throbber
Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 8 Filed 06/14/18 Page 1 of 4
`
`Robert F. McCauley (SBN 162056)
`robert.mccauley@finnegan.com
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`3300 Hillview Avenue
`Palo Alto, California 94304
`Telephone:
`(650) 849-6600
`Facsimile:
`(650) 849-6666
`
`C. Gregory Gramenopoulos (pro hac vice)
`c.gregory.gramenopoulos@finnegan.com
`Christopher C. Johns (pro hac vice)
`christopher.johns@finnegan.com
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`901 New York Avenue NW
`Washington, DC 20001-4413
`Telephone:
`(202) 408-4000
`Facsimile:
`(202) 408-4400
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`MERKLE, INC.
`
`MICHAEL A. SHERMAN (SBN 94783)
`masherman@stubbsalderton.com
`JEFFREY F. GERSH (SBN 87124)
`jgersh@stubbsalderton.com
`SANDEEP SETH (SBN 195914)
`sseth@stubbsalderton.com
`WESLEY W. MONROE (SBN 149211)
`wmonroe@stubbsalderton.com
`VIVIANA B. HEDRICK (SBN 239359)
`vhedrick@stubbsalderton.com
`STUBBS ALDERTON MARKILES, LLP
`15260 Ventura Boulevard, 20TH Floor
`Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
`Telephone:
`(818) 444-4500
`Facsimile:
`(818) 444-4520
`
`THEODORE S. MACEIKO (SBN 150211)
`ted@maceikoip.com
`MACEIKO IP
`420 2nd Street
`Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
`Telephone:
`(310) 545-3311
`Facsimile:
`(310) 545-3344
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PERSONALWEB
`TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
`
`DAVID D. WIER (PRO HAC VICE)
`david.wier@level3.com
`Assistant General Counsel
`1025 Eldorado Boulevard
`Broomfield, CO 80021
`Telephone:
`(720) 888-3539
`
`ATTORNEY FOR LEVEL 3
`COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
` Case No. 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`
`IN RE: PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES,
`LLC ET AL.
`
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, a
`Texas limited liability company, and
`LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, a
`Delaware limited liability company,
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`v.
`
`MERKLE, INC., a Maryland corporation,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
` Case No. 5:18-cv-00409
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND
`PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING
`TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO
`RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED
`COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST
`AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 5:18-CV-00409
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 8 Filed 06/14/18 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1 and 6-2, plaintiffs PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC and Level 3
`
`Communications, LLC (collectively “PersonalWeb”) and defendant Merkle, Inc. (“Merkle”)
`
`hereby stipulate and recite as follows:
`
`WHEREAS, on January 18, 2018, PersonalWeb filed a Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) for patent
`
`infringement naming Merkle as the defendant;
`
`WHEREAS, on February 20, 2018, Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Web Services, Inc.
`
`(collectively “Amazon”) filed a motion for preliminary injunction to enjoin this case and other
`
`similar patent infringement lawsuits that PersonalWeb filed against other website operators (Dkt.
`
`No. 15; Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v. PersonalWeb Tech., LLC et al., Case No. 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`
`10
`
`(N.D. Cal.));
`
`11
`
`WHEREAS, on February 20, 2018, PersonalWeb and Merkle filed a stipulation (Dkt. No. 15)
`
`12
`
`to extend the time for Merkle to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to April 7, 2018;
`
`13
`
`WHEREAS, on March 29, 2018, PersonalWeb and Merkle filed a second stipulation (Dkt.
`
`14
`
`No. 22) to extend the time for Merkle to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to June 22,
`
`15
`
`2018, and the Court granted that stipulation on April 2, 2018 (Dkt. No. 24);
`
`16
`
`WHEREAS, on April 10, 2018, Merkle filed a motion to stay this case (Dkt. No. 28) pending
`
`17
`
`resolution of Amazon’s DJ action and that motion is fully briefed;
`
`18
`
`WHEREAS, on April 13, 2018, PersonalWeb filed a motion to dismiss Amazon’s First
`
`19
`
`Amended Complaint in the Amazon DJ action (Dkt. No. 43; Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v. PersonalWeb
`
`20
`
`Tech., LLC et al., Case No. 5:18-cv-00767-BLF (N.D. Cal.));
`
`21
`
`WHEREAS, on April 27, 2018, this Court held a hearing on Amazon’s preliminary
`
`22
`
`injunction motion and motions to stay in fourteen suits PersonalWeb filed against website operators;
`
`23
`
`WHEREAS, at the April 27, 2018 hearing, the parties agreed to a stay of those fourteen
`
`24
`
`actions against other website operators until the June 7, 2018 hearing on PersonalWeb’s motion to
`
`25
`
`dismiss Amazon’s First Amended Complaint (Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v. PersonalWeb Tech., LLC
`
`26
`
`et al., Case No. 5:18-cv-00767-BLF (N.D. Cal.));
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST
`AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`2
`
`CASE NO. 5:18-CV-00409
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 8 Filed 06/14/18 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`WHEREAS, on May 11, 2018, PersonalWeb withdrew its motion to dismiss Amazon’s First
`
`Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 59; Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v. PersonalWeb Tech., LLC et al., Case
`
`No. 5:18-cv-00767-BLF (N.D. Cal.)), and the June 7, 2018 hearing was taken off calendar;
`
`WHEREAS, on May 29, 2018, PersonalWeb filed a First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 37)
`
`and Merkle’s deadline to answer or otherwise respond to that First Amended Complaint is June 15,
`
`2018;
`
`WHEREAS, Merkle’s motion to stay this case remains pending and is set to be heard on July
`
`19, 2018;
`
`WHEREAS, Merkle has requested, and PersonalWeb has agreed to, an extension of time, up
`
`10
`
`to and including August 16, 2018, for Merkle to file an answer or otherwise respond to
`
`11
`
`PersonalWeb’s First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 37);
`
`12
`
`WHEREAS, the parties may consider an additional extension of the deadline for Merkle to
`
`13
`
`file an answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint if the Court has not yet issued
`
`14
`
`an order on Merkle’s motion to stay (Dkt. No. 28) as of August 2, 2018;
`
`15
`
`WHEREAS, the parties do not expect that this change will impact any other dates already
`
`16
`
`fixed by Court Order;
`
`17
`
`THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE and jointly request that Merkle shall have up to and
`
`18
`
`including August 16, 2018 to submit an answer or otherwise respond to PersonalWeb’s First
`
`19
`
`Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 37).
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST
`AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`3
`
`CASE NO. 5:18-CV-00409
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 8 Filed 06/14/18 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`Dated: June 14, 2018
`
`
`Dated: June 14, 2018
`
`Dated: June 14, 2018
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`
`
`
`Dated: __________
`
`15
`
`16
`
`14
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`
`
`/s/ Robert F. McCauley
`By:
`Robert F. McCauley
`Attorneys for Defendant
`MERKLE, INC
`
`STUBBS ALDERTON MARKILES, LLP
`
`
`/s/ Michael A. Sherman
`By:
`Michael A. Sherman
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
`
`DAVID D. WIER
`
`
`/s/ David D. Wier
`By:
`David D. Wier
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Honorable Beth Labson Freeman
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`
`ATTESTATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`17
`
`
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`Counsel for Merkle hereby attests by his signature below that concurrence in the filing of this
`
`21
`
`document was obtained from counsel for PersonalWeb and Level 3.
`
`
`
`Dated: June 14, 2018
`
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`
`
`/s/ Robert F. McCauley
`By:
`Robert F. McCauley
`Attorneys for Defendant
`MERKLE, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST
`AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`4
`
`CASE NO. 5:18-CV-00409
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket