`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`IN RE PERSONALWEB
`TECHNOLOGIES, LLC PATENT
`LITIGATION.
`
`.
`
`Case No. 18-md-02834-BLF (SVK)
`Case No. 18-cv-00767-BLF (SVK)
`Case No. 18-cv-05619-BLF (SVK)
`
`ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL BRIEFING;
`ORDER RE SEALING
`
`Re: Dkt. No. 801
`
`
`
`
`
`The Court has reviewed the Joint Discovery Submission and the relevant discovery orders
`
`that preceded it. Dkt. 801. To further assess the Parties’ respective positions, the Court ORDERS
`
`that the information below, and only the information below, be filed no later than November 30,
`
`2022. All filings may be made UNDER SEAL because responsive information is likely to reflect
`
`attorney-client communications and attorney work-product.
`
`1. Responding Third Parties are to provide declarations of counsel detailing counsels’
`involvement in the identification and production of responsive documents. See Dkt. 801 at
`3:19.
`
`2. Amazon is to provide support for its statement that “Markiles used his Stubbs email
`accounts to conduct the business of Europlay and Claria.” Dkt. 801 at 2:12.
`
`3. In separate submissions not to exceed 3 double-spaced pages in pleading format, both
`parties are to address the Responding Third Parties’ statement that “this appears to be a
`moot issue given the Court’s October 31, 2022 order ordering Personal Web to produce
`documents from its counsel at the Stubbs Alderton firm.” Dkt. 801 at 4:19
`
`Nothing filed in response to this Order may be used in any proceeding to argue that a party has
`
`waived the attorney-client privilege or attorney work-product protection. Amazon and the
`
`////
`
`////
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`
`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 803 Filed 11/16/22 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`Responding Third Parties are admonished in advance not to re-argue issues already before the
`
`Court or to raise new issues.
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: November 16, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`SUSAN VAN KEULEN
`United States Magistrate Judge
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`