throbber
Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 507-6 Filed 08/26/19 Page 1 of 3
`Case 5:18-md-02834—BLF Document 507-6 Filed 08/26/19 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 5
`
`EXHIBIT 5
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 507-6 Filed 08/26/19 Page 2 of 3
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 507-6 Filed 08/26/19 Page 2 of 3
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`IN RE PERSONALWEB
`TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL.,
`PATENT LITIGATION
`
`Case No.: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES,
`
`LLC, et. al.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v‘
`
`TWITCH INTERACTIVE, INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`Case No.: 5:18-cv-05619-BLF
`
`TECHNICAL EXPERT REPORT OF ERIK DE LA IGLESIA
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`Executed this 23rd day ofAugust", 2019 in .mL/m‘ar'u M; w , California.
`
`
`
`Erik de la Iglesia
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 507-6 Filed 08/26/19 Page 3 of 3
`
`to determine whether the received ETag value matches the current ETag value for the content of
`
`the object referenced in the request (i.e. the URI of the file conditionally requested).
`
`179. After the comparison, if there was a matching ETag value for the content of an
`
`object referenced in the conditional GET request the Twitch web servers determined that the
`
`cached content was still the valid content, and therefore served a 304 NOT MODIFIED response
`
`message indicating to the browser that it has valid rights to keep using the cached contents for
`
`the duration specified by the max-age value set by Twitch and also sent in the 304 response. If
`
`the comparison resulted in a non-matching ETag value for the content of an object referenced in
`
`the conditional GET request the Twitch web servers determined that the browser did not have the
`
`valid content in its cache for that URI, and served a 200 OK response message containing the
`
`valid content, the valid ETag value, and a new max-age specifying how the time duration for
`
`which the new content would be valid to be cached and used by the browser without subsequent
`
`revalidation.
`
`180. Additional details regarding the receipt of conditional GET requests, comparison
`
`of ETags in conditional GET requests and service of 200 OK and 304 NOT MODIFIED
`
`response messages by the Twitch web servers are provided in paragraphs 90, 100, 101, and 102
`
`hereto, and the source code, HTTP protocol specifications, and portions of Appendix C cited
`
`therein, which are incorporated herein by reference.
`
`F.
`
`Exemplary Evidence
`
`181.
`
`In this report, I have demonstrated that the Accused Instrumentality included and
`
`practiced all of the limitations of the claimed system and methods based on an examination of
`
`exemplary webpage base files and asset files captured on certain dates during the Relevant Time
`
`–59–
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket