throbber

`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 661-1 Filed 04/26/21 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`J. DAVID HADDEN (CSB No. 176148)
`dhadden@fenwick.com
`SAINA S. SHAMILOV (CSB No. 215636)
`sshamilov@fenwick.com
`MELANIE L. MAYER (admitted pro hac vice)
`mmayer@fenwick.com
`TODD R. GREGORIAN (CSB No. 236096)
`tgregorian@fenwick.com
`RAVI R. RANGANATH (CSB No. 272981)
`rranganath@fenwick.com
`CHIEH TUNG (CSB No. 318963)
`ctung@fenwick.com
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`Silicon Valley Center
`801 California Street
`Mountain View, CA 94041
`Telephone:
`650.988.8500
`Facsimile:
`650.938.5200
`
`Counsel for AMAZON.COM, INC.,
`AMAZON WEB SERVICES INC., and
`TWITCH INTERACTIVE, INC.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`IN RE: PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES,
`LLC ET AL., PATENT LITIGATION,
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC., and AMAZON WEB
`SERVICES, INC.,
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and
`LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and
`LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`TWITCH INTERACTIVE, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No.: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`Case No.: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`Case No. 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`DECLARATION OF TODD R.
`GREGORIAN IN SUPPORT OF EX
`PARTE APPLICATION OF
`AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON WEB
`SERVICES, INC., AND TWITCH
`INTERACTIVE, INC. FOR AN ORDER
`THAT JUDGMENT DEBTOR
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES,
`LLC APPEAR FOR EXAMINATION
`
`Dept:
`Judge:
`
`Courtroom 3, 5th Floor
`Hon. Beth L. Freeman
`
`GREGORIAN DECL. ISO EX PARTE APPLICATION
`REQUESTING ORDER TO APPEAR FOR EXAMINATION
`
`
`
`
`CASE NOS.: 5:18-md-02834-BLF;
`5:18-cv-00767-BLF; 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 661-1 Filed 04/26/21 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`1.
`I am counsel to Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Web Services, Inc. and Twitch Inter-
`active, Inc. (collectively, “Amazon”) in this matter. I submit this declaration in support of Ama-
`zon’s Ex Parte Application for an order that judgment-debtor PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC
`(“PersonalWeb”) appear for an examination.
`2.
`On March 31, 2021, after PersonalWeb noticed its appeal of this Court’s March 2,
`2021 award for attorneys’ fees and non-taxable costs, I emailed Michael Sherman and Jeffrey
`Gersh, counsel of record for PersonalWeb, to inquire whether PersonalWeb intends to post bond to
`extend the automatic stay of enforcement. Having received no response, I followed up again on
`April 5, indicating that Amazon wished to avoid any unnecessary enforcement expenses. That
`same day, Mr. Gersh stated that “[PersonalWeb] is considering its options,” and invited me to fol-
`low up with him in the subsequent weeks. I did so on April 17, and requested a meet and confer to
`discuss whether PersonalWeb would be able to satisfy the judgment. I followed up again on April
`19. I received no response to these requests.
`3.
`Amazon served interrogatories and requests for production of documents under Fed.
`R. Civ. P. 69 and Cal. Civ. Code §§ 708.020 and 708.030 on April 19. On April 21, I again followed
`up with counsel for PersonalWeb, requesting that they identify bank or financial accounts for en-
`forcement purposes, separate from their obligations under Amazon’s written discovery, and pro-
`vided notice that Amazon intends to apply ex parte for a debtor’s examination. I also provided my
`availability for a meet and confer on these issues. On April 22, Mr. Gersh responded by stating he
`and his colleagues “do not represent [PersonalWeb] in the post judgment proceedings,” and that
`Amazon has “no authority” to serve discovery requests on his law firm.
`4.
`To date, PersonalWeb has not satisfied any portion of the Court’s March 2, 2021
`judgment, has not posted a supersedeas bond, has not provided any information about its accounts
`and assets in response to Amazon’s discovery requests or informal request, and has not conferred
`with Amazon on these issues. Given PersonalWeb’s silence, and based on the August 22, 2019
`deposition testimony of PersonalWeb’s principal Kevin Bermeister (Dkt. 659-2) indicating a real
`possibility of undercapitalization or insolvency, Amazon has serious concerns about its ability to
`
`GREGORIAN DECL. ISO EX PARTE APPLICATION
`REQUESTING ORDER TO APPEAR FOR EXAMINATION
`
`
`1
`
`CASE NOS.: 5:18-md-02834-BLF;
`5:18-cv-00767-BLF; 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 661-1 Filed 04/26/21 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`collect on the judgment. Amazon has not yet had any opportunity to examine PersonalWeb on the
`issue of judgment.
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United Sates that the foregoing is
`true and correct. Executed in Truckee, California on this 26th day of April, 2021.
`
`
`
`
`
`\-------------------------------------------------
`Todd R. Gregorian
`
`GREGORIAN DECL. ISO EX PARTE APPLICATION
`REQUESTING ORDER TO APPEAR FOR EXAMINATION
`
`
`2
`
`CASE NOS.: 5:18-md-02834-BLF;
`5:18-cv-00767-BLF; 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket