throbber
Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 608-17 Filed 06/18/20 Page 1 of 7
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 608-17 Filed 06/18/20 Page 1 of 7
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`

`

`Michael A. Sherman - Stubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 608-17 Filed 06/18/20 Page 2 of 7
`
`Necessary
`
`Always Enabled
`
`(cid:31)
`
`Michael A. Sherman
`Partner
`Chair of the Business Litigation Practice
`
`Direct Voice/Fax/Text: 818.444.4528
`
`Email: masherman@stubbsalderton.com
`
`(cid:31) DOWNLOAD VCARD
`
`Michael brings decades of experience in successfully handling disputes and litigation in an extraordinarily
`diverse array of industries and businesses. His peers in the legal community describe Michael as the
`consummate trial lawyer, and he approaches every trial as an opportunity tell his client’s story, in order to
`win.
`
`In an era of “specialization” in the legal profession, Michael has been fortunate to maintain a trial,
`litigation and dispute practice that emphasizes achieving great results for clients in areas as varied as real
`estate acquisition and development, intellectual property/technology, energy, pharmaceuticals/drug
`development, securities, healthcare, environmental, consumer products, finance, apparel, and others.
`Michael excels at guiding clients through the perilous waters of disputes and conflicts in virtually any type
`of business dispute, and in being expertly skilled in helping clients achieve great results in settlement all
`the way through trial, if required.
`
`Cookies Policy
`
`https://stubbsalderton.com/attorney/michael-sherman/[6/15/2020 1:17:34 PM]
`
`

`

`Michael A. Sherman - Stubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 608-17 Filed 06/18/20 Page 3 of 7
`Michael founded the firm’s Litigation Practice in 2014 and chairs that practice, and earlier in his career,
`following graduation with honors from Columbia college and thereafter from University of California
`Berkeley School of Law (Boalt Hall), he was blessed with extensive on-the-job training from several of the
`nation’s leading trial lawyers, with multiple opportunities to hone his litigation and trial skills. His
`creativity, persistence and work ethic led him to partnership at a leading Los Angeles litigation boutique at
`a young age and subsequently to a prominent partnership position at an international Am Law 100 law
`firm.
`
`(cid:31)
`
`Michael has been recognized as a leading trial lawyer by his peers and regularly featured in the press for
`some of his significant victories on behalf of clients. He is a past president of the Los Angeles Chapter of
`the association of business trial lawyers. Michael’s trial skills and courtroom success resulted in his being
`named to the “Top 100 Lawyers” in California list, published by the Daily Journal newspaper chain. For
`years he has consistently been named to “Best Lawyers in America” and “Super Lawyers”.
`
`In building the firm’s business litigation practice, Michael has spent considerable time becoming expert in
`the special needs of business entrepreneurs, in representing “risk takers” in all facets of disputes involving
`business formation, capital raising, business operation, and business mergers, acquisitions and dispositions,
`as well as business “divorces” and employment disputes of virtually all stripes for both smaller and larger
`companies including both the prosecution and defense of class actions. As often as he finds himself
`representing “Goliath” in litigation matters, he equally finds himself representing ‘David”.
`
`When not preparing cases for trial and in his “spare time,” Michael is active in the Los Angeles
`philanthropic community and in Bar activities, and spends time with his wife Stacey of 36 years, his three
`adult children, and participating in LA City life, the arts, traveling, hiking and indoor cycling.
`
`Practice & Industries
`
`Business Litigation
`
`Practice & Experience
`
`Ironclad v. Orr Industries – dissolved an onerous distributorship agreement for a small publicly traded
`
`https://stubbsalderton.com/attorney/michael-sherman/[6/15/2020 1:17:34 PM]
`
`

`

`Michael A. Sherman - Stubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 608-17 Filed 06/18/20 Page 4 of 7
`company against a large industrial distributor, with dissolution occurring on the eve of hearing of SJ
`
`Broadspring v. Content – successfully represented an internet marketing company in recovering $__ owing
`from a customer that had defaulted on its obligations
`
`Xaleron v. Allergan – representing an entrepreneurial drug development company against “Big Pharma”
`alleging unfair competition in bringing to market a novel treatment for allergic rhinitis/”hay fever” and
`seeking hundreds of millions of dollars in damages.
`
`Colburn v. EuroPlay Capital – achieved complete victory for founders of skype in opposition to a claim
`of a “shared investment” alleging $250M in damages
`
`Visconti v. Elemental Superfood, Anderson – counseled founder and CEO of one of nation’s fastest
`growing nutrition/supplements bar companies in achieving a business divorce from co-founder and in
`navigating complex appraisal process
`
`Fisher v. Biozone – SAM and Michael were retained to represent a publicly traded drug exploration
`company to resolve a long-running governance dispute between that company and its founder, and
`succeeded in achieving a settlement on favorable terms to the company
`
`Auritec v. Oak Crest – representing an early stage drug development company in a trade secrets dispute
`against a research institute, in a 2-week arbitration
`
`Fair v. SunAmerica – achieved total defense victory in a 3-week jury trial on behalf of an affiliate of AIG
`that was sued for millions of dollars by a former executive alleging breach of employment and investment
`agreements
`
`Reynolds Advisory Partners v. UPS Capital – achieved full recovery of a finders’ fee for an investment
`advisory firm on an acquisition transaction
`
`Riordan v. Burkle – Represented former Mayor of Los Angeles, Richard Riordan, in successfully exiting
`an investment operated by private equity investor Ron Burkle.
`
`Danny Wimmer Presents v. Davis Shapiro Lewitt, Leven – Achieved complete trial victory on behalf of
`
`https://stubbsalderton.com/attorney/michael-sherman/[6/15/2020 1:17:34 PM]
`
`

`

`Michael A. Sherman - Stubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 608-17 Filed 06/18/20 Page 5 of 7
`nation’s leading independent concert promotion company, against claim by former lawyers of that
`company that it owned a significant minority interest in that company.
`
`Schreiber v. Schultz – Following trial, achieved multi-million-dollar recovery for heir of an Estate
`following air crash disaster, where the Estate’s Administrator had cut heir out of the entire settlement
`proceeds.
`
`Coto v. Stockton – Recovered approximately $25M, and award of punitive damages, for co-owner of
`successful telephony start-up in 6 week arbitration, proving that the Company’s president had breached his
`fiduciary duties as part of his employment obligations owing to company and co-owner.
`
`US Ecology v. State of California – After lengthy bench trial that Michael co-tried with the state attorney
`general’s office, successfully represented state of California and Governor’s office in a breach of contract
`claim valued at $250M against the State, by the operator of a nuclear waste dump sites.
`
`Posner v. Nestor – Successfully represented family of one of nation’s foremost corporate raiders against
`estate administrator, alleging that valuation of unique beach front property in South Florida had been
`materially undervalued by the Estate. Trial resulted in millions of dollars in valuation accruing to benefit
`of family members.
`
`US Department of Justice and US Marine Corp v. Eastern Municipal Water District – Following a lengthy
`trial, Michael’s client completely defensed claims of the US Government that a pollution-remediation
`contract entered into between the parties, had caused hundreds of millions of dollars in damages to the city
`of Temecula and the Marine Corp base at Camp Pendleton.
`
`Education, Admissions And Accolades
`
`B.A, Columbia College
`J.D., University of California Berkeley School of Law (Boalt Hall)
`Admitted to practice in California
`
`Member California Bar Association
`
`https://stubbsalderton.com/attorney/michael-sherman/[6/15/2020 1:17:34 PM]
`
`

`

`Michael A. Sherman - Stubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 608-17 Filed 06/18/20 Page 6 of 7
`Member Beverly Hills Bar Association
`“Top 100 Lawyers in California,” Daily Journal
`
`Super Lawyers – recognized 2004-2019
`Best Lawyers in America – recognized 2007-2018
`
`CONTACT US
`
`818.444.4500
`info@stubbsalderton.com
`
`INFORMATION
`
`About Us
`Careers
`Privacy Policy
`Terms & Conditions
`
`STUBBS, ALDERTON & MARKILES
`
`Practice Areas
`Clients
`Attorneys
`Business Advisory & Ventures
`Blog
`Contact
`Preccelerator
`
`SUBSCRIBE TO SA&M VIA EMAIL
`
`(cid:31) (cid:31) (cid:31)
`
`https://stubbsalderton.com/attorney/michael-sherman/[6/15/2020 1:17:34 PM]
`
`

`

`Michael A. Sherman - Stubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 608-17 Filed 06/18/20 Page 7 of 7
`
`https://stubbsalderton.com/attorney/michael-sherman/[6/15/2020 1:17:34 PM]
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket