throbber

`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 728-2 Filed 02/10/22 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MICHAEL A. SHERMAN (SBN 94783)
`masherman@stubbsalderton.com
`JEFFREY F. GERSH (SBN 87124)
`jgersh@stubbsalderton.com
`STUBBS ALDERTON & MARKILES, LLP
`15260 Ventura Blvd., 20th Floor
`Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
`Telephone:
`(818) 444-4500
`Facsimile:
`(818) 444-4520
`
`Attorneys for PERSONALWEB
`TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
`(Excluding Post Judgment Debtor
`Collection Proceedings)
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`CASE NO.: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`IN RE PERSONAL WEB TECHNOLOGIES,
`LLC, ET., AL., PATENT LITIGATION
`Case No.: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`
`Case No.: 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`DECLARATION OF DAVID PARKER,
`ESQ. IN SUPPORT STUBBS ALDERTON
`& MARKILES, LLP’S SECOND MOTION
`TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
`PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA RULES
`OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, RULE
`1.16(a)(2)
`
`
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC. and AMAZON WEB
`SERVICE, INC.,
`
` Plaintiffs,
`v.
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, et
`al.,
` Defendants.
`
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, et
`al.,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`TWITCH INTERACTIVE, INC.,
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`PARKER DECL. ISO MOTION TO WITHDRAW
`AS COUNSEL FOR PERSONALWEB
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`CASE NO: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 728-2 Filed 02/10/22 Page 2 of 3
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`DECLARATION OF DAVID PARKER
`I am a member of the bar of the State of California since 1976 and am admitted to
`1.
`practice before the United States District Court in California, Hawaii, Western District of
`Michigan, Middle District of Florida and the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. I am a founding partner
`of Parker Mills LLP, and previously a senior partner of Lewis, D’Amato, Brisbois & Bisgaard.
`The facts set forth herein are, unless otherwise stated, based upon my personal knowledge, and if
`called upon to do so, I could, and would testify to their truth under oath. I submit this declaration
`in support of Stubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP’s (“SAM”) Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for
`PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC (“Motion”).
`2. My practice focuses primarily on advising and consulting attorneys on professional
`responsibility and ethics. I have been involved in hundreds of matters both for clients and attorneys
`in legal malpractice, professional responsibility, and similar cases in both state and federal courts,
`as well as representing insureds in business and professional liability litigation. I have also had
`significant experience representing attorneys in responding to disciplinary complaints and
`investigations in the California State Bar, the Los Angeles Superior Court, and the United States
`District Court for the Central District of California. I have served on multiple ethics committees
`and frequently write and lecture on conflicts of interest and other ethical issues.
`In connection with my consultation role for SAM, I reached out to Todd Gregorian of
`3.
`Fenwick & West, counsel for Amazon in the underlying matter, at least three times to (i) advise
`Mr. Gregorian on behalf of Amazon that SAM intended to file a second motion to withdraw as
`counsel for PersonalWeb in this matter because of circumstances, facts and issues that have arisen
`since SAM filed its first motion to withdraw (Dkt. 688) and to ascertain what Amazon’s position
`would be as to SAM in connection with the filing of such Motion, and (ii) to ascertain whether
`Amazon intended to seek any type of contempt or sanctions against SAM or its attorneys arising
`out of the issues relating to the Orders (Dkts. 664, 704) to compel SAM’s client PersonalWeb to
`respond to post judgment discovery requests and PersonalWeb’s failure to respond thereto.
`In connection with the foregoing, I called Mr. Gregorian twice and spoke to him, and
`4.
`most recently sent him an email yesterday, February 8, 2022, to which I have not yet received a
`reply. Mr. Gregorian told me in both conversations that Amazon had not yet made any decisions
`with respect to contempt or other sanctions, and if such actions are to be taken, whether they would
`
`
`1
`PARKER DECL. ISO MOTION TO WITHDRAW
`AS COUNSEL FOR PERSONALWEB
`
`
`CASE NO: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`CASE NO: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 728-2 Filed 02/10/22 Page 3 of 3
`
`also target SAM. I also told Mr. Gregorian in the last call that I would follow-up with him for
`further information shortly prior to SAM filing the instant Motion. Hence my email yesterday.
`
`I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America
`
`that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`
`
`Executed this __day of February, 2022 at _____, California.
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`David Parker
`
`
`
`
`
`PARKER DECL. ISO MOTION TO WITHDRAW
`AS COUNSEL FOR PERSONALWEB
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`CASE NO: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`9th
`
`Los Angeles
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket