Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 452-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 1 of 24
`Case 5:18—md-02834-BLF Document 452-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 1 of 24
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`
`Case 5:18—md-02834-BLF Document 452-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 1 of 24
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00661-JRG Document 78 Filed 11/18/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1831Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 452-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 2 of 24
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 6:12-cv-00659-JRG
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 6:12-cv-00661-JRG
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`§§§§§§§§§§§§
`
`§§§§§§§§§§§§
`
`
`
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.
`AND LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`RACKSPACE US, INC., ET AL.,
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.
`AND LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES
`CORPORATION.
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`In accordance with Patent Rule 4-3, the parties hereby submit their Joint Claim
`
`Construction and Prehearing Statement for the constructions of terms, phrases, and clauses for
`
`U.S. Patent Nos. 6,415,280 (“the ’280 patent”), 6,928,442 (“the ’442 patent”), 7,802,310 (“the
`
`’310 patent), and 8,099,420 (”the ’420 patent), (collectively “the asserted patents”). In
`
`accordance with Patent Rule 4-2(c), the parties met and conferred for the purposes of narrowing
`
`the issues and finalizing preparation of a Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement.
`
`A.
`
`Agreed-Upon Constructions
`
`Exhibit A provides the construction of those claim terms, phrases, or clauses on which
`
`the parties agree.
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00661-JRG Document 78 Filed 11/18/15 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 1832Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 452-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 3 of 24
`
`B.
`
`Disputed Claim Constructions
`
`Exhibit B identifies the disputed claim terms and provides PersonalWeb’s and
`
`Defendants’ respective proposed constructions and an identification of intrinsic and extrinsic
`
`evidence supporting their proposed constructions, as required by P.R. 4-3(b).
`
`C.
`
`Anticipated Length of Time for the Claim Construction Hearing
`
`The Parties propose that each side be allotted ninety minutes of argument time.
`
`D.
`
`Identification of Witnesses
`
`The Parties do not intend to offer the oral or written testimony of any witnesses,
`
`including experts, at the Claim Construction Hearing.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00661-JRG Document 78 Filed 11/18/15 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 1833Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 452-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 4 of 24
`
`Dated: November 18, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Brent P. Ray
`Kenneth R. Adamo
`Texas State Bar No. 00846960
`kradamo@kirkland.com
`Brent P. Ray
`Illinois State Bar No. 6291911
`brent.ray@kirkland.com
`Ryan M. Hubbard
`Illinois State Bar No. 6296777
`ryan.hubbard@kirkland.com
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
` 300 N. LaSalle Dr.
`Chicago, Illinois 60654-3406
`Telephone: (312) 862-2000
`Facsimile: (312) 862-2200
`
`Eric M. Albritton
`Texas State Bar No. 00790215
`ema@emafirm.com
`ALBRITTON LAW FIRM
`P.O. Box 2649
`Longview, Texas 75606
`Telephone: (903) 757-8449
`Facsimile: (903) 758-7397
`
`Attorneys for Defendant IBM
`
`/s/ Ryan M. Kent
`Ryan M. Kent
`rkent@durietangri.com
`Durie Tangri LLP
`217 Leidesdorff Street
`San Francisco, CA 94111-3007
`Telephone: (415) 362-6666
`Facsimile: (415) 236-6300
`
`Michael E. Jones
`SBN: 10929400
`mikejones@potterminton.com
`Allen F. Gardner
`SBN: 24043679
`allengardner@potterminton.com
`POTTER MINTON, PC
`110 North College Avenue, Suite 500
`Tyler, Texas 75702
`Telephone: (903) 597-8311
`Facsimile: (903) 593-0846
`
`Attorneys For Defendant Github, Inc.
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00661-JRG Document 78 Filed 11/18/15 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 1834Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 452-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 5 of 24
`
`McKOOL SMITH, P.C.
`
`/s/ Samuel E. Baxter
`Samuel E. Baxter
`(sbaxter@mckoolsmith.com)
`Texas Bar No. 01938000
`104 East Houston Street, Suite 300
`P. O. Box. O
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Telephone: (903) 923-9000
`Facsimile: (903) 923-9099
`
`
`Roderick G. Dorman (CA SBN 96908)
`rdorman@mckoolsmithhennigan.com
`Lawrence M. Hadley (CA SBN 157728)
`lhadley@mckoolsmithhennigan.com
`865 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2900
`Los Angeles, California 90017
`Telephone: (213) 694-1200
`Facsimile: (213) 694-1234
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`PersonalWeb Technologies LLC
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00661-JRG Document 78 Filed 11/18/15 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 1835Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 452-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 6 of 24
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`This is to certify that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to
`
`electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system
`
`per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on this 18th day of November, 2015.
`
`/s/ Brent P. Ray
`Brent P. Ray
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00661-JRG Document 78-1 Filed 11/18/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1836Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 452-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 7 of 24
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00661-JRG Document 78-1 Filed 11/18/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1837Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 452-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 8 of 24
`
`Exhibit A
`Agreed Constructions
`Claim Terms Asserted for Construction
`
`Agreed Construction
`
`Data identifier
`
`’280 patent, claim 1
`
`Data file
`
`’280 patent, claim 1
`’442 patent, claims 1, 2, 4, 7, 23, 30
`
`Content-based name
`
`’310 patent, claims 1, 8, 11, 18
`
`Digital identifier
`
`’420 patent, claim 166
`
`An identity for a data item generated by processing all of the data
`in the data item, and only the data in the data item, through an
`algorithm that makes the identifier substantially unique.
`
`A named data item(s).
`
`An identity for a data item generated by processing all of the data
`in the data item, and only the data in the data item, through an
`algorithm that makes the identifier substantially unique.
`
`An identity for a data item generated by processing all of the data
`in the data item, and only the data in the data item, through an
`algorithm that makes the identifier substantially unique.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00661-JRG Document 78-2 Filed 11/18/15 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1838Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 452-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 9 of 24
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT B
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00661-JRG Document 78-2 Filed 11/18/15 Page 2 of 16 PageID #: 1839Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 452-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 10 of 24
`
`
`
`Exhibit B
`Joint Claim Construction Chart
`PersonalWeb and Defendants present their proposed constructions for each disputed term, together with an identification of all
`
`references from the intrinsic record and extrinsic evidence that support those constructions. All references to the specification are to
`U.S. Patent No. 5,978,791 (“the ’791 patent), the first patent to issue from the patent family of the asserted patents. Although the ’791
`patent is no longer asserted, the parties cite to the ’791 patent because its specification is identical to the specifications of the asserted
`patents and because the Court cited to the ’791 patent specification when previously construing terms from the asserted patents. (See
`11-cv-655-LED, ECF No. 103).
`
`Claim Terms Asserted for
`Construction
`
`PersonalWeb’s Proposed
`Construction & Evidence
`
`Defendants’ Proposed Construction & Evidence
`
`Data item
`
`Sequence of bits.
`
`A sequence of bits distinct from contextual information.
`
`’280 patent, claim 1
`’310 patent, claims 1, 2, 7, 8, 10,
`11, 14, 16-19
`’420 patent, claim 166
`
`Intrinsic:
`
`’791 patent, 1:54–60.
`
`’280 patent, 1:53-59.
`
`’310 patent, 16-21.
`
`’420 patent, 1:58-63.
`
`2013 08 05 Claim Construction
`Order (11-cv-655, ECF No. 103)
`at 8-10.
`
`Intrinsic:
`
`‘791 patent at Figs. 10a-10b, 1:65-3:35, 8:19-34, 14:40-50,
`28:46-49, 31:58-63, 32:49-33:47, 35:29-37, 38:33-40.
`
`‘791 file history at Amendment Under 37 C.F.R. 1.115
`dated March 12, 1997 at 10-23, Figures A and B;
`Amendment Under 37 C.F.R. 1.116 dated August 29, 1997
`at 8-30.
`
`IPR2013-00082, Record of Oral Hearing at 109-123.
`
`IPR2013-00083, Record of Oral Hearing at 109-123.
`
`IPR2013-00084, Record of Oral Hearing at 109-123.
`
`IPR2013-00085, Record of Oral Hearing at 109-123.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00661-JRG Document 78-2 Filed 11/18/15 Page 3 of 16 PageID #: 1840Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 452-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 11 of 24
`
`
`
`IPR2013-00086, Record of Oral Hearing at 109-123.
`
`IPR2013-00087, Record of Oral Hearing at 109-122; Final
`Written Decision at 13-14.
`
`Extrinsic:
`
`Defendant Digital Island’s Opening Brief on Claim
`Construction Issues, Digital Island, Inc. v. Akamai Techs.,
`Inc. et al., Case No. 1:00-cv-11851 (MAD) (D. Mass.) at 3-
`4.
`
`Feb. 16, 2006 Dep. Tr. of David Farber, Altnet, Inc. v.
`Recording Indus. Assoc. of Am., Case No. CV 04-7456 JFW
`(CFX) (C.D. Cal.) at PWEB011123-30, PWEB011311-15.
`
`Feb. 21, 2014 Rough Dep. Tr. of David Farber,
`PersonalWeb Techs., LLC et al. v. Microsoft Corp., Case
`No. 6:12-cv-00663-LED (E.D. Tex.) at 34-38, 42-47.
`
`Given function of the data [in the
`data file]
`
`Plain and ordinary. No
`construction necessary.
`
`Computation where the input is all of the data in the data
`file, and only the data in the data file.
`
`’280 patent, claim 1
`’442 patent, claims 1, 7
`
`(Bracketed portion appears only
`in ’442 patent, claim 7.)
`
`
`
`
`Intrinsic:
`
`’791 patent, Abstract, 12:54-
`13:67.
`
`’280 patent, Abstract, 12:37-
`13:51, Claims 2-6.
`
`’442 patent, Abstract, 12:56-14:3.
`
`See 2013 08 05 Claim
`Construction Order (11-cv-655,
`
`2
`
`Intrinsic:
`
`’791 patent at Title, Abstract, 1:12-18, 1:20-3:20, 3:28-35,
`6:6-10, 12:54-13:34, 13:55-14:12, 32:54-64, Figs. 10(a) &
`10(b), Claims 7, 9, 13, and 38.
`
`’442 patent at Abstract.
`
`’539 patent, Claim 21.
`
`PWEB 000504–879 at PWEB 000574, PWEB 000632,
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00661-JRG Document 78-2 Filed 11/18/15 Page 4 of 16 PageID #: 1841Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 452-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 12 of 24
`
`ECF No. 103) (holding no
`construction is necessary for,
`among other terms, “file system,”
`“sufficient number of copies,”
`“licensed/unlicensed,”
`“distributing a set of data files
`across a network of servers,”
`“identifier,” and “substantially
`unique.”).
`
`
`
`
`
`PWEB 000646–63, PWEB 000664.
`
`PWEB 001260–938 at PWEB 001826, PWEB 001875.
`
`PWEB 000880–1259 at PWEB 001073-74, PWEB 001075,
`PWEB 001078.
`
`PWEB 000504–879 at PWEB 000741, PWEB 000749,
`PWEB 000751, PWEB 000772, PWEB 000818.
`
`PWEB 156619-7047 at PWEB 156722-23.
`
`PWEB 001939-2832 at PWEB 002278, PWEB 002282.
`
`PWEB 162865 – 905 at PWEB 162867.
`
`PWEB 155507– 43 at PWEB 155525.
`
`PWEB 158586–610 at PWEB 018600.
`
`Extrinsic:
`
`Defendant Digital Island’s Opening Brief on Claim
`Construction Issues, Digital Island, Inc. v. Akamai Techs.,
`Inc. et al., Case No. 1:00-cv-11851 (MAD) (D. Mass.) at 3-
`4.
`
`Order Regarding Claim Construction [Dkt. No. 137], Digital
`Island, Inc. v. Akamai Techs., Inc. et al., Case No. 1:00-cv-
`11851 (MAD) (D. Mass.) at 2.
`
`CWIS’ Reply Markman Brief Construing the Terms at Issue
`in U.S. Patent No. 6,415,280 [Dkt. No. 58], Cable &
`Wireless Internet Servs., Inc. et al. v. Akamai Techs., Inc.,
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00661-JRG Document 78-2 Filed 11/18/15 Page 5 of 16 PageID #: 1842Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 452-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 13 of 24
`
`Civil Action No. 02-11430 RWZ (D. Mass.) at 7-12.
`
`Feb. 16, 2006 Dep. Tr. of David Farber, Altnet, Inc. v.
`Recording Indus. Assoc. of Am., Case No. CV 04-7456 JFW
`(CFX) (C.D. Cal.) at PWEB011123-30, PWEB011178-85,
`PWEB011311-15, PWEB011330-35.
`
`Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement, Altnet,
`Inc. et al. v. Streamcast Networks, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:06-
`cv-05086-ODW-E (C.D. Cal.) at 4, 16;
`
`Mar. 23, 2007 Dep. Tr. of Robert B. K. Dewar, Altnet, Inc.
`et al. v. Streamcast Networks, Inc. et al., No. cv-06-5086-
`SJO (C.D. Cal.) at PWEB071524-28.
`
`Plaintiff’s Claim Construction Brief, Altnet, Inc. et al. v.
`Streamcast Networks, Inc. et al., No. cv-06-5086-SJO (C.D.
`Cal.) at PWEB112936-39.
`
`Feb. 20, 2014 Rough Dep. Tr. of David Farber,
`PersonalWeb Techs., LLC et al. v. Microsoft Corp., Case
`No. 6:12-cv-00663-LED (E.D. Tex.) at 128-134.
`
`Feb. 21, 2014 Rough Dep. Tr. of David Farber,
`PersonalWeb Techs., LLC et al. v. Microsoft Corp., Case
`No. 6:12-cv-00663-LED (E.D. Tex.) at 34-38, 42-47.
`
`Mem. Opinion & Order regarding Claim Construction [Dkt.
`No. 103], PersonalWeb Techs., LLC et al. v. NEC Corp. of
`Am., Case No. 6:11-cv-655-LED (E.D. Tex.) at 13-23.
`
`PersonalWeb Techs., LLC’s Opening Claim Construction
`Br. [Dkt. No. 86], PersonalWeb Techs., LLC et al. v. NEC
`Corp. of Am., Case No. 6:11-cv-655-LED (E.D. Tex.) at 5-8.
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00661-JRG Document 78-2 Filed 11/18/15 Page 6 of 16 PageID #: 1843Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 452-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 14 of 24
`
`PersonalWeb Techs., LLC’s Markman Hearing Slides,
`PersonalWeb Techs., LLC et al. v. NEC Corp. of Am., Case
`No. 6:11-cv-655-LED (E.D. Tex.) at 20-24;
`
`Markman Hearing Transcript, PersonalWeb Techs., LLC et
`al. v. NEC Corp. of Am., Case No. 6:11-cv-655-LED (E.D.
`Tex.) at 6-11.
`
`Order denying Motion for Reconsideration, PersonalWeb
`Techs., LLC et al. v. Microsoft Corp., Case No. 6:12-cv-
`663-LED (E.D. Tex.) at 1-6.
`
`PersonalWeb Techs., LLC v. Google Inc., No. 11-cv-00656
`(LED), D.I. 159, Opening Claim Construction Brief. (June
`5, 2013 E.D. Tex.) (GITHUB0000310 – GITHUB0000346).
`
`Paul E. Black, “function”, in Dictionary of Algorithms and
`Data Structures [online], Vreda Pieterse and Paul E. Black,
`eds. 17 December 2004, available at
`http://www.nist.gov/dads/HTML/function.html (last
`accessed Nov. 2, 2015) (GITHUB000347–
`GITHUB0000348).
`
`Webster’s II New College Dictionary 453 (2001)
`(GITHUB0000349– GITHUB0000351).
`McMillan Dictionary, “a function of something” (online
`ed.), available at
`http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/american/a-
`function-of-something) (last accessed Nov. 2, 2015)
`(GITHUB0000352 – GITHUB0000353).
`
`Feb. 16, 2006 Depo. Trans. of David Farber, Altnet, Inc. v.
`Recording Industry Assoc. of Am., Case No. CV 04-7456
`JFW (CTX) (C.D. Cal.) (PWEB 011056 – PWEB 011365).
`
`Applying a function to the
`
`Plain and ordinary. No
`
`Performing a computation where the input is all of the data
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00661-JRG Document 78-2 Filed 11/18/15 Page 7 of 16 PageID #: 1844Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 452-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 15 of 24
`
`
`
`contents of the corresponding file1
`
`construction necessary.
`
`in the file, and only the data in the file.
`
`’442 patent, claim 23
`
`Intrinsic:
`
`Intrinsic:
`
`’791 patent, Abstract, 12:54-
`13:67.
`
`’442 patent, Abstract, 12:56-14:3,
`Claims 27-30.
`
`See 2013 08 05 Claim
`Construction Order (11-cv-655,
`ECF No. 103) (holding no
`construction is necessary for,
`among other terms, “file system,”
`“sufficient number of copies,”
`“licensed/unlicensed,”
`“distributing a set of data files
`across a network of servers,”
`“identifier,” and “substantially
`unique.”).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`’791 patent at Title, Abstract, 1:12-18, 1:20-3:20, 3:28-35,
`6:6-10, 12:54-13:34, 13:55-14:12, 32:54-64, Figs. 10(a) &
`10(b), Claims 7, 9, 13, and 38.
`
`’442 patent at Abstract.
`
`’539 patent, Claim 21.
`
`PWEB 000504–879 at PWEB 000574, PWEB 000632,
`PWEB 000646–63, PWEB 000664.
`
`PWEB 001260–938 at PWEB 001826, PWEB 001875.
`
`PWEB 000880–1259 at PWEB 001073-74, PWEB 001075,
`PWEB 001078.
`
`PWEB 000504–879 at PWEB 000741, PWEB 000749,
`PWEB 000751, PWEB 000772, PWEB 000818.
`
`PWEB 156619-7047 at PWEB 156722-23.
`
`PWEB 001939-2832 at PWEB 002278, PWEB 002282.
`
`PWEB 162865 – 905 at PWEB 162867.
`
`PWEB 155507– 43 at PWEB 155525.
`
`
`1 This term appears in a claim that is only asserted against defendant IBM.
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00661-JRG Document 78-2 Filed 11/18/15 Page 8 of 16 PageID #: 1845Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 452-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 16 of 24
`
`PWEB 158586–610 at PWEB 018600.
`
`Extrinsic:
`
`Defendant Digital Island’s Opening Brief on Claim
`Construction Issues, Digital Island, Inc. v. Akamai Techs.,
`Inc. et al., Case No. 1:00-cv-11851 (MAD) (D. Mass.) at 3-
`4.
`
`Order Regarding Claim Construction [Dkt. No. 137], Digital
`Island, Inc. v. Akamai Techs., Inc. et al., Case No. 1:00-cv-
`11851 (MAD) (D. Mass.) at 2.
`
`CWIS’ Reply Markman Brief Construing the Terms at Issue
`in U.S. Patent No. 6,415,280 [Dkt. No. 58], Cable &
`Wireless Internet Servs., Inc. et al. v. Akamai Techs., Inc.,
`Civil Action No. 02-11430 RWZ (D. Mass.) at 7-12.
`
`Feb. 16, 2006 Dep. Tr. of David Farber, Altnet, Inc. v.
`Recording Indus. Assoc. of Am., Case No. CV 04-7456 JFW
`(CFX) (C.D. Cal.) at PWEB011123-30, PWEB011178-85,
`PWEB011311-15, PWEB011330-35.
`
`Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement, Altnet,
`Inc. et al. v. Streamcast Networks, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:06-
`cv-05086-ODW-E (C.D. Cal.) at 4, 16;
`
`Mar. 23, 2007 Dep. Tr. of Robert B. K. Dewar, Altnet, Inc.
`et al. v. Streamcast Networks, Inc. et al., No. cv-06-5086-
`SJO (C.D. Cal.) at PWEB071524-28.
`
`Plaintiff’s Claim Construction Brief, Altnet, Inc. et al. v.
`Streamcast Networks, Inc. et al., No. cv-06-5086-SJO (C.D.
`Cal.) at PWEB112936-39.
`
`7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00661-JRG Document 78-2 Filed 11/18/15 Page 9 of 16 PageID #: 1846Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 452-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 17 of 24
`
`Feb. 20, 2014 Rough Dep. Tr. of David Farber,
`PersonalWeb Techs., LLC et al. v. Microsoft Corp., Case
`No. 6:12-cv-00663-LED (E.D. Tex.) at 128-134.
`
`Feb. 21, 2014 Rough Dep. Tr. of David Farber,
`PersonalWeb Techs., LLC et al. v. Microsoft Corp., Case
`No. 6:12-cv-00663-LED (E.D. Tex.) at 34-38, 42-47.
`
`Mem. Opinion & Order regarding Claim Construction [Dkt.
`No. 103], PersonalWeb Techs., LLC et al. v. NEC Corp. of
`Am., Case No. 6:11-cv-655-LED (E.D. Tex.) at 13-23.
`
`PersonalWeb Techs., LLC’s Opening Claim Construction
`Br. [Dkt. No. 86], PersonalWeb Techs., LLC et al. v. NEC
`Corp. of Am., Case No. 6:11-cv-655-LED (E.D. Tex.) at 5-8.
`
`PersonalWeb Techs., LLC’s Markman Hearing Slides,
`PersonalWeb Techs., LLC et al. v. NEC Corp. of Am., Case
`No. 6:11-cv-655-LED (E.D. Tex.) at 20-24;
`
`Markman Hearing Transcript, PersonalWeb Techs., LLC et
`al. v. NEC Corp. of Am., Case No. 6:11-cv-655-LED (E.D.
`Tex.) at 6-11.
`
`Order denying Motion for Reconsideration, PersonalWeb
`Techs., LLC et al. v. Microsoft Corp., Case No. 6:12-cv-
`663-LED (E.D. Tex.) at 1-6.
`
`PersonalWeb Techs., LLC v. Google Inc., No. 11-cv-00656
`(LED), D.I. 159, Opening Claim Construction Brief. (June
`5, 2013 E.D. Tex.) (GITHUB0000310 – GITHUB0000346).
`
`Paul E. Black, “function”, in Dictionary of Algorithms and
`Data Structures [online], Vreda Pieterse and Paul E. Black,
`eds. 17 December 2004, available at
`
`8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00661-JRG Document 78-2 Filed 11/18/15 Page 10 of 16 PageID #: 1847Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 452-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 18 of 24
`
`http://www.nist.gov/dads/HTML/function.html (last
`accessed Nov. 2, 2015) (GITHUB000347–
`GITHUB0000348).
`
`Webster’s II New College Dictionary 453 (2001)
`(GITHUB0000349– GITHUB0000351).
`McMillan Dictionary, “a function of something” (online
`ed.), available at
`http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/american/a-
`function-of-something) (last accessed Nov. 2, 2015)
`(GITHUB0000352 – GITHUB0000353).
`
`Feb. 16, 2006 Depo. Trans. of David Farber, Altnet, Inc. v.
`Recording Industry Assoc. of Am., Case No. CV 04-7456
`JFW (CTX) (C.D. Cal.) (PWEB 011056 – PWEB 011365).
`
`Valid/invalid rights to access content.
`
`Intrinsic:
`
` ‘791 patent at 8:51:55, 11:63-67, 12:4-7, 32:17-48.
`
`‘420 file history at Non-Final Office Action dated May 19,
`2009 at 10-19; Response to Final Office Action dated
`February 14, 2010 at 11-19.
`
`Extrinsic:
`
`PersonalWeb Techs., LLC’s Opening Claim Construction
`Br. [Dkt. No. 86], PersonalWeb Techs., LLC et al. v. NEC
`Corp. of Am., Case No. 6:11-cv-655-LED (E.D. Tex.) at 20-
`21.
`
`Plaintiff’s Claim Construction Brief, Altnet, Inc. et al. v.
`Streamcast Networks, Inc. et al., No. cv-06-5086-SJO (C.D.
`
`Licensed / unlicensed
`
`’442 patent, claims 1, 7, 23
`
`Plain and ordinary. No
`construction necessary.
`
`Intrinsic:
`
`’791 patent, 8:51-55, 11:63-67,
`32:17-48.
`
`’442 patent, Abstract, 8:53-56,
`11:66-12:10, 32:42-33:7, Claims
`3, 6-10.
`
`2013 08 05 Claim Construction
`Order (11-cv-655, ECF No. 103)
`at 24-26; see generally id.
`(holding no construction is
`necessary for, among other terms,
`“file system,” “sufficient number
`of copies,” “licensed/unlicensed,”
`
`9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00661-JRG Document 78-2 Filed 11/18/15 Page 11 of 16 PageID #: 1848Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 452-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 19 of 24
`
`“distributing a set of data files
`across a network of servers,”
`“identifier,” and “substantially
`unique.”).
`
`
`
`Cal.) at PWEB112942-43.
`
`Authorized / unauthorized /
`authorization
`
`Plain and ordinary. No
`construction necessary.
`
`’442 patent, claims 7, 23
`’310 patent, claims 1, 2, 16-19
`’420 patent, claim 166
`
`Intrinsic:
`
`’791 patent, 8:51-55, 11:63-67,
`12:1-9, 32:17–48.
`
`
`
`’442 patent, Abstract, 12:5-10,
`32:42-33-7, Claims 3, 6-9.
`
`Compliant/non-compliant/compliance with a valid license.
`
`Intrinsic:
`
`‘791 patent at 12:4-7; 32:17-48.
`
`‘420 file history at Non-Final Office Action dated May 19,
`2009 at 10-19; Response to Final Office Action dated
`February 14, 2010 at 11-19; Supplemental Amendment
`dated April 20, 2010 at 32-33.
`
`’310 patent, Abstract, 11:40-45,
`31:3-33, Claim 3, 4.
`
`IPR2013-00596, Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response at
`18, 28-29, 40-41; Patent Owner’s Response at 38.
`
`’420 patent, 11:5-12, 31:1-32,
`Claim 168.
`
`IPR2014-00058, Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response at 4-
`5; Patent Owner’s Response at 5, 8-9, 13.
`
`Extrinsic:
`
`Plaintiff’s Claim Construction Brief, Altnet, Inc. et al. v.
`Streamcast Networks, Inc. et al., No. cv-06-5086-SJO (C.D.
`Cal.) at PWEB112942-43.
`
`2013 08 05 Claim Construction
`Order (11-cv-655, ECF No. 103)
`at 24-26; see generally id.
`(holding no construction is
`necessary for, among other terms,
`“file system,” “sufficient number
`of copies,” “licensed/unlicensed,”
`“distributing a set of data files
`across a network of servers,”
`“identifier,” and “substantially
`
`10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00661-JRG Document 78-2 Filed 11/18/15 Page 12 of 16 PageID #: 1849Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 452-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 20 of 24
`
`
`
`File name2
`
`’442 patent, claim 23
`
`unique.”).
`
`
`
`Plain and ordinary. No
`construction necessary.
`
`Intrinsic:
`
`’791 patent, 1:45-48, 2:3-5, 5:38-
`43, 20:49-52, 57-62, 37:24-27.
`
`Identifier derived only from the context of a file. (IBM
`contends that claim 23 of the ’442 patent is indefinite as
`properly construed.)
`
`Intrinsic:
`
`‘791 patent at 1:44-48, 1:65-2:11, 5:36-43.
`
`’442 patent, Abstract, 1:46-49,
`2:4-6, 5:39-44, 15:62-65, 18:64-
`65, 20:57-59, 37:50-53.
`
`‘791 FH at Amendment Under 37 C.F.R. 1.115 dated March
`12, 1997 at 10-23, Figures A and B; Amendment Under 37
`C.F.R. 1.116 dated August 29, 1997 at 8-30.
`
`See 2013 08 05 Claim
`Construction Order (11-cv-655,
`ECF No. 103) (holding no
`construction is necessary for,
`among other terms, “file system,”
`“sufficient number of copies,”
`“licensed/unlicensed,”
`“distributing a set of data files
`across a network of servers,”
`“identifier,” and “substantially
`unique.”).
`
`
`
`
`
`‘662 FH at Response to Non-Final Office Action dated
`March 13, 2008 at 11-27.
`
`IPR2013-00082, Record of Oral Hearing at 103-104, 110-
`112, 122-123.
`
`IPR2013-00083, Record of Oral Hearing at 103-104, 110-
`112, 122-123.
`
`IPR2013-00084, Record of Oral Hearing at 103-104, 110-
`112, 122-123.
`
`IPR2013-00085, Record of Oral Hearing at 103-104, 110-
`112, 122-123.
`
`IPR2013-00086, Record of Oral Hearing at 103-104, 110-
`
`
`2 This term appears in a claim that is only asserted against defendant IBM.
`
`
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00661-JRG Document 78-2 Filed 11/18/15 Page 13 of 16 PageID #: 1850Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 452-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 21 of 24
`
`
`
`112, 122-123.
`
`IPR2013-00087, Record of Oral Hearing at 103-104, 110-
`112, 122-123; Final Written Decision at 13-14.
`
` Extrinsic:
`
`Alan Freedman, The Computer Glossary at 149 (7th ed.
`1995).
`
`PersonalWeb’s Technology Tutorial submitted in
`PersonalWeb Techs. LLC et al. v. NEC Corp. of Am., Inc.,
`6:11-cv-00655 (E.D. Tex.).
`
`An identity for a data item generated by processing all of the
`data in the data item, and only the data in the data item,
`through an algorithm that makes the identifier substantially
`unique.
`
`Intrinsic:
`
`’791 patent at Title, Abstract, 1:12-18, 1:20-3:20, 3:28-35,
`6:6-10, 12:54-13:34, 13:55-14:12, 32:54-64, Figs. 10(a) &
`10(b), Claims 7, 9, 13, and 38.
`
`’442 patent at Abstract.
`
`’539 patent, Claim 21.
`
`PWEB 000504–879 at PWEB 000574, PWEB 000632,
`PWEB 000646–63, PWEB 000664.
`
`Substantially unique value3
`
`’442 patent, claim 30
`
`No construction necessary for
`“substantially unique value.”
`
`To the extent the court determines
`that a construction of the phrase is
`needed, it should have the same
`meaning as “substantially unique
`identifier”:
`
`An identity for a data item
`generated by processing all of the
`data in the data item, and only the
`data in the data item, through an
`algorithm that makes the identifier
`substantially unique.
`
`Intrinsic:
`
`
`3 This term appears in a claim that is only asserted against defendant IBM.
`
`
`
`
`12
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00661-JRG Document 78-2 Filed 11/18/15 Page 14 of 16 PageID #: 1851Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 452-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 22 of 24
`
`’791 patent, 1:13-17, 3:6-11,
`Claims 1, 30, 33, & 35.
`
`’442 patent, 1:14-18, 3:7-12,
`Claim 18.
`
`2013 08 05 Claim Construction
`Order (11-cv-655, ECF No. 103)
`at 13-16; see generally id.
`(holding no construction is
`necessary for, among other terms,
`“file system,” “sufficient number
`of copies,” “licensed/unlicensed,”
`“distributing a set of data files
`across a network of servers,”
`“identifier,” and “substantially
`unique.”).
`
`
`
`13
`
`PWEB 001260–938 at PWEB 001826, PWEB 001875.
`
`PWEB 000880–1259 at PWEB 001073-74, PWEB 001075,
`PWEB 001078.
`
`PWEB 000504–879 at PWEB 000741, PWEB 000749,
`PWEB 000751, PWEB 000772, PWEB 000818.
`
`PWEB 156619-7047 at PWEB 156722-23.
`
`PWEB 001939-2832 at PWEB 002278, PWEB 002282.
`
`PWEB 162865 – 905 at PWEB 162867.
`
`PWEB 155507– 43 at PWEB 155525.
`
`PWEB 158586–610 at PWEB 018600.
`
`Extrinsic:
`
`Defendant Digital Island’s Opening Brief on Claim
`Construction Issues, Digital Island, Inc. v. Akamai Techs.,
`Inc. et al., Case No. 1:00-cv-11851 (MAD) (D. Mass.) at 3-
`4.
`
`Order Regarding Claim Construction [Dkt. No. 137], Digital
`Island, Inc. v. Akamai Techs., Inc. et al., Case No. 1:00-cv-
`11851 (MAD) (D. Mass.) at 2.
`
`CWIS’ Reply Markman Brief Construing the Terms at Issue
`in U.S. Patent No. 6,415,280 [Dkt. No. 58], Cable &
`Wireless Internet Servs., Inc. et al. v. Akamai Techs., Inc.,
`Civil Action No. 02-11430 RWZ (D. Mass.) at 7-12.
`
`Feb. 16, 2006 Dep. Tr. of David Farber, Altnet, Inc. v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00661-JRG Document 78-2 Filed 11/18/15 Page 15 of 16 PageID #: 1852Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 452-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 23 of 24
`
`Recording Indus. Assoc. of Am., Case No. CV 04-7456 JFW
`(CFX) (C.D. Cal.) at PWEB011123-30, PWEB011178-85,
`PWEB011311-15, PWEB011330-35.
`
`Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement, Altnet,
`Inc. et al. v. Streamcast Networks, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:06-
`cv-05086-ODW-E (C.D. Cal.) at 4, 16;
`
`Mar. 23, 2007 Dep. Tr. of Robert B. K. Dewar, Altnet, Inc.
`et al. v. Streamcast Networks, Inc. et al., No. cv-06-5086-
`SJO (C.D. Cal.) at PWEB071524-28.
`
`Plaintiff’s Claim Construction Brief, Altnet, Inc. et al. v.
`Streamcast Networks, Inc. et al., No. cv-06-5086-SJO (C.D.
`Cal.) at PWEB112936-39.
`
`Feb. 20, 2014 Rough Dep. Tr. of David Farber,
`PersonalWeb Techs., LLC et al. v. Microsoft Corp., Case
`No. 6:12-cv-00663-LED (E.D. Tex.) at 128-134.
`
`Feb. 21, 2014 Rough Dep. Tr. of David Farber,
`PersonalWeb Techs., LLC et al. v. Microsoft Corp., Case
`No. 6:12-cv-00663-LED (E.D. Tex.) at 34-38, 42-47.
`
`Mem. Opinion & Order regarding Claim Construction [Dkt.
`No. 103], PersonalWeb Techs., LLC et al. v. NEC Corp. of
`Am., Case No. 6:11-cv-655-LED (E.D. Tex.) at 13-23.
`
`PersonalWeb Techs., LLC’s Opening Claim Construction
`Br. [Dkt. No. 86], PersonalWeb Techs., LLC et al. v. NEC
`Corp. of Am., Case No. 6:11-cv-655-LED (E.D. Tex.) at 5-8.
`
`PersonalWeb Techs., LLC’s Markman Hearing Slides,
`PersonalWeb Techs., LLC et al. v. NEC Corp. of Am., Case
`
`14
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00661-JRG Document 78-2 Filed 11/18/15 Page 16 of 16 PageID #: 1853Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 452-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 24 of 24
`
`No. 6:11-cv-655-LED (E.D. Tex.) at 20-24;
`
`Markman Hearing Transcript, PersonalWeb Techs., LLC et
`al. v. NEC Corp. of Am., Case No. 6:11-cv-655-LED (E.D.
`Tex.) at 6-11.
`
`Order denying Motion for Reconsideration, PersonalWeb
`Techs., LLC et al. v. Microsoft Corp., Case No. 6:12-cv-
`663-LED (E.D. Tex.) at 1-6.
`
`PersonalWeb Techs., LLC v. Google Inc., No. 11-cv-00656
`(LED), D.I. 159, Opening Claim Construction Brief. (June
`5, 2013 E.D. Tex.) (GITHUB0000310 – GITHUB0000346).
`
`Paul E. Black, “function”, in Dictionary of Algorithms and
`Data Structures [online], Vreda Pieterse and Paul E. Black,
`eds. 17 December 2004, available at
`http://www.nist.gov/dads/HTML/function.html (last
`accessed Nov. 2, 2015) (GITHUB000347–
`GITHUB0000348).
`
`Webster’s II New College Dictionary 453 (2001)
`(GITHUB0000349– GITHUB0000351).
`McMillan Dictionary, “a function of something” (online
`ed.), available at
`http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/american/a-
`function-of-something) (last accessed Nov. 2, 2015)
`(GITHUB0000352 – GITHUB0000353).
`
`Feb. 16, 2006 Depo. Trans. of David Farber, Altnet, Inc. v.
`Recording Industry Assoc. of Am., Case No. CV 04-7456
`JFW (CTX) (C.D. Cal.) (PWEB 011056 – PWEB 011365).
`
`
`
`15
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
