Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 828-2 Filed 01/03/23 Page 1 of 11
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 828-2 Filed 01/03/23 Page 1 of 11
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 828-2 Filed 01/03/23 Page 2 of 11
`
`Christopher Lavin
`From:
`McCormick, Patrick Emerson <PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>
`Sent:
`Tuesday, January 3, 2023 10:45 AM
`To:
`Todd Gregorian; Christopher Lavin
`Cc:
`Charles, Robert; Creswell, Renee; Rodriguez, Daniela
`Subject:
`RE: PersonalWeb v. Amazon - post-judgment production
`
`** EXTERNAL EMAIL ** 
`Todd, 
`I don’t understand your question, can you clarify?  
`The approximately 2,500 recent documents SAM transmitted resulting from the search terms below were new 
`documents not previously transmitted to PersonalWeb. SAM did not review the documents that resulted from the 
`below searches, but transmitted the results in their entirety to PersonalWeb to review. 
` 
`
`Patrick Emerson McCormick, CIPP/US 
`He|Him|His 
`Associate 
`
` 
`
`PMcCormick@lewisroca.com 
`D. 520.629.4455 
`
` 
`
` 
` 
`From: Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com>  
`Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2023 06:36 
`To: McCormick, Patrick Emerson <PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>; Christopher Lavin <CLavin@fenwick.com> 
`Cc: Charles, Robert <RCharles@lewisroca.com>; Creswell, Renee <RCreswell@lewisroca.com>; Rodriguez, Daniela 
`<DIRodriguez@lewisroca.com> 
`Subject: RE: PersonalWeb v. Amazon ‐ post‐judgment production 
` 
`[EXTERNAL]
`
`Patrick,  
` 
`Did SAM run the additional search terms across the entire collected data set and review and produce the results?  Your 
`message makes it sound like they ran them only across the materials they had already designated for production.   
` 
`Thanks,  
`‐t 
` 
`From: McCormick, Patrick Emerson <PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>  
`Sent: Monday, January 2, 2023 7:01 PM 
`To: Christopher Lavin <CLavin@fenwick.com>; Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com> 
`Cc: Charles, Robert <RCharles@lewisroca.com>; Creswell, Renee <RCreswell@lewisroca.com>; Rodriguez, Daniela 
`<DIRodriguez@lewisroca.com> 
`Subject: RE: PersonalWeb v. Amazon ‐ post‐judgment production 
`1
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 828-2 Filed 01/03/23 Page 3 of 11
`
` 
`** EXTERNAL EMAIL ** 
`Chris, 
` 
`SAM represented to me that the most recent documents it transmitted to Lewis Roca (approximately 2,500 documents) 
`were the result of the following (direct quotes from Michael Sherman of SAM): 
` 
`
`These documents do include some number of documents being furnished you that fall within Boolean searches 
`in what Amazon had dubbed “additional search terms”. 
`The categories that Amazon had referred to as the “additional search terms” are: 
`(3) judgment w/5 (adverse or fee! or “attorney fees” or “attorney’s fees” or “attorneys’ fees” or sanction or 
`cost! or 285 or PersonalWeb or “Personal Web” or PWeb or PW)  
`(4) (asset! or capital! or patent!) w/5 (fee! or cost! or sanction! or 285 or protect! or insulate or receiver!)  
`(5) (note! or loan! or invest! Or pay!) w/5 (“Brilliant Digital” or BDE or Claria or Europlay or ECA or Monto or 
`Topodia or creditor!) 
`(6) (PWeb) w/5 (“set‐up” or establish! or organiz! or purpose or structur! or protect! or insulate or 
`receiver!) 
`I am told that documents we had previously furnished you did include search results that pulled some of these 
`categories 3‐6.  The link provides more documents that fall within these categories.  
`
` 
`Mr. Sherman also stated that SAM searched these categories without an end‐date restriction. 
` 
`
`Patrick Emerson McCormick, CIPP/US 
`He|Him|His 
`Associate 
`
` 
`
`PMcCormick@lewisroca.com 
`D. 520.629.4455 
`
` 
`
` 
` 
`From: Christopher Lavin <CLavin@fenwick.com>  
`Sent: Friday, December 30, 2022 16:47 
`To: McCormick, Patrick Emerson <PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>; Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com> 
`Cc: Charles, Robert <RCharles@lewisroca.com>; Creswell, Renee <RCreswell@lewisroca.com>; Rodriguez, Daniela 
`<DIRodriguez@lewisroca.com> 
`Subject: RE: PersonalWeb v. Amazon ‐ post‐judgment production 
` 
`[EXTERNAL]
`
`Patrick, 
`
`  
`Following up on our call, please provide an updated list of the search terms that Stubbs Alderton has run to collect 
`responsive PersonalWeb documents. 
`
`  
`Thanks, 
`Chris 
`
`  
`Chris Lavin 
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 828-2 Filed 01/03/23 Page 4 of 11
`
`Fenwick | Associate | +1 415‐875‐2287 | CLavin@fenwick.com | Admitted to practice in California. 
` 
`From: Christopher Lavin  
`Sent: Friday, December 30, 2022 9:44 AM 
`To: McCormick, Patrick Emerson <PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>; Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com> 
`Cc: Charles, Robert <RCharles@lewisroca.com>; Creswell, Renee <RCreswell@lewisroca.com>; Rodriguez, Daniela 
`<DIRodriguez@lewisroca.com> 
`Subject: RE: PersonalWeb v. Amazon ‐ post‐judgment production 
` 
`Patrick, 
` 
`We would still like to meet and confer this afternoon – please provide your availability.   
` 
`Thanks, 
`Chris 
` 
`Chris Lavin 
`Fenwick | Associate | +1 415‐875‐2287 | CLavin@fenwick.com | Admitted to practice in California. 
` 
`From: McCormick, Patrick Emerson <PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>  
`Sent: Friday, December 30, 2022 8:09 AM 
`To: Christopher Lavin <CLavin@fenwick.com>; Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com> 
`Cc: Charles, Robert <RCharles@lewisroca.com>; Creswell, Renee <RCreswell@lewisroca.com>; Rodriguez, Daniela 
`<DIRodriguez@lewisroca.com> 
`Subject: RE: PersonalWeb v. Amazon ‐ post‐judgment production 
` 
`** EXTERNAL EMAIL ** 
`Chris, 
` 
`It looks like we have about 2,700 documents from SAM to review from their two most recent transmissions.  
` 
`As to the eight hard drives recently disclosed by SAM, they appear to comprise Michael Weiss’ collection of 
`PersonalWeb’s ESI in the summer of 2019 that he then transmitted to SAM. Weiss has confirmed that he has maintained 
`a strict litigation hold on these repositories since summer 2019, and the data we collected this year would have captured 
`everything that is in the eight hard drives. We are working with a vendor to confirm, but we do not expect that the 
`documents contained in the eight hard drives will require our review or additional production.  
` 
`SAM has represented that it will transmit its physical files to my office soon. I have demanded that SAM provide all of its 
`documents so that PersonalWeb has sufficient time to review and produce all of its documents for PersonalWeb to 
`comply with the January 20, 2023 deadline.  
` 
`Please advise if you still want to meet and confer this afternoon.  
` 
`Best, 
`Patrick 
` 
`
`Patrick Emerson McCormick, CIPP/US 
`He|Him|His 
`Associate 
`
` 
`
`PMcCormick@lewisroca.com 
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 828-2 Filed 01/03/23 Page 5 of 11
`
`D. 520.629.4455 
`
` 
`
` 
` 
`From: Christopher Lavin <CLavin@fenwick.com>  
`Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2022 13:21 
`To: Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com>; McCormick, Patrick Emerson <PMcCormick@lewisroca.com> 
`Cc: Charles, Robert <RCharles@lewisroca.com>; Creswell, Renee <RCreswell@lewisroca.com>; Rodriguez, Daniela 
`<DIRodriguez@lewisroca.com> 
`Subject: RE: PersonalWeb v. Amazon ‐ post‐judgment production 
` 
`[EXTERNAL]
`
`Patrick, 
` 
`Please provide your availability for a call tomorrow. 
` 
`Thanks, 
`Chris 
` 
`Chris Lavin 
`Fenwick | Associate | +1 415‐875‐2287 | CLavin@fenwick.com | Admitted to practice in California. 
` 
`From: Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com>  
`Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2022 7:23 PM 
`To: McCormick, Patrick Emerson <PMcCormick@lewisroca.com> 
`Cc: Christopher Lavin <CLavin@fenwick.com>; Charles, Robert <RCharles@lewisroca.com>; Creswell, Renee 
`<RCreswell@lewisroca.com>; Rodriguez, Daniela <DIRodriguez@lewisroca.com> 
`Subject: Re: PersonalWeb v. Amazon ‐ post‐judgment production 
` 
`Yes, thanks.  Friday is fine. 
` 
`
`On Dec 28, 2022, at 9:51 PM, McCormick, Patrick Emerson <PMcCormick@lewisroca.com> wrote: 
`
`  
`
`** EXTERNAL EMAIL ** 
`
`Todd, 
`We just received another round of documents from SAM this evening, so I will not have an answer to 
`your first question until Friday at the earliest.  
`PersonalWeb will produce all responsive documents it has received from SAM no later than January 20, 
`2023.  
`Please let me know if you still wish to meet and confer on the issue. 
`  
`
`Patrick Emerson McCormick, CIPP/US 
`He|Him|His 
`Associate 
`<image001.png>
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 828-2 Filed 01/03/23 Page 6 of 11
`
`PMcCormick@lewisroca.com 
`D. 520.629.4455 
`
`<image002.png>
`
`  
`  
`‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ 
`From: Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com>  
`Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2022 18:06 
`To: McCormick, Patrick Emerson <PMcCormick@lewisroca.com> 
`Cc: Christopher Lavin <CLavin@fenwick.com>; Charles, Robert <RCharles@lewisroca.com>; Creswell, 
`Renee <RCreswell@lewisroca.com>; Rodriguez, Daniela <DIRodriguez@lewisroca.com> 
`Subject: Re: PersonalWeb v. Amazon ‐ post‐judgment production 
`  
`[EXTERNAL] 
`
`  
`Your away message provided that email responses may be delayed but that you could be reached by 
`phone.  The call will address: 
`
`  
`1.  The volume of documents and status of review of Stubbs documents previously provided. 
`
`  
`2.  The timing of PersonalWeb’s production of the responsive Stubbs materials. 
`
`  
`Thank you for accommodating us.  Let us know when you are available. 
`
`  
`On Dec 28, 2022, at 7:36 PM, McCormick, Patrick Emerson <PMcCormick@lewisroca.com> wrote: 
`  
` 
`** EXTERNAL EMAIL ** 
`  
`
`  
`Todd, 
`  
`In what way does my out of office message suggest that I would be available this week? 
`  
`I have record of one call from Chris, from late afternoon yesterday. 
`
`  
`Before I set aside time on my family vacation, please explain what it is you would like to discuss on this 
`call so that we can keep it as short as possible. Thanks. 
`  
`
`  
`Patrick Emerson McCormick, CIPP/US 
`He|Him|His 
`Associate 
`<image001.png> 
`PMcCormick@lewisroca.com<mailto:PMcCormick@lewisroca.com> 
`D. 520.629.4455 
`<image002.png> 
`  
`  
`  
`  
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 828-2 Filed 01/03/23 Page 7 of 11
`
`‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ 
`From: Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com> 
`Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2022 08:30 
`To: McCormick, Patrick Emerson <PMcCormick@lewisroca.com> 
`Cc: Christopher Lavin <CLavin@fenwick.com>; Charles, Robert <RCharles@lewisroca.com>; Creswell, 
`Renee <RCreswell@lewisroca.com>; Rodriguez, Daniela <DIRodriguez@lewisroca.com> 
`Subject: RE: PersonalWeb v. Amazon ‐ post‐judgment production 
`  
`  
`  
`[EXTERNAL] 
`  
`  
`
`  
`Patrick, 
`  
`  
`
`  
`Chris has been trying to reach you by phone at the number which your outgoing message said you 
`would be available this week.  Please let us know when we can conduct a call concerning the documents 
`(both provided to date and yet to be collected) by Stubbs Alderton, as well as PersonalWeb's intended 
`production timeline. 
`  
`  
`
`  
`Thank you, 
`  
`‐t 
`  
`  
`  
`‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ 
`
`  
`From: McCormick, Patrick Emerson 
`<PMcCormick@lewisroca.com<mailto:PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>> 
`
`  
`Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2022 10:11 PM 
`
`  
`To: Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com<mailto:TGregorian@fenwick.com>> 
`
`  
`Cc: Christopher Lavin <CLavin@fenwick.com<mailto:CLavin@fenwick.com>>; Charles, Robert 
`<RCharles@lewisroca.com<mailto:RCharles@lewisroca.com>>; Creswell, Renee 
`<RCreswell@lewisroca.com<mailto:RCreswell@lewisroca.com>>; Rodriguez, Daniela 
`<DIRodriguez@lewisroca.com<mailto:DIRodriguez@lewisroca.com>> 
`
`  
`Subject: RE: PersonalWeb v. Amazon ‐ post‐judgment production 
`  
`  
`  
`  
`
`  
`** EXTERNAL EMAIL ** 
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 828-2 Filed 01/03/23 Page 8 of 11
`
`  
`  
`
`  
`Todd, 
`
`  
`What? 
`  
`  
`
`  
`Patrick Emerson McCormick, CIPP/US 
`
`  
`He|Him|His 
`
`  
`Associate 
`  
`  
`
`  
`PMcCormick@lewisroca.com<mailto:PMcCormick@lewisroca.com> 
`
`  
`D. 520.629.4455 
`  
`  
`  
`  
`  
`  
`  
`  
`  
`‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ 
`
`  
`From: Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com<mailto:TGregorian@fenwick.com>> 
`
`  
`Sent: Friday, December 23, 2022 19:44 
`
`  
`To: McCormick, Patrick Emerson <PMcCormick@lewisroca.com<mailto:PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>> 
`
`  
`Cc: Christopher Lavin <CLavin@fenwick.com<mailto:CLavin@fenwick.com>>; Charles, Robert 
`<RCharles@lewisroca.com<mailto:RCharles@lewisroca.com>>; Creswell, Renee 
`<RCreswell@lewisroca.com<mailto:RCreswell@lewisroca.com>>; Rodriguez, Daniela 
`<DIRodriguez@lewisroca.com<mailto:DIRodriguez@lewisroca.com>> 
`
`  
`Subject: Re: PersonalWeb v. Amazon ‐ post‐judgment production 
`  
`  
`  
`[EXTERNAL] 
`  
`  
`
`  
`Thank you, Patrick.  As you well know, the Court ordered PersonalWeb to complete compliance with its 
`order by January 20th, not merely to produce the withheld privilege screen documents by then.    Your 
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 828-2 Filed 01/03/23 Page 9 of 11
`
`suggestion that PersonalWeb simply intends to disregard the Court’s order with respect to the Stubbs 
`documents is unfortunate.  Please provide your availability for a call on Dec 27 or 28, so that we may 
`clarify this issue in advance of the hearing. 
`  
`  
`  
`  
`  
`  
`
`  
`On Dec 23, 2022, at 8:55 PM, McCormick, Patrick Emerson 
`<PMcCormick@lewisroca.com<mailto:PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>> wrote: 
`  
`  
`  
` 
`
`  
`** EXTERNAL EMAIL ** 
`  
`  
`
`  
`Counsel, 
`  
`  
`
`  
`PersonalWeb’s post‐judgment production can be found at the following link: 
`https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lewisroca.sharefile.com/d‐
`s69bc05a9260e45769f600630ec8c7749__;!!HJT62s_lzg!0y0P7owVjctU9pHzHsU1WYMJ‐
`xcEfDT1XWwJwUq4rnOG3lPmWBK_1Qk1L1xuVVvDSuo8kM9Glf‐
`36IxXg0GBf81I$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lewisroca.sharefile.com/d‐
`s69bc05a9260e45769f600630ec8c7749__;!!HJT62s_lzg!0y0P7owVjctU9pHzHsU1WYMJ‐
`xcEfDT1XWwJwUq4rnOG3lPmWBK_1Qk1L1xuVVvDSuo8kM9Glf‐36IxXg0GBf81I$> 
`<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lewisroca.sharefile.com/d‐
`s69bc05a9260e45769f600630ec8c7749__;!!HJT62s_lzg!1uWws3qu9dBC9ABi_cH6A‐
`K5iESP1uqSoAajVUjkXtrx92HgMPriP0‐25i5lIYKNfXMtzzz4HOuwSlchN‐
`9Qnwa4$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lewisroca.sharefile.com/d‐
`s69bc05a9260e45769f600630ec8c7749__;!!HJT62s_lzg!1uWws3qu9dBC9ABi_cH6A‐
`K5iESP1uqSoAajVUjkXtrx92HgMPriP0‐25i5lIYKNfXMtzzz4HOuwSlchN‐9Qnwa4$>> 
`  
`  
`
`  
`Other than documents in SAM’s possession, there remain approximately 3,700 documents to be 
`reviewed by PersonalWeb. We expect no issues completing this review by the Court’s deadline of 
`January 20, 2023. PersonalWeb will continue to review and produce documents in SAM’s possession on 
`a rolling basis. 
`  
`  
`  
`If you have any difficulty accessing the above production, please let me know. A password will follow 
`under separate cover. 
`  
`  
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 828-2 Filed 01/03/23 Page 10 of 11
`
`  
`
`Patrick Emerson McCormick, CIPP/US 
`
`  
`He|Him|His 
`
`  
`Associate 
`
`  
`<image001.png> 
`
`  
`PMcCormick@lewisroca.com<mailto:PMcCormick@lewisroca.com<mailto:PMcCormick@lewisroca.com
`%3cmailto:PMcCormick@lewisroca.com>> 
`
`  
`D. 520.629.4455 
`
`  
`<image002.png> 
`
`  
`One South Church Avenue, Suite 2000 
`
`  
`Tucson, Arizona 85701‐1611 
`  
`lewisroca.com<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lewisroca.com/__;!!HJT62s_lzg!1uWws3qu9dBC9AB
`i_cH6A‐K5iESP1uqSoAajVUjkXtrx92HgMPriP0‐
`25i5lIYKNfXMtzzz4HOuwSlchN5CP1eqp$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/lewisroca.com/__;!!HJT62
`s_lzg!1uWws3qu9dBC9ABi_cH6A‐K5iESP1uqSoAajVUjkXtrx92HgMPriP0‐
`25i5lIYKNfXMtzzz4HOuwSlchN5CP1eqp$>> 
`
`  
`LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP 
`  
`  
`  
`  
`  
`  
`
`  
`________________________________ 
`  
`  
`
`  
`This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they 
`are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the 
`employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you 
`are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is 
`strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
`replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be 
`privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is 
`covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510‐2521. 
`  
`  
`
`  
`________________________________ 
`  
`  
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 828-2 Filed 01/03/23 Page 11 of 11
`
`  
`
`This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they 
`are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the 
`employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you 
`are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is 
`strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
`replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be 
`privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is 
`covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510‐2521. 
`
`  
`________________________________ 
`
`  
`This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they 
`are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the 
`employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you 
`are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is 
`strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
`replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be 
`privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is 
`covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510‐2521. 
` 
`
`
`This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
`message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the
`intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly
`prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information
`transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended
`recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.  
`
` 
`
` 
`
`
`This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an
`attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby
`notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
`please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for
`the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.  
` 
`
`
`This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an
`attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby
`notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
`please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for
`the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.  
` 
`
`
`This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an
`attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby
`notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
`please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for
`the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.  
`
`10
`
`