throbber
Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 448-5 Filed 06/11/19 Page 1 of 5
`Case 5:18-md-02834—BLF Document 448-5 Filed 06/11/19 Page 1 of 5
`
`EXHIBIT 4
`
`EXHIBIT 4
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 448-5 Filed 06/11/19 Page 2 of 5
`
`1
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`C-18-02834 BLF
`SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA
`MAY 24, 2019
`PAGES 1-108
`
`)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
`
`IN RE: PERSONALWEB
`TECHNOLOGIES, LLC ET AL.,
`PATENT LITIGATION,
`_______________________________
`AMAZON.COM, INC., AND AMAZON
`WEB SERVICES, INC.,
`
`PLAINTIFFS,
`
`VS.
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
`AND LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS,
`LLC,
`
`DEFENDANTS.
`_______________________________
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
`AND LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS,
`LLC,
`
`PLAINTIFF,
`
`VS.
`TWITCH INTERACTIVE, INC.,
`DEFENDANT.
`_______________________________
`
`TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
`BEFORE THE HONORABLE BETH LABSON FREEMAN
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`APPEARANCES ON NEXT PAGE
`OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER:
`LEE-ANNE SHORTRIDGE, CSR, CRR
`CERTIFICATE NUMBER 9595
`PROCEEDINGS RECORDED BY MECHANICAL STENOGRAPHY
`TRANSCRIPT PRODUCED WITH COMPUTER
`
`UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 448-5 Filed 06/11/19 Page 3 of 5
`
`2
`
`A P P E A R A N C E S:
`FOR PLAINTIFF
`PERSONALWEB:
`
`
`
`
`
`FOR DEFENDANTS
`AMAZON AND
`TWITCH:
`
`
`
`STUBBS ALDERTON MARKILES, LLP
`BY: MICHAEL A. SHERMAN
` SANDEEP SETH
` WESLEY W. MONROE
` STANLEY H. THOMPSON
` VIVIANA B. HEDRICK
`15260 VENTURA BOULEVARD, 20TH FLOOR
`SHERMAN OAKS, CALIFORNIA 91403
`
`FENWICK & WEST
`BY: J. DAVID HADDEN
` SAINA S. SHAMILOV
` PHILLIP J. HAACK
` TODD R. GREGORIAN
`801 CALIFORNIA STREET
`MOUNTAIN VIEW, CALIFORNIA 94041
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 448-5 Filed 06/11/19 Page 4 of 5
`
`94
`
`CONTENT-BASED NAMES FOR A COMPOUND DATA ITEM. AND WE DO IT BY
`BREAKING UP THE SEQUENCE OF BITS TO MAKE UP THE FILE INTO
`PARTS, AND THEN WE CREATE A TRUE NAME FOR EACH PART OR SEGMENT
`BY HASHING IT. THAT'S WHAT WE DO.
`AND THAT'S WHAT THE CLAIM DESCRIBES, RIGHT? YOU HAVE A
`PART VALUE OF EACH SPECIFIC PART AND IT IS BEING BASED ON THE
`FIRST FUNCTION OF THE CONTENTS OF THE SPECIFIC PART. THAT'S
`CLAIM 46 ON CLAIM -- ON SLIDE 95.
`THERE IS -- IT IS VERY CLEAR IN THE PATENT THAT WHAT YOU
`HAVE TO DO IS TAKE THE SEQUENCE OF BITS TO MAKE UP THE PART AND
`HASH THEM. YOU DON'T HASH PART OF THEM. YOU DON'T HASH THEM
`PLUS SOME OTHER JUNK THAT YOU ARBITRARILY THROW IN. OTHERWISE
`YOU DO NOT GET A CONTENT-BASED NAME AT THE END OF THE PROCESS.
`RIGHT?
`A FUNCTION OF X MEANS X IS THE INPUT TO THE FUNCTION.
`RIGHT? A FUNCTION OF X DOES NOT MEAN A FUNCTION OF X AND Y OR
`A FUNCTION OF X AND ANY ARBITRARY OTHER THING THAT YOU WANT TO
`THROW IN. THAT IS JUST -- THAT'S NOT WHAT THE WORDS MEAN AND
`THAT'S CLEARLY NOT WHAT THE PATENT DESCRIBES.
`THE COURT: UM-HUM.
`MR. HADDEN: THIS PROCESS ONLY WORKS IF YOU FOLLOW
`THE SPECIFIC STEPS OF DIVIDING THINGS INTO PARTS, CREATING
`SOMETHING FROM THOSE PARTS AND NOTHING ELSE, CREATING SOMETHING
`FROM THE RESULT OF THE STEPS. THAT'S HOW YOU GET A
`CONTENT-BASED IDENTIFIER THAT IS TIED TO THE CONTENT OF THE
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 448-5 Filed 06/11/19 Page 5 of 5
`
`95
`
`FILE AND ONLY THE CONTENT OF THE FILE AT THE END OF THE DAY.
`THE COURT: SO YOU ACTUALLY WOULD LIKE A FURTHER
`CLARIFICATION TO MAKE SURE THAT --
`MR. HADDEN: YEAH. IF IT WASN'T CLEAR FROM OUR
`CONSTRUCTION --
`THE COURT: SO WHERE --
`MR. HADDEN: -- THE FUNCTION OF X SHOULD BE THE
`FUNCTION OF ONLY THE SEQUENCE OF BITS THAT MAKE UP THE PART.
`THE COURT: IT IS ONLY ALL OF THE DATA?
`MR. HADDEN: YES.
`THE COURT: AND THE SAME WOULD BE FOR "PART VALUE,"
`YOU WOULD MAKE THAT SIMILAR CHANGE?
`MR. HADDEN: CORRECT, YOUR HONOR.
`THE COURT: A VALUE CREATED BY A COMPUTATION ONLY ON
`THE SEQUENCE?
`MR. HADDEN: YES.
`AND, AGAIN, THIS IS ON SLIDE 96, THIS IS EXACTLY HOW
`PERSONALWEB EXPLAINED THEIR INVENTION IN THE '544 PATENT TO THE
`FEDERAL CIRCUIT, "APPLYING A HASH FUNCTION TO EACH PART TO
`OBTAIN A 'VALUE' FOR EACH PART."
`THEY'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT APPLYING A HASH FUNCTION TO A
`PART OF THE PART AND OTHER JUNK.
`AGAIN, JUDGE GILSTRAP UNDERSTOOD THIS. THERE WAS A
`SIMILAR DISPUTE IN THE PRIOR CASE, RIGHT? AND IT'S KIND OF --
`YOU KNOW, THE SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION, AGAIN, ALL OF THE DATA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket