throbber
Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 674 Filed 05/12/21 Page 1 of 3
`
`MICHAEL A. SHERMAN (SBN 94783)
`masherman@stubbsalderton.com
`JEFFREY F. GERSH (SBN 87124)
`jgersh@stubbsalderton.com
`WESLEY W. MONROE (SBN 149211)
`wmonroe@stubbsalderton.com
`VIVIANA BOERO HEDRICK (SBN 239359)
`vhedrick@stubbsalderton.com
`STUBBS ALDERTON & MARKILES, LLP
`15260 Ventura Blvd., 20th Floor
`Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
`Telephone:
`(818) 444-4500
`Facsimile:
`(818) 444-4520
`Attorneys for PERSONALWEB
`TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
`(Excluding Post Judgment Debtor
`Collection Proceedings)
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC. and AMAZON WEB
`SERVICE, INC.,
` Plaintiffs,
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`CASE NO.: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`IN RE PERSONAL WEB TECHNOLOGIES,
`LLC, ET., AL., PATENT LITIGATION
`Case No.: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`Case No.: 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION OF
`STUBBS ALDERTON & MARKILES TO
`WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
`DECLARATION OF JEFFREY F. GERSH
`FILED IN SUPPORT; [PROPOSED]
`ORDER
`Hearing: June 17, 2021
`Time: 9:00 a.m.
`Judge:
`Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
`
`v.
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, et
`al.,
`
` Defendants.
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, et
`al.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`TWITCH INTERACTIVE, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`MOTION TO WITHDRAW
`AS COUNSEL OF RECORD
`
`4838-3604-8523, V. 2
`
`CASE NO: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`CASE NO: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 674 Filed 05/12/21 Page 2 of 3
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`4838-3604-8523, V. 2
`
`I.
`
`NOTICE OF MOTION
`TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on June 17, 2021 at 9:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter
`may be heard before the Honorable Beth Labson Freeman, Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, of the United
`States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, 280 South First Street,
`San Jose, California 95113, Stubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP (“SAM”), will and hereby does move
`the Court, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 11-5(a) and in compliance with California Rule of Professional
`Conduct 1.16, to withdraw as counsel for PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC (“PersonalWeb”).
`
`
`MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR PERSONALWEB
`INTRODUCTION
`Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 11-5, SAM seeks to withdraw as counsel for PersonalWeb. SAM
`has not been retained to represent PersonalWeb in any post judgment collection proceedings and to
`SAM’s knowledge PersonalWeb has engaged other counsel for that purpose. Based on the foregoing,
`SAM respectfully requests that the Court issue an order granting withdrawal.
`LEGAL ARGUMENT
`II.
`Civil Local Rule 11-5(a) permits withdrawal of counsel by “order of Court after written notice
`has been given reasonably in advance to the client and to all other parties who have appeared in the
`case.” Pursuant to the California Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.16(b)(6), an attorney may
`withdraw from representing a client if “the client knowingly and freely assents to termination of the
`representation.” Prior to the receipt of the legal authorities cited by Amazon/Twitch in their filing on
`Monday, May 10, 2021, SAM reasonably believed that the entry of judgment, conclusion of the
`disposition of the motion on attorneys’ fees, and administrative closing of this case resulted in the
`termination of SAM’s counsel of record status for PersonalWeb in the District Court.
`Here, SAM should be permitted to withdraw because PersonalWeb assents to termination of
`SAM’s representation since PersonalWeb never retained SAM to represent it in any post judgment
`collection proceedings. (Gersh Decl., ¶ 2.) SAM’s engagement as counsel for PersonalWeb has been
`(1) limited to proceedings pending in this court up through entry of judgment and proceedings relating
`
`
`
`MOTION TO WITHDRAW
`AS COUNSEL OF RECORD
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`CASE NO: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 674 Filed 05/12/21 Page 3 of 3
`
`to Amazon/Twitch’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs, and (2) the appeals relating thereto pending
`in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Case Nos. 19-1918, 20-1566, 21-1858,
`and the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari pending in the United States Supreme Court, Case No. 20-
`1394. (Gersh Decl., ¶¶ 2, 3.) PersonalWeb has engaged Ronald Richards of the Law Offices of Ronald
`Richards and Associates, APC to represent it in all post judgment collection proceedings. (Gersh Decl.,
`¶ 4, Ex. A.) Indeed, Mr. Richards sent an email communication to SAM attorneys expressly informing
`them that SAM is “not authorized to do anything post judgment” and that SAM “is only engaged for
`the appeal.” (Id., Ex. B.)
`III. CONCLUSION
`Based on the foregoing, SAM respectfully requests the Court grant this Motion and permit it
`
`to withdraw from this case.
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Dated: May 12, 2021
`
`
`
`
`STUBBS, ALDERTON & MARKILES, LLP
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Michael A. Sherman
`Michael A. Sherman
`Jeffrey F. Gersh
`Wesley W. Monroe
`Viviana Boero Hedrick
`
`Attorneys for PERSONALWEB
`TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
`(Excluding Post Judgment Debtor
`Collection Proceedings)
`
`
`
`
`MOTION TO WITHDRAW
`AS COUNSEL OF RECORD
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`CASE NO: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`4838-3604-8523, V. 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket