throbber
Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 350-7 Filed 01/24/19 Page 1 of 4
`
`EXHIBIT 21
`(Redacted Version
`Filed Under Seal) 
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 350-7 Filed 01/24/19 Page 2 of 4
`
`Highly Confidential - Attorneys Eyes Only
`
`Page 1
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`PERSONAL WEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
`AND LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`VS.
`
`INC., HELWETT-PACKARD
`AUTONOMY,
`COMPANY, AND HP ENTERPRISE
`SERVICES, LLC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Civil Action No.
`6:11-cv-00683
`(LED)
`
`Volume I
`
`- HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY -
`
`VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF PRAVEEN K. GATTU
`
`30(b) (6) AMAZON DESIGNEE
`
`Seattle, Washington
`
`Thursday, April 3, 2014
`
`Reported by:
`
`NOS Job No.:
`
`Janis K. Floate
`CCR No. 2996
`161530
`
`Network Deposition Services, Inc. • networkdepo.com • 866-NET-DEPO
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
`
`AMZ_PWT _00006400
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 350-7 Filed 01/24/19 Page 3 of 4
`
`Highly Confidential - Attorneys Eyes Only
`
`Page 90
`
`1
`
`A.
`
`They are some of examples where we required
`
`2 MOS.
`
`I don't have a full list of all the policies on
`
`3 which we require MOS.
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Do you remember any other ones?
`
`Not from the top of my head.
`
`Do you know how the signature or URL path
`
`that's given to the web server is processed or
`
`disassembled?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`I have some knowledge about that.
`
`What is it?
`
`Okay. Most of the time the URL contains
`
`12 most of the time the requests come to us as
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`S3.AmazonAWS.com forward slash --
`
`S3.AmazonAWS.com/bucketname/objectname. And the
`
`customer is referencing an object.
`
`Q.
`
`And that's also the case for presigned
`
`URLs?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`That's correct.
`
`Well, let's say the user is doing a get
`
`operation with the If-Match option and provides an
`
`ETag. Does S3 -- S3 looks at the ETag that the user
`
`provides,
`
`correct?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`That's correct.
`
`Does S3
`
`how does S3 find the object --
`
`We have
`
`Network Deposition Services, Inc. • networkdepo.com • 866-NET-DEPO
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
`
`AMZ_PWT _00006489
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 350-7 Filed 01/24/19 Page 4 of 4
`
`Highly Confidential - Attorneys Eyes Only
`
`Page 91
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Q.
`
`-- that's associated with it?
`
`MR. DONNELLY: Objection. Form.
`
`A.
`
`Can I have the question again?
`
`BY MR. HAREL:
`
`Q.
`
`If a user sends a get request with an
`
`If-Match option, how does S3 find the object?
`
`A.
`
`Customer has -- customer, when he sends the
`
`get operation, he includes the bucket and the key
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`e
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Q.
`
`If the user issues a get operation with an
`
`If-Match option
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Yes.
`
`how does S3 know that the match has been
`
`successful?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Q.
`
`And that's what's used to do the comparison
`
`Network Deposition Services, Inc. • networkdepo.com • 866-NET-DEPO
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
`
`AMZ_PWT _00006490
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket