throbber
1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 279 Filed 11/01/18 Page 1 of 5
`
`
`Michael A. Sherman (SBN 94783)
`
`masherman@stubbsalderton.com
`Jeffrey F. Gersh (SBN 87124)
`
`jgersh@stubbsalderton.com
`Sandeep Seth (SBN 195914)
`
`sseth@stubbsalderton.com
`Wesley W. Monroe (SBN 149211)
`
`wmonroe@stubbsalderton.com
`Stanley H. Thompson, Jr. (SBN 198825)
`
`sthompson@stubbsalderton.com
`Viviana Boero Hedrick (SBN 239359)
`
`vhedrick@stubbsalderton.com
`STUBBS ALDERTON & MARKILES, LLP
`
`15260 Ventura Blvd., 20th Floor
`Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
`
`Telephone:
`(818) 444-4500
`(818) 444-4520
`Facsimile:
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`
`[ADDITIONAL ATTORNEYS LISTED ON
`SIGNATURE PAGE]
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`IN RE. PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES,
`LLC ET AL. PATENT LITIGATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO.: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`
`NOTICE OF RELATED CASES
`PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 3-12 TO BE
`FILED IN CASE NO. 5:18-md-02834;
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
`CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD
`BE RELATED PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R.
`7-11
`
`
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF RELATED CASES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 279 Filed 11/01/18 Page 2 of 5
`
`TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on or about October 30, 2018, in the United States District Court
`
`
`for the Northern District of California, PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC and Level 3
`
`Communications, LLC (“Plaintiffs”) filed certain cases related to the within coordinated or
`
`consolidated pretrial patent proceedings under 28 U.S.C. §1407. action. Pursuant to Civil Local
`
`Rules 3-12(b) and 7-11 of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California,
`
`and Paragraph 4 of the June 18, 2018 Order re Preliminary Case Management Conference issued by
`
`the Honorable Beth Labson Freeman, presiding judge over this MDL matter [18-md-02834, Dkt.
`
`19], Plaintiff PersonalWeb Technologies LLC and Level 3 Communications submit this
`
`
`Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related.
`
`I.
`
`APPLICABLE STANDARD UNDER CIVIL L.R. 3-12
`
`Under Civil Local Rule 3-12(a), an “action is related to another when: (1) The actions concern
`
`substantially the same parties, property, transaction or event; and (2) It appears likely that there will
`
`be an unduly burdensome duplication of labor and expense or conflicting results if the case is
`
`conducted by different judges.” Civil L.R. 7-11.” 1
`
`II.
`
`RELATED CASES
`
`The actions below should be related to the within action, In re. PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC
`
`et al. because the related cases involve substantially the same issues, similar wrongful act or acts and
`
`occurrences, and infringement of the same Patents by Defendants, namely: U.S. Patent No.
`
`6,928,442 (the “’442 patent”), U.S. Patent No. 7,802,310 (the “’310 patent”), and U.S. Patent
`
`No.8,099,420 (the “’420 patent”), all owned by Plaintiffs:
`
`CASE NAME:
`
`CASE NO:
`
`JUDGE
`
`PersonalWeb Technologies LLC, et al. v.
`
`3:18-cv-06615
`
`Hon. Magistrate Judge
`
`Hootsuite, Inc.
`
`Thomas J. Hixson
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`1 “In addition to complying with Civil L.R. 7-11, a copy of the motion, together with proof of
`service pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-5, must be served on all known parties to each apparently related
`action. A Chambers copy of the motion lodged with the assigned Judge in each apparently related
`case under Civil L.R. 5-1(e).” Civil L.R. 3-12(b).
`
`
`NOTICE OF RELATED CASES
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 279 Filed 11/01/18 Page 3 of 5
`
`CASE NAME:
`
`CASE NO:
`
`JUDGE
`
`PersonalWeb Technologies LLC, et al. v.
`
`5:18-cv-06614
`
`Hon. Magistrate Judge Susan
`
`Optimizely, Inc.
`
`van Keulen
`
`PersonalWeb Technologies LLC, et al. v.
`
`5:18-cv-06612
`
`Hon. Magistrate Judge Susan
`
`PopSugar, Inc.
`
`van Keulen
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`As a result, the cases require determination of substantially the same questions of fact and law.
`
`
`Specifically, each case involves Defendants who operate or operated a website and have done so
`
`since before the expiration of the last to expire of the Patents-In-Suit, which provides webpage
`
`
`content to its users.
`
`As such, the following similar questions of law and facts exist in one or more of the apparently
`
`related cases.
`
`• Defendants have infringed at least claims 10 and 11 of the ’442 patent by their manufacture,
`
`use, sale, importation, and/or offer for sale of products or services, and/or controlling the
`
`distribution of its webpage content. Defendants are liable for their infringement of
`
`the ’442 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271.
`
`• Defendants have infringed at least claims 20 and/or 69 of the ’310 patent by their
`
`manufacture, use, sale, importation, and/or offer for sale of products or services, and/or
`
`controlling the distribution of its webpage content. Defendants are liable for their
`
`infringement of the ’310 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271.
`
`• Defendants have infringed claims 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 32, 34-36 and 166 of the ’420 patent
`
`by their manufacture, use, sale, importation, and/or offer f o r s a l e o f products or
`
`services, and/or controlling the distribution of its webpage content. Defendants are liable
`
`for their infringement of the ‘420 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271.
`
`Accordingly, there will be an unduly burdensome duplication of labor and expense, and there
`
`will be a risk of conflicting results if the case set forth above is not related to the within action, In re.
`
`PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al., and the cases proceed before different judges.
`
`
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF RELATED CASES
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 279 Filed 11/01/18 Page 4 of 5
`
`III.
`
`STATUS OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`For each of the aforementioned defendants, the summons and complaint, and all related
`
`
`documents are currently out for service pursuant FRCP Rule 4(c).
`
`
`This Notice of Related Case will be served on Defendants.
`
`
`Dated: November 1, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: November 1, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`STUBBS ALDERTON
`& MARKILES, LLP
`
`By: /s/ Michael A. Sherman
` Michael A. Sherman
` Jeffrey F. Gersh
` Sandeep Seth
` Wesley W. Monroe
` Stanley H. Thompson, Jr.
` Viviana Boero Hedrick
` Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`
`
`
`
`
`MACEIKO IP
`
`By: /s/ Theodore S. Maceiko
` Theodore S. Maceiko (SBN 150211)
` ted@maceikoip.com
` MACEIKO IP
` 420 2nd Street
` Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
` Telephone: (310) 545-3311
` Facsimile: (310) 545-3344
` Attorneys for Plaintiff
` PERSONALWEB
` TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, a Texas
` limited liability company
`
`
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF RELATED CASES
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 279 Filed 11/01/18 Page 5 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Dated: November 1, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DAVID D. WIER
`
`
`
`By: /s/ David D. Wier
` David D. Wier
` David.wier@level3.com
` Vice President and Assistant General
` Counsel
` 1025 Eldorado Boulevard
` Broomfield, CO 80021
` Telephone: (720) 888-3539
` Attorney for Plaintiff
` LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS,
` LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF RELATED CASES
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket