throbber
Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 644-2 Filed 10/30/20 Page 1 of 6
`Case 5:18-md-02834—BLF Document 644-2 Filed 10/30/20 Page 1 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 644-2 Filed 10/30/20 Page 2 of 6
`
` Curriculum Vitae
`GERALD G. KNAPTON, ESQ.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pg. 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 644-2 Filed 10/30/20 Page 3 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`: 1977
`: 1978
`: 1979
`: 1981
`
`Hong Kong (registered foreign lawyer*) : 2007
`Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
`
`: 1978
`Northern District of California
`
`: 1979
`Third Circuit Court of Appeals
`
`: 1998
`
`Firm Name:
`Ropers, Majeski, P.C. (f/k/a Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley apc)
`445 South Figueroa Street, 30th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`(also Costa Mesa, Redwood City, San Francisco, San Jose, NYC, Boston, Las Vegas, Paris &
`Hong Kong* offices) *In Association with Liau, Ho & Chan
`Main tel. (213) 312-2000 or direct line: (213) 312-2016 or mobile (213) 808-2019
`Main fax (213) 312-2001 – web site www.ropers.com
`E-mail: gerald.knapton@ropers.com
`Status:
`Senior Partner (Shareholder)
`(Prior experience as general counsel and as partner and associate at L.A. law firms)
`Ratings: AV Preeminent in 2019/2020/2021 by Martindale-Hubbell and Preeminent “AV” in
`2019/2020/2021 Judicial Edition Martindale-Hubbell/Reed Elsevier/Lexis-Nexis rating
`Admissions to Practice Law:
`California (SBN 077038)
`Central District of California
`Southern District of California
`Eastern District of California
`Member:
`
`California State Bar Committee on Mandatory Fee Arbitration
`(2001- 2006; Vice-Chair 2004 – 2005; Chair 2005-2006).
`American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA)
`(2004 - 2005; 2009 - 2012; 2017 - 2020)
`Los Angeles County Bar Association member
`(2003 to 2012)
`Los Angeles County Bar Association Professional Responsibility & Ethics Committee
`(2005 – 2008).
`Pasadena Humane Society & SPCA – Board of Directors
`(2008 – 2017)
`Council on Litigation Management
`(member 2009 – 2012).
`American Bar Association
`(member 1978 – 1983; 2009 to 2011).
`Education:
`Brown University (Providence, Rhode Island) and
`University of California, Berkeley, B.A., 1973 (With Highest Honors & Phi Beta Kappa).
`University of California, Los Angeles, School of Law, J.D., 1976
`Pepperdine University School of Law – Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution, 2003
`
`
`
`
`
`pg. 2
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 644-2 Filed 10/30/20 Page 4 of 6
`
`Litigation/Trial Experience:
`More than 48 cases to court, jury and arbitration panel(s).
`More than 8 Court of Appeals and Supreme Court matters.
`
`
`Testifying expert:
`Qualified and testified as an expert more than 59 times to a jury, court or arbitrator(s) as an
`expert on the reasonableness and necessity of fees and costs.
`
`Fee Dispute Matters:
`
`Far over $4.5 billion dollars in nationwide legal fees, experts’ fees and costs and work product reviewed.
`Litigation management and fee matters concerning attorney's fees and related costs ranging from
`$20,000 to in excess of $800,000,000.00 in charges. Lawyer to lawyer approach backed by computer
`technology. Lectures and seminars, written and oral opinions, declarations and expert testimony on
`reasonableness of fees in hundreds of matters throughout the United States, Canada and other common
`law jurisdictions. Analysis of Cumis, fee-shifting, lodestar, agreement-based, common-fund, panel and
`retained counsel's fees. “CAFA” projections. Buss and Brandt and other allocations. Cost-control
`training, including budgets, alternative fee programs, guidelines and retainer agreements. California
`State Bar Sub-Committee member on drafting the 2005 State Bar Sample Fee Agreements. Chief
`outside auditor of legal fees for the several governmental entities. Retained by insurance companies, law
`firms, governmental entities, corporations and private individuals as fee expert, in support of and
`opposing requests for fees. Designated “binding” neutral by existing clients, an adverse prominent
`city and large insurer. Retained as mediator in fee disputes.
`
`Author:
`“Finding a Path Forward to Regulate the Legal Industry” October 22, 2020 Law360; “Why not follow
`the best road?” August 21, 2020 Los Angeles & San Francisco Daily Journal; “How to Count to Thirty”
`December 9, 2019 Los Angeles Daily Journal“; “Candor to the Tribunal is now Mandatory in
`California” November 8, 2019 Los Angeles Daily Journal; “MFAA versus CAA: Jurisdictional traps for
`the unwary in arbitration” June 17, 2019 Los Angeles Daily Journal; “Unconscionable’ legal fees under
`California’s new rules” May 31, 2019 Los Angles Daily Journal. “Budgets, Performance Metrics and
`You” (ADTA Program Handout -76th Meeting, Nashville April 2017). “What Every Lawyer Should
`Know About the Latest Interpretation of California’s Cost-Shifting Settlement Statute“ (MCLE article,
`January 5, 2017) California Lawyer; “How to Prove an Attorney’s Reasonable Hourly Fee” Expert
`Advice/Practical Tips California Lawyer November 2015; “Can You Prove Your Hourly Rate to the
`Court?” Daily Journal October 19, 2015; 2 Routes to Hourly Rates for Lawyers” April 15, 2015 Law
`360; “Recovering Fees In Family Law Practice” 2015 - Volume 37 No. 1 Family Law Newsletter,
`California State Bar; “Wrangling with whether and when actual trial begins” Los Angeles Daily Journal,
`February 4, 2015; “Recovering Fees from Clients” California Lawyer, July 2014; “Catalyst theory still a
`viable route to attorney fees” Los Angeles Daily Journal, June 19, 2013. “One-way fee shifting proves
`risky” Los Angeles Daily Journal, March 21, 2013. “Welcome to the cafeteria of Jankey v. Lee” [federal
`preemption law] Los Angeles Daily Journal, December 27, 2012. “For the Love of a Family Pet,” The
`Recorder, October 19 & 22, 2012. “State high court to review fee award in disability access suit,” Los
`Angeles Daily Journal, October 17, 2012. “Warning: Some Cost Shifting May Occur” California
`Lawyer (MCLE article September 2012). “Legislative History Says No Fee-Shifting in Meal and Rest
`Break Litigation,” Los Angeles Daily Journal, May 16, 2012. “Labor Code Fee Shifting Provisions,”
`
`
`
`pg. 3
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 644-2 Filed 10/30/20 Page 5 of 6
`
`Los Angeles Daily Journal, February 17, 2012. “Fee Shifting Statutes and Self Representation” The
`Recorder November 2011. “Recoverable Attorney Fees for Public Entities” Public CEO (July 22,
`2011). “The fine art of actually collecting legal fees” National Law Journal, June 15, 2009. “Arbitration
`& Mediation”, The Recorder April 15, 2009. “Attorney’s Guide to Arbitrating and Litigating a Fee
`Dispute,” September 2008 program materials at California State Bar Annual Meeting in Monterey, CA.
`“Controlling the Costs of E-Discovery,” Los Angeles Daily Journal, August 6, 2008. October 2006
`California State Bar Meeting materials and speaker at MCLE program on California State Bar retainer
`agreements. September, 2005 California Sate Bar meeting materials for and speaker at 2 MCLE
`programs: “New State Bar Sample Written Fee Agreements” and “Overview of the Mandatory Fee
`Arbitration Process.” “Billing Guidelines Offer Base Against Which to Measure Results.” San
`Francisco and Los Angeles Daily Journal November 24, 2004. October 2004 California State Bar
`meeting materials for, and speaker at, 2 MCLE programs: “Getting It Right From the Beginning” and
`“Do’s and Don’ts For Collecting Attorneys Fees”. “Vroom, Vroom. Three Categories For Fee Shifting
`Means Finding The Right Gear”, The Recorder & Cal Law (Practice Center, August 18, 2004). “Ethics
`of Attorneys Fees”, California Lawyer (MCLE article July, 2004). “Attorney Liens Must Comply With
`‘Fletcher’ Requirements”, San Francisco and Los Angeles Daily Journal, June 29, 2004. “’Catch-All’
`Arbitration Clauses Don’t Give Parties Firm Footing”, San Francisco and Los Angeles Daily Journal,
`June 4, 2004. “Attorney-Client Fee Conflicts” San Francisco and Los Angeles Daily Journals (January
`26, 2004). “Attorneys Fees Applications” MCLE, California Lawyer (January, 2004 revision). “Paper
`Cutter” (Electronic Invoicing) Daily Journal Extra (December 29, 2003). “Appealing Arbitration
`Awards”, Los Angeles Daily Journal (October 6, 2003). “Fees in Flux” MCLE Program materials for,
`and speaker at, 2003 California State Bar Meeting. “Shaping Arbitration”, Los Angeles Daily Journal
`Verdicts & Settlements (March 8, 2002). “The Catalyst Theory May Still Live”, Expert Advice,
`California Lawyer (November, 2001). “Policy Language Is Winning Against Recoupment But A New
`Battle Looms” Mealey’s Attorney Fees, Vol. 3, #11 (June, 2001). “Why Don’t Clients Pay? What You
`Need to Know to Avoid Collections Headaches” Law Practice Management Magazine (American Bar
`Association) Vol. 27, # 3 (April, 2001).” The Choice Of The Yardstick Is The Most Crucial Decision”,
`Mealey’s Attorney Fees, Vol. 3, #2 (September, 2000). “A Lawyers Bill May Be Reduced or Forfeited
`by Ethical Violations”, Expert Advice, California Lawyer (February, 2000). “How Do You Prove the
`“Lodestar” for In-house Counsel Fees?”, Mealey’s Attorney Fees, Vol. 2, #1 (August, 1999).” Attorneys
`Fees Applications”, MCLE, California Lawyer (May, 1999). “Paying the Other Side’s Legal Fees:
`Attorneys’ Fees Calculations Under Fee-Shifting Statutes.”, The Directory of Municipal Practitioners, §
`II, G. (League of California Cities, 1997).
`
`Recent Speaking engagements:
`
`
`
`
`USC/Gould School of Law, Second Annual Advanced Arbitration Institute - July 28, 2017.
`Association of Southern California Defense Counsel MCLE program on recovering fees by motion
`and the ethics of legal billing on November 3, 2016.
`Law firm pricing program to large law firm on June 17, 2015.
`Plaintiffs Securities Law Firm: In-house MCLE program “Optimal Timekeeping Procedures;
`Avoiding Objectionable Case-Related Expenses.” August 9, 2012
`Smart Business Los Angeles – July 2012 edition. “How to ensure your money is well spent with the
`right law firm during litigation.”
` ACI’s 6th Annual Forum “Reducing Legal Costs” October 20-21, 2011
`
`Provisors, LLP “Effective Motions for Attorney’s Fees” July 8, 2011
`
`
`
`pg. 4
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 644-2 Filed 10/30/20 Page 6 of 6
`
` Mercury Insurance Group on Mediation for CLM February 2011
`
`Sonoma Risk Insurance MCLE on Contract Litigation Insurance 2010
` How to Review Legal Bills, CLM program in Columbia, SC June 2010
`
`Strafford’s Ethical Pitfalls in Client Billing & Fee Collection, July 29, 2009.
`
`State Bar Annual Meeting, September, 2008 (Monterey) on arbitrating or litigating fee
`
`disputes.
` Bermuda offshore carriers program May, 2008.
`
`State Bar Annual Meeting, 2006 (Monterey) on retainer agreements.
` CELA Annual Conference speaker on retainer agreement, September 15, 2006
` Bridgeport MCLE program on Insurance Bad Faith August 25, 2006
` Class Action/UCL MCLE Program section on Attorney’s Fees, April, 2006
` Quisenberry Insurance Bad Faith Litigation Seminar, January, 2006
`
`State Bar Annual Meeting, 2005 (San Diego) on retainer agreements and arbitration.
` Quisenberry Seminar in January, 2005 on fees and ethics.
`
`State Bar Annual Meeting, 2004 (Monterey) on fees and ethics.
`
`State Bar Annual Meeting, 2003 (Anaheim) on fees and ethics.
`
`Employment History of Gerald G. Knapton, Esq. (CA SBN 077038):
`2002 to present.
`Ropers, Majeski, P.C. – Sr. Partner/Shareholder
`
`
`
`(formerly known as Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley apc)
`1992 to 2002
`Cooper Kardaras & Kelleher LLP (formerly known as Cooper, Brown, Kardaras
`& Scharf) - Partner (& Manager of Lauditors, Inc.)
`First National Group, Inc. - General Counsel
`Northland Financial Company - Vice President
`First National Group, Inc. - General Counsel
`Schroeder, Forde & Knapton - Business/Bank Litigation Partner
`Hahn Cazier & Leff - Business Litigation Associate
`Kirtland & Packard - Tort Defense Litigation Associate
`California Attorney General and Law Offices of Kenneth L. Knapp; law clerk
`while attending and after law school.
`
`1992 to 1992
`1989 to 1991
`1983 to 1989
`1982 to 1983
`1978 to 1982
`1977 to 1978
`1973 to 1977
`
`
`Business Experience prior to law school:
`Rogers Corporation (Manufacturing Company)
`Branch Motor Express (Trucking Company)
`Adley Express (Trucking Company).
`
`Others to be provided upon request.
`
`
`End of list.
`
`
`
`pg. 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket