throbber
Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 233-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 1 of 62
`Case 5:18—md-02834-BLF Document 233-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 1 of 62
`
`EXHIBIT 3
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 233-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 2 of 62
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 233-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 2 of 62
`
`US007802310B2
`
`(12) United States Patent
`US 7,802,310 B2
`(10) Patent N0.:
`Farber et a1.
`
`(45) Date of Patent: *Sep. 21, 2010
`
`(54) CONTROLLING ACCESS TO DATA IN A DATA
`PROCESSING SYSTEM
`
`(75)
`
`Inventors: David A. Farber, Ojai, CA (US);
`Ronald D. Laclnnan, Northbrook, IL
`(US)
`(73) Assignees: Kinetech, Inc., Studio City, CA (US);
`Level 3 Communications, LLC,
`Broomfield, CO (US)
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 79 days.
`This patent is subject to a terminal dis-
`claimer.
`
`( * ) Notice:
`
`(21) Appl.No.: 11/980,687
`(22)
`Filed:
`Oct. 31, 2007
`(65)
`Prior Publication Data
`US 2008/0066191 A1
`Mar. 13, 2008
`Related US. Application Data
`
`(60) Continuation of application No. 11/724,232, filed on
`Mar. 15, 2007, which is a continuation of application
`No. 11/017650, filed on Dec. 22, 2004, which is a
`continuation of application No. 09/987,723, filed on
`Nov. 15, 2001, now Pat. No. 6,928,442, which is a
`continuation of application No. 09/283,160, filed on
`Apr. 1, 1999, now Pat. No. 6,415,280, which is a divi-
`sion of application No. 08/960,079, filed on Oct. 24,
`1997, now Pat. No. 5,978,791, which is a continuation
`ofapplication No. 08/425,160, filed on Apr. 11, 1995,
`now abandoned, application No. I 1/980,687, which is
`a continuation of application No. lO/742,972, filed on
`Dec. 23, 2003, which is a division of application No.
`09/987,723, filed on Nov. 15, 2001, now Pat. No.
`6,928,442, which is a continuation of application No.
`09/283,160, filed on Apr. 1, 1999, now Pat. No. 6,415,
`280, which is a division ol'application No. 08/960,079,
`filed on Oct. 24, 1997, now Pat. No. 5,978,791, which
`is a continuation of application No. 08/425,160, filed
`on Apr. 1 1, 1995, now abandoned.
`Int. CI.
`11041. 29/06
`006F 21/00
`
`(2006.01)
`(2006.01)
`
`(51)
`
`726/28: 711/163
`(52) US Cl.
`(58)
`Field of Classification Search ................... 726/28,
`726/27, 29; 713/181
`See application file l'or complete search history.
`
`(56)
`
`EP
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`3,668,647 A
`
`6/1972 Evangelisti ct a1.
`
`(Continued)
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`0 268 069 A2
`5/1988
`
`(Continued)
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Cheriton, David R. and Mann, Timothy R. “Decentralizing a global
`naming service for improved performance and fault tolerance". ACM
`Transactions on Computer Systems, vol. 7. No. 2. May 1989. pp.
`147-183.
`
`(Continued)
`
`Primary Examiner—Gilberto Barron, Jr.
`Assistant Examiner—Samson B Lemma
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Davidson Berqu ist Jackson &
`Gowdey, LLP; Brian Siritzky
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Access to and delivery of licensed content is controlled using
`content names that were determined based on the content. A
`name for a data item is obtained.
`the name having been
`determined based at least in part on the data which comprise
`the contents of the data item. Access to the data item is
`authorized based at least in part on the name. Once autho-
`rized, access may be granted from more than one computer.
`The name may have been determined using a hash or message
`digest function such as MD4, MD5 or SHA. 'lhe data item
`may comprise a file, a portion ofa file, a page in memory. a
`digital message, a digital image, a video signal or an audio
`signal.
`
`87 Claims, 31 Drawing Sheets
`
`STORAGE
`DEVICE
`
`
`
`102
`
`
`PRU BESS 0R
`PROCESSOR
`
`
`
`
`
`108
`
`
`102
`
`
`PROCESSOR
` PROCESSOR PROCESSOR
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 3 — l
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 233-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 3 of 62
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 233-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 3 of 62
`
`US 7,802,310 B2
`
`PageZ
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`3.835.260 A
`4.096.568 A
`4.215.402 A
`4.221.003 A
`4.290.105 A
`4.376299 A
`4.405.829 A
`4.412.285 A
`4.414.624 A
`4.441.155 A
`4.464.713 A
`4.490.782 A
`4.558.413 A
`4.571.700 A
`4.577.293 A
`4642.703 A
`4.658.093 A
`4.675.810 A
`4.691.299 A
`4.725.945 A
`4.773.039 A
`4.821.184 A
`4.887.235 A
`4.888.681 A
`4.914.586 A
`4.922.414 A
`4.922.417 A
`4.949.302 A
`4.972.367 A
`5.007.658 A
`5.014.192 A
`5.025.421 A
`5.047.918 A
`5.050.074 A
`5.050.212 A
`5.057.837 A
`5.077.658 A
`5.084315 A
`5.117.351 A
`5.129.081 A
`5.129.082 A
`5.144.667 A
`5.163.147 A '1
`5.179.680 A
`5.182.799 A
`5.199.073 A
`5.202.982 A *
`5.204.897 A
`5.204.958 A
`5.204.966 A
`5.208.858 A
`5.247.620 A
`5.260.999 A
`5.276.869 A
`5.276.901 A
`5.287.499 A
`5.287.514 A
`5.297.279 A
`5.30I.286 A
`5.301.316 A
`5.317.693 A
`5.341.477 A
`5.343.527 A
`5.347.653 A
`5.351.302 A
`5.357.440 A
`5.357.623 A
`5.359.523 A
`5.361.356 A
`5.371.897 A
`5.384.565 A
`
`9/1974 Prescherelal
`6/1978 Bennett et a].
`7/1980 Mitchell eta].
`911980 Chang elal-
`9/1981 Cichellietal
`3/1983 Rivest
`9/1983 Rivcstctal-
`10/1983 Nechesetal-
`”/1983 Summer. Jr. e181.
`4/1984 Fletcheret a1.
`8/1984 Benhaseelal.
`12/1984 D'onn et al.
`12/1985 Schmidlelal.
`211986 Emrer-elal-
`3/1986 Matick et 81.
`2/l987 Menden
`4/1987 Hellman
`6/1987 Grunerelal-
`9/1987 Rivestetal.
`2/1988 Kronstadt e1 8]
`9/1988 Zamora
`4/1989 Clancyelal.
`12/1989 Hollowayclal.
`12/1989 Bamesetal-
`4/l990 Swinehan eta].
`50990 Hollowayetal-
`5/1990 Churm et al.
`8/1990 Arnold e1 al.
`”/1990 Burke
`40991 Bendert 981-
`5/1991 Mansfieldel :11
`6/1991 Cho
`9/1991 Schwartzet 111
`0/l991 Maren
`9/1991 Dyson
`10/1991 Colwell et a1.
`12/1991 Bends/1
`1/1992 Mazznrio
`5/1992 Miller
`7/1992 Kobayashielali
`7/1992 Tirfing er a1.
`9/1992 PogueaJrvelali
`11/1992 Orita ............................. 707/9
`1/1993 Colwell et 211-
`[/1993 Tamuraeta].
`30993 Scott
`4/1993 Gramlich elal.
`40993 Wyman
`40993 Chengelal-
`4/1993 Wittenberg eta].
`5/1993 V0115“ etaJ.
`9/1993 Fukuzawa e121].
`”/1993 Wyman
`1/1994 Forrest e1 :11.
`1/1994 Howell et a1.
`2/1994 Nemes
`2/1994 Gram
`3/1994 anon at a].
`4/ I994 Rajani
`409% Hamilton etal-
`5/1994 Cuenod eta].
`809% Firkin el al-
`8/1994 Moore
`91994 Flynn etal-
`9/1994 Leighton eta].
`10/1994 Talbert eta].
`10/1994 Megory-Cohen
`10/1994 Talbot! e181.
`11/1994 Clark 618.1.
`12/1994 Brown eta].
`1/1995 Cannon
`
`................... 1/1
`
`5.394.555 A
`5.403.639 A
`5.404.508 A
`5.438.508 A
`5442343 A
`5.448.668 A *
`5.448.718 A
`5.452.447 A
`5.454.000 A *
`5.454.039 A
`5.459350 A
`5.465.365 A
`5.467.471 A
`5475325 A
`5.479.654 A *
`5.491.817 A
`5.499294 A
`5.504.879 A
`5.530.757 A *
`5.537.585 A *
`5.542.087 A
`55531143 A
`5.568.181 A
`5‘531'515 A
`5.581.758 A
`5.581.764 A
`5.583.995 A
`5.588.147 A
`5.600.834 A
`5504303 A
`5.604.892 A
`5.630.067 A
`5.632.031 A
`5.638.443 A
`5.640.564 A
`5.649.196 A
`5.677.952 A
`5.678.038 A
`5.678.046 A
`5.694.472 A *
`5.694.596 A
`5.701.316 A
`5.710.922 A
`5.724.425 A
`5724552 A
`5.742.807 A *
`51745379 A
`5.757.913 A
`5‘757‘915 A
`5.781.629 A
`5.802.291 A
`5309494 A
`5.826.049 A
`5.835.087 A
`5.864.683 A
`5307519 A
`5.907.704 A
`5.940.504 A
`5.978.791 A
`5‘991_414 A
`6.006.018 A
`6.134.603 A
`5.135546 A
`6.415.280 131
`6.732.180 Bl
`6.816.872 131*
`6.928.442 132
`2002/0052884 A1
`2002/0082999 A1
`2003/0078888 A1
`2003/0078889 A1
`2003/0095660 A1
`2004/0139097 A1
`
`............... 714/21
`
`707/695
`
`............. 713/189
`
`2/1995 Hunteretal.
`4/1995 Belsnn e161.
`4/1995 Konrad e1 .11,
`8/1995 Wymzm
`3/1995 Cato et a1.
`9/1995 Perelson etal.
`9/1995 Cohn c121].
`9/1995 Nelson at 81.
`9/1995 Dorfman ..................... 714/54
`9/1995 Coppersmith e1 al.
`10/1995 Burnett
`11/1995 Winlerbouom
`“/1995 Bader
`12/1995 Fischer
`12/1995 Squibb
`2/1996 Gopal et a].
`3/1996 Friedman
`4/1996 Eiscnbcrg 01111.
`6/1996 Krawezyk ................... 713/188
`7/1996 Blickensrat‘fet n1.
`........ 707/205
`7/1995 Neimatetal.
`9/1995 Rossel a].
`10/1996 Greenwoodelal.
`12/1996 Slern
`121/1995 Bumen
`12/1996 Fitzgerald et a].
`12/1996 Gnrdnerei n1.
`12/1996 Neeman et a].
`2/1997 Howaxd
`2/1997 Azjz
`2/1997 Nuttal] et a].
`5/1997 Kindelletal.
`5/1997 Velissampouloselal.
`6/1997 Stcfik c1511.
`51/1997 Hamilton eta].
`7/1997 Woodhillel n1.
`10/1997 Blakley.111elal.
`10/1997 Dockteretal.
`10/1997 Cahil] e181.
`12/1997 Johnson eta].
`12/1997 Campbell
`12/1997 Alrerness el al.
`1/1998 Alley cial.
`3/1998 Changeta].
`3/1998 Taoda
`4/1998 Masinter ........................ 707/1
`4/1998 Wyn-11m
`5/1998 Bellare et a1.
`5/1998 Aucsmith et 31.
`7/1998 Haber et a].
`9/1998 Balickelal
`9/1998 Nguyen
`10/1998 Ogata et al.
`11/1998 Herz et a].
`1/1999 Boebert e] a].
`5/1999 Davis
`5/1999 Gudmundson at al.
`8/1999 Griswold
`11/1999 Farbel'elal.
`11/1999 Garay e181.
`12/1999 Burnett 0181.
`10/2000 Jones et a].
`10/2000 Kahn eta].
`7/2002 Farber et a1.
`5/2004 Hale eta].
`11/2004 Squibb ..............................
`8/2005 Rube; elal.
`5/2002 Fa.rber e1 81.
`6/2002 Lee e181.
`4/2003 1,ee e1 :11.
`4/2003 Lee el al.
`5/2003 Lee eta].
`7/2004 Farber e1 81.
`
`l/l
`
`EXHIBIT 3 - 2
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 233-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 4 of 62
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 233-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 4 of 62
`
`US 7,802,310 32
`Page 3
`
`2005/0010792 AI“
`2005/0114296 A1
`2007/0185848 A1
`2008/0065635 A1
`2008/0066191 A1
`2008/0071855 A1
`2008/0082551 Al
`
`1/2005 Carpentier et a1.
`5/2005 Farber et a1.
`8/2007 Farber et a1.
`3/2008 Farber et a1.
`3/2008 Farber et a1.
`3/2008 Farber et a1.
`4/2008 Farbcr ct a1.
`
`713/193
`
`EP
`EP
`EP
`EP
`El’
`13?
`EP
`GB
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`W0
`W0
`W0
`W0
`W0
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`0315425
`5/1989
`0 558 945 A2
`9/1993
`0 566 967 A2
`10/1993
`0592045
`4/1994
`0631 226 A1
`12/1994
`0 654 920 A2
`5/1995
`0 658 022 A2
`6/1995
`2294132 A
`4/1996
`59058564
`4/1984
`63-106048
`5/1988
`63-27396]
`11/1988
`2-127755
`5/1990
`05162529
`6/1993
`06187384 A2
`7/1994
`06348558 A
`12/1994
`WO 92/20021
`11/1992
`W0 94/06087
`3/1994
`W0 94/209121
`9/1994
`WO 95/01599
`1/1995
`WO 97/43717
`11/1997
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Request for Reexamination of US. Patent No. 6.928.442: Reexam
`U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,260. filed on Aug. 29. 2008.
`Advances
`in Cryptology-AUSCRYPT '92—Workshop on the
`Theory and Application of Cryptographic Techniques Gold Coast.
`Queensland. Australia Dec. 13-16. 1992 Proceedings.
`Advances in Cryptology-EUROCRYP’T '93. Workshop on the
`Iheory and Application ofCryptographic Techniques Lofthus. Nor-
`way. May 23-27. 1993 Proceedings.
`Affidavit ofTimothy P. Walker in Support ofCWIS' Opening Mark-
`man Brief Construing the Terms at
`Issue in US. Patent No.
`6.415.280. dated Jul. 25. 2003. from Civil Action No. 02-11430
`RWZ.
`Akamai and MIT’s Memorandum in Support of Their Claim Con-
`struction of USPAT 5.978.791. dated Aug. 31. 2001. from Civil
`Action No.00-cv-11851RWZ.
`Akamai‘s Answer. Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims to
`Amended Complaint. filed Dec. 6. 2002. in Civil Action No 02-CV—
`I 1430RWZ.
`Akamai‘s Brief on Claim Construction. dated Aug. 8. 2003. from
`Civil Action No. 02-11430 RWZ.
`Albert Langer
`(cmf851@anu.oz.au). http://groups.google.com/
`groups?se1m—I991Aug7.225 159 786%40newshost.anu.
`edu.au
`&oe=UTF-8&output=gplain. Aug. 7. 1991.
`Alexander Dupuy (dupuy@smarts.com). "MD5 and LIFNs (was:
`Misc Comments)". www.ac1.1an1.gov/URI/archive/uri-94q2.mes-
`sages/008Ihtml. Apr. 17. 1994.
`Alexander Dupuy (dupuy@smarts.com). “RE: MD5 and LIFNs
`(was: Misc Comments)". www.ac1.1an1.govf1JRI/archive/uri-94q2.
`messages/0113.htm1. Apr. 26. 1994.
`Answer ofDefendant RJAA to First Amended Complaint and Coun-
`terclaim. dated Feb. 8. 2005. from Civil Action No. CV04—7456 JFW
`(CTx)
`Berners-Lee. T. et a1.. “Hypertext Transfer Protocol
`May 1996. pp. 1-54.
`Berners—Lee. T. et a1 .. "Uniform Resource Locators (URL)." pp. 1-25.
`Dec. 1994.
`Berners-Iee. T.. “Universal Resource Identifiers in WWW." Jun
`1994. pp. 1-25.
`Bert dem Boer. et a1.. Collisions for the compression function of
`MD.sub.5 pp. 292—304. 1994.
`
`HTTP/ 1 .0."
`
`lst
`
`Birgit Pfitzman. Sorting Out Signature Schemes. Nov. 1993. l.sup.sl
`Conf. Computer & Corrun. Security ’93. p. 74-85.
`Birgit Pfitzmann. Sorting Out Signature Schemes. Nov. 1993.
`Conf. Computer & Comm. Security '93 pp. 74-85.
`Bowman. C. Mic. et a1.. “Harvest: A Scalable. Customizable Discov-
`ery and Access System." Aug. 4. 1994. pp. 1-27.
`Bowman. C. Mic. ct a1.. “Harvest: A Scalable. Customizable Discov-
`ery and Access System." Mar. 12. 1995. pp. 1-29.
`Brisco. T.. “DNS Support for Load Balancing." Apr. 1995. pp 1-7.
`Browne. Shirley et a1.. "Location-Independent Naming for Virtual
`Distributed Software Repositories." 1995. 7 pages.
`Browne. Shirley et a.l.. “Location-Independent Naming for Virtual
`Distributed Sofiware Repositories." 1995. printed from http:/www.
`netlib.org/utk/papers/Iifn/main html on Mar. 22. 2006. 18 pages.
`Caner. J. Lawrence. et a1. “Universal Classes of Hash Functions ."
`Journal ofComputer and System Sciences. vol 18. No. 2. Apr. 1979.
`pp. 143-154.
`Chris Charnes and Josef Picprlky. Linear Noncquivalcncc versus
`Nonlinearity. Pieprzky. pp. 156-164. 1993.
`Civil Minutes General dated .Ian. 25. 2005. from Civil Action No. CV
`04-7456—JFW (CTx).
`Clifford Lynch (Ca1ur@uccmvsa.bitnet). “ietfurI/uri overview drafi
`paper
`(Iong)". wwwacl.1a.n1.gov/URI/archive/uri-93q| .messages/
`0015.htm1. Mar. 25. 1993.
`Complaint for Patent Infringement. Permanent Injunction. and Dam-
`ages. dated Sep. 8. 2004. from Civil Action No. CV 04-7456 JFW
`(AJWx).
`Cormen. Thomas 11. et a1. Introduction to Algoritiu'ns. The MIT
`Press. Cambridge. Massachusetts. 1994. pp. 219-243. 991-993.
`CWIS‘ Opening Markman Brief Construing the Terms at Issue in
`US Patent No. 6.415.280. dated Jul. 25. 2003. frotn Civil Action No.
`02-11430 RWZ.
`CWIS‘ Reply Markman BriefConstruing Lhe Terms at Issue in US.
`Patent No. 6.415.280. dated Aug. 15. 2003. from Civil Action No.
`02-11430 RWZ.
`Danzig. P.B.. et a1.. ““Distrihuted Indexing: A Scalable Mechanism
`For Distributed Information Retrieval.“ Proceedings of the 14th
`Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and
`Development
`in Information Retrieval. pp. 220-229. Oct. 13-16.
`1991.
`Davis. James R.. “A Server for a Distributed Digital Technical Report
`Library." Jan. 15. 1994. pp 1—8.
`Declaration ofRobcrt B.K. Dewar in Support ofCWIS' Construction
`of the Terms at Issue in US. Patent No. 6.415.280. dated Jul. 25.
`2003. from Civil Action No. 02-cv-l 1430RWZ.
`in Datagram
`Deering. Stephen.
`et
`a1.
`“Multicast Routing
`Intemetworks and Extended LANs." ACM Transactions on Com-
`puter Systems. vol 8. No. 2. May 1990. pp 85-1 10
`Defendant Digital Island's Opening Brief on Claim Constmction
`Issues dated Aug. 17. 2001. from Civil Action No. 00-cv-11851-
`RWZ.
`Defendant Lime Wire. LLC's Answer. Affirmative Defenses and
`Counterclaims dated Nov. 15.2007. from Civil Action No. 07-06161
`VBF (PLAx).
`Defendant Media Sentry. Inc‘s Reply Memorandum of Points and
`Authorities in Further Support of Its Motion to Dismiss. dated Nov.
`15. 2004. from Civil Action No. CV04-7456 JFW (CTx).
`Defendant MediaSentry Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion to Dis-
`miss First Amended Complaint; Memorandum of Points and
`Authorities in Support Thereof. dated Dec. 13. 2004. from Civil
`Action No. CV04-74S6 JFW.
`Defendant MediaSentry. Inc.'s Answer to Plaintiffs’ First Amended
`Complaint and Counterclaims. dated Feb. 8. 2005. from Civil Action
`No. CV04-7456 JFW (CTx).
`Defendant RIAA’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss First
`Amended Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in
`Support Thereof. dated Dec. 13.2004. from Civil Action No CV04-
`7456 JFW (CTx).
`Defendants Loudeye Corp.'s and Overpeer. Inc '5 Answer to Plain-
`tiffs’ First Amended Complaint and Counterclaim. dated Feb 8.
`2005. from Civil Action No. 04-7456 JFW (AJWX).
`Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions dated Dec. 14. 2006.
`from Civil Action No. CV 06-5086 SJO (Ex).
`
`EXHIBIT 3 - 3
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 233-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 5 of 62
`Case 5:18-md-02834—BLF Document 233-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 5 of 62
`
`US 7,802,310 B2
`Page 4
`
`Devine. Robert. “Design and Implementation ofDDH: A Distributed
`Dynamic Hashing Algorithm." In Proc. of4th International Confer-
`ence on Foundations of Data Organizations and Algorithms. 1993.
`pp. 101—114.
`issued Dec. 23. 2004 in con'epsonding
`European Search Report
`European Application No. 96910762.2-2201.
`Expert Report ofProfessor Ellis Horowitz. dated Mar. 6.2006. from
`Civil Action No. 04-7456 JFW (CTx).
`Expert Report of the Honorable Gerald J. Mossinghoff. dated Mar.
`13. 2006. from Civil Action No. 04-7456 JFW (CTx).
`Faltstrom. P. et 13].. “How to Interact with a Whois++ Mesh." Feb
`1996. pp. 1-9.
`Feeley. Michael. et a1. “Implementing Global Memory Management
`in aWorkstation Cluster." In Proc. ofthe 15th ACM Symp. on Oper-
`ating Systems Principles. 1995. pp. 201—212.
`Fielding. R. et a1.. “Hypertext Transfer Protecol—HTTP/l .1." Jan
`1997. pp. I-l63.
`Fielding. R. el a1.. “Hypertext Transfer Protocol—HTTP/I .1." Jun
`1999. pp 1-157.
`Infringement. Permanent
`for Patent
`First Amended Complaint
`Injunction and Damages. dated Nov 24. 2004. from Civil Action No
`CV 04—7456 JFW (CTx).
`Floyd. Sally. et al. "A reliable Multicast Framework for Light-Weight
`Sessions and Application Level Framing." In Proceeding of ACM
`SIGCOMM ‘95. pp. 342-356.
`Frcdman. Michael. ct a1. “Storing a Sparse Table with 0(1) Worst
`Case Access Time." Journal of the Association for Computing
`Machinery. vol. 31. No. 3. Jul. 1984. pp. 538-544.
`G. L. Friedman. Digital Camera With Apparatus for Authentication
`of Images Produced From an Image File. NASA Case No. NPO-
`19108-I-CU. U.S.App1. No. 08/159.980. Nov. 24. 1993.
`Grigni. Michelangelo. et a1. “Tight Bounds on Minimum Broadcasts
`Networks." SIAM Journal of Discrete Mathematics. vol. 4. No. 2.
`May 1991. pp. 207-222.
`Gwertzman. James. et al. “The Case for Geographical Push—Cach-
`ing." Technical Report HU TR 34-94 (excerpt). Harvard University.
`DAS. Cambridge. MA 02138. 1994.2 pgs.
`H. Goodman. Ada. Object-Oriented Techniques. and Concurrency in
`Teaching Data Structures and File Management Report Documenta-
`tion p. Ad-A275 385-94-04277.
`H. Goodman. Feb. 9. 1994 Ada. Object-Oriented Techniques. and
`Concurrency in Teaching Data Sructures and File Management
`Report Documentation P. AD-A275 385-94-04277.
`I-Iauzeur. B. M.. “A Model for Naming. Addressing. and Routing."
`ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 4. Oct. 4. 1986). 293-311.
`International Search Report dated Jun. 24. 1996 in corresponding
`international application PCT/US1996/004733.
`K. Sollins and 1.. Masinler. “Functional Requirements for Uniform
`Resource Names". www.w3.org/Addressing/rfc I 737 .txt. Dec. 1994.
`pp. 1—7.
`Khare. R. and Lawrence. S.. “Upgrading to TLS Within HTTP/1.1."
`May 2000. pp 1-12.
`Khoshafian. S N. et al. 1986. Object identity. In Conf. Proc. On
`Object-Oriented Programming Systems. Languages and Applica—
`tions (Portland. Oregon. United States. Sep. 29-Oct. 2. 1986). N.
`Meyrowitz. lid. OOPLSA ‘86 ACM Press. New York. NY. 406-4 16.
`Kim et a1.. "Experiences with Tripwire: Using Integrity Checkers for
`Intrusion Detection”. COAST Labs. Dept. of Computer Sciences
`Purdue University, Feb. 22. 1995. pp. 1—12.
`Kim et a1.. “The Design and Implementation of Tripwire: A file
`System Integrity Checker". COAST Labs. Dept. of Computer Sci—
`ences Purdue University. Feb. 23. 1995. pp. I-18.
`Kim ct a1.. “The Design and Implementation of Tripwire: A file
`System Integrity Checker". COAST Labs. Dept. of Computer Sci-
`ences Purdue University. Nov. 1‘). 1093. pp. 1-21.
`Kim. Gene H.. and Spafford. Eugene H.. “Writing. Supporting. and
`Evaluating Tripwire: A Publicly Available Security Tool." COAST
`Labs. Dept. ofComputer Sciences Purdue University. Mar. 12. 1994.
`pp. 1-23.
`Knuth. Donald E.. “The Art of Computer Programming." 1973. vol.
`3. Ch. 6.4. pp. 506-549.
`
`Lantz. K. A.. et a1.. “Towards a universal directory service." In Proc.
`4th Annual ACM Symp. on Principles of Distributed Computing
`(Minaki. Ontario. Canada). PODC ‘85. ACM Press. New York1 NY.
`250-260.
`Leach. P. 1.. et al.. The file system ofan integrated local network. In
`Proc. 1985 ACM 13th Annual Conf. on Comp Sci CSC '85. ACM
`Press. NY. NY. 309-324.
`Leach. P.J.. et a1.. “UIDs as Internal Names in a Distributed File
`System." In Proc. IstACM SIGAC'ILSIGOPS Symp. on Principles of
`Distributed Computing (Ottawa. Canada. Aug 18-20. 1982). PODC
`'82. ACM Press. New York. NY. 34-41
`Ma C. 1992. On building very large naming systems. In Proc. 5th
`Workshop on ACM SIGOPS European Workshop: Models and Para-
`digms For Distributed Systems Structuring (France. Sep. 21-23.
`1992). EW 5. ACM Press. New York. NY. [-5.
`Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support ofLoudeye's and
`Overpeer's Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint for
`Failure to State a Claim or. In the Alternative. for a More Definitive
`Statement. dated Dec. 13. 2004. from Civil Action No. CV-04-7456
`JFW (AJWX)
`Ming-Ling Lo et a1.. 0n Optimal Processor Allocation to Support
`Pipelined Hash Joins. ACM SIGMOD. pp. 69-78. May 1993.
`Meats. R.. “URN Syntax." May 1997. pp. 1-8.
`Murlidhar Koushik. Dynamic Hashing With Distributed Overflow
`Space: A File Organization With Good Insertion Performance. 1993.
`Info. Sys.. vol. 18. No. 5. pp. 299-317.
`Myers.
`.1. and Rose. M.. “The Content—MDS Header Field." Oct.
`1995. pp. 1-4.
`Naor. Moni. ct a]. “The Lead. Capacity and Availability of Quorum
`Systems." In Proceedings of the 35th IEEE Symposium on Founda-
`tions ofComputer Science. Nov. 1994. pp. 214-225.
`Nisan. Noam. "Psuedorandom Generators for Space-Bounded Com-
`putation." In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual ACM Sym-
`posium on Theory of Computing. May 1990. pp. 204-212.
`Office Action in corresponding Japanese Application No. 531.073/
`1996 mailed on Apr 25. 2006.
`Office Communication in corresponding European Application No.
`96910762.2—1225 dated Jan. 17. 2007.
`Order Re Clairu Construction dated Nov. 8. 2001. from Civil Action
`No.00-11851—RWZ.
`Palmer. Mark. et a1. “Fido: A Cache that Learns to Fetch." In Pro-
`ceedings of the 17th Intemational Conference on Very Large Data
`Bases. Sep 1991. pp. 255-264.
`Patent Abstracts of Japan. “Device for Generating Database and
`Method for the Same." Application No. 03-080504. Sun Microsyst.
`Inc.. published Jun. 1993. 38 pages.
`Patent Abstracts ofJapan.“E1ectronic Mail Multiplexing System and
`Communication Control Method in The System." .Iun. 30. 1993. .IP
`051625293.
`Patent Abstracts of Japan. “Method for Registering and Retrieving
`Data Base.” Application No. 03-187303. Nippon Telegr. & Teleph.
`Corp.. published Feb 1993. l 1 pages.
`I’eleg. David. et al. “The Availability onuorum Systems." Informa-
`tion and Computation 123. 1995. 210-223.
`Peter Deutsch (peterd@bunyip.corn). “Re: MDS and LiFNs (was:
`Misc Comments)". www.acl.lanl.govl1IRI/archive/uri-94q2.mcs-
`sages/0106.htrn1. Apr. 26. 1994.
`Peterson. L. L. 1988. A yellow-pages service for a local-area net-
`work. In Proc. ACM Workshop on Frontiers in Computer Commu-
`nications Technology (Vermont. 1987). J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves.
`Ed. SIGCOMM '87. ACM Press. New York. NY. 235—242.
`Plaintifls‘ Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to
`Loudeye Dcfcndants' Motion to Dismiss. dated Nov. 8. 2004. from
`Civil Action No. CV-04-7456 JFW (AJWX).
`Plaintiffs' Opposition to Media Sentry's Motion to Dismiss. Memo-
`randum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof. dated Nov. 8.
`2004. from Civil Action No. CV 04-7456 JFW (CTx).
`Plaintifl‘s Opposition to Recording Industry Association of Ameri-
`ca's Motion to Dismiss; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in
`Support Thereof. dated Nov. 8. 2004. from Civil Action No CV-04-
`7456 JFW (CTx).
`
`EXHIBIT 3 - 4
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 233-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 6 of 62
`Case 5:18—md-02834—BLF Document 233-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 6 of 62
`
`US 7,802,310 BZ
`Page 5
`
`Plaintiff‘s Reply to Defendant Loudeye Corp.'s and Overpeer. 1nc.'s
`Counterclaims. dated Mar. 3. 2005. from Civil Action No. CV
`04-7456 JFW (CTX).
`Plaintifl‘ 5 Reply to Defendant MediaSentry's Counterclaims. dated
`Mar. 3. 2005. from Civil Action No. CV 04-7456 JFW (CTx)
`Plaintiff‘s Reply to Defendant RIAA‘s Counterclaims. dated Mar. 3.
`2005. from Civil Action No 04-7456 JFW (CTx).
`Proceedings ol'the 1993 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on
`Management of Data. vol. 22. Issue 2. Jun. 1993.
`Rabin. Michael. “Efficient Dispersal of Information for Security.
`Load Balancing. and Fault Tolerance." Journal of the ACM. vol. 36.
`No. 2. Apr. 1989. pp. 335-348.
`Ravi. 11.. “Rapid Rumor Ramification: Approximating the Minimum
`Broadcast Time." In Proc. ofthe 35th lEEE Symp. on Foundation of
`Computer Science. Nov. 1994. pp. 202-213.
`Ravindran. K. and Ramakrishnarr. K. K. 1991. A naming system for
`feature-based service specification in distributed operating systems.
`SIGSMAIJJPC Notes 17.3-4 (Sep. 1991). 12-21.
`Reed Wade (wade@cs.utk.edu). “re: Dienst and BFD/‘LIFN docu-
`ment." Aug. 8. 1904. printed from http://wwwwebhistoryorg/www
`Iists/www-talk1994q3/0416.htm1 on Mar. 22. 2006. (7 pages).
`Rivest. R.. “The MDS Message-Digest Algorithm." Apr. 1992. pp
`1-19 and errata sheet (1 page).
`Rose. M.. “The Content-MDS Header Field." Nov. 1993. pp [-3.
`Ross. K.. “Hash-Routing for Collections of Shared Web Caches."
`lEEE Network Magazine. pp. 37-44. Nov-Dec 1997.
`Sakti Pramanik et a1.. Multi-Directory Hasing. 1993. Info. Sys.. vol
`18. No. 1. pp. 63—74.
`Schmidt. Jeanette. et a1. “Chernoff—Hoeffding Bounds for Applica-
`tions with Limited Independence." In Proceedings of the 4th ACS-
`SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. 1993. pp. 331-340.
`Schneier. Bruce. “One-Way Hash Functions. Using Crypographic
`Algorithms for Hashing." 1991. printed from http://202.l79135 4/
`data’DDJ/articles/‘199I/9109/91909g/9109ghtm on Mar. 22.2006.
`Schwartz. M.. et a1 1987. A name service for evolvingheterogeneous
`systems. In Proc. 1th ACM Symp. on ()5 Principles (Texas. Nov.
`8-11. 1987). SOSP '87. ACM Press. NY. NY 52-62.
`Search Report dated Jun. 24. 1996.
`Shaheen-Gouda.A.And Loucks. L. 1992. Name borders. In Proc. 5th
`Workshop on ACM SIGHPS European Workshop: Models and Para-
`digms For Distributed Systems Stmcl tiring (Mont Saint-Wichel.
`France. Sep. Tit-23. 1992). IEW 5. ACM Press. NY. NY.
`l-ti.
`Sun Microsystems. Inc... “NFS: Network File System Protocol Speci-
`fication." Mar. 1980. pp. 1-25.
`'l'arjan. Robert Endre. et a1. “Storing a Sparse Table." Communica-
`tions ofthe ACM. vol. 22. No. II. Nov. 1979. pp. 606-611.
`‘Ierry. D. B. 19841. An analysis ofniuning conventions for distributed
`computer systems. In I‘roc. ACM SIGCOMM Symp. on Communi-
`cations Architectures and Protocols: 'l‘utorials d: Symp. SIGCOMM
`'84 ACM Press. NY. NY. 218-224.
`Thomas A. Berson. Differential Cryptanalysis Mod 2.sup.32 with
`Applications to MDS. pp. 69-81. 1992.
`Vuay Kumrtr. A Concurrency Control Mechanism Based on Extend-
`ible Hashing for Main Memory Database Systems. ACM. vol. 3.
`1989. pp. 109—113.
`\r'rjay Know. A concurrency Control Mechanism based on Extend-
`ihlc Hashing for Main Memory Database Systems. pp. 109-113.
`ACM. vol 3. I989.
`Vinccnzetti. David and Cotrrozzi. Massimo. “Anti Tampering Pro-
`gram." Proceedings ofthe Fourth {USENIX} Security Symposium.
`Santa Clara. CA. 1993. 11 pages.
`Vincenzetti. David and Comozzi. Massimo. “Anti Tampering Pro-
`gram." Proceedings of the Fourth {USENIX} Security Symposium,
`Santa Clara. CA. undated. printed from httpa'i'wwwjanctJCiEth
`Vinccnzetti_a.nd_Cotrozzi/ATP_Anti_Tamp on Mar. 22. 2006. 8
`pages.
`Vitter. Jeffrey Scott. et a1. “Optimal Prefetching via Data Compres-
`sion." In Proceedings of32nd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of
`Computer Science. Nov. I991. pp. 121—130.
`W3C:ID, HTTP; A protocol for networked information. “Basic
`I'l'l'l'l1 as defined in 1992". wwxuw’j.orga'ProtocoISi'I-inPZ.html.
`1992.
`
`Wegman. Mark. et al. “New Hash Functions and 'Iheir Use in Authen-
`tication and Set Equality.” Journal of Computer and System Sciences
`vol. 22. Jun. 1981. pp. 265-279.
`William Pen'izo. et al.. Distributed Join Processing Performance
`Evaluation. I994.’1‘wenty-Sevenflt Hawaii Intemational Conference
`on System Sciences. vol. II. pp 236-244.
`Witold Litwin et al.. LII.sup —Linear11ashing for Distributed Files.
`HP Labs Tech. Report No. HPL-93-21. Jun. 1993. pp. 1-22.
`Witold Litwin et a1.. Linear [lashing for Distributed Files. ACM
`SIGMOD. May 1993. pp. 327-336.
`Witold Litwin. et a1., LH—Linear Hashing for Distributed Files. HP
`Labs Tech. Report No. lIPL-93-21 Jun. 1993. pp. 1-22
`Yao. Andrew Chi-Chih. “Should Tables be Sorted?" Joumal of the
`Association for Computing Machinery. vol. 28. No. 3. J11] 1981. pp.
`615-628.
`Yuliang Zheng et 211.. HavaI—A One-Way Hashing Algorithm with
`Variable Length of Output (Extended Abstract). pp 83-105.
`Yuliang Zheng. et 511.. Haval—A One-Way Hashing Algorithm with
`Variable Length of Output
`(Extended Abstract). pp. 83-105.
`Advances in Cryptology. AUSCRIPT ‘92. 1992.
`Zhiyu Tian. ct al.. A New Hashing Function: Statistical Behaviour
`and Algorithm. pp. 3-13. SIGIR Forum. 1993
`Zhiyu Tian. et al.. A New Hashing Function: Statistical Behaviour
`and Algorithm. pp. 3-13. SIGIR Forum. Spring 1993.
`[Proposed] Order Regarding Construction of Terms. filed Mar. 29.
`200? in CD. Cal case No. CV 06-5086 SJO (Ex) [9 pgs.].
`Analysis of I’laintiffs‘ Claim Chart for the ’280 Patent As Against
`Defendant Media Sentry. Inc.
`|
`1 pages.
`Analysis of Plaintiffs’ Claim Chart for the '791 Patent As Against
`Defendant Media Sentry. Inc. (I 1916.001.0150.a) pp. 1-48.
`Analysis of Plaintiffs' Claim Chart for the ‘791 Patent As Against
`Defendant Overpeer pp. [-40
`Barbara. D.. et a1.. “Exploiting symmetries for low-cost comparison
`of file copies". 8th Int'l Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems.
`Jun. 1988. pp. 471-479. San Jose. CA.
`Campbell. M.. “The Design of text Signatures for Text Retrieval
`Systerns."Tech. Report. Sep. 5. 1994. Dcaltin University. School of
`Computing & Math. Geelong. Australia.
`Chang. W. W. et aI.. “A signature access method for the Starburst
`database system." in Proc. 15th Int'I Conf. on Very Large Data Bases
`(Amsterdam. The Netherlands). pp. 145—153.
`Changes to Mar. 23. 200? Deposition of Robert B. K. Dewar. in CD
`Cal. case No. CV 06—5086 5100.53) [3 pgs + cover letter].
`Communication from EPO in European Application No. 96 910
`7622-1225 dated May 8. 2009 [4 pgs.].
`{Immunisation pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC from EPt'J (Examina-
`tion Report). Jan. 17. 200?. inApplication No. El’96 910 2622-1225
`[1 pg. with 5 pg. annex].
`(.‘omplaint for Patent Infringement. Permanent injunction and Darn-
`rtgcs. Aug. 8. 2006. in CD. Cal. case No. CV 06-5086 SJO (Ex) [11
`pgs.]-
`Compltu'nt for Patent Infringement. Permanent Injunction and Darn-
`ages. filed Sep. 21. 2007 in CD. Cal. Case No. Cv 07-06161 VBF
`(PLAX) [10 pgs.].
`Declaration ofCharIes S. Baker in Support ofDefendant Lime Wire's
`Motion to Stay Pending Reexamination of Patent and Request for
`Extension of Deadlines. Aug 29. 20013.
`in CD. Cal. Case No. CV
`07-06161 VBF (PLAx) [2 pgs.].
`Defendant Lime Wire. LLC's First Amended Answer. Affirmative
`Defenses and Countcrclaims. Oct. 2. 2008. CD. Cal case No.
`07-06161VBF(PLAX)[13 pgs.].
`Defendant Lime Wire. LLC’s Second Amended Answer. Affirmative
`Defenses and Counterclaims. Oct. 27. 2008. From CD. Cal. case No.
`07-06161VBF(PLAX)[13 pgs.].
`Defendant Michael Weiss's Answer to Plaintiff‘s Complaint for
`Patent Infringement. Permanent Injunction and Damages: Demand
`for Jury 'I't’ial. Sep. 15. 2006. case No. CV 06-5086 $.30 (Ex) [10
`PBS-l-
`Del‘endartl Recording Industry Association of America‘s Amended
`Notice of Motion and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on
`Plaintiffs' Claims for Patent Infringement and Inducing Patent
`Infringement. Memorandum of Points and Authorities. May 22.
`2006. redacted. original confidential. filed under seal. in CD. Cal.
`case No. CV 04-7456 JFW (CTx) [19 pgs ].
`
`EXHIBIT 3 - 5
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 233-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 7 of 62
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 233-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 7 of 62
`
`US 7,802,310 B2
`Page 6
`
`1
`
`Defendant Recording Industry Association of America's and
`Mediasentry. Inc.‘s Notice of Motion and Motion for Partial Sum-
`mary Judgment Based on Implied License or. In the Altemnlive.
`Based on Patent Misuse and Unclean Hands. May 22. 2006.
`Redacted. in CD. Cal case No. CV 04-7456 JFW (CTx) [2] pgs.].
`Defendant Recording Industry Association of America's and
`Mediasentry. Inc‘s Notice of Motion and Motion for Partial Sum-
`mary Judgment Based on Implied License or. In the Alternative.
`Based on Patent Misuse and Unclean Hands. May 8. 2006. in CD.
`Cal. case No. CV 04-7456 JFW (CTx) [20 pgs.].
`Defendant StreamCast Networks Inc.‘s Answer to Plaintiff’s Com-
`plaint for Patent Infringement. Permanent Injunction and Damages;
`Demand for Jury 'l'rial, Sep. 5. 2006. CD. Cal. case No. CV 06-5086
`SJO (Ex) [10 pgs.].
`Defendants' Amended Preliminary Claim Constructions [Patent
`Rule 4-2]. filed Feb. 7. 2007 in CD. Cal. case No. CV 06-5086 SJO
`(E0110 pgsi.
`Defendant‘s Second Amended Preliminary Claim Constructions
`[Patent Rule 4-2]. filed Feb. 9. 2007 in CD. Cal. case No. CV
`06-5086 SJO (Ex) [10 pgs.].
`Dewar. Rebuttal Expert Report of Robert B.K. Dewar. in CD. Cal
`case No CV 04-7456 JFW (C'I'x). Apr. 10. 2006 [87 pgs].
`Faloutsos. C. "Acces

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket