throbber
Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 324-1 Filed 12/11/18 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`J. DAVID HADDEN (CSB No. 176148)
`dhadden@fenwick.com
`SAINA S. SHAMILOV (CSB No. 215636)
`sshamilov@fenwick.com
`TODD R. GREGORIAN (CSB No. 236096)
`tgregorian@fenwick.com
`PHILLIP J. HAACK (CSB No. 262060)
`phaack@fenwick.com
`RAVI R. RANGANATH (CSB No. 272981)
`rranganath@fenwick.com
`CHIEH TUNG (CSB No. 318963)
`ctung@fenwick.com
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`Silicon Valley Center
`801 California Street
`Mountain View, CA 94041
`Telephone:
`650.988.8500
`Facsimile:
`650.938.5200
`
`Counsel for AMAZON.COM, INC.
`and AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`IN RE: PERSONAL WEB TECHNOLOGIES,
`LLC ET AL., PATENT LITIGATION
`
` Case No. 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`
` Case No.: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`
`DECLARATION OF RAVI R. RANGA-
`NATH IN SUPPORT OF ADMINIS-
`TRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER
`SEAL CERTAIN LIMITED PORTIONS
`OF EXHIBITS 3 AND 4 TO JOINT
`STATEMENT REGARDING
`DISCOVERY DISPUTE RELATING
`TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDG-
`MENT
`
`
`
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC., and AMAZON WEB
`SERVICES, INC.,
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and
`LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`Defendants.
`PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and
`LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`Counterclaimants,
`
`v.
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC., and AMAZON WEB
`SERVICES, INC.,
`Counterdefendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF RAVI R. RANGANATH ISO AM-
`AZON’S ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`
`
`CASE NO.: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 324-1 Filed 12/11/18 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`I, Ravi R. Ranganath, hereby declare as follows:
`1.
`I am an attorney duly licensed to practice law in the state of California and am an
`associate with the law firm of Fenwick & West LLP, counsel for Amazon.com, Inc., and Amazon
`Web Services, Inc. (collectively, “Amazon”) in the above-captioned action. I have personal
`knowledge of the facts set forth in this declaration.
`2.
`Amazon seeks to file under seal certain limited portions of the following documents
`(“Requested Sealed Material”):
`Document
`Exhibit 3 to joint statement
`regarding discovery dis-
`pute relating to motion for
`summary judgment (“Joint
`Statement”)
`
`Document description
`Excerpts of First Supplemental Re-
`sponse and Objections of Ama-
`zon.com, Inc. and Amazon Web Ser-
`vices, Inc. to First Set of Interrogato-
`ries of PersonalWeb Technologies,
`LLC (Nos. 1-11)
`
`Portion to be Sealed
`p.8, l.23 – p.9, l.7
`
`Exhibit 4 to Joint State-
`ment
`
`Excerpts of Third Supplemental Re-
`sponse and Objections of Ama-
`zon.com, Inc. and Amazon Web Ser-
`vices, Inc. to First Set of Interrogato-
`ries of PersonalWeb Technologies,
`LLC (No. 3)
`
`p.6, l.23 – p.7, l.7
`
`3.
`The Requested Sealed Material reflects sensitive business information, namely the
`specific terms of Amazon’s indemnification of its customers in the present litigation. A party seek-
`ing to file documents under seal in connection with a non-dispositive motion will override the pre-
`sumption of public access to judicial documents by showing “good cause,” which it can establish
`by showing specific prejudice or harm as a result of disclosure. See Phillips ex rel. Estates of Byrd
`v. General Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210 (9th Cir. 2002). The limited portions of Amazon’s
`discovery responses that contain the confidential terms of indemnity that Amazon seeks to file
`under seal meet this standard: it represents Amazon’s confidential business information regarding
`its indemnity obligations to its customers in this litigation. See Nicolosi Distributing, Inc. v. Fin-
`ishmaster, Inc., No. 18-cv-03587-BLF, 2018 WL 3932554, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2018) (good
`cause to seal contracts exists where they contain confidential business practices); see also Phoenix
`Technologies Ltd. v. VMware, Inc., No. 15-cv-01414-HSG, 2018 WL 1169188, at *2 (N.D. Cal.
`
`DECLARATION OF RAVI R. RANGANATH ISO AM-
`AZON’S ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`CASE NO.: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 324-1 Filed 12/11/18 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`Feb. 14, 2018) (good cause exists to protect business information that might harm a litigant’s com-
`petitive standing if disclosed, and where the redaction is “sufficiently narrowly tailored” to only
`seal portions of the exhibit that might put sensitive business information at risk).
`4.
`The terms of Amazon’s indemnification of its customers in this case are highly con-
`fidential and not disclosed to the public. Pursuant to the stipulated protective order entered in this
`case, Amazon designated information relating to the terms of its indemnification as “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYES’ EYES ONLY.” Amazon.com, Inc. v. PersonalWeb Tech-
`nologies, LLC et al, No. 5:18-md-02834-BLF, Dkt. 76.
`5.
`Accordingly, Amazon now requests that the Court seal certain redacted portions of
`Exhibits 3 and 4 to the Joint Statement, as noted in paragraph 2 above.
`6.
`In light of the foregoing, there is a good cause in maintaining the confidentiality of
`the Requested Sealed Material described above. Public disclosure of this highly confidential infor-
`mation would put Amazon at undue risk of serious harm by revealing business practices that may
`put Amazon at a disadvantage in future indemnity negotiations and discussions.
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is
`true and correct.
`Executed this 11th day of December, 2018, in Mountain View, California.
`
`/s/ Ravi R. Ranganath
`Ravi R. Ranganath
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF RAVI R. RANGANATH ISO AM-
`AZON’S ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`CASE NO.: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`CASE NO.: 5:18-cv-00767-BLF
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket