Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 791 Filed 10/27/22 Page 1 of 6
`
`
`
`ROBERT M. CHARLES, JR.
`(adm. pro hac vice)
`RCharles@lewisroca.com
`PATRICK EMERSON MCCORMICK
`(SBN 307298)
`PMcCormick@lewisroca.com
`LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER
` CHRISTIE LLP
`One South Church Ave., Ste. 2000
`Tucson, AZ 85701-1611
`Telephone:
`(520) 622-2090
`Facsimile:
`(520) 622-3088
`
`Attorneys for PERSONALWEB
`TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
`
`
`
`J. DAVID HADDEN (CSB No. 176148)
`dhadden@fenwick.com
`SAINA S. SHAMILOV (CSB No. 215636)
`sshamilov@fenwick.com
`MELANIE L. MAYER (admitted pro hac vice)
`mmayer@fenwick.com
`TODD R. GREGORIAN (CSB No. 236096)
`tgregorian@fenwick.com
`RAVI R. RANGANATH (CSB No. 272981)
`rranganath@fenwick.com
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`Silicon Valley Center
`801 California Street
`Mountain View, CA 94041
`Telephone:
`650.988.8500
`Facsimile:
`650.938.5200
`
`Counsel for AMAZON.COM, INC.,
`AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC., and
`TWITCH INTERACTIVE, INC.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`Case No.: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`Case No.: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`Case No.: 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`JOINT STIPULATION RE
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES,
`LLC’S POST-JUDGMENT DISCOVERY
`
`IN RE: PERSONAL WEB TECHNOLOGIES,
`LLC ET AL., PATENT LITIGATION,
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC., and AMAZON WEB
`SERVICES, INC.,
`Plaintiffs
`
`v.
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and
`LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`Defendants.
`
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, and
`LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`TWITCH INTERACTIVE, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`JOINT STIP RE RELIEF—
`PW POST-JUDGMENT DISCOVERY
`
`
`
`CASE NOS. 5:18-md-02834-BLF,
`5:18-cv-00767-BLF, and 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 791 Filed 10/27/22 Page 2 of 6
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Web Services, Inc., and Twitch Interactive, Inc.
`(“Amazon”) served post-judgment discovery (requests for production and interrogatories) on
`PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC (“PersonalWeb”) on April 19, 2021;
`WHEREAS, the Court ordered PersonalWeb to respond to the post-judgment discovery
`without objections after PersonalWeb failed to respond to the discovery (see Dkt 704; see also Dkt.
`664);
`
`WHEREAS, PersonalWeb has agreed to supplement its responses to the discovery including
`interrogatories, and to produce additional documents responsive to the requests for production;
`WHEREAS, PersonalWeb represents that in mid-August 2022 it retained a forensic
`specialist to collect documents from PersonalWeb for possible production to Amazon in response
`to the requests for production;
`WHEREAS, PersonalWeb represents that the forensic specialist had harvested about
`500,000 documents from PersonalWeb that has since been narrowed down through back-end
`processing (i.e., de-duplication, domain filtering, and email threading and sorting);
`WHEREAS, PersonalWeb had reviewed approximately 200 documents through October 7,
`2022, and PersonalWeb had reviewed approximately 1,500 documents through October 18, 2022;
`WHEREAS, on October 11, 2022, Amazon served on PersonalWeb its portion of a joint
`statement seeking PersonalWeb to provide its supplemental responses and to complete its document
`production sooner than the current pace for expected completion of these undertakings;
`WHEREAS, the parties have previously submitted to the Court for resolution a dispute
`regarding the waiver of privilege by PersonalWeb in a Joint Statement (Dkt. 790);
`WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to resolve in-part the relief that Amazon seeks as
`PersonalWeb has offered to make a bulk production of documents, subject to a withholding certain
`documents pending resolution of the Joint Statement, within a reasonable time period to Amazon;
`
`
`
`JOINT STIP RE RELIEF—
`PW POST-JUDGMENT DISCOVERY
`
`1
`
`CASE NOS. 5:18-md-02834-BLF,
`5:18-cv-00767-BLF, and 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 791 Filed 10/27/22 Page 3 of 6
`
`
`
`NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED amongst Amazon
`and PersonalWeb that:
`Bulk Production. PersonalWeb shall produce the documents that PersonalWeb has
`collected to date, and complete such production no later than one week from the filing of this
`Stipulation, subject to the withholding provision below, that contain any of the following search
`terms, with rooting:
`
`account
`action
`acquir
`“adverse monetary”
`affiliat
`agreement
`annuit
`asset
`“attorney-in-fact”
`audit
`authori
`award
`bailment
`bank
`“bill of sale”
`bookkeep
`broker
`bullion
`bylaw
`casino
`carrier
`certificate
`charter
`checking
`collection
`commodit
`compensation
`contract
`court
`coverage
`credit
`currenc
`damage
`debt
`deductible
`value
`
`deposit
`disburse
`distribution
`employee
`employer
`employment
`excess
`expense
`financ
`firearm
`gems
`gold
`gun
`hypothecation
`“independent contractor”
`installment
`insurance
`insured
`interest
`invest
`invoice
`jewel
`lawsuit
`lease
`liability
`litigat
`loss
`member
`minute
`mortgage
`obligat
`ownership
`P&L
`parent
`participat
`weapon
`
`payable
`payment
`payroll
`pledge
`policies
`policy
`“power of attorney”
`“predecessor in interest”
`premium
`prepay
`proceeds
`profit
`promissory
`propert
`purchas
`receipt
`receivable
`rent
`retainer
`revenu
`safe
`salary
`sale
`sanction
`secur
`silver
`specie
`strongbox
`subsidiar
`“successor in interest”
`tax
`token
`transfer
`transmittal
`valuat
`wire
`
`JOINT STIP RE RELIEF—
`PW POST-JUDGMENT DISCOVERY
`
`2
`
`CASE NOS. 5:18-md-02834-BLF,
`5:18-cv-00767-BLF, and 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`
`
`
`1 1
`
`2 2
`
`3 3
`
`4 4
`
`5 5
`
`6 6
`
`7 7
`
`8 8
`
`9 9
`
`10 10
`
`11 11
`
`12 12
`
`13 13
`
`14 14
`
`15 15
`
`16 16
`
`17 17
`
`18 18
`
`19 19
`
`20 20
`
`21 21
`
`22 22
`
`23 23
`
`24 24
`
`25 25
`
`26 26
`
`27 27
`
`28 28
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 791 Filed 10/27/22 Page 4 of 6
`
`
`
`bermeister
`weiss
`klier
`petty
`mirman
`frandzel
`welin
`kane
`fund
`shield
`amazon
`insulate
`ledger
`
`dyne
`neumann
`ko
`“robb evans”
`mbn
`fletcher
`robins
`money
`dollar
`benefi
`twitch
`crypto
`
`
`markiles
`chan
`miller
`robbevans
`bubman
`poltrock
`receiver
`cash
`protect
`judgment
`freeman
`offshore
`
`
`Documents Withheld for Potential Privilege. From the set of documents resulting from
`running the search terms above against the collected documents, PersonalWeb will withhold
`documents that hit on any of the following search terms, which are intended to identify a potential
`privilege claim subject to resolution by the Court in connection with the Joint Statement. Nothing
`in this stipulation shall be construed as a concession by Amazon that PersonalWeb preserved and
`did not waive these privilege claims. PersonalWeb will disclose to Amazon the number of
`documents it has withheld under this provision. PersonalWeb will review the withheld documents
`through its outside counsel Lewis Roca and produce non-privileged documents and privilege logs
`on a rolling basis, every two weeks. The search terms for the potential-privilege screen are:
`
`farnan
`farnanlaw
`welin
`poltrock
`iplawllp
`“lawrence hadley”
`lewisroca
`“jack gordon”
`“patrick emerson mccormick” maceikoip
`mbn
`bubman
`mckoolsmithhennigan
`mckool
`“jeanne irving”
`“jim bergman”
`lamken
`“robert kry”
`vanderhye
`“joseph rhoa”
`ronaldrichards
`“ronald richards”
`sethlaw
`sandeep
`siritskylaw
`siritzky
`“stafford davis”
`“cate bartles”
`“jason holt”
`sthompson
`stubbsalderton
`gersh
`“james ponce”
`“michael sherman”
`
`frandzel
`glaserweil
`kbg-law
`“rob charles”
`maceiko
`mckoolsmith
`“roderick dorman”
`mololamken
`nixon-vanderhye
`robbevans
`“ron richards”
`“sandy seth”
`stafforddavisfirm
`stevenslove
`“stanley thompson”
`“gonzaque-dirks”
`“vivian hedrick”
`
`JOINT STIP RE RELIEF—
`PW POST-JUDGMENT DISCOVERY
`
`3
`
`CASE NOS. 5:18-md-02834-BLF,
`5:18-cv-00767-BLF, and 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`
`
`
`1 1
`
`2 2
`
`3 3
`
`4 4
`
`5 5
`
`6 6
`
`7 7
`
`8 8
`
`9 9
`
`10 10
`
`11 11
`
`12 12
`
`13 13
`
`14 14
`
`15 15
`
`16 16
`
`17 17
`
`18 18
`
`19 19
`
`20 20
`
`21 21
`
`22 22
`
`23 23
`
`24 24
`
`25 25
`
`26 26
`
`27 27
`
`28 28
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 791 Filed 10/27/22 Page 5 of 6
`
`
`
`“wes monroe”
`“roderick dorman”
`“attorney client”
`“awp”
`
`susmangodfrey
`“jeanne irving”
`“attorney-client”
`
`
`“susman godfrey”
`privilege*
`“work product”
`
`
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only. This bulk production will be made “Attorneys’ Eyes Only,” and the
`Parties will meet and confer regarding any requests by Amazon, through its counsel to de-designate
`any document or reclassify it as “Confidential.”
`Privileged Claw Back Provision. Upon discovery of any document or communication in
`the bulk production that may be an inadvertent production of disputed attorney-client privileged
`communications or attorney work product subject to the pending Joint Statement, Amazon will
`promptly notify PersonalWeb of the potentially inadvertent production. PersonalWeb will have 10
`business days to review the document(s) in question to determine if it wishes to assert a privilege
`claim and withhold such document or communication pending the Court’s resolution of the Joint
`Statement. If so, it will notify Amazon and claw them back such that Amazon will promptly delete
`the records from its system and destroy any copies. PersonalWeb will then review the document
`and produce, withhold, and/or log per the Court’s ruling on the pending Joint Statement (Dkt. 790).
`Agreement To Meet And Confer. The Parties agree to meet and confer on the scope of any
`additional document collection, search terms, technical issues, privilege issues (other than those
`already before the Court in the Joint Statement), confidentiality classifications, and other issues as
`they may arise on an ongoing basis.
`Supplemental Discovery Responses. Since Amazon will receive this bulk production in
`native format such that it can search and review the universe of documents just as PersonalWeb
`could, PersonalWeb will not supplement its RFP responses to indicate which documents are
`responsive to which requests.
`IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED.
`
`
`
`
`JOINT STIP RE RELIEF—
`PW POST-JUDGMENT DISCOVERY
`
`4
`
`CASE NOS. 5:18-md-02834-BLF,
`5:18-cv-00767-BLF, and 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`
`
`
`1 1
`
`2 2
`
`3 3
`
`4 4
`
`5 5
`
`6 6
`
`7 7
`
`8 8
`
`9 9
`
`10 10
`
`11 11
`
`12 12
`
`13 13
`
`14 14
`
`15 15
`
`16 16
`
`17 17
`
`18 18
`
`19 19
`
`20 20
`
`21 21
`
`22 22
`
`23 23
`
`24 24
`
`25 25
`
`26 26
`
`27 27
`
`28 28
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 791 Filed 10/27/22 Page 6 of 6
`
`
`
`Dated: October 27, 2022
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Todd R. Gregorian
`TODD R. GREGORIAN
`
`Attorney for AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON
`WEB SERVICES, INC., and TWITCH
`INTERACTIVE, INC.
`
`
`
`Dated: October 27, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP
`
`By: /s/ Patrick Emerson McCormick
` PATRICK EMERSON MCCORMICK
`Attorney for PERSONALWEB
`TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING
`I, Todd R. Gregorian, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used
`to file this Joint Stipulation. In compliance with N.D. Cal. Civil L.R. 5-1(h)(3), I hereby attest that
`Patrick Emerson McCormick has concurred in this filing.
`
`
`Dated: October 27, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Todd R. Gregorian
`TODD R. GREGORIAN
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`Date: ____________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`______________________________
`HON. BETH LABSON FREEMAN
`United States District Judge
`
`JOINT STIP RE RELIEF—
`PW POST-JUDGMENT DISCOVERY
`
`5
`
`CASE NOS. 5:18-md-02834-BLF,
`5:18-cv-00767-BLF, and 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`
`
`
`1 1
`
`2 2
`
`3 3
`
`4 4
`
`5 5
`
`6 6
`
`7 7
`
`8 8
`
`9 9
`
`10 10
`
`11 11
`
`12 12
`
`13 13
`
`14 14
`
`15 15
`
`16 16
`
`17 17
`
`18 18
`
`19 19
`
`20 20
`
`21 21
`
`22 22
`
`23 23
`
`24 24
`
`25 25
`
`26 26
`
`27 27
`
`28 28
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`
`
`