`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 771-10 Filed 08/18/22 Page 1 of 2
`
`
`J. DAVID HADDEN (CSB No. 176148)
`dhadden@fenwick.com
`SAINA S. SHAMILOV (CSB No. 215636)
`sshamilov@fenwick.com
`MELANIE L. MAYER (admitted pro hac vice)
`mmayer@fenwick.com
`TODD R. GREGORIAN (CSB No. 236096)
`tgregorian@fenwick.com
`RAVI R. RANGANATH (CSB No. 272981)
`rranganath@fenwick.com
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`Silicon Valley Center
`801 California Street
`Mountain View, CA 94041
`Telephone:
`650.988.8500
`Facsimile:
`650.938.5200
`
`Counsel for AMAZON.COM, INC.,
`AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC., and
`TWITCH INTERACTIVE, INC.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`IN RE: PERSONAL WEB TECHNOLOGIES,
`LLC ET AL., PATENT LITIGATION
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC., and AMAZON WEB
`SERVICES, INC.,
`Plaintiffs
`
`v.
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and
`LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`Defendants,
`
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, and
`LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`TWITCH INTERACTIVE, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No.: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`Case No.: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`Case No.: 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
`MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE
`WITH COURT ORDER BY BRILLIANT
`DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENT, INC.,
`CLARIA INNOVATIONS, LLC,
`EUROPLAY CAPITAL ADVISORS,
`LLC, AND MONTO HOLDINGS PTY.
`LTD.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER TO
`COMPEL COMPLIANCE
`
`
`
`CASE NOS. 5:18-md-02834-BLF,
`5:18-cv-00767-BLF, and
`5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 771-10 Filed 08/18/22 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`Before this Court is the Joint Statement of Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Web Services, Inc.,
`Twitch Interactive, Inc. (collectively, “Amazon”) and third-parties Brilliant Digital Entertainment,
`Inc., Claria Innovations, LLC, Europlay Capital Advisors, LLC, and Monto Holdings Pty. Ltd.
`(collectively, “PersonalWeb Affiliates”). Having considered the parties’ Joint Statement, as well
`as supporting documents filed therewith, the Court finds good cause to compel the PersonalWeb
`Affiliates to comply with the Court’s orders (Dkts. 738 & 746).
`Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Amazon’s motion as follows:
`1. The PersonalWeb Affiliates shall each provide Amazon responses to the
`requests for production removing objections other than attorney-client privilege
`and work product protection within seven (7) days of the date of this Order.
`2. The PersonalWeb Affiliates shall produce all responsive non-privileged
`documents within any of their possession, custody, or control within fourteen
`(14) days of the date of this Order.
`3. The PersonalWeb Affiliates are ordered to reimburse Amazon’s costs and
`reasonable attorney fees in securing compliance with the Court’s previous
`orders. Amazon shall submit a declaration substantiating those costs and fees
`within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order.
`
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`Dated: ______________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`____________________________________
`
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER TO
`COMPEL COMPLIANCE
`
`
`
`1
`
`CASE NOS. 5:18-md-02834-BLF,
`5:18-cv-00767-BLF, and
`5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
