE SEALED
`
`1
`
`
`
`CASE NOS 5:18-cv-02834-BL;
`5:18-cv-00767-BLF; 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
