`
`Robert F. McCauley (SBN 162056)
`robert.mccauley@finnegan.com
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`3300 Hillview Avenue
`Palo Alto, California 94304
`Telephone:
`(650) 849-6600
`Facsimile:
`(650) 849-6666
`
`C. Gregory Gramenopoulos (pro hac vice)
`c.gregory.gramenopoulos@finnegan.com
`Christopher C. Johns (pro hac vice)
`christopher.johns@finnegan.com
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`901 New York Avenue NW
`Washington, DC 20001-4413
`Telephone:
`(202) 408-4000
`Facsimile:
`(202) 408-4400
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`MERKLE, INC.
`
`MICHAEL A. SHERMAN (SBN 94783)
`masherman@stubbsalderton.com
`JEFFREY F. GERSH (SBN 87124)
`jgersh@stubbsalderton.com
`SANDEEP SETH (SBN 195914)
`sseth@stubbsalderton.com
`WESLEY W. MONROE (SBN 149211)
`wmonroe@stubbsalderton.com
`VIVIANA B. HEDRICK (SBN 239359)
`vhedrick@stubbsalderton.com
`STUBBS ALDERTON MARKILES, LLP
`15260 Ventura Boulevard, 20TH Floor
`Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
`Telephone:
`(818) 444-4500
`Facsimile:
`(818) 444-4520
`
`THEODORE S. MACEIKO (SBN 150211)
`ted@maceikoip.com
`MACEIKO IP
`420 2nd Street
`Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
`Telephone:
`(310) 545-3311
`Facsimile:
`(310) 545-3344
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PERSONALWEB
`TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
`
`DAVID D. WIER (PRO HAC VICE)
`david.wier@level3.com
`Assistant General Counsel
`1025 Eldorado Boulevard
`Broomfield, CO 80021
`Telephone:
`(720) 888-3539
`
`ATTORNEY FOR LEVEL 3
`COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
` Case No. 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`
`IN RE: PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES,
`LLC ET AL.
`
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, a
`Texas limited liability company, and
`LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, a
`Delaware limited liability company,
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`v.
`
`MERKLE, INC., a Maryland corporation,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
` Case No. 5:18-cv-00409
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND
`PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING
`TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO
`RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED
`COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST
`AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 5:18-CV-00409
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 8 Filed 06/14/18 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1 and 6-2, plaintiffs PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC and Level 3
`
`Communications, LLC (collectively “PersonalWeb”) and defendant Merkle, Inc. (“Merkle”)
`
`hereby stipulate and recite as follows:
`
`WHEREAS, on January 18, 2018, PersonalWeb filed a Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) for patent
`
`infringement naming Merkle as the defendant;
`
`WHEREAS, on February 20, 2018, Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Web Services, Inc.
`
`(collectively “Amazon”) filed a motion for preliminary injunction to enjoin this case and other
`
`similar patent infringement lawsuits that PersonalWeb filed against other website operators (Dkt.
`
`No. 15; Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v. PersonalWeb Tech., LLC et al., Case No. 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`
`10
`
`(N.D. Cal.));
`
`11
`
`WHEREAS, on February 20, 2018, PersonalWeb and Merkle filed a stipulation (Dkt. No. 15)
`
`12
`
`to extend the time for Merkle to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to April 7, 2018;
`
`13
`
`WHEREAS, on March 29, 2018, PersonalWeb and Merkle filed a second stipulation (Dkt.
`
`14
`
`No. 22) to extend the time for Merkle to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to June 22,
`
`15
`
`2018, and the Court granted that stipulation on April 2, 2018 (Dkt. No. 24);
`
`16
`
`WHEREAS, on April 10, 2018, Merkle filed a motion to stay this case (Dkt. No. 28) pending
`
`17
`
`resolution of Amazon’s DJ action and that motion is fully briefed;
`
`18
`
`WHEREAS, on April 13, 2018, PersonalWeb filed a motion to dismiss Amazon’s First
`
`19
`
`Amended Complaint in the Amazon DJ action (Dkt. No. 43; Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v. PersonalWeb
`
`20
`
`Tech., LLC et al., Case No. 5:18-cv-00767-BLF (N.D. Cal.));
`
`21
`
`WHEREAS, on April 27, 2018, this Court held a hearing on Amazon’s preliminary
`
`22
`
`injunction motion and motions to stay in fourteen suits PersonalWeb filed against website operators;
`
`23
`
`WHEREAS, at the April 27, 2018 hearing, the parties agreed to a stay of those fourteen
`
`24
`
`actions against other website operators until the June 7, 2018 hearing on PersonalWeb’s motion to
`
`25
`
`dismiss Amazon’s First Amended Complaint (Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v. PersonalWeb Tech., LLC
`
`26
`
`et al., Case No. 5:18-cv-00767-BLF (N.D. Cal.));
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST
`AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`2
`
`CASE NO. 5:18-CV-00409
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 8 Filed 06/14/18 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`WHEREAS, on May 11, 2018, PersonalWeb withdrew its motion to dismiss Amazon’s First
`
`Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 59; Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v. PersonalWeb Tech., LLC et al., Case
`
`No. 5:18-cv-00767-BLF (N.D. Cal.)), and the June 7, 2018 hearing was taken off calendar;
`
`WHEREAS, on May 29, 2018, PersonalWeb filed a First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 37)
`
`and Merkle’s deadline to answer or otherwise respond to that First Amended Complaint is June 15,
`
`2018;
`
`WHEREAS, Merkle’s motion to stay this case remains pending and is set to be heard on July
`
`19, 2018;
`
`WHEREAS, Merkle has requested, and PersonalWeb has agreed to, an extension of time, up
`
`10
`
`to and including August 16, 2018, for Merkle to file an answer or otherwise respond to
`
`11
`
`PersonalWeb’s First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 37);
`
`12
`
`WHEREAS, the parties may consider an additional extension of the deadline for Merkle to
`
`13
`
`file an answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint if the Court has not yet issued
`
`14
`
`an order on Merkle’s motion to stay (Dkt. No. 28) as of August 2, 2018;
`
`15
`
`WHEREAS, the parties do not expect that this change will impact any other dates already
`
`16
`
`fixed by Court Order;
`
`17
`
`THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE and jointly request that Merkle shall have up to and
`
`18
`
`including August 16, 2018 to submit an answer or otherwise respond to PersonalWeb’s First
`
`19
`
`Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 37).
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST
`AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`3
`
`CASE NO. 5:18-CV-00409
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 8 Filed 06/14/18 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`Dated: June 14, 2018
`
`
`Dated: June 14, 2018
`
`Dated: June 14, 2018
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`
`
`
`Dated: __________
`
`15
`
`16
`
`14
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`
`
`/s/ Robert F. McCauley
`By:
`Robert F. McCauley
`Attorneys for Defendant
`MERKLE, INC
`
`STUBBS ALDERTON MARKILES, LLP
`
`
`/s/ Michael A. Sherman
`By:
`Michael A. Sherman
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
`
`DAVID D. WIER
`
`
`/s/ David D. Wier
`By:
`David D. Wier
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Honorable Beth Labson Freeman
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`
`ATTESTATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`17
`
`
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`Counsel for Merkle hereby attests by his signature below that concurrence in the filing of this
`
`21
`
`document was obtained from counsel for PersonalWeb and Level 3.
`
`
`
`Dated: June 14, 2018
`
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`
`
`/s/ Robert F. McCauley
`By:
`Robert F. McCauley
`Attorneys for Defendant
`MERKLE, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST
`AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`4
`
`CASE NO. 5:18-CV-00409
`
`
`
`