throbber
Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 350-4 Filed 01/24/19 Page 1 of 3
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 350-4 Filed 01/24/19 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 18
`
`EXHIBIT 18
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 350-4 Filed 01/24/19 Page 2 of 3
`
`Amazon Simple Storage Service
`
`API Reference
`
`API Version 2006-03-01
`
`DO
`n.Jtamazon
`II webservices"'
`
`AMZ_PWT _00000035
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 350-4 Filed 01/24/19 Page 3 of 3
`
`Amazon Simple Storage Service API Reference
`PUT Object
`
`PUT Obj ect
`
`Description
`
`This implementation o f the PUT operation adds an object to a bucket. You must have WRITE permissions
`on a bucket to add an object to it.
`
`Amazon S3 never adds partial objects; if you receive a success response, Amazon S3 added the entire
`object to the bucket.
`
`Amazon S3 is a distributed system. If it receives multiple write requests for the same object simultaneously,
`it overwrites all but the last object written. Amazon S3 does not provide object locking; if you need this,
`make sure to build it into your application layer or use versioning instead.
`
`To ensure that data is not corrupted traversing the network, use the Content-MOS header. When you use
`this header, Amazon S3 checks the object against the provided MOS value and, if they do not match,
`returns an error. Additionally, you can calculate the MOS while putting an object to Amazon S3 and
`compare the returned ETag to the calculated MOS value.
`
`Note
`
`To configure your application to send the Request Headers prior to sending the request body,
`use the 1 0 0 -continue HTTP status code. For PUT operations, this helps you avoid sending
`the message body if the message is rejected based on the headers (e.g., because of authentication
`failure or redirect). For more information on the 1 o a - cont inue HTTP status code, go to Section
`8.2.3 of http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc261 6.txt.
`
`Versioning
`
`If you enable versioning for a bucket, Amazon S3 automatically generates a unique version ID for the
`
`object being stored. Amazon S3 returns this ID in the response using the x-amz-version-id response
`
`header. If versioning is suspended, Amazon S3 always uses n u l l as the version ID for the object stored.
`For more information about returning the versioning state of a bucket, see GET Bucket versioning (p. 64).
`
`If you enable versioning on a bucket, when Amazon S3 receives multiple write requests for the same
`object simultaneously, it stores all of the objects.
`
`To see sample requests that use versioning, see Sample Request (p. 158).
`
`Reduced Red undancy Storage
`
`Reduced redundancy storage (RRS) enables customers to reduce their costs b y storing non-critical,
`reproducible data at lower levels of redundancy than Amazon S3's standard storage. RRS provides a
`cost-effective, highly available solution for distributing or sharing content that is durably stored elsewhere,
`or for storing thumbnails, transcoded media, or other processed data that can be easily reproduced. The
`RRS option stores objects on multiple devices across multiple facilities, providing 400 times the durability
`of a typical disk drive, but does not replicate objects as many times as standard Amazon S3 storage.
`Thus, using RRS is even more cost effective.
`
`To store an object using reduced redundancy, set the x-amz-storage-class request header to
`
`REDUCED REDUNDANCY. The default value is S TANDARD.
`
`API Version 2006-03-01
`1 52
`
`AMZ_PWT _000001 91
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket