throbber
1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 550-4 Filed 10/25/19 Page 1 of 5
`
`Michael A. Sherman (SBN 94783)
`masherman@stubbsalderton.com
`Jeffrey F. Gersh (SBN 87124)
`jgersh@stubbsalderton.com
`Sandeep Seth (SBN 195914)
`sseth@stubbsalderton.com
`Wesley W. Monroe (SBN 149211)
`wmonroe@stubbsalderton.com
`Stanley H. Thompson, Jr. (SBN 198825)
`sthompson@stubbsalderton.com
`Viviana Boero Hedrick (SBN 239359)
`vhedrick@stubbsalderton.com
`STUBBS, ALDERTON & MARKILES, LLP
`15260 Ventura Blvd., 20th Floor
`Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
`Telephone:
`(818) 444-4500
`Facsimile:
`(818) 444-4520
`
`Attorneys for PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`CASE NO.: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`IN RE PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES,
`LLC, ET., AL., PATENT LITIGATION
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC. and AMAZON WEB
`SERVICES, INC.,
`
`
`Case No.: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`Case No.: 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`DECLARATION OF VIVIANA BOERO
`HEDRICK IN SUPPORT OF
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES,
`LLC’S NON-OPPOSITION TO
`AMAZON.COM, INC. AND AMAZON
`WEB SERVICES, INC.’S MOTION FOR
`SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-
`INFRINGEMENT AND OPPOSITION TO
`MOTION REGARDING STANDING,
`AND NON-OPPOSITION TO TWITCH
`INTERACTIVE, INC.’S MOTION FOR
`SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF
`NONINFRINGEMENT AND PARTIAL
`OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO
`EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF ERIK DE
`LA IGLESIA
`
`
`
` Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
`and LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`
` Defendants.
`
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
`and LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`
`Counterclaimants,
`v.
`AMAZON.COM, INC. and AMAZON WEB
`SERVICES, INC.,
`
`Counterdefendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HEDRICK DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF PERSONALWEB’S
`RESPONSE TO AMAZON’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
`AND TWITCH’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`
`
`
`CASE NO: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`CASE NO. 5:18-CV-00767-BLF
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 550-4 Filed 10/25/19 Page 2 of 5
`
`Date: November 15, 2019
`Time: 9:00 am
`Dept.: Courtroom 3, 5th Floor
`Judge.: Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
`
`Trial Date: March 16, 2020
`
`
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, a
`Texas limited liability company, and LEVEL 3
`COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, a Delaware
`limited liability company
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`TWITCH INTERACTIVE, INC. a Delaware
`corporation,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`HEDRICK DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF PERSONALWEB’S
`RESPONSE TO AMAZON’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
`AND TWITCH’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`
`CASE NO: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`CASE NO. 5:18-CV-00767-BLF
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 550-4 Filed 10/25/19 Page 3 of 5
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF VIVIANA BOERO HEDRICK
`I, Viviana Boero Hedrick, declare as follows:
`I am over the age of 18 and competent to make this declaration. I am an attorney duly
`1.
`licensed to practice law in the state of California and Of Counsel with Stubbs Alderton & Markiles,
`LLP, counsel for Plaintiffs PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC (“PersonalWeb”) in the above-captioned
`actions. The facts herein are, unless otherwise stated, based upon personal knowledge, and if called
`upon to do so, I could, and would testify to their truth under oath. I submit this declaration in support
`of PersonalWeb’s Non-Opposition to Amazon.com Inc. and Amazon Web Service, Inc.’s Motion for
`Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement and Opposition to Motion Regarding Standing.
`On October 15, 2019, at my direction, James Ponce, a paralegal at Stubbs Alderton &
`2.
`Markiles LLP working on the PersonalWeb matter, downloaded from PACER all publicly-accessible
`substantive documents in PersonalWeb Technologies LLC et al. v. Microsoft Corporation, Case No.
`6:12-cv-00663-LED (the “Microsoft Action”). Under my direction, Mr. Ponce then combined the
`downloaded documents into one PDF document using Adobe Acrobat Pro 2017 and undertook a
`search in these docketed pleadings for the following terms:
`a.) “Content delivery network”;
`b.) “CDN”;
`c.) “field of use”;
`d.) “FOU”;
`e.) “Level 3”;
`f.) “ISP sites”; and
`g.) “ISP”.
`Mr. Ponce reported to me that the term “Content delivery network” appeared zero times
`3.
`in the search of the Microsoft Action’s docketed pleadings.
`Mr. Ponce reported to me that the term “CDN” appeared zero times in the search of the
`4.
`Microsoft Action’s docketed pleadings.
`Mr. Ponce reported to me that the term “field of use” appeared one time in the search
`5.
`of the Microsoft Action’s docketed pleadings, in Dkt. 1, PersonalWeb’s Complaint for Patent
`
`1
`
`HEDRICK DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF PERSONALWEB’S
`RESPONSE TO AMAZON’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
`AND TWITCH’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`CASE NO. 5:18-CV-00767-BLF
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 550-4 Filed 10/25/19 Page 4 of 5
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`Infringement, which lists Level 3 and PersonalWeb’s co-plaintiff.
`Mr. Ponce reported to me that the term “FOU” appeared zero times in the search of the
`6.
`Microsoft Action’s docketed pleadings.
`Mr. Ponce reported to me that the term “Level 3” appeared multiple times in the search
`7.
`of the Microsoft Action’s docketed pleadings as PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC’s co-plaintiff and
`in the case cite Level 3 Commc’ns, LLC v. Limelight Networks, Inc 589 F. Supp.2d 664 (E.D. Va.
`2008) which appeared in PersonalWeb’s Opening Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. 73).
`Mr. Ponce reported to me that the term “ISP sites” appeared zero times in the search of
`8.
`the Microsoft Action’s docketed pleadings.
`Mr. Ponce reported to me that the term “ISP” appeared zero times in the search of the
`9.
`Microsoft Action’s docketed pleadings.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of the docket sheet for
`10.
`PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC, et al., v. Microsoft Corp., Case No. 6:12-cv-00633-LED.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the January 17,
`11.
`2014 deposition transcript of Ronald Lachman from PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Microsoft
`Corp., No. 6:12-cv-00663-LED.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of the May 21, 2019 Declaration
`12.
`of Ronald D. Lachman.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of the May 21, 2019 Declaration
`13.
`of Ezra Goldman.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of the September 1, 2000 License
`14.
`Agreement between Kinetech, Inc. and Digital Island, Inc.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of the December 14, 2000
`15.
`Agreement between Kinetech, Inc. and Digital Island, Inc.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 7 is a true and correct of excerpts from the October 1, 2019
`16.
`deposition transcript of James Richard in the present case.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 8 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the July 24,
`17.
`2019 30(b)(6) deposition transcript of Matthew Baldwin in the present case.
`
`2
`
`HEDRICK DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF PERSONALWEB’S
`RESPONSE TO AMAZON’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
`AND TWITCH’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`CASE NO. 5:18-CV-00767-BLF
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 550-4 Filed 10/25/19 Page 5 of 5
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is
`true and correct.
`Executed this 25th day of October, 2019 in Los Angeles, California.
`
`/s/Viviana Boero Hedrick__
`Viviana Boero Hedrick
`
`
`3
`
`HEDRICK DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF PERSONALWEB’S
`RESPONSE TO AMAZON’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
`AND TWITCH’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`CASE NO. 5:18-CV-00767-BLF
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket