`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 279 Filed 11/01/18 Page 1 of 5
`
`
`Michael A. Sherman (SBN 94783)
`
`masherman@stubbsalderton.com
`Jeffrey F. Gersh (SBN 87124)
`
`jgersh@stubbsalderton.com
`Sandeep Seth (SBN 195914)
`
`sseth@stubbsalderton.com
`Wesley W. Monroe (SBN 149211)
`
`wmonroe@stubbsalderton.com
`Stanley H. Thompson, Jr. (SBN 198825)
`
`sthompson@stubbsalderton.com
`Viviana Boero Hedrick (SBN 239359)
`
`vhedrick@stubbsalderton.com
`STUBBS ALDERTON & MARKILES, LLP
`
`15260 Ventura Blvd., 20th Floor
`Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
`
`Telephone:
`(818) 444-4500
`(818) 444-4520
`Facsimile:
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`
`[ADDITIONAL ATTORNEYS LISTED ON
`SIGNATURE PAGE]
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`IN RE. PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES,
`LLC ET AL. PATENT LITIGATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO.: 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`
`NOTICE OF RELATED CASES
`PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 3-12 TO BE
`FILED IN CASE NO. 5:18-md-02834;
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
`CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD
`BE RELATED PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R.
`7-11
`
`
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF RELATED CASES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`
`
`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 279 Filed 11/01/18 Page 2 of 5
`
`TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on or about October 30, 2018, in the United States District Court
`
`
`for the Northern District of California, PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC and Level 3
`
`Communications, LLC (“Plaintiffs”) filed certain cases related to the within coordinated or
`
`consolidated pretrial patent proceedings under 28 U.S.C. §1407. action. Pursuant to Civil Local
`
`Rules 3-12(b) and 7-11 of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California,
`
`and Paragraph 4 of the June 18, 2018 Order re Preliminary Case Management Conference issued by
`
`the Honorable Beth Labson Freeman, presiding judge over this MDL matter [18-md-02834, Dkt.
`
`19], Plaintiff PersonalWeb Technologies LLC and Level 3 Communications submit this
`
`
`Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related.
`
`I.
`
`APPLICABLE STANDARD UNDER CIVIL L.R. 3-12
`
`Under Civil Local Rule 3-12(a), an “action is related to another when: (1) The actions concern
`
`substantially the same parties, property, transaction or event; and (2) It appears likely that there will
`
`be an unduly burdensome duplication of labor and expense or conflicting results if the case is
`
`conducted by different judges.” Civil L.R. 7-11.” 1
`
`II.
`
`RELATED CASES
`
`The actions below should be related to the within action, In re. PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC
`
`et al. because the related cases involve substantially the same issues, similar wrongful act or acts and
`
`occurrences, and infringement of the same Patents by Defendants, namely: U.S. Patent No.
`
`6,928,442 (the “’442 patent”), U.S. Patent No. 7,802,310 (the “’310 patent”), and U.S. Patent
`
`No.8,099,420 (the “’420 patent”), all owned by Plaintiffs:
`
`CASE NAME:
`
`CASE NO:
`
`JUDGE
`
`PersonalWeb Technologies LLC, et al. v.
`
`3:18-cv-06615
`
`Hon. Magistrate Judge
`
`Hootsuite, Inc.
`
`Thomas J. Hixson
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`1 “In addition to complying with Civil L.R. 7-11, a copy of the motion, together with proof of
`service pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-5, must be served on all known parties to each apparently related
`action. A Chambers copy of the motion lodged with the assigned Judge in each apparently related
`case under Civil L.R. 5-1(e).” Civil L.R. 3-12(b).
`
`
`NOTICE OF RELATED CASES
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 279 Filed 11/01/18 Page 3 of 5
`
`CASE NAME:
`
`CASE NO:
`
`JUDGE
`
`PersonalWeb Technologies LLC, et al. v.
`
`5:18-cv-06614
`
`Hon. Magistrate Judge Susan
`
`Optimizely, Inc.
`
`van Keulen
`
`PersonalWeb Technologies LLC, et al. v.
`
`5:18-cv-06612
`
`Hon. Magistrate Judge Susan
`
`PopSugar, Inc.
`
`van Keulen
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`As a result, the cases require determination of substantially the same questions of fact and law.
`
`
`Specifically, each case involves Defendants who operate or operated a website and have done so
`
`since before the expiration of the last to expire of the Patents-In-Suit, which provides webpage
`
`
`content to its users.
`
`As such, the following similar questions of law and facts exist in one or more of the apparently
`
`related cases.
`
`• Defendants have infringed at least claims 10 and 11 of the ’442 patent by their manufacture,
`
`use, sale, importation, and/or offer for sale of products or services, and/or controlling the
`
`distribution of its webpage content. Defendants are liable for their infringement of
`
`the ’442 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271.
`
`• Defendants have infringed at least claims 20 and/or 69 of the ’310 patent by their
`
`manufacture, use, sale, importation, and/or offer for sale of products or services, and/or
`
`controlling the distribution of its webpage content. Defendants are liable for their
`
`infringement of the ’310 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271.
`
`• Defendants have infringed claims 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 32, 34-36 and 166 of the ’420 patent
`
`by their manufacture, use, sale, importation, and/or offer f o r s a l e o f products or
`
`services, and/or controlling the distribution of its webpage content. Defendants are liable
`
`for their infringement of the ‘420 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271.
`
`Accordingly, there will be an unduly burdensome duplication of labor and expense, and there
`
`will be a risk of conflicting results if the case set forth above is not related to the within action, In re.
`
`PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al., and the cases proceed before different judges.
`
`
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF RELATED CASES
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 279 Filed 11/01/18 Page 4 of 5
`
`III.
`
`STATUS OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`For each of the aforementioned defendants, the summons and complaint, and all related
`
`
`documents are currently out for service pursuant FRCP Rule 4(c).
`
`
`This Notice of Related Case will be served on Defendants.
`
`
`Dated: November 1, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: November 1, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`STUBBS ALDERTON
`& MARKILES, LLP
`
`By: /s/ Michael A. Sherman
` Michael A. Sherman
` Jeffrey F. Gersh
` Sandeep Seth
` Wesley W. Monroe
` Stanley H. Thompson, Jr.
` Viviana Boero Hedrick
` Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`
`
`
`
`
`MACEIKO IP
`
`By: /s/ Theodore S. Maceiko
` Theodore S. Maceiko (SBN 150211)
` ted@maceikoip.com
` MACEIKO IP
` 420 2nd Street
` Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
` Telephone: (310) 545-3311
` Facsimile: (310) 545-3344
` Attorneys for Plaintiff
` PERSONALWEB
` TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, a Texas
` limited liability company
`
`
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF RELATED CASES
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 279 Filed 11/01/18 Page 5 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Dated: November 1, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DAVID D. WIER
`
`
`
`By: /s/ David D. Wier
` David D. Wier
` David.wier@level3.com
` Vice President and Assistant General
` Counsel
` 1025 Eldorado Boulevard
` Broomfield, CO 80021
` Telephone: (720) 888-3539
` Attorney for Plaintiff
` LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS,
` LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF RELATED CASES
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 5:18-md-02834-BLF
`
`