throbber
Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 348 Filed 01/18/19 Page 1 of 8
`
`
`
`
`
`J. DAVID HADDEN (CSB No. 176148)
`dhadden@fenwick.com
`SAINA S. SHAMILOV (CSB No. 215636)
`sshamilov@fenwick.com
`TODD R. GREGORIAN (CSB No. 236096)
`tgregorian@fenwick.com
`PHILLIP J. HAACK (CSB No. 262060)
`phaack@fenwick.com
`RAVI R. RANGANATH (CSB No. 272981)
`rranganath@fenwick.com
`CHIEH TUNG (CSB No. 318963)
`ctung@fenwick.com
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`Silicon Valley Center
`801 California Street
`Mountain View, CA 94041
`Telephone:
`650.988.8500
`Facsimile:
`650.938.5200
`
`Counsel for AMAZON.COM, INC.
`and AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`IN RE: PERSONAL WEB TECHNOLOGIES,
`LLC ET AL., PATENT LITIGATION
`
` Case No. 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`
`v.
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC., and AMAZON WEB
`SERVICES, INC.,
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and
`LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`Defendants.
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and
`LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`Counterclaimants,
`
`v.
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC., and AMAZON WEB
`SERVICES, INC.,
`Counterdefendants.
`
` Case No.: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`
`DECLARATION OF
`RAVI R. RANGANATH IN SUPPORT
`OF PERSONALWEB TECHNOLO-
`GIES, LLC AND LEVEL 3 COMMUNI-
`CATIONS, LLC’S ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`Date:
` February 7, 2019
`Time:
` 2:00 p.m.
` Courtroom 3, 5th Floor
`Dept.:
`Judge:
` Hon. Beth L. Freeman
`
`Trial Date: March 16, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF RAVI R. RANGANATH ISO
`PERSONALWEB AND LEVEL 3’S ADMIN. MOTION
`TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`
`
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-02834-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 348 Filed 01/18/19 Page 2 of 8
`
`
`
`I, Ravi R. Ranganath, hereby declare as follows:
`I am an attorney duly licensed to practice law in the state of California and am an
`1.
`associate with the law firm of Fenwick & West LLP, counsel for Amazon.com, Inc., and Amazon
`Web Services, Inc. (collectively, “Amazon”) in the above-captioned action. I have personal
`knowledge of the facts set forth in this declaration.
`I submit this declaration in support of the Administrative Motion to File Under Seal
`2.
`(5:18-md-02834-BLF, Dkt. 341) (“Administrative Motion”) filed by PersonalWeb Technologies,
`LLC, and Level 3 Communications, LLC (collectively, “PersonalWeb”). The Administrative Mo-
`tion was filed in support of PersonalWeb’s Opposition to Amazon’s Motion for Summary Judgment
`on Declaratory Judgment Claims and Defenses Under the Claim Preclusion and Kessler Doctrine
`(5:18-md-02834-BLF, Dkt. 334) (“Opposition”).
`3. The Administrative Motion seeks an order sealing, in their entirety, Exhibits 4, 12,
`13A, 13B, 13C, 13D, and 13E to the Declaration of Wesley Monroe in Support of PersonalWeb’s
`Opposition (5:18-md-02834-BLF, Dkt. 340) (“Monroe Declaration”) and the corresponding por-
`tions of the Opposition that quote or summarize these exhibits (collectively, the “Originally Re-
`quested Sealed Material”).
`4. To provide public access and redact documents only where necessary, I submit this
`declaration in support of sealing only portions of the Originally Requested Sealed Material (the
`“Revised Requested Sealed Material”). Specifically, this declaration supports the sealing of:
`Document
`Document descrip-
`Originally Re-
`Revised Requested
`tion
`quested Sealed Ma-
`Sealed Material
`terial
`Entire document.
`
`References are to tran-
`script page:line nos.:
`51:2-5; 65:1-5; 105:1-
`6; 164:5-24.
`
`Exhibit 4 to the Mon-
`roe Declaration (Dkt.
`340-9).
`
`
`Pages from the Rule
`30(b)(6) deposition of
`Seth William Markle.
`
`
`DECLARATION OF RAVI R.RANGANATH ISO PER-
`SONALWEB AND LEVEL 3’S ADMIN. MOTION TO
`FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-02834-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 348 Filed 01/18/19 Page 3 of 8
`
`
`
`Document
`
`Opposition.
`
`Document descrip-
`tion
`
`Pages from Personal-
`Web’s
`opposition
`brief
`that quote or
`summarize
`excerpts
`from the Rule 30(b)(6)
`deposition of Mr. Mar-
`kle.
`
`
`Exhibit 12 to the Mon-
`roe Declaration (Dkt.
`340-18).
`
`
`Pages from the Rule
`30(b)(6) deposition of
`Jeffrey H. Dean.
`
`
`Originally Re-
`quested Sealed Ma-
`terial
`to
`References
`are
`page:line nos.: 2:4-6;
`2:7-8; 2:10-12; 3:3-4;
`3:5-6; 3:26-27; 4:1-2;
`4:3-5; 4:6; 5:14-16;
`5:16-18;
`5:18-19;
`5:19-21;
`5:23-24;
`5:24-26;
`5:27-6:1;
`6:25; 7:2-5; 7:7; 13:6-
`7; 14:13-14; 14:18-19;
`15:3-5.
`
`
`Entire document.
`
`Revised Requested
`Sealed Material
`
`References are to
`page:line nos.: 2:7-8.
`
`
`References are to tran-
`script page:line nos.:
`41:2-25;
`76:11-13;
`76:24-25; 118:19-21.
`
`Opposition.
`
`Exhibit 13A to the
`Monroe Declaration
`(Dkt. 340-19).
`
`
`Pages from Personal-
`Web’s
`opposition
`brief that summarize
`excerpts from the Rule
`30(b)(6) deposition of
`Mr. Dean.
`
`Pages from the Sup-
`plemental
`Infringe-
`ment
`Contentions
`from the prior Eastern
`District of Texas Ac-
`tion,
`PersonalWeb
`Techs., LLC v. Ama-
`Inc., No.
`zon.com
`6:11-cv-00658
`(“Texas Action”), for
`U.S.
`Patent No.
`6,415,280.
`
`
`to
`are
`References
`page:line nos.: 10:7-9;
`10:10-11.
`
`
`to
`are
`References
`page:line nos.: 10:10-
`11.
`
`
`Entire document.
`
`References are to page
`nos.: 1-5, 22-24, 27,
`30-32, 43-44, 51-55.
`Although
`the
`refer-
`ences are to page num-
`bers, the Revised Re-
`quested Sealed Mate-
`rial includes only the
`redacted portions of
`these pages in the up-
`dated exhibits, not
`necessarily the pages
`in their entirety.
`
`DECLARATION OF RAVI R.RANGANATH ISO PER-
`SONALWEB AND LEVEL 3’S ADMIN. MOTION TO
`FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-02834-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 348 Filed 01/18/19 Page 4 of 8
`
`
`
`Document
`
`the
`to
`Exhibit 13B
`Monroe Declaration
`(Dkt. 340-20).
`
`
`Document descrip-
`tion
`
`Pages from the Sup-
`plemental
`Infringe-
`ment
`Contentions
`from the Texas Action
`for U.S. Patent No.
`7,802,310.
`
`Originally Re-
`quested Sealed Ma-
`terial
`Entire document.
`
`the
`to
`Exhibit 13C
`Monroe Declaration
`(Dkt. 340-21).
`
`
`Pages from the Sup-
`plemental
`Infringe-
`ment
`Contentions
`from the Texas Action
`for U.S. Patent No.
`6,928,442.
`
`Entire document.
`
`Exhibit 13D to the
`Monroe Declaration
`(Dkt. 340-22).
`
`
`Pages from the Sup-
`plemental
`Infringe-
`ment
`Contentions
`from the Texas Action
`for U.S. Patent No.
`7,945,544.
`
`Entire document.
`
`Revised Requested
`Sealed Material
`
`References are to page
`nos.: 1-2, 20-29, 31-
`34, 44-55, 65-69, 75-
`78, 84-89, 99-102,
`109-112. Although the
`references are to page
`numbers, the Revised
`Requested Sealed Ma-
`terial includes only the
`redacted portions of
`these pages in the up-
`dated exhibits, not
`necessarily the pages
`in their entirety.
`
`References are to page
`nos.: 1-3, 13-15, 21-
`23, 29-31, 36-39, 50-
`52, 58-61. Although
`the references are to
`page numbers, the Re-
`vised
`Requested
`Sealed Material
`in-
`cludes only the re-
`dacted portions of
`these pages in the up-
`dated exhibits, not
`necessarily the pages
`in their entirety.
`
`References are to page
`nos.: 11-12, 23-24, 35-
`38, 48-49, 60-62, 72-
`74, 85-87, 97-99, 109-
`112. Although the ref-
`erences are to page
`numbers, the Revised
`Requested Sealed Ma-
`terial includes only the
`redacted portions of
`these pages in the up-
`dated exhibits, not
`necessarily the pages
`in their entirety.
`
`DECLARATION OF RAVI R.RANGANATH ISO PER-
`SONALWEB AND LEVEL 3’S ADMIN. MOTION TO
`FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-02834-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 348 Filed 01/18/19 Page 5 of 8
`
`
`
`Document
`
`the
`to
`Exhibit 13E
`Monroe Declaration
`(Dkt. 340-23).
`
`
`Document descrip-
`tion
`
`Pages from the Sup-
`plemental
`Infringe-
`ment
`Contentions
`from the Texas Action
`for U.S. Patent No.
`5,978,791.
`
`Originally Re-
`quested Sealed Ma-
`terial
`Entire document.
`
`Revised Requested
`Sealed Material
`
`References are to page
`nos.: 13-15, 22-33, 45-
`47, 54-59, 70-72, 80-
`82. Although the refer-
`ences are to page num-
`bers, the Revised Re-
`quested Sealed Mate-
`rial includes only the
`redacted portions of
`these pages in the up-
`dated exhibits, not
`necessarily the pages
`in their entirety.
`
`None.
`
`to
`are
`References
`page:line nos.: 14:25-
`26.
`
`
`Opposition.
`
`Pages from Personal-
`Web’s
`opposition
`brief that summarize
`any excerpts from any
`of Exhibits 13A, 13B,
`13C, 13D, and/or 13E
`to the Monroe Decla-
`ration.
`
`5. The Revised Requested Sealed Material contains materials designated by Amazon as
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—SOURCE CODE” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTOR-
`NEYS’ EYES ONLY” pursuant to the Stipulated Protective Order (5:18-md-02834-BLF, Dkt.
`290).
`
`6. Excerpts of Exhibits 13A, 13B, 13C, 13D and 13E are designated “HIGHLY CON-
`FIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” pursuant to the Stipulated Protective Order. Previously, Amazon
`designated its source code as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” under the protec-
`tive order entered in the prior Texas Action. PersonalWeb Techs., LLC v. Amazon.com Inc., No.
`6:11-cv-00658 (E.D. Tex. Filed Dec. 8, 2011), Dkt. 89.
`7. Excerpts of Exhibits 13A through 13E reflect sensitive business information, namely
`infringement contentions reproducing confidential and proprietary source code for Amazon’s Sim-
`ple Storage Service (“S3”). A party seeking to file documents under seal in connection with a
`dispositive motion must establish compelling reasons for doing so to rebut the presumption against
`
`DECLARATION OF RAVI R.RANGANATH ISO PER-
`SONALWEB AND LEVEL 3’S ADMIN. MOTION TO
`FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-02834-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 348 Filed 01/18/19 Page 6 of 8
`
`
`
`public access. See Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1136 (9th Cir. 2003).
`The confidential source code Amazon seeks to file under seal meets this standard, as it represents
`Amazon’s trade secret regarding the detailed operations of S3. See Opperman v. Path, Inc., No. 3-
`cv-00453-JST, 2017 WL 1036652, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 17, 2017) (sealing excerpts of developers’
`proprietary source code in summary judgment pleadings). Though the source code relates to the
`operation of S3 from several years ago, as explained in the previously filed Declaration of Seth
`Markle in support of Amazon’s summary judgment motion (5:18-md-02834-BLF, Dkt.315-18), S3
`works in essentially the same way then as now, meaning the public disclosures of this information
`would reveal critical information about the way in which S3 operates today.
`8. Updated versions of Exhibits 13A through 13E are attached as Exhibits 13A through
`13E. These versions have been newly redacted to conform with this declaration. Only the Revised
`Requested Sealed Material has been redacted.
`9. Excerpts of Exhibit 4 and the corresponding portions of the Opposition that summa-
`rize Exhibit 4 are designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order. As explained above, Amazon previously designated its source code
`as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” under the protective order entered in the
`Texas Action. PersonalWeb Techs., LLC v. Amazon.com Inc., No. 6:11-cv-00658 (E.D. Tex. Filed
`Dec. 8, 2011), Dkt. 89.
`10. Excerpts of Exhibit 4 and portions of the Opposition that summarize Exhibit 4 reflect
`sensitive business information, namely Amazon Principal Software Engineer Seth Markle’s discus-
`sion of confidential and proprietary source code for Amazon’s S3.
`11. Like the excerpts of Exhibits 13A through 13E, the excerpts of Exhibit 4 and portions
`of the Opposition that summarize Exhibit 4 meet the standard set forth in Foltz: they represent
`Amazon’s trade secrets regarding the detailed operations of S3. See Opperman, 2017 WL 1036652,
`at *2 (sealing excerpts of developers’ proprietary source code in summary judgment pleadings).
`12. Updated versions of Exhibit 4 and the Opposition are attached to this declaration.
`These versions have been newly redacted to conform with this declaration. Only the Revised Re-
`quested Sealed Material has been redacted.
`DECLARATION OF RAVI R.RANGANATH ISO PER-
`SONALWEB AND LEVEL 3’S ADMIN. MOTION TO
`FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`5
`
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-02834-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 348 Filed 01/18/19 Page 7 of 8
`
`
`
`13. Excerpts of Exhibit 12 and the corresponding portions of the Opposition that summa-
`rize Exhibit 12 are designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” pur-
`suant to the Stipulated Protective Order (5:18-md-02834-BLF, Dkt. 290).
`14. Excerpts of Exhibit 12 and the corresponding portions of the Opposition that summa-
`rize Exhibit 12 reflect sensitive business information, namely Associate General Counsel Jeff
`Dean’s discussion of agreements between Amazon and its S3 customers. These documents contain
`the identities of Amazon customers that use S3 technology and the terms of Amazon’s contractual
`relationship with each customer, including whether Amazon indemnifies these customers for the
`purposes of this litigation. Additionally, the underlying customer agreements are subject to non-
`disclosure provisions that limit Amazon’s ability to publicly disclose information about the agree-
`ments. Disclosure of this information would cause injury to Amazon because it would reveal to
`competitors both the identities of Amazon customers and the nature of Amazon’s contractual rela-
`tionships with those customers.
`15. Excerpts of Exhibit 12 and the corresponding portions of the Opposition that summa-
`rize Exhibit 12 meet the standard set forth in Foltz, as they represent Amazon’s confidential cus-
`tomer agreements and the terms of those agreements. See Finisar Corp. v. Nistica, Inc., No. 13-
`CV-03345-BLF(JSC), 2015 WL 3988132, at *4 (N.D. Cal. June 30, 2015) (sealing “excerpts from
`the deposition transcripts” of a party’s employees that “exclusively reflect[ed] [the party’s] confi-
`dential product and business information which [were] not intended for public disclosure”); see
`also id at *5 (sealing party’s agreements with third parties where the “contracts themselves con-
`tain[ed] confidentiality clauses, along with lists of the parties’ obligations and terms of payment”
`and noting “[c]ourts regularly find that litigants may file under seal contracts with third parties that
`contain proprietary and confidential business information”); Ojmar US, LLC v. Sec. People, Inc.,
`No. 16-CV-04948-HSG, 2017 WL 7726713, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2017) (“‘[L]icense agree-
`ments, financial terms, details of confidential licensing negotiations, and business strategies’ con-
`taining ‘confidential business information’ satisfied the ‘compelling reasons’ standard in part be-
`cause sealing that information ‘prevented competitors from gaining insight into the parties’ busi-
`ness model and strategy’”) (quoting In re Qualcomm Litig., No. 3:17-CV-0108-GPC-MDD, 2017
`DECLARATION OF RAVI R.RANGANATH ISO PER-
`SONALWEB AND LEVEL 3’S ADMIN. MOTION TO
`FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`6
`
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-02834-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 348 Filed 01/18/19 Page 8 of 8
`
`
`
`WL 5176922, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2017)); In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name & Likeness Li-
`censing Litig., No. 09-CV-01967 CW NC, 2013 WL 1997252, at *2 (N.D. Cal. May 13, 2013)
`(sealing portions of document that “reveal[ed] competitively sensitive, individually negotiated fi-
`nancial terms of licensing agreements”).
`16. Updated versions of Exhibit 12 and the Opposition are attached to this declaration.
`These versions have been newly redacted to conform with this declaration. Only the Revised Re-
`quested Sealed Material has been redacted.
`In light of the foregoing, there is a compelling interest in maintaining the confidenti-
`17.
`ality of the Revised Requested Sealed Material described above. Public disclosure of this highly
`confidential information would put Amazon at undue risk of serious harm by revealing trade secrets
`and confidential contractual information that may put Amazon at a competitive disadvantage rela-
`tive to competitors and competing services.
`18. This declaration in support of the Administrative Motion to seal is narrowly tailored
`to those materials that merit sealing. Likewise, updated Exhibits 4, 12, 13A through 13E, and the
`Opposition have been redacted in a way that is narrowly tailored to those materials that merit seal-
`ing.
`
`19. Accordingly, Amazon requests that the Court seal the above-identified Revised Re-
`quested Sealed Material in Exhibits 4, 12, 13A, 13B, 13C, 13D, and 13E and the Opposition.
`20. An updated proposed order is attached to this declaration.
`
` I
`
` declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is
`true and correct.
`Executed this 18th day of January, 2019, in Mountain View, California.
`
`/s/ Ravi R. Ranganath
`Ravi R. Ranganath
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF RAVI R.RANGANATH ISO PER-
`SONALWEB AND LEVEL 3’S ADMIN. MOTION TO
`FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-02834-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket