throbber
Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 671-7 Filed 05/07/21 Page 1 of 7
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 7
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 671-7 Filed 05/07/21 Page 2 of 7
`
`From:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Ronald Richards
`Todd Gregorian; Morani Stelmach
`Michael Sherman; Viviana Boero Hedrick; Lamken, Jeffrey; Jeffrey Gersh
`RE: PERSONALWEB TECHONLOGIES INC.
`Tuesday, April 27, 2021 3:25:15 PM
`
`[EXTERNAL EMAIL] This email is from an external sender, and not from Stubbs Alderton & Markiles.
`Do not click on links or attachments unless you are sure of the sender.
`
`Mr. Gregorian,
`
` I
`
` am following federal law. See Rule 69.
`
`
`There are serious consequences under California law for falsely obtaining enforcement without compliance with service. I will not reiterate
`them hear to avoid an uncivil email but you should review them carefully before you try and seek remedial efforts while ignoring Rule 69 and
`CCP 708.170(2)(b).
`
`As I have repeatedly said, we will respond to all lawfully served post judgment discovery orders.
`
` I
`
` believe you have an obligation to alert a busy federal judge of nuanced California procedure which is typically handled by the mag court.
`
`
`Submitting ex parte applications representing they are unopposed or impliedly unopposed to obtain orders that could be abused or
`improperly used creates issues.
`
` I
`
` would like to avoid them so if you are not going to follow Rule 69 set forth below applying CCP 708 et. seq, please tell me and I will know
`what to do.
`
`All rights reserved.
`
`
`
`
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Ronald Richards, Esq.
`Law Offices of Ronald Richards & Associates, A.P.C.
`310-556-1001 Office
`310-277-3325 Fax
`www.ronaldrichards.com
`
`Mailing Address:
`P.O. Box 11480
`Beverly Hills, CA 90213
` ®
`
`
` **A multi jurisdictional practice with bar admissions on the East and West Coast**
` ***CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*** This electronic mail transmission has been sent by an attorney. This
`message and any files or text attached to it are intended only for the recipients named above, and contain
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 671-7 Filed 05/07/21 Page 3 of 7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`information that may be confidential or privileged. If you are not an intended recipient, you must not read,
`copy, use or disclose this communication. Please also notify the sender by replying to this message, and then
`delete all copies of it from your system. Thank you.
`________________________________
`THINK GREEN. PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE YOU PRINT THIS MESSAGE. THANK YOU.
`Rule 69. Execution
`Primary tabs
`(a) In GEnERal.
`(1) Money Judgment; Applicable Procedure. a money judgment is enforced by a writ of
`execution, unless the court directs otherwise. The procedure on execution—and in
`proceedings supplementary to and in aid of judgment or execution—must accord with the
`procedure of the state where the court is located, but a federal statute governs to the
`extent it applies.
`(2) Obtaining Discovery. In aid of the judgment or execution, the judgment creditor or
`a successor in interest whose interest appears of record may obtain discovery from any
`person—including the judgment debtor—as provided in these rules or by the procedure of
`the state where the court is located.
`
`
`
`From: Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 2:58 PM
`To: Ronald Richards <ron@ronaldrichards.com>; Morani Stelmach <morani@ronaldrichards.com>
`Cc: Michael Sherman <masherman@stubbsalderton.com>; Viviana Boero Hedrick <vhedrick@stubbsalderton.com>;
`Lamken, Jeffrey <jlamken@mololamken.com>; Jeffrey Gersh <jgersh@stubbsalderton.com>
`Subject: RE: PERSONALWEB TECHONLOGIES INC.
`
`Mr. Richards,
`
`The Court has now entered the order to appear, setting the debtor’s examination for May 25. I do understand that the
`California Code of Civil Procedure has separate service requirements for creating a judgment lien on personal property.
`But we are in federal court, and both the order to appear and the order directing PersonalWeb to produce documents were
`properly served on PersonalWeb through ECF. I have now served them on you separately via email as PersonalWeb’s
`chosen counsel for this matter.
`
`Please let me know whether PersonalWeb intends to comply, or if instead it plans to maintain its objection that the Court’s
`orders are ineffective absent additional service.
`
`
`Todd Gregorian
`Fenwick | Partner | 415-875-2402 | tgregorian@fenwick.com
`
`
`
`
`From: Jeffrey Gersh <jgersh@stubbsalderton.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 2:33 PM
`To: Ronald Richards <ron@ronaldrichards.com>; Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com>; Morani Stelmach
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 671-7 Filed 05/07/21 Page 4 of 7
`
`<morani@ronaldrichards.com>
`Cc: Michael Sherman <masherman@stubbsalderton.com>; Viviana Boero Hedrick <vhedrick@stubbsalderton.com>;
`Lamken, Jeffrey <jlamken@mololamken.com>
`Subject: RE: PERSONALWEB TECHONLOGIES INC.
`
`** EXTERNAL EMAIL **
`
`I understand.
`
`Thank you.
`
`JG
`
`
`Jeffrey F. Gersh
`Partner, Stubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP
`818.444.9222 (voice/text/fax) | jgersh@stubbsalderton.com
`www.stubbsalderton.com | Attorney Bio
`15260 Ventura Blvd., 20th FL, Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
`
`
`
`The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an
`attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent
`responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination,
`distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the
`original message.
`From: Ronald Richards <ron@ronaldrichards.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 2:18 PM
`To: Jeffrey Gersh <jgersh@stubbsalderton.com>; Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com>; Morani Stelmach
`<morani@ronaldrichards.com>
`Cc: Michael Sherman <masherman@stubbsalderton.com>; Viviana Boero Hedrick <vhedrick@stubbsalderton.com>;
`Lamken, Jeffrey <jlamken@mololamken.com>
`Subject: RE: PERSONALWEB TECHONLOGIES INC.
`
`[EXTERNAL EMAIL] This email is from an external sender, and not from Stubbs Alderton & Markiles.
`Do not click on links or attachments unless you are sure of the sender.
`
`Mr. Gersh,
`
`You are not authorized to do anything post judgment. The case is on appeal. There is no jurisdiction with this Court
`pending the appeal except for collateral post judgment matters per Code.
`
`If Mr. Gregorian, who I do not know personally but feels free to call me by my first name and the wrong one at that, does
`not serve my office, please forward any documents.
`
`Your office is only engaged for the appeal. Please confirm receipt and acknowledgment of the above.
`
`
`
`
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Ronald Richards, Esq.
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 671-7 Filed 05/07/21 Page 5 of 7
`
`Law Offices of Ronald Richards & Associates, A.P.C.
`310-556-1001 Office
`310-277-3325 Fax
`www.ronaldrichards.com
`
`Mailing Address:
`P.O. Box 11480
`Beverly Hills, CA 90213
` ®
`
`
` **A multi jurisdictional practice with bar admissions on the East and West Coast**
` ***CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*** This electronic mail transmission has been sent by an attorney. This
`message and any files or text attached to it are intended only for the recipients named above, and contain
`information that may be confidential or privileged. If you are not an intended recipient, you must not read,
`copy, use or disclose this communication. Please also notify the sender by replying to this message, and then
`delete all copies of it from your system. Thank you.
`________________________________
`THINK GREEN. PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE YOU PRINT THIS MESSAGE. THANK YOU.
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Jeffrey Gersh <jgersh@stubbsalderton.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 2:16 PM
`To: Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com>; Ronald Richards <ron@ronaldrichards.com>; Morani Stelmach
`<morani@ronaldrichards.com>
`Cc: Michael Sherman <masherman@stubbsalderton.com>; Viviana Boero Hedrick <vhedrick@stubbsalderton.com>;
`Lamken, Jeffrey <jlamken@mololamken.com>
`Subject: RE: PERSONALWEB TECHONLOGIES INC.
`
`Todd
`
`As I told you before and I will tell you again, we are not counsel for Personal Web in any of the
`post judgment collection proceedings, only the appeals. Nothing has changed. We have never
`agreed to accept service for the client, verbally or otherwise.
`
`JG
`
`
`Jeffrey F. Gersh
`Partner, Stubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP
`818.444.9222 (voice/text/fax) | jgersh@stubbsalderton.com
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 671-7 Filed 05/07/21 Page 6 of 7
`
`www.stubbsalderton.com | Attorney Bio
`15260 Ventura Blvd., 20th FL, Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
`
`
`
`The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an
`attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent
`responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination,
`distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the
`original message.
`From: Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 2:03 PM
`To: Ronald Richards <ron@ronaldrichards.com>; Morani Stelmach <morani@ronaldrichards.com>
`Cc: Michael Sherman <masherman@stubbsalderton.com>; Jeffrey Gersh <jgersh@stubbsalderton.com>; Viviana Boero
`Hedrick <vhedrick@stubbsalderton.com>; Lamken, Jeffrey <jlamken@mololamken.com>
`Subject: RE: PERSONALWEB TECHONLOGIES INC.
`
`[EXTERNAL EMAIL] This email is from an external sender, and not from Stubbs Alderton & Markiles.
`Do not click on links or attachments unless you are sure of the sender.
`
`Ron,
`
`Please let me know when you are retained. Until then we will continue to deal with PersonalWeb’s counsel of record (the
`Stubbs Alderton attorneys cc’ed), who have not withdrawn from the case. The Court has ordered that PersonalWeb
`produce its bank and financial account information by May 7 and its remaining financial records within 30 days.
`
`
`Todd Gregorian
`Fenwick | Partner | 415-875-2402 | tgregorian@fenwick.com
`
`
`
`From: Ronald Richards <ron@ronaldrichards.com>
`Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 3:39 PM
`To: Todd Gregorian <TGregorian@fenwick.com>
`Cc: Morani Stelmach <morani@ronaldrichards.com>
`Subject: PERSONALWEB TECHONLOGIES INC.
`
`** EXTERNAL EMAIL **
`
`Dear Mr. Gregorian,
`
`Our firm is going to be retained in the next day or two to handle any post judgment matters you bring. This is not my only
`file but we will respond as quickly as possible to any demands upon legal service.
`
`As you know, post judgment matters are handled by the magistrate and we are not going to appear in the underlying case
`except for post judgment motions if for some reason we need to involve the Court.
`
`Hopefully that won’t be necessary.
`
`Presently the case is on appeal and the divestiture rule applies.
`
`There is no rush to do anything pending the outcome of that appeal.
`
`Once we are retained, I am happy to have a call with you to discuss this matter.
`
`
`Sincerely,
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 671-7 Filed 05/07/21 Page 7 of 7
`
`
`Ronald Richards, Esq.
`Law Offices of Ronald Richards & Associates, A.P.C.
`310-556-1001 Office
`310-277-3325 Fax
`www.ronaldrichards.com
`
`Mailing Address:
`P.O. Box 11480
`Beverly Hills, CA 90213
` ®
`
`
` **A multi jurisdictional practice with bar admissions on the East and West Coast**
` ***CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*** This electronic mail transmission has been sent by an attorney. This
`message and any files or text attached to it are intended only for the recipients named above, and contain
`information that may be confidential or privileged. If you are not an intended recipient, you must not read,
`copy, use or disclose this communication. Please also notify the sender by replying to this message, and then
`delete all copies of it from your system. Thank you.
`________________________________
`THINK GREEN. PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE YOU PRINT THIS MESSAGE. THANK YOU.
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket