throbber
Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 540 Filed 10/04/19 Page 1 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`J. DAVID HADDEN (CSB No. 176148)
`dhadden@fenwick.com
`SAINA S. SHAMILOV (CSB No. 215636)
`sshamilov@fenwick.com
`MELANIE L. MAYER (admitted pro hac vice)
`mmayer@fenwick.com
`TODD R. GREGORIAN (CSB No. 236096)
`tgregorian@fenwick.com
`RAVI R. RANGANATH (CSB No. 272981)
`rranganath@fenwick.com
`SHANNON E. TURNER (CSB No. 310121)
`sturner@fenwick.com
`CHIEH TUNG (CSB No. 318963)
`ctung@fenwick.com
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`Silicon Valley Center
`801 California Street
`Mountain View, CA 94041
`Telephone:
`650.988.8500
`Facsimile:
`650.938.5200
`
`Counsel for AMAZON.COM, INC.,
`AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC., and
`TWITCH INTERACTIVE, INC.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`IN RE: PERSONAL WEB TECHNOLOGIES,
`Case No.: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`LLC ET AL., PATENT LITIGATION
`Case No.: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC., and AMAZON WEB
`Case No.: 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`SERVICES, INC.,
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
`Plaintiffs
`UNDER SEAL EXHIBITS 1-2, 4, 7 TO
`DECLARATION OF SAINA S.
`SHAMILOV IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
`OF AMAZON.COM, INC., AND
`AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC.,
`FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF
`NONINFRINGEMENT AND MOTION
`OF TWITCH INTERACTIVE, INC. FOR
`SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF
`NONINFRINGEMENT AND TO
`EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF
`ERIK DE LA IGLESIA
`Date:
`November 15, 2019
`Time:
`9:00 a.m.
`Dept:
`Courtroom 3, 5th floor
`Judge:
`Hon. Beth L. Freeman
`CASE NO.: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER
`SEAL
`
`
`
`
`v.
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and
`LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`Defendants,
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and
`LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`Counterclaimants,
`
`v.
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC., and AMAZON WEB
`SERVICES, INC.,
`
`Counterdefendants.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`
`1010
`
`1111
`
`1212
`
`1313
`
`1414
`
`1515
`
`1616
`
`1717
`
`1818
`
`1919
`
`2020
`
`2121
`
`2222
`
`2323
`
`2424
`
`2525
`
`2626
`
`2727
`
`2828
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 540 Filed 10/04/19 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
`Trial Date: March 16, 2020
`
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, a
`Texas limited liability company, and LEVEL 3
`COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, a Delaware limited
`liability company,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`v.
`
`TWITCH INTERACTIVE, INC. a Delaware
`corporation,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`ADMINISTRATIVE. MOTION TO FILE UNDER
`SEAL
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO.: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 540 Filed 10/04/19 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5(d), Amazon.com, Inc., and Amazon Web
`Services, Inc. (collectively, “Amazon”), and Twitch Interactive, Inc. (“Twitch”) hereby move for
`administrative relief to file the following items under seal in connection with Amazon’s Motion for
`Summary Judgment of Noninfringement and Twitch’s Motion for Summary Judgment of
`Noninfringement and to Exclude the Testimony of Erik de la Iglesia (“Motions”).
` Amazon’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement at page:line nos.:
`14:2-3, 14:4-5.
` Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Saina S. Shamilov in Support of Amazon and
`Twitch’s Motions (“Shamilov Declaration”) is the technical report of PersonalWeb
`Technologies, LLC’s (“PersonalWeb”) expert Erik de la Iglesia on infringement.
` Exhibit 2 to the Shamilov Declaration is the responsive report of Amazon and
`Twitch’s expert, Dr. Jon B. Weissman, on non-infringement.
` Exhibit 4 to the Shamilov Declaration is an excerpt from the deposition of James
`Richard (“Richard”).
` Exhibit 7 to the Shamilov Declaration is an excerpt from the deposition of Ronald
`Lachman (“Lachman”).
`Amazon and Twitch request leave to file Exhibits 1-2, 4, and 7 under seal.
`Exhibit 1 is the technical expert report of PersonalWeb’s expert, Erik de la Iglesia, on
`infringement. PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC (“PersonalWeb”) has designated this report as
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” under the Stipulated Protective
`Order entered by the Court in the pending actions, Case Nos. 5:18-md-02834-BLF (Dkt. No. 290)
`and 5:18-cv-00767-BLF (“Current Actions).” Specifically, the expert report attached as Exhibit 1
`includes references to and characterizations of Twitch’s proprietary source code and excerpts of the
`deposition testimony of Twitch’s technical witnesses. The Court previously granted Amazon and
`Twitch’s Administrative Motion to Seal Exhibit 1 for substantially the same reasons. (Dkt. 535.)
`As to information other than the Amazon and Twitch confidential information discussed above,
`Amazon and Twitch file this administrative motion to abide by the terms of the Stipulated Protective
`
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER
`SEAL
`
`3
`
`
`
`CASE NO.: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 540 Filed 10/04/19 Page 4 of 5
`
`
`
`Order and to facilitate the filing of their Motions.
`Exhibit 2 is the responsive expert report of Amazon and Twitch’s expert, Dr. Jon B.
`Weissman, on non-infringement. Amazon and Twitch designated this report as “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” under the Stipulated Protective Order entered
`by the Court in the Current Actions. Exhibit 2 similarly includes references to and characterizations
`of Amazon and Twitch’s proprietary source code and excerpts of the deposition testimony of
`Amazon and Twitch’s technical witnesses. Both this highly confidential source code and the
`deposition transcript have been designated under the Stipulated Protective Order, and consist of
`sensitive information that Amazon and Twitch maintain as confidential and do not reveal to the
`general public.
`In the Ninth Circuit, a district court may override the presumption of public access to judicial
`documents where “good cause” is shown. See Phillips ex rel. Estates of Byrd v. General Motors
`Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210 (9th Cir. 2002). “For good cause to exist, the party seeking protection
`bears the burden of showing specific prejudice or harm will result if no protective order is granted.”
`Id. at 1211 (internal citations omitted). A party seeking to file documents under seal in connection
`with a dispositive motion must establish compelling reasons for doing so to rebut the presumption
`against public access. See Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1136 (9th Cir.
`2003). As explained in the accompanying Declaration of Ravi R. Ranganath in Support of
`Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Exhibits 1-2, 4, 7 (“Ranganath MFUS Declaration”), the
`confidential and proprietary source code and the excerpted deposition testimony meets this standard.
`See, e.g., Opperman v. Path, Inc., No. 3-cv-00453-JST, 2017 WL 1036652, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Mar.
`17, 2017) (sealing excerpts of developers’ proprietary source code in summary judgment pleadings).
`Amazon and Twitch have designated the Weissman report as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
`– ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” in its entirety. Disclosure of confidential and proprietary source
`code and excerpts of depositions of Amazon and Twitch’s technical witnesses would put these
`entities at a competitive disadvantage with respect to competitors and competing services.
`Amazon and Twitch also request leave to file Exhibit 4 under seal. Exhibit 4 contains an
`
`ADMINISTRATIVE. MOTION TO FILE UNDER
`SEAL
`
`
`4
`
`CASE NO.: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 540 Filed 10/04/19 Page 5 of 5
`
`
`
`excerpt of deposition testimony regarding non-public aspects of the internal operation of Twitch’s
`web servers. Amazon and Twitch designated this item as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” in the Current Actions.
`As further explained in the Ranganath MFUS Declaration, the confidential deposition
`testimony Amazon and Twitch seek to file under seal meets the Foltz standard. See Phoenix
`Technologies Ltd. v. VMware, Inc., No. 15-cv-01414-HSG, 2018 WL 1169188, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Feb.
`14, 2018) (good cause exists to protect business information that might harm a litigant’s competitive
`standing if disclosed, and where the redaction is “sufficiently narrowly tailored” to only seal portions
`of the exhibit that might put sensitive business information at risk). Disclosure of non-public details
`regarding the operation of Twitch’s services would put it at a competitive disadvantage with respect
`to competitors and competing services.
`Amazon and Twitch also request leave to file Exhibit 7 under seal. The deposition transcript
`was designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” (“AEO”) in its
`entirety by PersonalWeb. With respect to this exhibit, Amazon and Twitch seek leave to file under
`seal only to abide by the terms of the Stipulated Protective Order in the Current Actions and to
`facilitate the filing of their Motions. By filing this administrative motion, Amazon and Twitch do
`not waive their right to contest PersonalWeb’s designations and expressly reserve their rights to
`contest the propriety of the designations, in whole or in part. Because PersonalWeb has designated
`this exhibit as highly confidential, Amazon and Twitch also seek leave to file the corresponding
`excerpt in Amazon’s Motion under seal for the same reason outlined above.
`
`
`Dated: October 4, 2019
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/ Ravi R. Ranganath
`Ravi R. Ranganath (CSB No. 272981)
`Counsel for AMAZON.COM, INC.,
`AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC., and
`TWITCH INTERACTIVE, INC.
`
`
`
`ADMINISTRATIVE. MOTION TO FILE UNDER
`SEAL
`
`
`5
`
`CASE NO.: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket