throbber
Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 834 Filed 01/05/23 Page 1 of 4
`
`MICHAEL A. SHERMAN (SBN 94783)
`masherman@stubbsalderton.com
`JEFFREY F. GERSH (SBN 87124)
`jgersh@stubbsalderton.com
`STUBBS ALDERTON & MARKILES, LLP
`15260 Ventura Blvd., 20th Floor
`Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
`Telephone:
`(818) 444-4500
`Facsimile:
`(818) 444-4520
`
`Former Attorneys for PERSONALWEB
`TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`CASE NO.: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`IN RE PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES,
`LLC, ET., AL., PATENT LITIGATION
`
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC. and AMAZON WEB
`SERVICE, INC.,
`
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
` Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, et
`al.,
`
` Defendants.
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, et
`al.,
`
`STATEMENT OF STUBBS ALDERTON
`& MARKILES, LLP IN RESPONSE TO
`THE UPDATED STATUS REPORT OF
`AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON WEB
`SERVICES, INC. AND TWITCH
`INTERATIVE, INC.
`
`JUDGE: Hon. Susan van Keulen
`HEARING DATE: January 6, 2023
`TIME: 1:30 p.m.
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`TWITCH INTERACTIVE, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`STATEMENT OF STUBBS ALDERTON & MARKILES, LLP
`IN RESPONSE TO THE UPDATED STATUS REPORT
`
`
`CASE NO: 5:18-MD-02834-BLF
`CASE NO: 5:18-CV-00767-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-CV-05619-BLF
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`STUBBS ALDERTON & MARKILES, LLP
`
`15260 VENTURA BLVD.
`
`SHERMAN OAKS, CALIFORNIA 91403
`
`20TH FLOOR
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 834 Filed 01/05/23 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Web Services, and Services, Inc. and Twitch Interactive, Inc.
`
`(collectively “Amazon”) unilaterally filed an Updated Status Report with respect to the hearing
`
`originally set for January 5, 2023 at 1:30 p.m., (now continued to January 6, 2023) without ever
`
`seeking Stubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP’s (“SAM”), position. Amazon’s report distorts the facts
`
`and attacks SAM in the process. The very first paragraph of Amazon’s report accuses PersonalWeb
`
`of only “last week” instructing SAM to turn over documents and cites to Exhibit A of Mr. Gregorian’s
`
`Declaration, Dkt. 828-2, at page 3. Mr. Gregorian simply misstates the documents/emails in order to
`
`paint SAM in the most unfavorable light before this Court. Amazon’s attacks on SAM are simply
`
`unwarranted and unnecessary. SAM has been diligently working to provide documents to
`
`PersonalWeb’s new counsel, Lewis Roca. (Gersh Dec. ¶ 2).
`
`SAM has undertaken to provide and has provided documents to Lewis Roca on a rolling basis
`
`and continues to do so. To date, SAM has delivered approximately 4.3 gigabytes of data to Lewis
`
`Roca which consist of approximately 14,000 emails with approximately 4,000 pdf attachments, 1800
`
`Word documents, approximately 455 (originally estimated at 520) Excel spreadsheets, 730 images,
`
`580 text files, 115 compressed files (uncompressed), and other documents. Approximately 27
`
`mailboxes have been searched for emails and documents and approximately 23,000 PersonalWeb
`
`documents have been delivered to Lewis Roca. (Gersh Dec. ¶ 3.) More documents will be
`
`forthcoming. In fact, it is anticipated that today, January 5, 2023, or at the latest tomorrow, hard
`
`copies of certain documents in possession of SAM are going to be delivered to Lewis Roca;
`
`approximately 5 banker type boxes. (Gersh Dec. ¶ 3)
`
`Amazon then attacks SAM directly and accuses SAM of failing to discuss “what paper or
`
`electronic files it maintains for PersonalWeb” and cites once again to Exhibit C of Mr. Gregorian’s
`
`declaration (Dkt. 828-4).
`
`This Court should note that on December 28, 2022, Mr. Gersh of SAM sent a detailed response
`
`to Mr. Lavin explaining the domains that were searched, that the search cut off was extended from
`
`July 31, 2021 [not July 31, 2022] to September 15, 2022 (the date that SAM was no longer counsel
`
`for PersonalWeb), advised counsel for Amazon that searches were continuing and roughly how much
`
`time had already been spent through the Christmas holidays conducting searches and what additional
`1
`STATEMENT OF STUBBS ALDERTON & MARKILES, LLP
`IN RESPONSE TO THE UPDATED STATUS REPORT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO: 5:18-MD-02834-BLF
`CASE NO: 5:18-CV-00767-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-CV-05619-BLF
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`STUBBS ALDERTON & MARKILES, LLP
`
`15260 VENTURA BLVD.
`
`20TH FLOOR
`
`SHERMAN OAKS, CALIFORNIA 91403
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 834 Filed 01/05/23 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`search terms were run, all of which were responsive to Mr. Lavin’s December 26, 2022 email (Dkt
`
`828-4) as Exhibit C to Mr. Gregorian’s declaration at page 4. At no time did Mr. Gersh state in the
`
`referenced email that he has “no information” as declared by Mr. Gregorian.
`
`What is most troubling is Amazon’s counsel, accusing SAM of participating in a “shell game”
`
`with PersonalWeb, without any evidence to support its claim (Dkt 828-4, at 2). Amazon simply wants
`
`to continue to beat on SAM despite the hundreds and hundreds of hours it has put into reviewing
`
`documents and emails and providing same to PersonalWeb’s counsel, Lewis Roca.
`
`Amazon further misstates the email that it references from Mr. Gersh in Mr. Gregorian’s
`
`declaration at Exhibit C, (Dkt 828-4 at 2). Amazon takes out of context the word “prohibited”
`
`claiming that the email somehow says that SAM is “prohibited” from communicating with its former
`
`client. That is not the context at all in which the email was written. Mr. Gersh’s email references a
`
`cutoff date of September 15, 2022 as the date when it no longer represented PersonalWeb in the
`
`District Court matter. This seemed like the most logical date to run the searches to, since it was the
`
`date SAM no longer represented PersonalWeb. Any communications after that between SAM and
`
`its former client PersonalWeb in the District Court matter should still remain privileged, including
`
`communications regarding the Federal Circuit matter.
`
`Counsel for Amazon then attacks SAM on “technical issues” citing missing pages, missing
`
`attachments, no load files with document metadata. This is not true. Whenever SAM has been
`
`advised of a "technical issue”, it has worked diligently to provide the missing information or sought
`
`to understand what happened. In fact, load files were provided to Lewis Roca, and when SAM was
`
`later informed they were in the wrong format or a format they could not read, the format was changed
`
`and the documents resent to Lewis Roca. The document metadata is found on the load files sent to
`
`Lewis Roca, as well as parent/child information (i.e., attachments to the main email). SAM learned
`
`from its third-party document management company, Everlaw, that the pages all appear as originally
`
`transmitted and are informed that nothing was intentionally deleted or omitted. (Gersh Dec. ¶ 8,
`
`Ex. 1.)
`
`
`2
`STATEMENT OF STUBBS ALDERTON & MARKILES, LLP
`IN RESPONSE TO THE UPDATED STATUS REPORT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO: 5:18-MD-02834-BLF
`CASE NO: 5:18-CV-00767-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-CV-05619-BLF
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`STUBBS ALDERTON & MARKILES, LLP
`
`15260 VENTURA BLVD.
`
`20TH FLOOR
`
`SHERMAN OAKS, CALIFORNIA 91403
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 834 Filed 01/05/23 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`Dated: January 5, 2023
`
`STUBBS, ALDERTON & MARKILES, LLP
`
`By: /s/ Jeffrey F. Gersh
`Michael A. Sherman
`Jeffrey F. Gersh
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`3
`STATEMENT OF STUBBS ALDERTON & MARKILES, LLP
`IN RESPONSE TO THE UPDATED STATUS REPORT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO: 5:18-MD-02834-BLF
`CASE NO: 5:18-CV-00767-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-CV-05619-BLF
`
`STUBBS ALDERTON & MARKILES, LLP
`
`15260 VENTURA BLVD.
`
`20TH FLOOR
`
`SHERMAN OAKS, CALIFORNIA 91403
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket